Optimizing Total Knee Arthroplasty Rehabilitation with Telehealth Physical Activity Behavior Change Intervention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rehabilitation has little impact on sedentary lifestyles that have negative long-term health consequences. The purpose of this trial was to determine the effect of telehealth-based physical activity behavior change intervention on physical activity and functional outcomes following TKA. METHODS: This study was a 2-arm, parallel randomized controlled superiority trial at a regional Veterans Affairs medical center. The participants were 92 US military Veterans (mean age = 65.7 [SD =7.8] y) undergoing unilateral TKA. The Physical Activity Behavior Change (PABC) intervention included telehealth-based self-management training (ten 30-minute sessions) delivered over 12 weeks. The control intervention included telehealth-based health education sessions that matched PABC frequency and duration. Both groups participated in standardized conventional outpatient rehabilitation. Physical activity, measured as average daily step count, was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were Life-Space Assessment questionnaire, 30-Second Chair-Stand test, Timed Up-and-Go Test, Six-Minute Walk test, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey. The Self Efficacy for Exercise scale and daily time spent in different postures (sitting/lying, standing, stepping) were exploratory variables. Outcomes were measured at baseline (before surgery), mid-intervention (8 weeks after surgery), after the intervention (14 weeks after surgery; primary endpoint), and follow-up (38 weeks after surgery). RESULTS: The PABC group had an estimated 931 (95% CI = 42-1819) more daily steps than the control group from baseline to 14 weeks, though a between-group effect was not sustained at 38 weeks. There were no group differences in secondary outcomes. Participants included only military veterans using Veteran's Health Administration services. The intervention targeted self-management and did not include peer support. CONCLUSIONS: The PABC intervention improved physical activity for Veterans recovering from unilateral TKA at 14 weeks after surgery, though the effect was not sustained at 38 weeks. Physical function improved with rehabilitation but was not different between groups, indicating that physical function was not a primary driver of physical activity behavior. IMPACT: Conventional TKA rehabilitation has a negligible effect on free-living physical activity, which is relevant to long-term health outcomes. This trial identified telehealth physical activity self-management as effective in addressing activity behaviors, separate from conventional rehabilitation strategies.

Development and alpha testing of a patient shared decision aid for prosthesis design for new lower limb prosthesis users.

BACKGROUND: After lower limb amputation, several prosthesis design options exist. However, prosthesis design decisions do not always reflect a prosthesis user's needs, values, and preferences. OBJECTIVE: To develop a patient decision aid (PDA) prototype for prosthetists and new prosthesis users facing prosthesis design decisions after lower limb amputation, and to assess its usability, accuracy, and comprehensibility. STUDY DESIGN: Exploratory mixed methods. METHODS: PDA development was informed by a qualitative needs assessment and guided by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. The PDA was evaluated by steering groups of experienced prosthesis users and prosthetic professionals (prosthetists and researchers) to test usability, accuracy, and comprehensibility through focus groups, individual interviews, and rating on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10. RESULTS: The resulting PDA included 6 sections: (1) Amputation and Early Recovery, (2) Communication, (3) Values, (4) Prosthesis Design, (5) Preferences, and (6) Prosthetic Journey. Usability, accuracy, and comprehensibility were rated as 9.2, 9.6, and 9.6, respectively, by prosthetic professionals, and 9.4, 9.6, and 9.6, respectively, by prosthesis users. DISCUSSION: The PDA incorporated guidance by relevant stakeholders and was rated favorably, emphasizing a need for shared decision-making support in prosthesis design. One challenge was determining the amount of information in the PDA, highlighting the diversity in end users' informational needs. Future iterations of the PDA should undergo beta testing in clinical settings. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized, iterative method was used to develop a PDA for new lower limb prosthesis users and prosthetists when considering prosthesis design decisions. The PDA was considered useable, accurate, and comprehensible.

Telehealth Walking Self-Management for Individuals With Amputation: A Qualitative Study of Therapist Perspectives on Adoption.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to understand therapist-identified factors influencing clinical adoption of a telehealth walking self-management intervention for individuals with lower limb amputation. METHODS: Semi-structured focus groups were completed with actively practicing physical and occupational therapists treating populations that are medically complex. A qualitative explorative design was employed with conventional content analysis and iterative independent parallel coding using 2 analysts. Themes and subthemes were generated with a consensus building process identifying patterns and collapsing codes to represent participant perspectives. RESULTS: Thematic saturation was met after 5 focus groups (24 therapists). Therapists were on average 34 years old and predominantly female (n = 19; 79%) physical therapists (n = 17; 71%). Three primary facilitator and barrier themes were identified for intervention adoption: system, therapist, and person. System considerations included telehealth support and interprofessional care coordination. Therapist facilitators included self-management programming that overlapped with standard of care and personalization methods. However, limited behavioral theory training was a therapist level barrier. Finally, person factors such as patient activation could influence both positively and negatively. Person facilitators included social support and barriers included the complex health condition. CONCLUSION: System, therapist, and person facilitators and barriers must be considered to maximize the adoption of similar telehealth walking self-management interventions and prior to larger scale implementation of the current intervention for individuals with lower limb amputation. IMPACT: A telehealth walking self-management intervention has potential impact for individuals with lower limb amputation and must be considered in terms of optimizing system, therapist, and person level facilitators and barriers to implementation.

