Moving from left ventricular ejection fraction to deformation imaging in mitral valve regurgitation.

The increasing prevalence of valvular heart diseases, specifically mitral regurgitation (MR), underscores the need for a careful and timely approach to intervention. Severe MR, whether primary or secondary, when left untreated leads to adverse outcomes, emphasizing the critical role of a timely surgical or transcatheter intervention. While left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains the guideline-recommended measure for assessing left ventricle damage, emerging evidence raises concerns regarding its reliability in MR due to its volume-dependent nature. This review summarizes the existing literature on the role of LVEF and deformation imaging techniques, emphasizing the latter's potential in providing a more accurate evaluation of intrinsic myocardial function. Moreover, it advocates the need for an integrated approach that combines traditional with emerging measures, aiming to optimize the management of patients with MR. It attempts to highlight the need for future research to validate the clinical application of deformation imaging techniques through large-scale studies.

Factors associated with delayed presentation at the emergency department in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Background and aims: Pre-hospital delay is a crucial factor that determines the eligibility for intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. We aimed to evaluate the time to presentation at the emergency department (ED) and the factors that affect this time. Patients and methods: We prospectively studied 682 patients who were admitted with acute ischemic stroke (43.3% men, age 79.9 ± 6.6 years). Results: The median time to presentation at the ED was 2.1 h (range 0.15 to 168 h); 68.8% of the patients arrived within 4.5 h and 56.5% arrived within 3 h from the onset of symptoms. Independent predictors of presentation within 4.5 h were the use of emergency medical services (EMS) for transportation to the hospital (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.38-4.94, p = .003), family history of cardiovascular disease (CVD)(OR 4.0 0,95%CI 1.61-12.23, p = .006) and the absence of history of smoking (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.13-5.42, p = .021). Independent predictors of presentation within 3 h were the use of EMS for transportation to the hospital (OR 6.24, 95% CI 2.52-16.63, p = .0001), family history of CVD (OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.14-9.43, p = .03), and a moderately severe stroke at admission (OR vs. minor stroke 0.38, 95% CI 0.16-0.87, p = .02). Conclusions: A considerable proportion of patients with acute ischemic stroke arrives at the ED after the 4.5-h threshold for performing intravenous thrombolysis. Non-smokers, patients with a family history of CVD, with moderately severe stroke and those who use the EMS are more likely to arrive on time.

Impaired antioxidative activity of high-density lipoprotein is associated with more severe acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: High-density lipoprotein (HDL) has important anti-atherogenic functions, including antioxidant effects. However, it is unclear whether the antioxidative activity of HDL is associated with the severity and outcome of acute ischemic stroke. We aimed to evaluate this association. METHODS: We prospectively studied 199 consecutive patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke and followed them up until discharge. We measured HDL antioxidant capacity, HDL-associated paraoxonase-1 (PON1) activity and HDL-associated myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels. Severe stroke was defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission ≥5. Dependency was defined as modified Rankin scale at discharge between 2 and 5. RESULTS: Patients with severe stroke had lower HDL antioxidant capacity, higher MPO levels and higher MPO/PON1 ratio. Independent risk factors for severe stroke were female gender (RR 2.80, 95% CI 1.37-5.70, p = 0.005), glucose levels (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.0-1.02, p < 0.01) and HDL antioxidant capacity (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p < 0.05). Patients who were dependent at discharge had lower HDL antioxidant capacity, higher MPO levels and higher MPO/PON1 ratio. Independent predictors of dependency at discharge were lack of lipid-lowering treatment (RR 6.86, 95% CI 1.83-25.67, p < 0.005) and NIHSS (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.29-1.88, p < 0.0001). The HDL antioxidant capacity did not differ between patients who died during hospitalization and those who were discharged. The only independent predictor of in-hospital mortality was NIHSS (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.27, p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Impaired antioxidative activity of HDL is associated with more severe acute ischemic stroke and might also predict a worse functional outcome in these patients.

Treatment with Mannitol is Associated with Increased Risk for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Cerebral Edema.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines state that osmotic therapy is reasonable in patients with clinical deterioration from cerebral infarction-related cerebral edema. However, there are limited data on the safety and efficacy of this therapy. We aimed to evaluate the effect of mannitol on the outcome of ischemic stroke-related cerebral edema. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied 922 consecutive patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke. Patients who showed space-occupying brain edema with tissue shifts compressing the midline structures received mannitol. The outcome was assessed with dependency rates at discharge (modified Rankin Scale grade 2-5) and in-hospital mortality. Rates of dependency were higher in patients treated with mannitol (n = 86) than in those who were not (97.7 and 58.5%, respectively; p < 0.001). Independent predictors of dependency were age, history of ischemic stroke and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission. Rates of mortality were higher in patients treated with mannitol than in those who were not (46.5 and 5.6%, respectively; p < 0.001). Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were diastolic blood pressure [relative risk (RR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.08, p < 0.001], NIHSS score at admission (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.14-1.23, p < 0.001) and treatment with mannitol (RR 3.45, 95% CI 1.55-7.69, p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of mannitol to patients with ischemic stroke-related cerebral edema does not appear to affect the functional outcome and might increase mortality, independently of stroke severity.

