Association Between Neighborhood Opportunity, Allostatic Load, and All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Adverse neighborhood contextual factors may affect breast cancer outcomes through environmental, psychosocial, and biological pathways. The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between allostatic load (AL), neighborhood opportunity, and all-cause mortality among patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Women age 18 years and older with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer who received surgical treatment between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2020, at a National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center were identified. Neighborhood opportunity was operationalized using the 2014-2018 Ohio Opportunity Index (OOI), a composite measure derived from neighborhood level transportation, education, employment, health, housing, crime, and environment. Logistic and Cox regression models tested associations between the OOI, AL, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The study cohort included 4,089 patients. Residence in neighborhoods with low OOI was associated with high AL (adjusted odds ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.40]). On adjusted analysis, low OOI was associated with greater risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.45 [95% CI, 1.11 to 1.89]). Relative to the highest (99th percentile) level of opportunity, risk of all-cause mortality steeply increased up to the 70th percentile, at which point the rate of increase plateaued. There was no interaction between the composite OOI and AL on all-cause mortality (P = .12). However, there was a higher mortality risk among patients with high AL residing in lower-opportunity environments (aHR, 1.96), but not in higher-opportunity environments (aHR, 1.02; P interaction = .02). CONCLUSION: Lower neighborhood opportunity was associated with higher AL and greater risk of all-cause mortality among patients with breast cancer. Additionally, environmental factors and AL interacted to influence all-cause mortality. Future studies should focus on interventions at the neighborhood and individual level to address socioeconomically based disparities in breast cancer.

Oncology mental health providers' adaptation of an evidence-based intervention: A mixed-methods study.

BACKGROUND: Adaptations are intentional modifications maximizing the fit of an evidence-based intervention (EBI) in new context. Little is known about EBI adaptation within psychosocial oncology. Guided by the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME), this mixed-methods study describes oncology mental health providers' planned adaptations to a psychosocial oncology EBI and examines the relationship between planned adaptations and longitudinal EBI usage. METHODS: Providers (N = 128) were social workers (47%) and psychologists (40%) practicing in community settings (44%) or academic medical centers (41%). They attended a 3-day training on a multicomponent psychosocial oncology EBI, the Biobehavioral Intervention (BBI). During training, providers prepared an "adaptation plan" describing necessary adaptations to BBI and rationales for change. Qualitative data from adaptation plans were analyzed using directed content analysis. Linear mixed models examined the relationship between adaptation characteristics (number, similarity to the manualized BBI) and EBI usage across 12 months post-training. RESULTS: Three sets of qualitative themes reflecting FRAME elements emerged: (1) content modifications (e.g., shortening/condensing, selecting elements, adding/removing elements); (2) contextual changes (e.g., alternative group formats); and (3) reasons for adaptations (e.g., organization/setting, provider, and recipient factors). Neither number of adaptations nor adaptation similarity were associated with BBI usage across 12 months post-training. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study is the first to characterize oncology mental health providers' planned adaptations to a psychosocial oncology EBI. Planned adaptations did not increase usage, but importantly they did not decrease usage. The adaptation process enabled providers to make thoughtful adaptation choices, with implementation successful irrespective of setting constraints.

COVID-19 or Cancer Stress? Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Of all cancer patients, those with lung cancer are among the highest risk for infection, pneumonia, hospitalization, and early death from COVID-19. As cancer stress is ubiquitous, this exploratory study examines patients' COVID-19 stress and cancer stress in relation to their depressive and anxiety symptoms. METHOD: Newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer patients (N = 76) completed measures of cancer stress, COVID-19 illness perceptions and stress, and depressive and anxiety symptoms at a single monthly follow-up early in the pandemic (May 2020 to July 2020; Clinicaltrials.gov #NCT03199651). Hierarchical linear multiple regression analysis was used to identify the relationship of stressor variables to depressive and anxiety symptoms in this cross-sectional study. RESULTS: Hierarchical linear models revealed cancer stress was a significant predictor of both depressive symptoms (F(14,30) = 5.327, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.71, adjusted R2 = 0.58) and anxiety symptoms (F(14,30) = 4.513, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.68, adjusted R2 = 0.53) for patients at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. By contrast, COVID-19 stress was not a significant predictor of depressive (F(13,31) = 1.415 p = .21, R2 = .37, adjusted R2 = .11) or anxiety symptoms (F(13,31) = 1.23, p = .30, R2 = .34, adjusted R2 = - .07). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced lung cancer patients during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic reported cancer stress as more important than COVID-19 stress in relation to their mental health. Empirically supported biobehavioral and cognitive behavioral treatments remain important to reducing psychological symptoms and enhancing patients' quality of life.