Improving shared decision-making for prosthetic care: A qualitative needs assessment of prosthetists and new lower-limb prosthesis users.

BACKGROUND: Prosthesis design is complex and multiple appropriate options exist for any individual with lower-limb amputation. However, there is insufficient evidence for guiding decision-making. Shared decision-making (SDM) offers an opportunity to incorporate patient-specific values and preferences where evidence is lacking for prosthesis design decisions. To develop resources to facilitate SDM, and consistent with the International Patient Decision Aid Standards, it is necessary to identify the decisional needs of prosthetists and prosthesis users for prosthesis design decisions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the needs of prosthetists and new prosthesis users for SDM about the first prosthesis design. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive design. METHODS: Six focus groups were conducted with 38 prosthetists. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 17 new prosthesis users. Transcripts were analyzed using directed content analysis, with codes defined a priori using existing frameworks for SDM: the Three Talk Model for SDM and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. RESULTS: Four main themes were identified among prosthetists and prosthesis users: acknowledging complexity in communication, clarifying values, recognizing the role of experience to inform preferences , and understanding the prosthetic journey . CONCLUSIONS: Resources that support SDM for the first prosthesis design should consider methods for identifying individual communication needs, support with clarifying values, and resources such as experience for achieving informed preferences, within the context of the overall course of rehabilitation and recovery following lower-limb amputation. The themes identified in this work can inform SDM to promote collaborative discussion between prosthetists and new prosthesis users when making prosthesis design decisions.

Understanding decision-making in prosthetic rehabilitation by prosthetists and people with lower limb amputation: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: Little has been published about the process of decision-making between prosthetists and people with lower limb amputation (LLA). The purpose of this study is to identify decisions and factors influencing decision-making in prosthetic rehabilitation from the perspectives of prosthetists and prosthesis users, to identify barriers and opportunities for shared decision-making (SDM). METHODS: Qualitative semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 13 prosthetists and 14 prosthesis users from three clinics in three states of the Rocky Mountain and Southwest regions of the United States. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four main themes were identified: perceived decision points, importance of relationship, balancing competing priorities, and experience. Contrasts between perceptions of prosthetists and prosthesis users were related to prosthesis design decisions, and the purpose of communication (e.g., goals for a prosthesis vs. goals informing prosthesis design). Both prosthetists and prosthesis users described balancing priorities that contribute to prosthetic rehabilitation decisions, and the role of experience for informing realistic expectations and preferences necessary for participating in decision-making. CONCLUSION: Opportunities for improving SDM between prosthetists and prosthesis users include (1) clarifying key rehabilitation decisions, (2) identifying the purpose of initial communications, (3) support for balancing priorities, and (4) utilizing experience to achieve informed preferences.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONMany people with lower limb amputation experience poor physical function and psychosocial outcomes, which may be further compounded by under informed prosthesis-user expectations for function with a prosthesis.Shared decision-making offers an opportunity for improving realistic prosthesis-user expectations, reducing healthcare costs, and improving prosthesis-user satisfaction and adherence to care plans.Opportunities for improving shared decision-making between prosthetists and prosthesis-users include (1) clarifying key rehabilitation decisions, (2) identifying the purpose of initial communications, (3) support for balancing priorities, and (4) utilizing experience to achieve informed preferences.

Development of a physical mobility prediction model to guide prosthetic rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic rehabilitation decisions depend on estimating a patient's mobility potential. However, no validated prediction models of mobility outcomes exist for people with lower-limb amputation (LLA). OBJECTIVES: To develop and test predictions for self-reported mobility after LLA, using the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M). STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort analysis. METHODS: Eight hundred thirty-one patient records (1,860 PLUS-M observations) were used to develop and test a neighbors-based prediction model, using previous patient data to predict the 6-month PLUS-M T-score trajectory for a new patient (based on matching characteristics). The prediction model was developed in a training data set (n = 552 patients) and tested in an out-of-sample data set of 279 patients with later visit dates. Prediction performance was assessed using bias, coverage, and precision. Prediction calibration was also assessed. RESULTS: The average prediction bias for the model was 0.01 SDs, average coverage was 0.498 (ideal proportion within the 50% prediction interval = 0.5), and prediction interval was 8.4 PLUS-M T-score points (40% improvement over population-level estimates). Predictions were well calibrated, with the median predicted scores falling within the standard error of the median of observed scores, across all deciles of the data. CONCLUSIONS: This neighbors-based prediction approach allows for accurate estimates of PLUS-M T-score trajectories for people with LLA.

Falls After Dysvascular Transtibial Amputation: A Secondary Analysis of Falling Characteristics and Reduced Physical Performance.

