Application of a dried blood spot based proteomic and genetic assay for diagnosing hereditary angioedema.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) with C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) is a rare disease caused by low level (type I) or dysfunction (type II) of the C1-inhibitor protein with subsequent reduction of certain complement protein levels. METHODS: To develop and test the reliability of a two-tier method based on C1-INH and C4 quantitation followed by genetic analysis from dried blood spot (DBS) for establishing the diagnosis of C1-INH-HAE. C1-INH and C4 proteins have been quantified in human plasma using a classical immuno-assay and in DBS using a newly developed proteolytic liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method. Genetic analysis was carried out as reported previously (PMID: 35386643) and by a targeted next-generation sequencing panel, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and in some cases whole genome sequencing. RESULTS: DBS quantification of C1-INH and C4 showed the same pattern as plasma, offering the possibility of screening patients with AE symptoms either locally or remotely. Genetic analysis from DBS verified each of the previously identified SERPING1 mutations of the tested C1-INH-HAE patients and revealed the presence of other rare variations in genes that may be involved in the pathogenesis of AE episodes. CONCLUSIONS: C1-INH/C4 quantification in DBS can be used for screening of hereditary AE and DNA extracted from dried blood spots is suitable for identifying various types of mutations of the SERPING1 gene.

The analysis of the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with hereditary angioedema type I and type II.

Due to the similarity between the pathomechanism of SARS-CoV-2 infections and hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE), a possibility emerged that C1-INH-HAE may worsen the course of the infection, or that the infection may influence the severity of angioedema (HAE) attacks in C1-INH-HAE patients. Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of life (QoL) of Hungarian C1-INH-HAE patients, and to survey the acute course of the infection, post COVID symptoms (PCS), vaccination coverage and the side effects of vaccines in this patient population. 93 patients completed our questionnaire between 1st July 2021 and 31st October 2021. In this same period and between March 2019 and March 2020, 63 patients completed the angioedema quality of life questionnaire (AE-QoL). Out of those patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the examined period (18/93 patients; 19%), 5% required hospitalization, 28% experienced HAE attacks in the acute phase of the infection, and 44% experienced PCS. A total number of 142 doses of vaccines were administered to the patients. Serious vaccine reactions did not occur in any case, 4 (5%) out of the 73 vaccinated patients experienced HAE attacks. No significant difference (p = 0.59) was found in the median of the AE-QoL total score, or in the number of HAE attacks prior and during the pandemic. Based on our study, HAE patients did not experience more serious SARS-CoV-2 infection, and it did not aggravate the course of HAE either. Changes in the QoL were not significant, and vaccines were safe in HAE patients.

Hypersensitivity reactions amongst Hungarian Patients with Hereditary Angioedema due to C1-Inhibitor Deficiency.

Background: In hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE), bradykinin-mediated submucosal and/or subcutaneous angioedema dominates the clinical picture. The deficiency of C1-inhibitor can lead to the over-activation of the complement system. Complement plays an important role in all types of hypersensitivity reactions. On the other hand, during the degranulation of mast cells, heparin is also released amongst other substances. Heparin can activate the plasma kinin-kallikrein system, leading to bradykinin generation. These observations suggest a possible connection between C1-INH-HAE and mast cell-mediated hypersensitivity reactions. Objective: To assess the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions in the Hungarian C1-INH-HAE population. Methods: Patients filled out a questionnaire of 112 questions, either online or on paper. The questions were about hypersensitivity and C1-INH-HAE symptoms, the relation between these 2, general health, and demographic data. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Semmelweis University, Budapest, and informed consent was obtained from the participants. Results: One hundred and six patients (64 female, 42 male, median age 46 years) responded, with 63.2% having hypersensitivity. Hypersensitivity was provoked by pollen in 25.5% of patients, by contact sensitivity in 22.6%, by food in 21.7%, by insect sting in 19.8%, by pet in 15.1%, by drug in 14.2%, by dust mite in 5.7%, and by mold in 1.9%. In 11 patients, hypersensitivity symptoms appeared after the diagnosis of C1-INH-HAE. Six hypersensitive patients experienced improvement in their symptoms; 42 remained the same, but none experienced worsening after the diagnosis of C1-INH-HAE. In 7.8% of the hypersensitive patients, a C1-INH-HAE attack worsened the hypersensitivity symptoms, while 15.7% of the hypersensitive patients experienced a C1-INH-HAE attack provoked by contact with the provoking factor. Conclusion: While 63.2% of our C1-INH-HAE patients have reported hypersensitivity symptoms, Eurostat's latest data puts the prevalence of self-reported allergies in Hungary at 19.3%. Since in our experience most Hungarian patients report hypersensitivity reactions as allergies, this may support a possible connection between the 2 diseases, but further molecular studies are needed.