The Implications of Racialized Economic Segregation and Allostatic Load on Mortality in Patients with Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the association between racialized economic segregation, allostatic load (AL), and all-cause mortality in patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women aged 18+ years with stage I-III breast cancer diagnosed between 01/01/2012 and 31/12/2020 were identified in the Ohio State University cancer registry. Racialized economic segregation was measured at the census tract level using the index of concentration at the extremes (ICE). AL was calculated with biomarkers from the cardiac, metabolic, immune, and renal systems. High AL was defined as AL greater than the median. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses using restricted cubic splines examined the association between racialized economic segregation, AL, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Among 4296 patients, patients residing in neighborhoods with the highest racialized economic segregation (Q1 versus Q4) were more likely to be Black (25% versus 2.1%, p < 0.001) and have triple-negative breast cancer (18.2% versus 11.6%, p < 0.001). High versus low racialized economic segregation was associated with high AL [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-1.61] and worse all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.41, 95% CI 1.08-1.83]. In dose-response analyses, patients in lower segregated neighborhoods (relative to the 95th percentile) had lower odds of high AL, whereas patients in more segregated neighborhoods had a non-linear increase in the odds of high AL. DISCUSSION: Racialized economic segregation is associated with high AL and a greater risk of all-cause mortality in patients with breast cancer. Additional studies are needed to elucidate the causal pathways and mechanisms linking AL, neighborhood factors, and patient outcomes.

Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer: from Detection to Treatment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Update on current racial disparities in the detection and treatment of breast cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Breast cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death among Black and Hispanic women. Mammography rates among Black and Hispanic women have surpassed those among White women, with studies now advocating for earlier initiation of breast cancer screening in Black women. Black, Hispanic, Asian, and American Indian and Alaskan Native women continue to experience delays in diagnosis and time to treatment. Further, racial discrepancies in receipt of guideline-concordant care, access to genetic testing and surgical reconstruction persist. Disparities in the initiation, completion, toxicity, and efficacy of chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted drug therapy remain for racially marginalized women. Efforts to evaluate the impact of race and ethnicity across the breast cancer spectrum are increasing, but knowledge gaps remain and further research is necessary to reduce the disparity gap.

Short-term and long-term financial toxicity from breast cancer treatment: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: The rising cost of breast cancer treatment has increased patients' financial burden, intensifying an already stressful treatment process. Although researchers increasingly recognize the harmful impact of medical and nonmedical costs associated with cancer treatment, understanding patients' perspectives of financial toxicity is limited. We aimed to explore the topic of financial toxicity through the lived experiences of patients with breast cancer from groups at risk of social and economic marginalization. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 50 women with breast cancer from four specific groups: Black women, Medicaid enrollees, rural residents, and women age ≤ 40. We transcribed, coded, and analyzed the data using deductive and inductive approaches. RESULTS: Two overarching themes captured patients' experiences of financial toxicity: short-term and long-term impacts. Short-term stressors included direct medical (e.g., co-pays, premiums), nonmedical (e.g., transportation, lodging), and indirect (e.g., job loss, reduced work hours) costs. Early in their treatments, patients' focus on survival took precedence over financial concerns. However, as the treatment course progressed, fear of consequences from compounding costs of care and financial distress negatively impacted patients' lifestyles and outlooks for the future. CONCLUSION: Programs addressing financial toxicity that look beyond early-phase interventions are needed. Specifically, patients struggling with the accumulation of treatment costs and the resultant stress require ongoing support. Long-term support is especially needed for groups vulnerable to financial instability and social marginalization.

