Perceptions of Breastfeeding Among Adolescents and Young Adults.

Purpose: We aimed to understand adolescents' and young adults' perceptions and the extent of their knowledge about breastfeeding. Methods: Participants (adolescents and young adults in the United States, 14-24 years of age) were texted five open-ended questions about their perceptions of various aspects of breastfeeding including their initial reaction to breastfeeding, the impact on the infant and parent, how it compares with formula, and whether they were breastfed. The responses were analyzed for themes using an inductive content analysis approach. Responses were compared using χ2 tests to assess if knowledge and education about breastfeeding differed according to gender identity and age. Results: Among 1,283 participants, 829 responded (response rate = 64.4%). The average age was 18.8 (standard deviation [SD] = 2.9), with 53% female and 10% Black. Most adolescents and young adults understand there are health benefits of breastfeeding for the breastfeeding dyad (n = 589; 78.8%), yet also indicate an awareness of negative aspects (n = 256; 36.1%). Participants who identified as female or gender-variant and those who were older were more likely to refer to the emotional and bonding connections breastfeeding creates (p = 0.0011 and p = 0.0002). Males were more likely to have less knowledge about breastfeeding effects on the breastfeeding person but have more negative attitudes toward formula (p = 0.0298 and p = 0.0543). Younger respondents tended to indicate that formula was better than breast milk (p = 0.0534). Conclusion: We found a mix of positive and negative perceptions of breastfeeding among adolescents and young adults. Understanding how youth view breastfeeding can inform targeted education for this population that includes all genders and can begin before pregnancy.

Experiential Interprofessional Education Rooted in the Social Determinants of Health and Ecological Model Fosters Interprofessional Socialization.

OBJECTIVE: Experiential interprofessional education (IPE) fostering socialization to interprofessional teams is essential to clinical practice. Inclusion of authentic patient voices cultivates an understanding of social factors that patients face. We qualitatively assessed how experiential IPE framed around social determinants of health (SDH) and socioecological model (SEM) influenced early health profession students' development of interprofessional socialization while working with patients. Secondarily, we explored how students shifted their mindsets for future interactions. METHODS: Fifty-one health profession students participated in the Longitudinal Interprofessional Family-based Experience (LIFE), a virtual, 13-week experiential IPE opportunity during which students interacted with patients living with chronic illnesses through two interviews. Prompts representing aspects of working on an interprofessional team while interacting with a patient framed around social factors affecting healthcare were coded using the constant comparative method of analysis. Themes were derived and tallied for frequencies. RESULTS: Themes from prompt related to working with an interprofessional team included: 1) perspectives, 2) informative, and 3) collaboration. Themes related to patients as a team member included: 1) active listening, 2) patients of similar/dissimilar back¬grounds, 3) person-centered care, and 4) awareness. Themes derived from prompt about future collaborations included: 1) collaboration, 2) awareness, and 3) person-centered care. CONCLUSIONS: This SDH-focused experiential IPE advanced the understanding among early learners of how social factors that patients experience are barriers to how care is delivered and interprofessional teams must collaborate to consider factors to support patients.

Dipping Your Toes in the Water: An Experiential Strategy to Recruit and Engage New Faculty in Interprofessional Education.

AIMS: Engaged and trained faculty to support and role-model interprofessional education (IPE)-related concepts and behaviors are vital in the development, implementation, and sustainability of IPE academic teaching and training programs. Thus, recruitment of engaged faculty is essential for effective IPE expansion, scalability innovation, and sustainability across a variety of schools, programs, and students. The primary aim of this descriptive study was to implement a strategy to recruit and engage new IPE faculty and determine the strategy's effectiveness in increasing faculty's intent to participate in future IPE. A secondary aim was to identify implementation recommendations for this strategy as a first step of IPE faculty engagement. METHODS: An introductory experiential recruitment and engagement strategy for new Faculty Observers was developed. The project used a descriptive study design and data were gathered through pre- and post-program online self-administered surveys completed by Faculty Observer participants. The surveys included questions about demographics, rating usefulness of activities, engagement motivators, and willingness to facilitate in the future. RESULTS: Fifteen faculty with no or limited IPE experience participated. Post-survey results indicated that 85% of the participants expressed willingness to participate in this program in the future, and 100% would recommend using this experiential recruitment and engagement strategy. DISCUSSION: A "dip your toes in the water" experiential strategy for IPE faculty recruitment and engagement was effective in recruitment of new IPE faculty.