Diagnosing Pediatric Patients With Hereditary C1-Inhibitor Deficiency-Experience From the Hungarian Angioedema Center of Reference and Excellence.

Background: Hereditary Angioedema with C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) is a rare disease characterized by recurrent subcutaneous and/or submucosal edematous (HAE) episodes, which may occur at any age. The mean age of the symptom onset is 10-12 years. Diagnostic protocols differ by age group and family history. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory data (C4-, C1-INH concentration and function) from 49 pediatric patients diagnosed with C1-INH deficiency at our Angioedema Center between 2001 and 2020. Moreover, we analyzed the connection between complement parameters and symptom onset. Results: From the 49 pediatric patients [boy/girl: 23/26, the average age of diagnosis: 6.7 years (min: 0-max: 18.84)], the majority (36/49, 73%) was diagnosed as the result of family screening. Of all the enrolled patients, 34% (17/49) experienced symptoms before the diagnosis. During the observational period, 33% (16/49) of the patients remained asymptomatic, while 33% (16/49) became symptomatic. The average age at symptom onset was 7.8 years (min: 0.5-max: 18). Only 27% (13/49) of pediatric patients were diagnosed after referrals to our center because of typical symptoms. From those patients diagnosed with family screening, 4/36 experienced symptoms at or before the time of the diagnosis. In the case of five newborns from the family screening group, umbilical cord blood samples were used for complement testing. In the case of 3/36 patients, the first complement parameters did not clearly support the disease, but the presence of the mutation identified in the family verified the diagnosis. Complement results were available from 11 patients who became symptomatic during the observational period. Complement parameters 1 year prior to and after the onset of symptoms were compared, and significantly lower concentrations of C1-INH (p = 0.0078) were detected after the onset of symptoms compared to the preceding (symptom-free) period. Discussion: The majority of pediatric patients were diagnosed as a result of family screening before the onset of symptoms. Early diagnosis allows supplying the patients with special acute treatment for HAE attacks, which may occur at any time. Our results highlight the importance of DNA analysis in pediatric patients in case of a known mutation in the family, and an ambiguous result of complement testing.

Overview of SERPING1 Variations Identified in Hungarian Patients With Hereditary Angioedema.

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder, characterized by recurrent, unpredictable edematous symptoms involving subcutaneous, and/or submucosal tissue. C1-INH-HAE may be caused by more than 700 different mutations in the gene encoding C1-INH (SERPING1) that may lead to decreased protein synthesis or to functional deficiency. Methods: Concentrations of C1-INH, C4, C1q, and anti-C1-INH antibodies, as well as functional C1-INH activity were determined in subjects suffering from edematous symptoms and admitted to the Hungarian Angioedema Center of Reference and Excellence. In those patients, who were diagnosed with C1-INH-HAE based on the complement measurements, SERPING1 was screened by bidirectional sequencing following PCR amplification and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. For detecting large deletions, long-range PCRs covering the entire SERPING1 gene by targeting 2-7 kb long regions were applied. Results: Altogether 197 individuals with C1-INH deficiency belonging to 68 families were identified. By applying Sanger sequencing or copy number determination of SERPING1 exons, 48 different mutations were detected in 66/68 families: 5 large and 15 small insertions/deletions/delins, 16 missense, 6 nonsense, and 6 intronic splice site mutations. Two novel variations (p.Tyr199Ser [c.596A>C] and the duplication of exon 7) were shown to cosegregate with deficient C1-inhibitor level and activity, while two other variations were detected in single patients (c.797_800delinsCTTGGAGCTCAAGAACTTGGAGCT and c.812dup). A series of long PCRs was applied in the remaining 2 families without an identified mutation and a new, 2606 bp long deletion including the last 91 bp of exon 6 (c.939_1029+2515del) was identified in all affected members of one pedigree. In the remaining one family, a deep intronic SERPING1 variation (c.1029+384A>G) was detected by a targeted next-generation sequencing panel as reported previously. Conclusions: Sequencing and copy number determination of SERPING1 exons uncover most pathogenic variants in C1-INH-HAE patients, and further methods are worth to be applied in cases with unrevealed genetic background. Since knowledge of the genetic background may support the establishment of the correct and early diagnosis of C1-INH-HAE, identification of causative mutations and reporting data supporting the interpretation on the pathogenicity of these variants is of utmost importance.