Low Hospital Volume Is Associated with Higher All-Cause Mortality in Black Women with Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: This study examines the association between hospital volume and all-cause mortality in Black women with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) who received surgery and chemotherapy. METHODS: Black women ages 18+ with stage I-III TNBC who received both surgery and chemotherapy were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Hospital volume was determined using the number of annual breast cancer cases divided by the number of years the hospital participated in the NCDB. Hospital annual volume quartiles ranged from Q1 (lowest) to Q4 (highest). Univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression modeling with restricted cubic splines examined the effect of hospital volume on all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Sixteen thousand five hundred fifty-six patients met the study criteria. All-cause mortality incidence was lower at higher volume compared to lower volume hospitals Q1 24.1% (95% CI: 22.8 to 25.4), Q2 21.8% (95% CI: 20.5 to 23.1), Q3 20.9% (95% CI: 19.6 to 22.1), Q4 19.0% (95% CI: 17.7 to 20.1), p<0.001. On multivariable analysis, treatment at the highest hospital volume quartile was associated with a 21% reduction in the odds of death compared to the lowest quartile [Q4 Vs. Q1, OR=0.79 (95% CI: 0.67 to 0.92)]. For every 100-patient increase in annual volume, all-cause mortality was reduced by 4% [OR=0.96 (95% CI: 0.94 to 0.98)]. There was a significant linear dose-dependent relationship between increasing hospital volume and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Black women treated at high-volume hospitals have lower all-cause mortality than those at low-volume hospitals. Future studies should examine the characteristics of high-volume hospitals associated with improved outcomes.

Association of Allostatic Load With All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Breast Cancer.

Importance: Elevated allostatic load (AL) has been associated with adverse socioenvironmental stressors and tumor characteristics that convey poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Currently, the association between AL and all-cause mortality in patients with breast cancer is unknown. Objective: To examine the association between AL and all-cause mortality in patients with breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from an institutional electronic medical record and cancer registry at the National Cancer Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center. Participants were patients with breast cancer diagnoses (stage I-III) between January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2020. Data were analyzed from April 2022 through November 2022. Exposure: AL was expressed as a summary score calculated by assigning 1 point for biomarkers in the worst sample quartile. High AL was defined as AL greater than the median. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was all-cause mortality. A Cox proportional hazard models with robust variance tested the association between AL and all-cause mortality. Results: There were 4459 patients (median [IQR] age, 59 [49-67] years) with an ethnoracial distribution of 3 Hispanic Black patients (0.1%), 381 non-Hispanic Black patients (8.5%), 23 Hispanic White patients (0.5%), 3861 non-Hispanic White patients (86.6%), 27 Hispanic patients with other race (0.6%), and 164 non-Hispanic patients with other race (3.7%). The mean (SD) AL was 2.6 (1.7). Black patients (adjusted relative ratio [aRR], those with 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18), single marital status (aRR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00-1.12), and those with government-supplied insured (Medicaid aRR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.21; Medicare aRR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19) had a higher adjusted mean AL than those who were White, married/living as married, or privately insured, respectively. Adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment factors, high AL was associated with a 46% increase in mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.46; 95% CI, 1.11-1.93) over low AL. Similarly, compared with patients in the first AL quartile, those in the third quartile (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.07-2.18) and the fourth quartile (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.16-2.75) had significantly increased risks of mortality. There was a significant dose-dependent association between increased AL and a higher risk of all-cause mortality. Furthermore, AL remained significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality after adjusting for the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest increased AL is reflective of socioeconomic marginalization and associated with all-cause mortality in patients with breast cancer.

A cognitive-behavioral model of dyspnea: Qualitative interviews with individuals with advanced lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Shortness of breath, or dyspnea, is the subjective experience of breathing discomfort and is a common, distressing, and debilitating symptom of lung cancer. There are no efficacious pharmacological treatments, but there is suggestive evidence that cognitive-behavioral treatments could relieve dyspnea. For this, understanding the psychological, behavioral, and social factors that may affect dyspnea severity is critical. To this end, patients with dyspnea were interviewed with questions framed by the cognitive-behavioral model-emphasizing thoughts, emotions, and behaviors as contributors and outcomes of dyspnea. METHODS: Two trained individuals conducted semi-structured interviews with lung cancer patients (N = 15) reporting current dyspnea. Interviews assessed patients' cognitive-behavioral experiences with dyspnea. Study personnel used a grounded theory approach for qualitative analysis to code the interviews. Inter-rater reliability of codes was high (κ = 0.90). RESULTS: Thoughts: Most common were patients' catastrophic thoughts about their health and receiving enough oxygen when breathless. Emotions: Anxiety about dyspnea was the most common, followed by anger, sadness, and shame related to dyspnea. Behaviors: Patients rested and took deep breaths to relieve acute episodes of dyspnea. To reduce the likelihood of dyspnea, patients planned their daily activity or reduced their physical activity at the expense of engagement in hobbies and functional activities. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Patients identified cognitive-behavioral factors (thoughts, emotions, and behaviors) that coalesce with dyspnea. The data provide meaningful insights into potential cognitive-behavioral interventions that could target contributors to dyspnea.