Public Health Graduate Students' Longitudinal Perceptions of Remote Learning Challenges and Career Goals During an Ongoing Public Health Crisis.

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic created a shift from traditional face-to-face learning toward remote learning, resulting in students experiencing unforeseen challenges and benefits through participation in a non-traditional mode of education. Little is known regarding the impact that a shift to remote learning may have had on the learning experiences and the career goals of Master of Public Health (MPH) students. A qualitative study was conducted among a convenience sample of MPH students in the US from January to April 2021. The primary aims were (1) to describe salient challenges or benefits of learning that persisted throughout a semester of remote learning and (2) to describe how being in graduate school during the pandemic impacted students' career goals in public health. A secondary aim was to describe students' general feelings regarding their public health education, given their lived experience of remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Study findings demonstrated that MPH students had mixed perceptions of how a shift to remote learning during a public health crisis impacted their learning experiences and career goals in public health over one semester. Understanding students' responses can guide public health instructors to best prepare trainees to join the workforce during ongoing and future unforeseen public health crises that continue or have the potential to disrupt learning modalities.

A Description of Breast Models Used to Teach Clinical Skills.

Background: Health care trainees lack opportunities to practice breast assessment and clinical skills with patients, making breast models significant for hands-on training. Insufficient training leads to low competence across practitioners in breast health areas of practice, including clinical lactation. The aim of this review was to describe types of breast models used to teach clinical skills of the breast across breast health areas. The secondary aims were to describe education interventions that included each model and identify whether multiple skin tones were available in models. Methods: Authors conducted a scoping review to identify which types of breast models are used to teach clinical skills across breast health areas of practice and determine gaps in literature regarding how clinical lactation skills are taught. The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus, MedLine, and ProQuest. Inclusion criteria were students/professionals engaging in breast model simulation. Eighteen studies were reviewed. Authors extracted data on participants, breast health area, breast model, intervention, evaluation, general outcomes, skin tone, and research design. Results: The most common skill area was clinical breast exam (n = 7), while least was breastfeeding education (n = 1). Most models were commercial (n = 12). Zero studies described skin tone. Generally, breast model simulations were correlated with increased clinical skills and confidence regardless of model used. Conclusions: Despite demonstrated gain of skills, this review reveals inconsistent use of breast models and evaluation, exclusion of diverse skin tones, and lack of breast models reported to teach clinical lactation skills.

Development of Team Behavior Skills and Clinical Lactation Competence Among Medical Students Engaging in Telesimulations with Standardized Patients.

Objective: The aims of this pilot feasibility study were to determine if telesimulations with standardized patients (SPs) wearing high-fidelity breast models impact students' team behavior and clinical competence in lactation support. Materials and Methods: Medical students (N = 19) completed five telesimulations: Cases 1, 2, 5 in a team, 3 as individual, and 4 randomized. SPs used the Formative Assessment Rubric (FAR) to evaluate interpersonal and clinical competence. Collaboration skills within team-based telesimulations (Cases 2 and 4) were rated using the Interprofessional Collaborator Assessment Rubric (ICAR). Satisfaction data were collected from a focus group and written evaluation. Descriptive statistics were calculated for FAR, ICAR, and written evaluations. Appropriate nonparametric tests were used to measure FAR and ICAR differences over time or between team and individual telesimulations and the relationship between FAR and ICAR scores. Content analysis was used to generate themes from focus group data. Results: Learners' interpersonal and lactation-specific competence improved over time (p = 0.003 and 0.009, respectively). Learners were able "to accept responsibility for their actions" more but spent less time "seeking perspectives from peers" in Case 4 compared with Case 2 (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). Themes from the focus group related to the value of team telesimulations to learn clinical lactation skills and learn about one's role in a team. Learners agreed they developed clinical lactation skills (>4.5/5-pt). Conclusions: Opportunities to work collaboratively in telesimulations with a SP prepare learners for professional collaborations to effectively care for breast/chestfeeding dyads.

