Engraftment after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients mobilized with Plerixafor: A retrospective, multicenter study of a large series of patients.

Plerixafor (PLX) appears to effectively enhance hematopoietic stem-cell mobilization prior to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). However, the quality of engraftment following auto-HCT has been little explored. Here, engraftment following auto-HCT was assessed in patients mobilized with PLX through a retrospective, multicenter study of 285 consecutive patients. Information on early and 100-day post-transplant engraftment was gathered from the 245 patients that underwent auto-HCT. The median number of PLX days to reach the stem cell collection goal (≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg) was 1 (range 1-4) and the median PLX administration time before apheresis was 11 h (range 1-18). The median number of apheresis sessions to achieve the collection goal was 2 (range 1-5) and the mean number of CD34+ cells collected was 2.95 × 106/kg (range 0-30.5). PLX administration was safe, with only 2 mild and transient gastrointestinal adverse events reported. The median time to achieve an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >500/µL was 11 days (range 3-31) and the median time to platelet recovery >20 × 103/µL was 13 days (range 5-69). At 100 days after auto-HCT, the platelet count was 137 × 109/L (range 7-340), the ANC was 2.3 × 109/L (range 0.1-13.0), and the hemoglobin concentration was 123 g/L (range 79-165). PLX use allowed auto-HCT to be performed in a high percentage of poorly mobilized patients, resulting in optimal medium-term engraftment in the majority of patients in whom mobilization failed, in this case mainly due to suboptimal peripheral blood CD34+ cell concentration on day +4 or low CD34+ cell yield on apheresis.

Optimal large-scale CD34+ enrichment from a leukapheresis collection using the clinimacs prodigy platform.

Optimization of Hematology Patient's treatment: It is possible to obtain a 100% CD34+ recovery after CD34+ selection using the CliniMACS Prodigy.

Methylene blue-treated plasma, versus quarantine fresh frozen plasma, for acute thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura treatment: Comparison between centres and critical review on longitudinal data.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is the first-line treatment for acute thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Methylene blue-plasma (MBP) has been used for over 20 years, but its efficacy in this setting remains controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: this is a comparative analysis of the experience of two Centres, with different plasma products, to evaluate their efficacy in TTP. One centre used quarantine plasma (QP), and MBP the other. We performed a retrospective longitudinal study, analysing the clinical files of TTP patients of a 13-year data evaluation period. Duration of treatment and transfusion parameters, medical record, laboratory testing, concomitant medication, and survival rate, were assessed for every episode. RESULTS: During the study period, 12 (55.5 %) and 10 (45.5 %) new cases were treated with QP and MBP, respectively. There were no significant differences between the mean numbers of TPE processes, days elapsed from diagnosis to TPE, and plasma volume transfused. The QP TPE episodes of treatment were significantly associated with an increased time to recovery compared with MBP episodes of treatment (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: MBP was as effective as QP in the treatment of TTP patients. Since recovery was more favourable when MBP was used, we consider MBP remains a suitable alternative to treat TTP patients.

Retrospective Multicenter Study of Extracorporeal Photopheresis in Steroid-Refractory Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an established treatment strategy in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). This study's main objective was to analyze the clinical response and impact of ECP therapy in steroid dose reduction. A retrospective observational series of 113 patients from 7 transplantation centers was analyzed. Sixty-five patients (58%) had acute GVHD (aGVHD), and 48 (42%) had chronic GVHD (cGVHD). All ECP procedures were performed with the off-line system. The median number of procedures until achievement of initial response was 3 for both patients with aGVHD and those with cGVHD. ECP was the second-line therapy in 48% of the aGVHD cases and in 50% of the cGVHD cases. 71% of the cases of aGVHD were grade III-IV, and 69% of the cases of cGVHD were severe. The overall response rate on day 28 was 53% (complete response [CR] rate, 45%) in the patients with aGVHD and 67% (CR, 23%) in those with cGVHD. Skin was the most frequently involved organ, with a response rate of 58% (CR, 49%) in the patients with aGVHD and 69% (CR 29%) in those with cGVHD. At the end of ECP treatment, 60% of patients treated for aGVHD who responded were able to stop steroid therapy, with a median dose reduction of 100%. Significant differences in overall survival were observed for patients responding to ECP with aGVHD (hazard ratio [HR], 4.3; P < .001) and with cGVHD (HR, 4.8; P = .003). Our data indicate that ECP is a valid therapeutic alternative in patients with steroid-refractory aGVHD and cGVHD, permitting significant steroid dosage reductions.

ABO-mismatched marrow processing for transplantation: Comparative results of 80 procedures performed with Cobe Spectra and Spectra Optia.

BACKGROUND: removal of incompatible red blood cells (RBCs) or plasma is usually required to avoid hemolysis during infusion of ABO incompatible bone marrow (BM) allogeneic transplants. This process often involves separation of buffy coat (BC) by centrifugation in automated devices. We have evaluated the Spectra Optia™ (Optia) apheresis system to determine its effectiveness in BC concentration, volume reduction and RBCs depletion of ABO-incompatible BM compared with our previous method using Cobe Spectra™ (Cobe). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 28 processes were performed with Optia and 52 with Cobe. We compared volume reduction, RBCs depletion, and recovery of total nucleated cells (TNCs), mononuclear cells (MNCs), CD34+ and CD3+ cells in the final product. Hematopoietic engraftment was ascertained. We used Saphiro-Wilks and Kolmorgorov- Smirnov tests to test normality and Mann-Whitney's U test to compare means between both groups. RESULTS: We found statistically significant differences favoring Optia versus Cobe in TNCs recovery (62% vs. 37%), CD34+ cell recovery (98 vs 84%), volume reduction (91 vs 84%), and RBCs depletion (99 vs. 97%), but not in processing time or time to engraftment. CONCLUSION: Optia achieves high RBCs and volume depletion of BM, while providing excellent CD34+ recovery in clinical routine. Some parameters compare favorably with Cobe Spectra.