Risk Factors for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Toxicity Among Older Adults with Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (IO) is revolutionizing cancer care but can lead to significant toxicity. This study seeks to describe potential risk factors for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) specifically among older adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study at a single academic comprehensive cancer center based on chart review data abstracted by physicians. For patients aged ≥70 years, frequency, type, and grade of irAEs and their association with baseline patient demographics, comorbidities, mobility, and functional status were characterized using bivariate analysis. Based on those results, multivariable logistic regressions were constructed to model the association between these characteristics with any grade and grade 3 or higher irAEs. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 238 patients aged ≥70 years who received IO for mostly (≥90%) advanced cancer between 2011 and 2018. Thirty-nine percent of older adults experienced an irAE and 13% experienced one that was grade 3 or higher. In the multivariable analysis, depression was associated with an increased incidence of any grade irAE, while decreased life-space mobility was associated with an increased incidence of grade ≥3 irAEs. CONCLUSION: Most characteristics of special interest among older adults, include fall risk, weight loss, cognitive limitations, and hearing loss, were not associated with irAEs in our study. However, decreased life-space mobility and depression are potential risk factors for IO toxicity among older adults with advanced cancer. Interventions designed to evaluate and mitigate modifiable risk factors for treatment-related toxicity are needed, and the results of this study may be useful for guiding those efforts.

Management of Anxiety and Depression in Adult Survivors of Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update.

PURPOSE: To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on the management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer survivors. METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert panel convened to update the guideline. A systematic review of evidence published from 2013-2021 was conducted. RESULTS: The evidence base consisted of 17 systematic reviews ± meta analyses (nine for psychosocial interventions, four for physical exercise, three for mindfulness-based stress reduction [MBSR], and one for pharmacologic interventions), and an additional 44 randomized controlled trials. Psychological, educational, and psychosocial interventions led to improvements in depression and anxiety. Evidence for pharmacologic management of depression and anxiety in cancer survivors was inconsistent. The lack of inclusion of survivors from minoritized groups was noted and identified as an important consideration to provide high-quality care for ethnic minority populations. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended to use a stepped-care model, that is, provide the most effective and least resource-intensive intervention based on symptom severity. All oncology patients should be offered education regarding depression and anxiety. For patients with moderate symptoms of depression, clinicians should offer cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), behavioral activation (BA), MBSR, structured physical activity, or empirically supported psychosocial interventions. For patients with moderate symptoms of anxiety, clinicians should offer CBT, BA, structured physical activity, acceptance and commitment therapy, or psychosocial interventions. For patients with severe symptoms of depression or anxiety, clinicians should offer cognitive therapy, BA, CBT, MBSR, or interpersonal therapy. Treating clinicians may offer a pharmacologic regimen for depression or anxiety for patients who do not have access to first-line treatment, prefer pharmacotherapy, have previously responded well to pharmacotherapy, or have not improved following first-line psychological or behavioral management.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines.

Depression in association with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, platelet-to-lymphocyte, and advanced lung cancer inflammation index biomarkers predicting lung cancer survival.

Lung cancer is a product of inflammation and a dysfunctional immune system, and depression has similar dysregulation. Depression disproportionately affects lung cancer patients, having the highest rates of all cancers. Systemic inflammation and depression are both predictive of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survival, but the existence and extent of any co-occurrence is unknown. Studied is the association between systemic inflammation ratio (SIR) biomarker levels and patients' depressive symptoms, with the hypothesis that depression severity would be significantly associated with prognostically poor inflammation. Newly diagnosed stage-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; N = 186) patients were enrolled (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03199651) and blood draws and depression self-reports (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) were obtained. For SIRs, cell counts of neutrophils (N), lymphocytes (L), and platelets (P) were abstracted for ratio (R) calculations for NLR, PLR, and the Advanced Lung cancer Inflammation Index (ALI). Patients were followed and biomarkers were tested as predictors of 2-year overall survival (OS) to confirm their relevance. Next, multivariate linear regressions tested associations of depression with NLR, PLR, and ALI. Overall 2-year mortality was 61% (113/186). Cox model analyses confirmed higher NLR [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.91; p = 0.001] and PLR (HR = 2.08; p<0.001), along with lower ALI (HR = 0.53; p = 0.005), to be predictive of worse OS. Adjusting for covariates, depression was reliably associated with biomarker levels (p ≤ 0.02). Patients with moderate/severe depressive symptoms were 2 to 3 times more likely to have prognostically poor biomarker levels. Novel data show patients' depressive symptoms were reliably associated with lung-relevant systemic inflammation biomarkers, all assessed at diagnosis/pretreatment. The same SIRs were found prognostic for patients' 2-year OS. Intensive study of depression, combined with measures of cell biology and inflammation is needed to extend these findings to discover mechanisms of depression toxicity for NSCLC patients' treatment responses and survival.