An Application of Kane's Validity Framework to Evaluate Formative and Summative Assessment Instruments for Telesimulations in Clinical Lactation.

INTRODUCTION: Health professional learners have limited exposure to breastfeeding patients from diverse backgrounds in clinical rotations. Instead, simulation-based training is used for lactation skills training. There are no validated or standardized simulations and assessment rubrics for lactation. In this pilot, breastfeeding telesimulations with standardized patients (SPs) wearing a high-fidelity breast model matching their skin tone were developed. The validity of Formative and Summative Assessment Rubrics (FAR, SAR) were assessed following Kane's validity framework. The objective was to provide initial evidence for the validity of the FAR and SAR as constructs of competence in lactation support at the entry to practice or practice level. METHODS: Three breastfeeding case scenarios, FAR, and SAR were developed and evaluated with clinical lactation specialists (evaluators, n = 17) and SPs. The FAR was used in practice telesimulations where SPs' (n = 14) performance and telesimulation feasibility were assessed. The FAR was updated in preparation for a pilot study where medical students (n = 13) completed the 3 telesimulations. In the pilot, the updated FAR was used by SPs (n = 6) to assess medical students' performance of clinical skills. After the pilot, rubrics were updated after focus groups with SPs and discussions with evaluators. Evaluators (n = 3) graded students' posttelesimulation documentations using the SAR. Cronbach ɑ level and the intraclass correlation coefficient were assessed iteratively to collect evidence for the scoring, generalizability, and extrapolation of the FAR and SAR according to Kane's framework. RESULTS: The FAR and SAR were found to have acceptable internal consistency and moderate to high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.55-0.94), which provided evidence for scoring and generalizability of the instruments. Evaluators agreed that SPs' performances were realistic (5.6/6), and SPs' feedback was organized (5.5/6) and helpful (5.6/6), which provided evidence for extrapolation. CONCLUSIONS: Initial evidence for validity of scoring, generalization, and extrapolation FAR and SAR (according to Kane's framework) in assessing health professional learner's performance of clinical lactation skills has been presented. These results from a pilot study suggest that the FAR and SAR are reliable instruments for assessing learners' clinical performance in a breastfeeding-focused telesimulation where the SP wears a high-fidelity breast model matching their skin tone. Additional studies will be required to collect evidence according to all 4 categories of Kane's framework for the validity of the FAR and SAR.

What Does It Mean to Be a Clinical Track Faculty Member in Public Health? A Survey of Clinical Track Faculty Across the United States.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical professor track has expanded and reflects a trend toward hiring non-tenure-track faculty in public health; however, little is known about this track. We documented characteristics of clinical faculty at US schools of public health. METHODS: We surveyed clinical faculty at Council on Education for Public Health-accredited schools of public health in the United States in 2019, identified via each school's website. We invited faculty (n = 264) who had the word clinical in their title (ie, apparently eligible faculty), had a working email address, and were not authors of this article to provide information about their rank, degree credentials, expectations for teaching, service, research and practice, and promotion criteria at their institution. In addition, we used open-ended responses to explain and contextualize quantitative data. RESULTS: Of 264 apparently eligible faculty surveyed, 88 (33.3%) responded. We included 81 eligible clinical faculty in our final sample, of whom 46 (56.8%) were assistant professors and 72 (88.9%) had a terminal degree; 57 of 80 (71.3%) had an initial contract of ≤2 years or no contract. Most clinical faculty listed service (96.2%), teaching (95.0%), and student advising/mentoring (86.3%) as duties; fewer clinical faculty reported research (55.0%), practice (33.8%), or clinic (7.5%) duties. Only 37.1% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that promotion policies for clinical track faculty were clear. CONCLUSIONS: If most clinical faculty are at the lowest academic rank, with short contracts and unclear expectations, it will be difficult for clinical faculty to advance and challenging for schools of public health to benefit from this track. Clear institutional expectations for scope of work and promotion may enhance the contribution of clinical faculty to schools of public health and help define this track.