INTRODUCTION: Over half of all people with lower limb amputation (LLA) experience at least one fall annually. Furthermore, the majority of LLAs result from dysvascular health complications, contributing to balance deficits. However, fall-related research specific to dysvascular LLA remains limited. OBJECTIVE: To characterize falls among adults with dysvascular LLA, using an existing Fall-Type Classification Framework and to describe the functional characteristics of participants across the framework categories. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis from two randomized controlled trials. SETTING: Outpatient setting. PARTICIPANTS: People (n = 69) 6 months to 5 years from dysvascular lower extremity amputation, who were ≥50 years of age and independently ambulatory using a prosthesis. INTERVENTION: None. OUTCOME: Descriptions of self-reported falls were collected on a weekly basis for 12 weeks, and analyzed using an existing Fall-Type Classification Framework. Fall frequencies, estimated count, and estimated proportions were compared across all framework categories, with 95% confidence intervals. Functional measures (Timed Up and Go, Two Minute Walk, Five Meter Walk, and average step count) were collected, and averages for each participant who experienced a fall were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty participants (43.5%) reported 42 falls within 12 weeks. A variety of fall types were described. Incidence of falls was highest for intrinsic destabilization sources, from incorrect weight shift patterns during transfer activities. CONCLUSION: Patients with dysvascular LLAs experience a variety of fall types. The high frequency of intrinsically sourced, incorrect weight-shift falls during transfer activities emphasizes the need to focus rehabilitation efforts on improving postural control in patients with dysvascular LLAs during activities such as reaching, turning, and transferring.

Physical Function and Pre-Amputation Characteristics Explain Daily Step Count after Dysvascular Amputation.

BACKGROUND: People with dysvascular lower limb amputation (LLA) achieve one-third of the recommended steps per day and experience severe disability. Although physical function improves with rehabilitation after dysvascular LLA, physical activity remains largely unchanged, and factors contributing to limited daily step count are unknown. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors that contribute to daily step count after dysvascular LLA. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, secondary data analysis. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-eight patients with dysvascular major LLA (age: 64 ± 9 years, body mass index: 30 ± 8 kg/m2 , male: 95%, transtibial LLA: 95%). METHODS: Data were collected by a blinded assessor after dysvascular LLA. Candidate explanatory variables included (1) demographics, (2) LLA characteristics, (3) comorbidities and health behaviors, and (4) physical function. Variables with univariate associations with log steps/day (transformed due to non-normality) were included in a multiple linear regression model using backward elimination to identify factors that explained significant variability in log steps/day. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome, daily step count, was measured with accelerometer-based activity monitors worn by participants for 10 days. RESULTS: Participants took an average (± SD) of 1450 ± 1309 steps/day. After backward elimination, the final model included four variables explaining 62% of the overall daily step count (P < .0001): 2-minute walk distance (32%), assistive device use (11%), cardiovascular disease (10%), and pre-amputation walking time (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Average daily step count of 1450 steps/day reflects the lowest category of sedentary behavior. Physical function, cardiovascular disease, and pre-amputation walking time explain 62% of daily step count after dysvascular LLA. Although physical rehabilitation commonly focuses on improving physical function, interventions to increase daily step count after dysvascular LLA should also consider chronic disease and health behaviors that predate LLA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Factors influencing participation in physical activity after dysvascular amputation: a qualitative meta-synthesis.

Purpose: Identifying factors associated with physical activity after dysvascular lower limb amputation (LLA) could provide targets for improving rehabilitation outcomes. The purpose of this meta-synthesis was to identify modifiable factors that may influence physical activity after LLA, a condition characterized by amputation in the setting of older age, diabetes mellitus (DM), and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD).Methods: A systematic search of the literature identified qualitative studies exploring the perceptions of physical activity in people with lower limb amputation, older age, DM, or PAD. Qualitative rigor was assessed using the McMaster University's Guidelines for Qualitative Review. Meta-synthesis was undertaken to analyze the findings of included studies.Results: Fourteen studies of variable methodological quality were included for analysis. Three overarching factors that may influence physical activity after LLA emerged: 1) educational experiences and motivation, 2) support and self-efficacy, and 3) special concerns after lower limb amputation (e.g., prosthesis, equipment, and environment).Conclusions: Physical activity after LLA is influenced by relationships among health understanding, motivation, support, and self-efficacy in the presence of disability. Themes from this meta-synthesis can be used to develop and test behavior-based interventions to improve physical activity after LLA.Implications for rehabilitationPhysical activity participation after dysvascular lower limb amputation is complicated by the presence of chronic conditions, severe disability, and unaddressed psychosocial factors.Addressing a patient's self-efficacy, social support, motivation, and understanding during physically focused rehabilitation may improve participation in physical activity after dysvascular lower limb amputation.Rehabilitation professionals can address self-efficacy, motivation, and understanding by using collaborative, empathetic communication strategies known to enhance a patient's sense of support.