Left ventricular hypertrophy assessed by electrocardiogram is associated with more severe stroke and with higher in-hospital mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), assessed by electrocardiogram (ECG), is associated with increased risk for stroke. However, few studies that evaluated whether ECG-detected LVH predicts ischemic stroke severity and outcome. We aimed to evaluate these associations. METHODS: We prospectively studied 922 patients consecutively admitted with acute ischemic stroke (age 79.6 ±â€¯6.9 years). Stroke severity was assessed at admission with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Severe stroke was defined as NIHSS≥5. LVH was evaluated with the Sokolow-Lyon index and the Cornell voltage-duration product criteria in an ECG obtained at admission. The outcome was assessed with dependency at discharge (modified Rankin scale 2-5) and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Independent predictors of severe stroke were age (relative risk (RR) per year 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.11, p<0.001), female gender (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.76, p<0.01), atrial fibrillation (RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.30-3.29, p<0.005), chronic kidney disease (RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.04-5.44, p<0.05), heart rate (RR per 1/min 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, p<0.005), glucose levels (RR 1.012, 95% CI 1.006-1.018, p<0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (RR 0.976, 95% CI 0.960-0.993, p<0.005) and LVH defined according to the Cornell voltage-duration product criteria (RR 2.08, 95% CI 1.12-3.86, p<0.05). Independent predictors of dependency at discharge were age (RR per year 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.13, p<0.001), past smoking (RR versus no smoking 0.42, 95% 0.19-0.89, p<0.05), history of ischemic stroke (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.23-3.71, p<0.01) and NIHSS at admission (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.35-1.63, p<0.001). Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were glucose levels (RR 1.014, 95% CI 1.003-1.025, p<0.05), NIHSS at admission (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.19-1.41, p<0.001) and LVH according to the Cornell voltage-duration product criteria (RR 4.95, 95% CI 1.09-22.37, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LVH according to the Cornell voltage-duration product criteria appears to be associated with more severe stroke and with higher in-hospital mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Effect of antihypertensive treatment on the long-term outcome of patients discharged after acute ischemic stroke.

We aimed to evaluate the effects of the five main classes of antihypertensive agents on the long-term outcome of 313 consecutive patients discharged after acute ischemic stroke (36.4% males, age 78.5 ± 6.3 years). One year after discharge, the functional status [evaluated with the modified Rankin scale (mRS)], the occurrence of cardiovascular events, and vital status were recorded. Patients prescribed angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) had lower mRS than patients not prescribed ARBs (1.7 ± 2.0 vs. 2.9 ± 2.5, respectively; p = 0.006). The rates of adverse outcome (mRS 2-6) and cardiovascular events did not differ between patients prescribed each one of the major classes of antihypertensive agents and those not prescribed the respective class. Patients who were prescribed ARBs had lower risk of death during follow-up than patients who did not receive ARBs (9.4 and 26.9%, respectively; p < 0.05). In binary logistic regression analysis, the only independent predictor of all-cause mortality during follow-up was the mRS at discharge (relative risk 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.25-2.28; p < 0.001). In conclusion, in patients discharged after acute ischemic stroke, administration of ARBs appears to have a more beneficial effect on long-term functional outcome and all-cause mortality than treatment with other classes of antihypertensive agents.

Stress hyperglycemia and acute ischemic stroke in-hospital outcome.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Stress hyperglycemia is frequent in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, it is unclear whether stress hyperglycemia only reflects stroke severity or if it is directly associated with adverse outcome. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of stress hyperglycemia in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: We prospectively studied 790 consecutive patients who were admitted with acute ischemic stroke (41.0% males, age 79.4±6.8years). The severity of stroke was assessed at admission with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Stress hyperglycemia was defined as fasting serum glucose levels at the second day after admission ≥126mg/dl in patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The outcome was assessed with adverse outcome rates at discharge (modified Rankin scale between 2 and 6) and with in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: In the total study population, 8.6% had stress hyperglycemia. Patients with stress hyperglycemia had more severe stroke. Independent predictors of adverse outcome at discharge were age, prior ischemic stroke and NIHSS at admission whereas treatment with statins prior to stroke was associated with favorable outcome. When the NIHSS was removed from the multivariate model, independent predictors of adverse outcome were age, heart rate at admission, prior ischemic stroke, log-triglyceride (TG) levels and stress hyperglycemia, whereas treatment with statins prior to stroke was associated with favorable outcome. Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were atrial fibrillation (AF), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), serum log-TG levels and NIHSS at admission. When the NIHSS was removed from the multivariate model, independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were age, AF, DBP, log-TG levels and stress hyperglycemia. CONCLUSION: Stress hyperglycemia does not appear to be directly associated with the outcome of acute ischemic stroke. However, given that patients with stress hyperglycemia had higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors than patients with normoglycemia and that glucose tolerance was not evaluated, more studies are needed to validate our findings.