A pilot study to evaluate the effect of classroom-based high-fidelity simulation on midwifery students' self-efficacy in clinical lactation and perceived translation of skills to the care of the breastfeeding mother-infant dyad.

BACKGROUND: Midwives are expected to provide timely and skilled support to breastfeeding mothers, yet it is not clear whether and how midwifery students receive training in clinical lactation. The primary objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the impact of a classroom-based breastfeeding simulation on nurse-midwifery students' self-efficacy in lactation skills. The secondary objective was to describe students' exposure to breastfeeding patients in the classroom and in clinical settings. METHODS: A pilot study using a prospective cohort study design and convenience sampling was completed between September 2017 and April 2018. Two simulation-based workshops were developed for the classroom setting in alignment with breastfeeding-focused competencies for midwives and lactation professionals. The workshops were integrated into the nurse-midwifery curriculum at a US-based program. Two Self-Efficacy Surveys (defined, 7-point Likert Scale) were developed and used to measure baseline and continuing self-efficacy in breastfeeding skills among students. Two Practice Patterns instruments, adapted from the American Academy of Pediatrics breastfeeding curriculum, were used to define the setting, quantity, and types of nurse-midwifery students' breastfeeding-related exposures. Students participated in a one-hour focus group upon completion of the study. RESULTS: In this pilot study, nurse-midwifery student participants (N = 9) reported a 14% increase (P < .0001) in their perceived self-efficacy in basic and advanced clinical lactation skills after completing both workshops. The nurse-midwifery students reported dozens of encounters with diverse breastfeeding patients over a six-month period during which they performed a wide variety of clinical lactation skills. The focus group revealed most students (n = 5/9) would like more time to practice clinical lactation skills in a simulated environment and some indicated a desire to have more exposure to challenging versus common (n = 2/9) of breastfeeding concerns. CONCLUSIONS: In this work, we demonstrate the first high-fidelity lactation simulation in a classroom setting in a healthcare professional training program. Midwifery educators and researchers can adapt the framework and instruments presented in this pilot study to determine the effect of educational interventions on students' translation of skills to breastfeeding mother-infant dyads. Likewise, this is the first study to define the number and type of breastfeeding-related clinical exposures among nurse-midwifery students.

A Framework and Recommendations to Recruit and Engage Faculty Facilitators for Large-Scale IPE Events.

AIMS: As integration of interprofessional education (IPE) events gains traction in health sciences, there is an increased need to recruit and train faculty to facilitate student groups from multiple health care disciplines. This report describes a framework used to effectively recruit and prepare faculty as facilitators for a large-scale, one-time IPE event. We detail recruitment strategies, training tools, facilitators' perceptions about the training, and recommendations for future training. PROCEDURES: Faculty were recruited via email to facilitate an IPE student group of 8-10 learners for an in-person, one-time event. Before the event, faculty facilitators received a Welcome Video and Guidebook providing a description of their role, best practices of facilitation, and scripts. On the event day, facilitators engaged in a face-to-face session to familiarize themselves with the Guidebook and best practices. After the event, facilitators received an email to thank them and invite their participation in a survey regarding perceptions of the training. Data were collected on 2018 and 2019 facilitators. Descriptive statistics were calculated for Likert scales or agreement survey items, and thematic analysis was completed for open-ended questions. RESULTS: Over two offerings of the event, 235 faculty facilitators across 10 academic units participated in 2018 and 2019. Most facilitators felt prepared (92.5% average across 2018 and 2019), the Guidebook was helpful (91%), and an increased interest in IPE (78.5%). Written responses indicated engaging diverse students as the main challenge. Fifty-three percent of facilitators in 2019 were newly recruited. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates an effective training program with a hybrid self-directed and in-person approach that adequately prepares faculty to facilitate IPE discussions. Inclusion of academic unit leaders for recruiting and acknowledging faculty facilitation may add value to the IPE event.

