MITO END-3: efficacy of avelumab immunotherapy according to molecular profiling in first-line endometrial cancer therapy.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) compared to first-line chemotherapy alone in advanced endometrial cancer (EC), with a much larger effect size in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cases. New biomarkers might help to select patients who may have benefit among those with a microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a pre-planned translational analysis of the MITO END-3 trial, we assessed the significance of genomic abnormalities in patients randomized to standard carboplatin/paclitaxel without or with avelumab. RESULTS: Out of 125 randomized patients, 109 had samples eligible for next-generation sequencing analysis, and 102 had MSI tested. According to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), there were 29 cases with MSI-H, 26 with MSS TP53 wild type (wt), 47 with MSS TP53 mutated (mut), and 1 case with POLE mutation. Four mutated genes were present in >30% of cases: TP53, PIK3CA, ARID1A, and PTEN. Eleven patients (10%) had a BRCA1/2 mutation (five in MSI-H and six in MSS). High tumor mutational burden (≥10 muts/Mb) was observed in all MSI-H patients, in 4 out of 47 MSS/TP53 mut, and no case in the MSS/TP53 wt category. The effect of avelumab on PFS significantly varied according to TCGA categories, being favorable in MSI-H and worst in MSS/TP53 mut (P interaction = 0.003); a similar non-significant trend was seen in survival analysis. ARID1A and PTEN also showed a statistically significant interaction with treatment effect, which was better in the presence of the mutation (ARID1A P interaction = 0.01; PTEN P interaction = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The MITO END-3 trial results suggest that TP53 mutation is associated with a poor effect of avelumab, while mutations of PTEN and ARID1A are related to a positive effect of the drug in patients with advanced EC.

Thymidine phosphorylase expression and benefit from capecitabine in patients with advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Capecitabine is an orally bioavailable prodrug that is converted to 5-fluorouracil through several enzymatic steps, the last of which is mediated by thymidine phosphorylase (TP). TP has been reported to be expressed at higher levels in cancer tissue compared with normal counterpart. The present study aimed at evaluating the potential relationship between TP expression and benefit from capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC). METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for TP and other biological markers was carried out on paraffin-embedded cancer tissues of 61 patients with BC treated with at least three cycles of capecitabine as single agent for metastatic disease. All patients had received capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. days 1-14 every 21 days. The following variables were analyzed as potential determinants of benefit from capecitabine: TP expression, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) status, MIB-1 expression, performance status at the beginning of capecitabine treatment, stage at diagnosis, grade, presence of visceral metastases at the beginning of capecitabine treatment, and previous chemotherapy. RESULTS: Overall, median time to progression (TTP) was 6.5 months (range 1.4-33). On multivariate analysis, ER status [hazard ratio (HR) for progression = 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.15-0.64; P = 0.002], presence of visceral metastases at the beginning of capecitabine treatment (HR = 2.30; 95% CI = 1.21-4.39; P = 0.01), and capecitabine as first- or second-line treatment (HR = 2.28; 95% CI = 1.21-4.32; P = 0.01) independently predicted TTP. TP was highly expressed in 34 of 61 cases (55.7%). In the subgroup of patients with TP-expressing tumor, TTP was significantly longer in patients who received anthracyclines and taxanes before capecitabine (median TTP 7.5 versus 3.3 months, P = 0.01, log-rank test). Similarly, patients with a TP-positive tumor showed a longer TTP if they received taxanes before capecitabine than patients with TP-positive tumor who did not receive this treatment (7.3 versus 3.4 months, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: These data provide further evidence that TP expression in BC could represent a biomarker of sensitivity to capecitabine treatment. Prospective studies with translational approach are desirable to confirm the predictive and prognostic role of TP.

