Prevention, treatment and outcomes of left ventricular assist device driveline infections. A single Center experience.

INTRODUCTION: While the survival rates for patients with end-stage heart failure have dramatically improved with newer generations of left ventricular assist devices, LVAD-specific infections are important cause of morbidity, mortality, and hospital readmissions in these patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all driveline infections in patients who had undergone LVAD implantation at a single cardiosurgical center. Between June 2013 and March 2017, 51 patients underwent implantation of LVAD. Among these, 12 received Heart Ware LVAD,34 Heart Mate II LVAD, and 5 Heart Mate III LVAD. The end goal for LVAD therapy was destination therapy in three patients and bridge-to-transplantation in 48 patients. RESULTS: One month, six months, and one-year survival rates were 90%, 85%, and 81%, respectively. Five patients developed driveline infections. Median time from LVAD implantation to driveline infections was 126 days. One of these patients underwent heart transplantation. Two patients were treated with antibiotics and surgical driveline repositioning with extensive debridement of the wound. Two patients with a chronic infection were treated conservatively with regular wound cleaning. CONCLUSION: Driveline infections remain a serious therapeutic challenge. With the development of surgical techniques and new devices, it is possible to reduce morbidity and increase survival rate in patients with implanted LVAD. KEY WORDS: Driveline, Infections, LVAD.

Long Term Outcomes of The Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting In A High-Volume Center.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the most frequent surgery in the practice of an adult cardiac surgeon and the most frequently performed cardiac surgical procedure worldwide. Despite the ongoing debates regarding the superiority or inferiority of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, it still comprises 15-30% of all CABG cases varying in different national registries. We performed a propensity matched study of 302 consecutive CABG patients,143 off -pump cases performed by the four experienced off-pump surgeons and the on-pump CABG cases performed by those surgeons and four other experienced coronary surgeons. The five year follow up was performed and data collected comprised of mortality, rehospitalization due to cardiac origin, repeated revascularization, myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident. Overall, the off-pump group of patients had a higher risk profile than the patients in the on-pump group. After matching, fewer differences were found between the groups. Propensity score matching analysis showed no difference in long-term survival as well as MACCE and repeated revascularization. The higher risk profile of the patients subjected to OPCAB and the comparable survival to lower risk CPB patients in this series indicate that in experienced hands, OPCAB is a valuable option in this important subgroup of patients.