Diagnosis of Eating Disorders Among College Students: A Comparison of Military and Civilian Students.

INTRODUCTION: Eating disorders are often under-detected, which poses a serious threat to the health of individuals with eating disorder symptoms. There is evidence to suggest that the military represents a subpopulation that may be susceptible to high prevalence of eating disorders and vulnerable to their underdiagnosis. Underreporting of eating disorder symptoms in the military could lead to this underdiagnosis of individuals with eating disorder symptoms. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between military affiliation and eating disorder symptoms among college students and the likelihood of eating disorder diagnosis among those with eating disorder symptoms using a large, diverse college-aged sample of both military-involved and civilian students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants for this study were from the 2015-2016, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018 Healthy Minds Study (HMS). Healthy Minds Study is a large, cross-sectional cohort study of both undergraduate and graduate students from universities and colleges across the United States and Canada. The Healthy Minds Study survey questions include assessment of demographic information, military status, self-reported eating disorder symptoms using the SCOFF questionnaire, and self-reported eating disorder diagnosis. Univariate analysis, chi-square analysis, and logistic regression with an unadjusted and covariate adjusted model were used to examine the association between eating disorder symptoms and military affiliation. These analyses were also used to examine the association between eating disorder diagnosis among those with eating disorder symptoms and military affiliation. All analyses were conducted using SPSS. RESULTS: The prevalence of eating disorder symptoms was high among both the civilian (20.4%) and military-involved (14.4%) students. Among females, there was a significantly higher (P value = .041) prevalence of eating disorder symptoms among civilian college students (24.7%) compared to military-involved students (21.3%). Among those with eating disorder symptoms, the prevalence of diagnosis was low in both military and civilian students. Specifically, the prevalence of diagnosis was significantly lower (P value = .032) among military-involved college students (10.8%) compared to civilian college students (16.4%). Differences in sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., gender, race/ethnicity, and age) among military-involved and civilian college students appear to explain this association. CONCLUSIONS: The underdiagnosis of eating disorders is far too common, and this represents a threat to the health of military and civilian populations alike. Underdiagnosis of eating disorders within military environments may be due to underreporting, particularly among men and racial/ethnic minority groups.

The Efficacy of Hybrid Telesimulation with Standardized Patients in Teaching Medical Students Clinical Lactation Skills: A Pilot Study.

Introduction: Medical students lack competencies in clinical lactation. We determined the effect of hybrid telesimulation with a standardized patient (SP) on medical students' clinical performance in lactation support. We assessed students' engagement and satisfaction with the experience. Materials and Methods: Undergraduate medical students (n = 13) completed (1) preparatory case scenarios with multiple-choice questions and (2) three telesimulations with SPs wearing a high-fidelity breast model. Students had the option to complete the Encounter Documentation. SPs used the Formative Assessment Rubric (FAR) to evaluate students' interpersonal skills and clinical lactation experts used the Summative Assessment Rubric to evaluate documentation skills. Investigators collected satisfaction data from a focus group and written evaluation. Dunn's multiple comparison and Freidman tests were used to measure differences in FAR scores between cases and telesimulations. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Most students (70%) attempted case questions multiple times and scores improved (p < 0.0001) between attempts. FAR scores suggest students were prepared for telesimulations (5.5/6-pt Likert) and interpersonal skills were appropriate (5.4/6), with no differences by case (p = 0.11). FAR scores increased between telesimulation 1-2 (+24.5/114, p = 0.002) and 2-3 (+17.5/114, p = 0.014). Students were satisfied with the experience and would recommend it to classmates (both 4.6/6). Thematic analysis revealed feedback regarding interpersonal skills was helpful. Conclusions: Medical students must develop skills to support breastfeeding in virtual settings. Telesimulation can be incorporated into existing curricula to support clinical lactation competencies.

