The Las Vegas military-civilian partnership: An origin story and call to action.

ABSTRACT: Military-civilian partnerships (MCPs) in urban American trauma centers have existed for more than 60 years to assist in the development and maintenance of wartime skills of military medical professionals. In the last 5 years, MCPs have gained congressional support, and their number and variety have grown substantially. The historical impact of these flagship trauma MCPs is well documented, with bidirectional benefit in the advancement of trauma care during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan both deployed and stateside, and the future aim of MCPs lies primarily in mitigating the "peacetime effect." The majority of data regarding MCPs; however, focus on trauma care and are biased toward surgeons specifically. The Las Vegas (LV) MCP began in 2002 with the similar goal of sustaining Air Force (AF) expeditionary medical skills by embedding AF medics from nearby Nellis Air Force Base (AFB) into University Medical Center of Southern Nevada (UMC), the only Level 1 Trauma Center in Nevada. Over nearly 20 years, the LV-MCP has evolved into an innovative market-based collaboration composed of numerous relationships and programs that are designed to develop and sustain critical skills for military medical personnel in all aspects of expeditionary medicine. This includes AF medical personnel providing care to federal beneficiaries as well as civilian patients in a variety of medical settings. The partnership's central coordinating authority, the Office of Military Medicine-Las Vegas (OMM-LV), brings together military and civilian organizations with distinct and intersecting missions to support the greater LV population and the DoD mission of readiness. The LV-MCP is presented here as a model for the future of MCPs within the integrated local and national trauma and medical systems.

Ink Retention and Endothelial Cell Viability After the Application of an Orientation Stamp Over an Air Bubble During Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation.

PURPOSE: To investigate stamp visibility and endothelial cell loss (ECL) after the application of an orientation mark to Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts supported by an air bubble. METHODS: Eighteen DMEK grafts were prepared at an eye bank using a technique where an orientation mark was applied to the stromal surface of a DMEK graft that was supported by a small air bubble placed at the edge of the 2 endothelial surfaces of the graft. Grafts were evaluated at 2 and 5 days for stamp visibility and at 5 days with calcein-AM staining for ECL. Nine grafts underwent cross-country shipping, and the ECL of shipped and nonshipped grafts was compared using unpaired t test. RESULTS: All 18 DMEK grafts exhibited a single, solid, readily visible orientation mark 2 and 5 days after preparation with a mean ECL of 13.5% ± 4.9%. Shipping conditions had no effect on stain retention or ECL. CONCLUSIONS: The application of an orientation stamp to a DMEK graft over an air bubble in an eye bank setting results in a single, solid orientation mark that is readily visible within the period in which most eye bank-prepared tissue is used. This technique produces no further ECL compared with the methods where the orientation stamp is applied through a stromal window. Eye bank technicians and surgeons can be confident that this modified preparation technique results in transplant-quality DMEK grafts with the additional benefit of conserving the stromal cap for use in other anterior lamellar procedures, thereby making efficient use of donor tissue.