The characteristics of upper airway edema in hereditary and acquired angioedema with C1-inhibitor deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Angioedemas localized in the upper airway are potentially life threatening, and without proper treatment, they may lead to death by suffocation. Upper airway edemas (UAE) in bradykinin-mediated angioedemas can even be the first symptoms of the disease. METHODS: Our survey was performed with a retrospective long-term follow-up method from the medical history of 197 hereditary (C1-INH-HAE) and 20 acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-AAE), 3 factor XII and 3 plasminogen gene mutation (FXII-HAE, PLG-HAE) patients treated at our center between 1990 and 2020. The UAE group included edemas localized to the mesopharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx, as narrowing of these anatomical regions can lead to suffocation. RESULTS: 98/197 C1-INH-HAE (47 families) and 13/20 C1-INH-AAE, 1/3 PLG-HAE, 1/3 FXII-HAE patients had experienced UAE at least once according to their medical history. In case of C1-INH-HAE patients, in 6/47 families who had undiagnosed ancestors had 13 members who died of suffocation. After the diagnosis, 1-1 member of two families died of UAE. 44/64 C1-INH-HAE patients did not smoke, 20/64 did. The occurrence of UAE was significantly higher in smoker patients. We analyzed 7607 HAE attacks of 56/98 patients. Out of all attacks, the incidence of UAE in the C1-INH-HAE group was 4%, and 9.5% in the C1-INH-AAE group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Early diagnosis is key in bradykinin-mediated angioedemas cases, since the patient must be provided with adequate treatment; and also it is essential to inform patients about the importance of avoiding the trigger factors and the early symptoms of UAE, as these measures could significantly decrease the incidence of lethal UAEs.

Diagnosis and treatment of paediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome / A gyermekkori koronavírus-fertozést követo sokszervi gyulladás diagnosztikája és kezelése.

Összefoglaló. A SARS-CoV-2-fertozés ritka gyermekkori szövodménye a sokszervi gyulladás, angol terminológiával paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS). Két vagy több szerv érintettségével járó, súlyos tünetekkel induló betegségrol van szó, amelynek tünetei átfedést mutatnak a Kawasaki-betegséggel, a toxikus sokk szindrómával és a makrofágaktivációs szindrómával. A PIMS-betegek intenzív terápiás osztályon vagy intenzív terápiás háttérrel rendelkezo intézményben kezelendok, ahol biztosítottak a kardiológiai ellátás feltételei is. A szükséges immunterápia a klinikai prezentációtól függ. A jelen közleményben a szerzok a releváns nemzetközi irodalom áttekintését követoen ajánlást tesznek a PIMS diagnosztikai és terápiás algoritmusára. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(17): 652-667. Summary. Pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS) is a rare complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. PIMS is a severe condition, involving two or more organ systems. The symptoms overlap with Kawasaki disease, toxic shock syndrome and macrophage activation syndrome. PIMS patients should be treated in an intensive care unit or in an institution with an intensive care background, where cardiological care is also provided. The required specific immunotherapy depends on the clinical presentation. In this paper, after reviewing the relevant international literature, the authors make a recommendation for the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm for PIMS. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(17): 652-667.

The Global Registry for Hereditary Angioedema due to C1-Inhibitor Deficiency.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare condition, mostly due to genetic deficiency of complement C1 inhibitor (C1-INH). The rarity of HAE impedes extensive data collection and assessment of the impact of certain factors known to affect the course of this disabling and life-threatening disease. Establishing a global registry could assist to overcome such issues and provides valuable patient data from different countries. The HAE Global Registry is a disease-specific registry, with web-based electronic support, where data are provided by physicians and patients through a dedicated application. We collected data between January 1, 2018, and August 31, 2020. Data on 1297 patients from 29 centers in 5 European countries were collected. At least one attack was recorded for 497 patients during the study period. Overall, 1182 patients were diagnosed with HAE type 1 and 115 with type 2. At the time of database lock, 389 patients were taking long-term prophylactic medication, 217 of which were on danazol. Most recorded attacks affected the abdomen, were generally moderate in severity, and occurred in patients who were not on prophylactic treatment (70.6%, 6244/8848). The median duration of attacks was 780 min (IQR 290-1740) in patients on prophylactic medication and 780 min (IQR 300-1920) in patients not on continuous prophylactic medication. In conclusion, the establishment of a registry for C1-INH-HAE allowed collection of a large amount of data that may help to better understand the clinical characteristics of this disease. This information may enhance patient care and guide future therapeutic decisions.