Midwifery students better approximate their self-efficacy in clinical lactation after reflecting in and on their performance in the LactSim OSCE.

BACKGROUND: Midwives are expected to support women with lactation initiation and maintenance. Midwifery students engaged in a simulation-based exercise (LactSim OSCE) where they role-played the clinician and the breastfeeding patient by wearing a high-fidelity breast model. We provided participants opportunities for reflecting in and on practice to compare their perceived self-confidence in clinical lactation skills to actual clinical performance. We also describe feasibility of implementing the LactSim OSCE with an emphasis on preparation and time spent on tasks during the OSCE. METHODS: Audio-video recordings from the LactSim OSCE were viewed and assessed using a technical skills checklist by an independent rater and by the study participants as part of the self-reflection. Mixed data on participants' self-efficacy in clinical lactation, experience with the LactSim OSCE, and self-assessment of clinical performance were collected in survey instruments and a focus group. Time spent on each component and clinical lactation skill during the LactSim OSCE was documented. RESULTS: Immediately following the LactSim OSCE, participants' confidence in clinical lactation was high (5.7/7), but after a guided video reflection exercise, their self-efficacy was 4.4/7. Participants spent approximately 2 of the allotted 10 min per case scenario discussing the OSCE logistics due to inadequate preparation. Participants spent approximately 2 min of the total encounter performing hands-on clinical lactation skills by touching, looking at, or using the high-fidelity breast model worn by their peer. CONCLUSION: We described the development and evaluation of the first simulated experience in clinical lactation with all three components of fidelity: conceptual, psychological, and physical. Multiple opportunities for reflecting on performance allowed the nurse-midwifery students to evaluate their competence in decision-making, technical, and counseling skills which resulted in a more realistic approximation of their perceived self-confidence in breastfeeding skills. Another innovation of this pilot work is the documentation of how long a learner spends on various tasks relevant to lactation support in a simulated encounter. Our findings highlight the importance of providing multiple opportunities for self-reflection using guided video reflection and checklists for objective self-assessment in the clinical lactation field.

A peer evaluation training results in high-quality feedback, as measured over time in nutritional sciences graduate students.

Peer evaluation skills are not typically taught to students, yet they are expected to provide high-quality feedback to their peers. Gameful learning, a pedagogy supporting student-driven learning, can further reinforce the development of peer evaluation skills, if students are motivated to improve upon them. To better understand the effects of a peer evaluation training on the quality of student-generated peer evaluations, we scored peer evaluations from two cohorts taking a graduate-level nutritional sciences class using gameful learning pedagogy. The intervention group completed a peer evaluation training before engaging in peer reviews, while the control group did not. The training included two readings, a video, and reflection questions. The peer evaluations submitted by both the intervention and control groups were assessed on a validated rubric. The peer evaluation training had a positive effect on the quality of the submitted peer evaluations. The intervention group had a 10.8% higher score on its first submitted peer evaluation compared with controls (P = 0.003). The intervention group improved the quality of its future submissions by a further 8.9%, whereas the controls did not continue to improve substantially (P < 0.001). Overall, peer review training enhanced the quality of peer evaluations and allowed students to develop professional skills that they can utilize in any biomedical profession. Our results highlight the importance of peer evaluation training in combination with repeated practice and student-driven learning brought forth by gameful learning pedagogy in improving the quality of evaluations and developing professional skills.