Association of Allostatic Load With Overall Mortality Among Patients With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Importance: Adverse social determinants of health (SDHs) (eg, poverty) are associated with poor oncologic outcomes among patients with lung cancer. However, no studies have evaluated biological correlates of adverse SDHs, operationalized as allostatic load (AL), with mortality due to lung cancer. Objective: To examine the association among AL, SDHs, and mortality among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study of an observational cohort was performed at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center with data accrued from June 1, 2017, to August 31, 2019. Patients with metastatic (stage IV) NSCLC enrolled at diagnosis into a prospective observational cohort study were included in the present analysis if they had all the biomarkers to calculate an AL score (N = 143). Follow-up was completed on August 31, 2021, and data were analyzed from July 1 to September 30, 2021. Exposures: Social determinants of health. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall mortality and AL. Results: A total of 143 patients met the study criteria with a median age of 63 (IQR, 55-71) years (89 men [62.2%] and 54 women [37.8%]). In terms of race and ethnicity, 1 patient (0.7%) was Asian, 7 (4.9%) were Black, 117 (81.8%) were White, 17 (11.9%) were of multiple races, and 1 (0.7%) was of other race or ethnicity. The mean (SD) AL was 2.90 (1.37). Elevated AL covaried with lower educational level (r = -0.26; P = .002), male sex (r = 0.19; P = .02), limited mobility (r = 0.19; P = .04), worsening self-care (r = 0.30; P < .001), problems engaging in usual activities (r = 0.21; P = .01), depressive symptoms (r = 0.23; P = .005), and a high number of stressful life events (r = 0.30; P < .001). Multivariable analysis found only increasing difficulty with mobility (r = 0.37 [95% CI, 0.13-0.60]; P = .002) and male sex (r = 0.63 [95% CI, 0.19-1.08]; P = .005) associated with higher AL. On adjusted analysis, elevated AL (hazard ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.16-1.79]; P = .001) and low educational level (hazard ratio, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.03-4.34]; P = .04) were associated with worse overall mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that higher AL was associated with adverse SDHs and worse overall mortality among patients with advanced NSCLC. These results provide a framework for replication and further studies of AL as a biological correlate for SDH and future prognostic marker.

Functional Trajectories and Resilience Among Adults With Advanced Lung Cancer.

Introduction: To evaluate whether and the degree to which patients with advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC) receiving lung cancer treatments will experience functional disability or have resilience and to identify characteristics associated with functional disability. Methods: We evaluated longitudinal data of patients with aNSCLC receiving treatment in the Beating Lung Cancer in Ohio prospective cohort study. Disability versus resilience in functional status (usual activities, mobility, and self-care) was measured monthly for 8 months using the EuroQol-5D-5L. Data captured included baseline demographics (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status), comorbidities, cancer and depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale), and cancer stress (impact of events). Group-based latent class trajectory modeling was used to determine clinically distinct functional disability trajectories jointly with attrition probability (death or withdrawal) in the study period. Results: Among 207 participants, the mean age was 63.5 years (range: 34-92 y), 58.9% were male, 6.8% were African American or Black, 73.3% were former smokers, and 35% resided in rural areas. At baseline, participants had adenocarcinoma histological subtype (74.9%), 40.3% had brain metastases, and 46.1% had bone metastases. Participants received chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (46.9%), immunotherapy single agent (21.7%), targeted treatments (18.8%), or no treatment (12.6%). Three distinct functional trajectory groups were identified, as follows: none/mild (n = 79, 38.2%), moderate (n = 99, 47.8%), and severe disability (n = 29, 14.0%). Characteristics associated with severe disability included baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than 1, worse dyspnea and pain, and higher Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale scores. At month 8, 95 participants (45.9%) displayed resilience, 11 (5.3%) experienced functional decline, and 69 (33.3%) were deceased. Conclusions: We identified three distinct functional trajectories among patients with aNSCLC. Risk stratification tools and targeted interventions designed to target these three groups are needed to improve functional resilience and prevent disability.

