Incidence of advanced neoplasia during surveillance in high- and intermediate-risk groups of the European colorectal cancer screening guidelines.

Background and study aims: The European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening have established high-risk (≥ 5 adenomas or an adenoma ≥ 20 mm) and intermediate-risk (3 - 4 adenomas or at least one adenoma 10 - 19 mm in size, or villous histology, or high grade dysplasia) groups with different endoscopic surveillance intervals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in the incidence of advanced neoplasia (advanced adenoma or CRC) between the two risk groups. Patients and methods: This retrospective group study included patients meeting high- or intermediate-risk criteria for adenomas detected in CRC screening programs and the COLONPREV study before European guidelines were adopted in Spain (June 2011) with a 3-year surveillance recommendation according to Spanish guidelines. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of advanced neoplasia in patients undergoing surveillance. The secondary outcome measure was the CRC incidence. We used an adjusted proportional hazards regression model to control confounding variables. Results: The study included 5401 patients (3379 intermediate risk, 2022 high risk). Endoscopic surveillance was performed in 65.5 % of the patients (2.8 ±â€Š1 years). The incidence of advanced neoplasia in the high- and intermediate-risk groups was 16.0 % (59.0 cases/1000 patient-years) and 12.3 % (41.2 cases/1000 patient-years), respectively. The CRC incidence was 0.5 % (1.4 cases/1000 patient-years) and 0.4 % (1 case/1000 patient-years), respectively. The advanced neoplasia and CRC attributable risk to the high risk group was of 3.7 % and 0.1 %, respectively. In the proportional hazards analysis, the risk of advanced neoplasia was greater in the high-risk group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.2 - 1.8), with no significant differences in the CRC incidence (HR 1.6, 95 %CI 0.6 - 3.8). Conclusions: Patients meeting high-risk criteria have a higher incidence of advanced neoplasia during endoscopic surveillance. No differences were found in the CRC incidence at a 3-year surveillance recommendation.

[Quality of life specific questionnaire for constipated patients: development and validation of CVE-20]. / Cuestionario específico de calidad de vida para pacientes con estreñimiento: desarrollo y validación del CVE-20.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although constipation affects quality of life, questionnaires hardly exist for its evaluation. We aimed to develop and validate a questionnaire able to measure the quality of life in patients with constipation. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A Spanish multicenter study was performed in 2 stages: a) questionnaire development (open interview to patients with constipation, pilot questionnaire, quantitative and factorial analysis, Rasch analysis, and specific questionnaire design), and b) questionnaire validation in 136 patients. These patients were divided in 2 groups: a) reliability group (n = 55; no need to begin or change treatment; re-tested after 15 days), and b) sensibility to change group (n = 81; need to begin or change treatment; re-tested after 3 months). We collected clinical and socio-demographic data and we evaluated the quality of life through the general questionnaire EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) and the specific one, design in the previous stage (25 items). After that, we analysed feasibility, reliability and validity (of content, convergent and longitudinal). RESULTS: The trial questionnaire was obtained during the development stage and the results were 51 items that were later reduced to 25 in the validation stage. A total of 126 patients (93% women; mean age [standard deviation]: 43.4 [1] years) completed the study properly. The answer average time was 12 min. The content validity process reduced the questionnaire to 20 items (CVE-20) within 4 domains: emotional, general physical, rectal physical and social. The reliability was good in relation to the general punctuation (Cronbach alpha coefficient = 0.87), being in the different domains of 0.79, 0.73, 0.75 and 0.60, respectively. The construct validity showed a good correlation between the CVE-20 results and constipation severity. The CVE-20 score positively correlated with EQ -5D changes. The test and re-test reliability were good: interclass correlation coefficient = 0.89 (ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 in the different domains). The clinically relevant and minimal difference was 17 points (95% confidence interval, 11-23). The content validity showed a strong correlation between CVE-20 and constipation severity. CONCLUSIONS: The CVE-20 is the first specific questionnaire in Spanish language for constipated patients; it is valid, reliable, sensitive to changes and it meets the psychometric requirements to be applied in daily practice and clinical trials.