RESUMO
A capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) method has been developed to perform routine, automated analysis of low-molecular-weight peptides in human serum. The method incorporates transient isotachophoresis for in-line preconcentration and a sheathless electrospray interface. To evaluate the performance of the method and demonstrate the utility of the approach, an experiment was designed in which peptides were added to sera from individuals at each of two different concentrations, artificially creating two groups of samples. The CE-MS data from the serum samples were divided into separate training and test sets. A pattern-recognition/feature-selection algorithm based on support vector machines was used to select the mass-to-charge (m/z) values from the training set data that distinguished the two groups of samples from each other. The added peptides were identified correctly as the distinguishing features, and pattern recognition based on these peptides was used to assign each sample in the independent test set to its respective group. A twofold difference in peptide concentration could be detected with statistical significance (p-value < 0.0001). The accuracy of the assignment was 95%, demonstrating the utility of this technique for the discovery of patterns of biomarkers in serum.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores/sangue , Eletroforese Capilar/métodos , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização por Electrospray/métodos , Automação , Eletroforese em Gel Bidimensional , HumanosRESUMO
The human cofactor complexes ARC (activator-recruited cofactor) and CRSP (cofactor required for Sp1 activation) mediate activator-dependent transcription in vitro. Although these complexes share several common subunits, their structural and functional relationships remain unknown. Here, we report that affinity-purified ARC consists of two distinct multisubunit complexes: a larger complex, denoted ARC-L, and a smaller coactivator, CRSP. Reconstituted in vitro transcription with biochemically separated ARC-L and CRSP reveals differential cofactor functions. The ARC-L complex is transcriptionally inactive, whereas the CRSP complex is highly active. Structural determination by electron microscopy (EM) and three-dimensional reconstruction indicate substantial differences in size and shape between ARC-L and CRSP. Moreover, EM analysis of independently derived CRSP complexes reveals distinct conformations induced by different activators. These results suggest that CRSP may potentiate transcription via specific activator-induced conformational changes.