The relationship between cognitive schemas activated in sexual context and early maladaptive schemas among married women of childbearing age.

BACKGROUND: Healthy sex can be affected by cognitive schemas activated in the sexual context (CSASCs) and early maladaptive schemas (EMSs). Cognitive schemas are the nuclear structure of the cognitive system which facilitate the interaction between individuals and their environments. CSASCs are emotional and behavioral responses in the sexual context. EMSs are extremely stable, enduring and are developed throughout the life of the individual, beginning in childhood. The present study investigated the relationship between CSASCs and EMSs among married women of childbearing age. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 260 married women of childbearing age participated. Using two-stage sampling, ten comprehensive urban health centers were first randomly selected and then 26 individuals from each center were invited to participate. Data collection included demographic variables, the Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form (YSQ-SF) with 15 EMSs (emotional deprivation, abandonment, mistrust/abuse, social alienation, defectiveness, incompetence, dependency, vulnerability to harm, enmeshment, subjugation of needs, self-sacrifice, emotional inhibition, unrelenting standards, entitlement, and insufficient self-control), and the Cognitive Schema Activation in Sexual Context Questionnaires (CSASCQ) with five subscales (undesirability/rejection, incompetence, self-depreciation, difference/loneliness, and helplessness). Data analysis was performed using a uni-variable and multi-variable linear regression model with a stepwise method at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 32.48 years and the average duration of their marriage was 10.34 years. The average score of early maladaptive schemas on the YSQ-SF was 151.5 (out of 450). Higher scores indicate more severe maladaptive schemas, although the total score has no defined cutoff point. Scores greater than 15 on each subscale constitute the internalization of that particular maladaptive schema. The highest average subscale scores were the schemas of self-sacrifice and unrelenting standards (M = 16.12, 15.90, respectively), indicating that these two schemas play important roles in the cognition of the participants. The mean score on the CSASCQ was 34.60 (SD ± 12.59; range: 25-125), with the highest mean reported on the loneliness subscale. Hypoactive sexual desire was the most common unpleasant sexual problem (6.9%) and disillusion was the most dominant feeling experienced by participants (33.3%). The results of the multivariable model showed that the following were significant predictors of the CSASC: three subscales of EMS (emotional deprivation [ß = 0.28], social isolation [ß = 0.31], and emotional inhibition [ß = 0.14]) and two demographic variables (job [ß = 0.11] and consanguineous marriage [ß = 0.20]). In total, the multi-variable model explained 92% of variance of CSASCs. CONCLUSIONS: The present study found a significant and meaningful association between EMSs and CSASCs adjusting for the effect of socio-demographic characteristics. The findings indicate that the study of schemas and schema therapy should be considered in both premarital and marital counseling.

Illness perception profiles and psychological and physical symptoms in newly diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Of all cancers, advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with the highest burden on mental and physical health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patients' subjective beliefs about their cancer (i.e., illness perceptions) may influence coping responses and treatment decisions and affect health. To identify cognitive and emotional perceptions and their association with patient characteristics and illness circumstances, the relationship between illness perception schemas and psychological and physical responses and symptoms were studied. METHOD: Patients newly diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC (N = 186) enrolled in a prospective cohort study (NCT03199651) completed measures of illness perceptions; anxiety, depression, and physical symptoms; and health status. Latent profile analysis identified illness perception profiles. Hierarchical linear regressions tested profile assignment as a correlate of responses and symptoms. RESULTS: A three-profile solution was optimal. Patients with a "struggling" profile (n = 83; 45%) reported the most negative perceptions; patients with a "coping" profile (n = 41; 22%) reported relatively positive perceptions; and patients with a "coping but concerned" profile (n = 62; 33%) endorsed high illness concern but relatively positive perceptions otherwise. Patients with a "struggling" profile reported the highest levels of anxiety and depression symptoms, overall physical symptoms, cough, dyspnea, and pain, and the poorest self-rated health. CONCLUSIONS: New data add to the clinical portrayal of patients coping with NSCLC since the availability of new therapies and survival improvements. Other disease groups have reported a predominance of positive perceptions, rather than ones of significant cognitive and emotional struggles found here. Illness perception data may provide content-rich resources for intervention tailoring. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Affect regulation as a moderator of intentions for breast cancer chemoprevention.

