Impact of aortic stenosis on postoperative outcomes after noncardiac surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative management of patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who need noncardiac surgery (NCS) remains controversial. We sought to determine the impact of AS on the postoperative outcomes after NCS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing NCS with moderate AS (valve area: 1.0-1.5 cm(2)) or severe AS (valve area: <1.0 cm(2)) were identified using the surgical and the echocardiographic databases. Using propensity score analysis, we obtained 4 matched control patients without AS for each patient with AS undergoing NCS. The propensity score matching used the 6 revised cardiac risk index criteria, in addition to age and sex. Primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality and postoperative myocardial infarction. We matched 634 patients with AS undergoing NCS to 2536 controls. There were 244 patients with severe AS and 390 patients with moderate AS. Thirty-day mortality was 2.1% for AS patients compared with 1.0% in non-AS controls (P=0.036). Postoperative myocardial infarction was more frequent in patients with AS compared with controls (3.0% versus 1.1%; P=0.001). Combined primary outcome was significantly worse for both moderate and severe AS patients compared with respective controls (4.4% versus 1.7%; P=0.002; and 5.7% versus 2.7%; P=0.02, respectively). High-risk surgery, symptomatic severe AS, coexisting mitral regurgitation, and preexisting coronary disease were significant predictors of primary outcome in patients with AS. CONCLUSION: Presence of AS adversely affects postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing NCS, evidenced by a higher 30-day mortality and postoperative myocardial infarction after NCS.

Angiographic lesion severity and subsequent myocardial infarction.

We sought to determine the angiographic severity of coronary lesions leading to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) with a focus on determining the impact of interval from initial angiogram to subsequent clinical event. In the late 1980s angiographic data on lesion characteristics that culminated in STEMI and NSTEMI were obtained from angiograms obtained several months before MI. It is not clear whether the conclusions on lesion severity would be different if elapsed interval from baseline angiogram to clinical event was factored in the analysis. From 2003 through 2010, we identified 84 patients with NSTEMI and 41 patients with STEMI in vessels without previous intervention. These patients had ≥1 previous angiographic study at our center. Angiograms were reanalyzed with quantitative coronary angiography, and relevant clinical data were obtained from medical records. Similar to previous studies, 71% of patients with STEMI and 63% of patients with NSTEMI had <50% baseline stenosis at the culprit site when the interval from initial angiogram to MI was >3 months. Interestingly, lesions that led to STEMI ≤3 months after evaluation were more severe than those leading to STEMI in >3 months (59 ± 31% vs 36 ± 21%, p = 0.02) with 57% of lesions having >50% stenosis. Although most MIs occurred at sites that did not have significant obstruction when examined >3 months before MI, most baseline lesions showed significant luminal narrowing when examined ≤3 months before STEMI. In conclusion, high-grade coronary stenosis may be an important predictor of STEMI in subsequent months.