Cultural Competency Training and Evaluation Methods Across Dietetics Education: A Narrative Review.

Developing cultural competence among credentialed nutrition and dietetics practitioners is critical to move toward eliminating disparities in health care. Despite emphasis put forth on culturally competent care by credentialed nutrition and dietetics practitioners, the types, methods, and outcomes of cultural competency training are lacking or inconsistent. In this narrative review, we evaluated studies detailing cultural competency training for content, modes of delivery, and learner outcomes. Main inclusion criteria were students in dietetics or credentialed nutrition and dietetics practitioners engaging in an educational intervention. Exclusion criteria were studies published before 2000 and not published in the English language. Ten studies were reviewed from four health science databases. Our aims were to quantify the literature on cultural competence training in dietetics education and describe the interventions to identify gaps within the field; thus, a quality assessment tool was not utilized. Data were extracted on learner type, number of participants, curriculum content, intervention type, learning outcomes, and outcome evaluation tool. Most studies employed interprofessional education (n=7) and/or service learning (n=6) as interventions types. Quantitative evaluation of learners in the studies reviewed indicated increased knowledge and skill (statistically significant; n=2), whereas qualitative evaluation of learners indicated themes, including curriculum satisfaction, gains in competence, and comfort working with diverse people. Methods of evaluation and delivery were inconsistent, making it difficult to draw larger conclusions about cultural competency training in dietetics. Cultural competence creates opportunities for growth and development of health professionals to serve diverse communities and work environments; future work should include standardizing evaluations of training, specifically to include both qualitative and quantitative methods.

Development and evaluation of a high-fidelity lactation simulation model for health professional breastfeeding education.

BACKGROUND: A key reason for premature cessation of breastfeeding is inadequate support from healthcare providers. Most physicians and nurses do not feel confident in their ability to support families with breastfeeding initiation or maintenance. Increasing health professional confidence in clinical lactation skills is key to improving maternal and child health outcomes. High-fidelity (realistic) simulators encourage learner engagement, resulting in increased clinical skills competency, confidence, and transfer to patient care. Lactation educators teach with low-fidelity cloth and single breast models. There are no high-fidelity breast simulators for health professional education in clinical lactation. DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A HIGH-FIDELITY LACTATION SIMULATION MODEL: In this commentary we describe the development of a high-fidelity Lactation Simulation Model (LSM) and how physician residents, nurse-midwifery students, and clinical lactation experts provided feedback on LSM prototypes. LIMITATIONS: The user-testing described in this commentary does not represent comprehensive validation of the LSM due to small sample sizes and the significant conflict of interest. CONCLUSION: For breastfeeding rates to improve, mothers need support from their nurses, midwives, pediatricians, obstetricians and gynecologists, and all healthcare staff who interact with pregnant and lactating women. Clinical education with high-fidelity breastfeeding simulators could be the ideal learning modality for trainees and hospital staff to build confidence in clinical lactation skills. The ability of a high-fidelity breastfeeding simulator to increase a learner's lactation knowledge and psychomotor skills acquisition, retention, and transfer to patient care still needs to be tested.

Are we teaching our students visual communication? Evaluation of writing assignments in public health.

Visuals are an important means through which public health data can be communicated to diverse audiences, yet many public health students are not trained to develop effective visuals. We evaluated writing assignments from courses taught in public health schools and programmes accredited by the Council on Education for Public Health during the 2016-2017 academic year to identify whether they mentioned a visual element, whether the assignment explained how to create the visual, and if the visual element was worth points. Only 13 of 44 writing assignments mentioned a visual element and only two provided some instructions about how to create the visual element(s). Five assignments awarded points for visual elements. The lack of emphasis on visual elements in writing assignments is significant since visual communication is a key skill needed by practitioners to accompany writing to convey important public health information. Visual communication requires a critical thinking process and therefore time to develop the skills to create effective visuals is necessary. Thus, there is a crucial need for dedicated instruction for public health students to establish competence in visual communication.