Women at high risk for breast cancer (BC) may consider chemoprevention for risk reduction, but uptake is low. This study examined the role of affect regulation (the attempt to alter or control one's emotions) in decision-making about BC chemoprevention. A cross-sectional, single group design was used. High-risk women (N = 81) were surveyed. Moderation analyses specified cancer-specific distress as the independent variable, affect regulation (cognitive reappraisal or expressive suppression) as the moderator, and chemoprevention intentions (yes = 1, unsure = 0, no = -1) as the dependent variable. Cognitive reappraisal significantly moderated the relationship between cancer-specific distress and chemoprevention intentions (p = 0.03), but expressive suppression did not (p = 0.31). For the 44% of participants who were highest on reappraisal, higher cancer-specific distress was associated with greater intentions for chemoprevention. For the remaining 56%, there was no relationship between cancer-specific distress and chemoprevention intentions. Cognitive reappraisal may play an important role in decisions regarding uptake of chemoprevention.

Cancer Treatment During COVID-19: Resilience of Individuals With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Versus Community Controls.

BACKGROUND: Among all patients with cancer, those with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience the most distress. Although new therapies are improving survival, it is unknown whether receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic increases patients' psychological vulnerability. To meet clinical needs, knowledge of patients' COVID-19 perceptions and safety behaviors is essential. Thus, this study compared patients' psychological responses at diagnosis and during COVID-19 and compared patients with similar individuals without cancer during the same period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced NSCLC enrolled at diagnosis for cohort study participated (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03199651). Those with follow-ups from April 28, 2020, through July 14, 2020 (n=76), were assessed again including COVID-19 measures. Simultaneously, community controls with similar sociodemographics and smoking histories were solicited (n=67). Measures were COVID-19 perceptions (Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire), social distancing, and depressive (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) symptoms. First, analyses evaluated differences in the psychological responses of patients with NSCLC at diagnosis and during COVID-19. Second, patients and controls were contrasted on COVID-19 perceptions, social distancing, and psychological symptoms. RESULTS: The depressive and anxious symptoms of patients with NSCLC were greater at diagnosis (P<.02) than during COVID-19, approximately 1 year later. Patients with NSCLC and controls did not differ in terms of sociodemographics, except those with NSCLC were more racially diverse and older, and had greater smoking history (P<.03). Groups did not differ regarding concern, understanding, or perceived control over COVID-19 (P>.406). Notably, controls anticipated the COVID threat would last longer, practiced more social distancing, were more concerned about family (P<.04), and reported worse psychological symptoms (P<.023). With less depression and anxiety, patients with NSCLC viewed COVID-19 as a shorter-term threat and had fewer COVID-19-related worries than did controls. For controls, COVID-19 was more salient, heightening worries and psychological symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Despite multiple health stressors, patients with NSCLC demonstrated resilience when receiving cancer treatment during COVID-19. Nonetheless, this population remains psychologically vulnerable, requiring support at diagnosis and thereafter.

Psychological Symptom Trajectories and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Survival: A Joint Model Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer remains the number one cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, but less known is that lung cancer patients are among the most psychologically disabled of all cancer groups. Patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were studied to test the hypothesis that trajectories of depression and/or anxiety symptoms after diagnosis would show an adverse relationship with survival, beyond relevant controls. METHODS: Patients with stage IV NSCLC (n = 157) were enrolled (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03199651) at diagnosis and completed validated measures for depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7). Patients were reassessed every 1 to 2 months through 24 months (16 assessments; 80% average completion rate) and survival monitored. Joint statistical models provided simultaneous modeling of longitudinal (psychological) and time-to-event (survival) processes. Control variables were age, sex, marital status, education, smoking status, cancer type, and treatment received. RESULTS: Depression and anxiety symptoms significantly decreased with time since diagnosis. The 2-year trajectory of depressive symptoms was significantly associated with cancer survival after adjustment for covariates (hazard ratio = 1.09 per unit increase in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, 95% confidence interval = 1.03-1.15, p = .002). Anxiety was marginally significant in the unadjusted (p = .053) but not the adjusted (p = .39) model. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, joint model analyses test the interaction of a longitudinal trajectory of psychological symptoms, assessed from diagnosis to 24 months, and cancer survival. New data show the continuation of depressive and anxiety symptoms through treatment and thereafter. Immunotherapy and targeted therapies have dramatically improved survival for patients with advanced NSCLC; however, novel data suggest their benefit may be constrained by depressive symptoms.