Thymidine phosphorylase expression is associated with time to progression in patients receiving low-dose, docetaxel-modulated capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical data have indicated a synergistic interaction between docetaxel and capecitabine by means of taxane-induced up-regulation of thymidine phosphorylase (TP). On the basis of such premises, we conducted a phase II trial to determine the activity and tolerability of weekly docetaxel plus capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Furthermore, we explored the relationship between TP tumor expression and benefit from this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15 and capecitabine orally 625 mg/m(2) b.i.d. from days 8 to 21. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. In the correlative study, we evaluated the TP expression by immunohistochemistry and the TP messenger RNA expression by real-time RT-PCR in the primary tumor. RESULTS: Forty-seven women were enrolled. In the intention-to-treat analysis, objective responses were achieved in 24 patients (51%). Fourteen additional patients (30%) had stable disease. The median time to progression (TTP) was 6 months (range 1-44 months). Median survival was 17 months (range 1-48 months). Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. The most common clinical adverse events (all grades) were alopecia (55%), nail changes (53%), fatigue/asthenia (51%), nausea/vomiting (51%), neutropenia (49%), and neuropathy (49%). A significantly higher TTP was observed in patients with TP-positive tumors (log-rank test, P = 0.009). Interestingly, a subgroup analysis confirmed this TTP benefit in patients with TP-positive tumors obtaining a tumor response (log-rank test, P = 0.03), whereas the statistical significance was lost in nonresponders (log-rank test, P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that a regimen with low doses of capecitabine plus weekly docetaxel is active against MBC. The correlative analysis provides preliminary evidence that TP expression may be a predictive marker for therapeutic benefit.

Expression of periostin in human breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Periostin is a secreted adhesion protein, normally expressed in mesenchime-derived cells. Aberrant expression of the periostin gene in epithelial tumours seems to play a role in angiogenesis and metastases. AIMS: To investigate periostin expression in a consecutive series of breast carcinomas and correlate it with established biological and prognostic factors. METHODS: A consecutive series of 206 breast carcinomas was investigated by immunohistochemistry with a specific antiperiostin antibody. Immunohistochemical expression of oestrogen and progesterone receptors, Ki-67 (MIB-1), HER-2/neu, VEGF-A, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 was analysed. Periostin expression was also investigated in MCF-7 and MDA-468 cell lines by immunohistochemistry, western blot and quantitative RT-PCR. Localisation of periostin was investigated in MCF-7 cells by the green fluorescent protein (GFP) approach. RESULTS: Periostin was highly expressed in carcinoma cells, but not in normal breast tissues. The pattern of expression was mainly cytoplasmic. However, in 12% of cases a nuclear reactivity was observed. Nuclear periostin significantly correlated with tumour size, and with expression of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, VEGF-A, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2. A nuclear localisation of periostin was also observed in MCF-7 and MDA-468 cell lines. In MCF-7 cells the nuclear localisation of periostin was also shown by transfection of a vector expressing a GFP-periostin chimeric protein. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that the aberrant gene expression of periostin in breast cancer cells is associated with an abnormal nuclear localisation of the protein. The nuclear localisation of periostin in breast cancer may induce significant biological effects.

Baseline staging tests after a new diagnosis of breast cancer: further evidence of their limited indications.

BACKGROUND: Bone scanning (BS), liver ultrasonography (LUS) and chest radiography (CXR) are commonly used in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer as part of baseline staging. However, in the absence of symptomatic disease, the usefulness of this routine diagnostic work-up is not evidence-based. METHODS: We selected the study sample from 516 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer. For each diagnostic test (BS, LUS, CXR), we analyzed the prevalence defined as the number of patients with diagnosis of metastatic disease after an imaging technique divided by the total number of patients tested. In addition, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Initial suspicion was confirmed by other independent tests (bone X-ray, computerized tomography scan, magnetic resonance imaging) in order to identify "true" positive diagnoses. RESULTS: At baseline, BS was carried out in 412 patients, LUS in 412 patients and CXR in 428 patients. Thirty-three patients were correctly diagnosed by the initial staging investigations as having metastatic disease (true positive cases). BS detected skeletal metastases in 6.31% of patients, LUS detected liver metastases in 0.72% of patients and CXR detected lung metastases in 0.93% of patients. Before imaging tests, all patients with either LUS or CXR evidence of metastases were previously classified as having stage III disease. On the other hand, only 26.9% of bone metastases were detected in patients with stage III. Accordingly, the detection rate in stage III patients was 14%, 5.6% and 7.2%, respectively for BS, LUS and CXR. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that a complete diagnostic work-up to detect metastases is unnecessary in the majority of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, whereas it may be indicated for specific patient categories such as those with stage III disease.