The Importance of Complement Testing in Acquired Angioedema Related to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may cause angioedema. Currently, no laboratory method is available for identifying acquired angioedema related to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. However, establishing the diagnosis is possible from the medical history and the preexisting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy, as well as by excluding other angioedema types. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of complement testing in patients experiencing angioedema while taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2019, a total of 149 patients taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were referred to our Angioedema Center for the diagnostic evaluation of recurrent angioedema episodes. Complement measurement was performed on these patients. RESULTS: The mean age of the 149 patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at the onset of the index angioedema episode was 55.8 years. The mean interval between the introduction of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy and the occurrence of the initial symptoms of angioedema was 43 months. The most commonly used angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor was perindopril (32.9% of the patients). The initial angioedema episode involved the face in 50.3%, the lips in 40.9%, and the tongue in 33.5% of the patients. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were discontinued in all 149 patients, and at the same time, a complement test was performed. The complement tests confirmed hereditary angioedema with C1-inhibitor deficiency in 2 patients and an additional 12 family members. Acquired angioedema with C1-inhibitor deficiency was found in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Excluding hereditary angioedema and acquired angioedema with C1-inhibitor deficiency is indispensable for establishing the diagnosis of acquired angioedema related to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of home treatment with the recombinant human C1-inhibitor in hereditary angioedema resulting from C1-inhibitor deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Conestat alpha, a C1-inhibitor produced by recombinant technology (rhC1-INH) is an acute treatment for edematous attacks occurring in hereditary angioedema (HAE) with C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE). Our study evaluated the efficacy and safety of rhC1-INH administered during HAE attacks, and for short-term prophylaxis (STP). MATERIALS & METHOD: Our prospective study analyzed the course of 544 HAE attacks experienced by the 21 C1-INH-HAE patients treated, as well as the outcome of 97 instances of STP implemented with rhC1-INH. Using a purpose-designed questionnaire, the patients recorded relevant, treatment-related information. RESULTS: Time to the administration of rhC1-INH was 90.0 min (median) after the onset of HAE attacks. The symptoms started to improve as early as 60 min after the injection of rhC1-INH, and the attack resolved 730.0 min after treatment. The interval between the onset of the HAE attack and the administration of rhC1-INH correlated with time until the onset of improvement (R = 0.2053 p < 0.0001), and with time to the complete resolution of symptoms (R = 0.2805, p < 0.0001). Nine patients received STP with rhC1-INH in 97 instances. STP successfully prevented the HAE attack within 72 h of the event on 93/97 occasions. No local and serious systemic adverse events/effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with rhC1-INH is effective and safe both for acute management, and for STP. Following the onset of an HAE attack, early administration of rhC1-INH may reduce time to the improvement and to the complete resolution of symptoms. Repeated administration of rhC1-INH does not impair its efficacy.

Idiopathic Nonhistaminergic Acquired Angioedema Versus Hereditary Angioedema.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of idiopathic nonhistaminergic acquired angioedema (InH-AAE) has not yet been precisely elucidated. This condition is characterized by recurrent angioedema without wheals. OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical features of InH-AAE, and to make, for the first time, independent comparisons with hereditary angioedema of unknown origin (U-HAE), as well as with hereditary angioedema with C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE). METHODS: We compared the clinical parameters of 46 patients with InH-AAE with those of 27 patients suffering from U-HAE, as well as of 73 patients with C1-INH-HAE. RESULTS: The mean age at the onset of symptoms was 36 years in InH-AAE, 13 years in C1-INH-HAE, and 29 years in U-HAE. More than 12 edematous episodes occurred over a year in 56% of patients with InH-AAE, in 59% of those with C1-INH-HAE, and in 48% of those with U-HAE. Edema of the extremities, of the upper airways, and of the gastrointestinal tract was more common in patients with C1-INH-HAE (92%, 51%, and 75%, respectively). These manifestations occurred less frequently in patients with InH-AAE (54%, 28%, and 20%) and in patients with U-HAE (37%, 29%, and 20%). By contrast, facial edema occurred in only 15% of patients with C1-INH-HAE, but in 67% of patients with InH-AAE and in 59% of patients with U-HAE. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical manifestations of patients with InH-AAE were different from those of patients with C1-INH-HAE. This may indicate different processes underlying edema formation in these disease forms. The close resemblance of the clinical manifestations in InH-AAE and U-HAE might suggest a similarity between the pathophysiology of these conditions.