Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 9: 849971, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35615559

RESUMO

Background: Data regarding management of patients with unprotected left main coronary artery in-stent restenosis (LM-ISR) are scarce. Objectives: This study investigated the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for the treatment of unprotected LM-ISR. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent PCI or CABG for unprotected LM-ISR were enrolled. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stroke. Results: A total of 305 patients were enrolled, of which 203(66.6%) underwent PCI and 102(33.4%) underwent CABG. At 30-day follow-up, a lower risk of cardiac death was observed in the PCI group, compared with the CABG-treated group (2.1% vs. 7.1%, HR 3.48, 95%CI 1.01-11.8, p = 0.04). At a median of 3.5 years [interquartile range (IQR) 1.3-5.5] follow-up, MACCE occurred in 27.7% vs. 29.6% (HR 0.82, 95%CI 0.52-1.32, p = 0.43) in PCI- and CABG-treated patients, respectively. There were no significant differences between PCI and CABG in cardiac death (9.9% vs. 18.4%; HR 1.56, 95%CI 0.81-3.00, p = 0.18), MI (7.9% vs. 5.1%, HR 0.44, 95%CI 0.15-1.27, p = 0.13), or stroke (2.1% vs. 4.1%, HR 1.79, 95%CI 0.45-7.16, p = 0.41). TVR was more frequently needed in the PCI group (15.2% vs. 6.1%, HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.15-0.85, p = 0.02). Conclusions: This analysis of patients with LM-ISR revealed a lower incidence of cardiac death in PCI compared with CABG in short-term follow-up. During the long-term follow-up, no differences in MACCE were observed, but patients treated with CABG less often required TVR. Visual overview: A visual overview is available for this article. Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04968977.

2.
Clin Imaging ; 36(6): 724-31, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23154001

RESUMO

We compared the variance of area and diameter significant stenosis measurement between quantitative computed tomography coronary angiography (QCTA) and quantitative invasive coronary angiography (QCA). Fifty patients presenting 65 significant coronary artery stenoses (≥70% area stenosis) in QCTA and QCA were included. Spearman's rank correlation revealed that area stenosis measurement by QCTA and QCA yields higher correlation than diameter stenosis and is highest for noncalcified and mixed lesions.


Assuntos
Calcinose/complicações , Calcinose/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia Coronária/métodos , Estenose Coronária/complicações , Estenose Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia Intervencionista/métodos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estatística como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...