Prognostic significance of major lipids in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Although dyslipidemia increases the risk for ischemic stroke, previous studies reported conflicting data regarding the association between lipid levels and stroke severity and outcome. To evaluate the predictive value of major lipids in patients with acute ischemic stroke. We prospectively studied 790 consecutive patients who were admitted with acute ischemic stroke (41.0 % males, age 79.4 ± 6.8 years). The severity of stroke was assessed at admission with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Moderate/severe stroke was defined as NIHSS ≥5. The outcome was assessed with dependency rates at discharge (modified Rankin scale between 2 and 5) and with in-hospital mortality. Independent predictors of moderate/severe stroke were age (relative risk (RR) 1.05, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.08, p < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (RR 1.71, 95 % CI 1.19-2.47, p < 0.005), heart rate (RR 1.02, 95 % CI 1.01-1.04, p < 0.001), log-triglyceride (TG) levels (RR 0.24, 95 % CI 0.08-0.68, p < 0.01) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (RR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.95-0.98, p < 0.001). Major lipids did not predict dependency at discharge. Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were atrial fibrillation (RR 2.35, 95 % CI 1.09-5.04, p < 0.05), diastolic blood pressure (RR 1.05, 95 % CI 1.02-1.08, p < 0.001), log-TG levels (RR 0.09, 95 % CI 0.01-0.87, p < 0.05) and NIHSS at admission (RR 1.19, 95 % CI 1.14-1.24, p < 0.001). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were not associated with stroke severity or outcome. Lower TG and HDL-C levels are associated with more severe stroke. Lower TG levels also appear to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Treatment with Clopidogrel Prior to Acute Non-Cardioembolic Ischemic Stroke Attenuates Stroke Severity.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel reduces the risk of non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke, but it is unclear whether it affects the severity and outcome of stroke. We aimed at evaluating the effect of prior treatment with clopidogrel on acute non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke severity and in-hospital outcome. METHODS: We prospectively studied 608 consecutive patients (39.5% males, age 79.1 ± 6.6 years) who were admitted with acute ischemic stroke. The severity of stroke was assessed at admission with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Severe stroke was defined as NIHSS ≥21. The outcome was assessed using the dependency rates that prevailed at the time of discharge (i.e. modified Rankin scale between 2 and 5) and with in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: At admission, 397 patients did not have atrial fibrillation or heart valve disease. Among these 397 patients, 69 were receiving monotherapy with clopidogrel prior to stroke, 69 were receiving monotherapy with aspirin and 236 patients were not on any antiplatelet treatment. The prevalence of severe stroke was lower in patients who were receiving clopidogrel than in patients who were receiving aspirin and patients who were not on antiplatelets (1.4, 13.0 and 11.0%, respectively; p < 0.05). Independent predictors of severe stroke at admission were male gender (relative risk (RR) 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.78, p < 0.05) and treatment with clopidogrel prior to stroke compared with no antiplatelet treatment (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.97, p < 0.05). Treatment with aspirin prior to stroke did not predict severe stroke compared with no antiplatelet treatment (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.51-2.98, p = NS). The rate of dependency at discharge did not differ between patients who were receiving clopidogrel, patients who were receiving aspirin and those who were not on antiplatelets (57.9, 47.8 and 59.7%, respectively; p = NS). Independent predictors of dependency at discharge were age (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.19, p < 0.001) and NIHSS at admission (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.46-1.92, p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality rate also did not differ between patients who were receiving clopidogrel, patients who were receiving aspirin and those who were not on antiplatelets (4.3, 4.3 and 5.0%, respectively; p = NS). The only independent predictor of in-hospital mortality was NIHSS at admission (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.14-1.30, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with clopidogrel prior to acute non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke attenuates the severity of stroke at admission but does not appear to affect the functional outcome at discharge or the in-hospital mortality of these patients.

Acenocoumarol vs. low-dose dabigatran in real-world patients discharged after ischemic stroke.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of dabigatran 110 mg twice daily and acenocoumarol in patients with atrial fibrillation discharged after ischemic stroke. We prospectively studied 436 consecutive patients who were discharged after acute ischemic stroke (39.2% males, age 78.6 ±â€Š6.7 years). Approximately 1 year after discharge, the functional status was assessed with the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Adverse outcome was defined as mRS between 2 and 6. The occurrence of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction (MI) and death during the 1-year follow-up was also recorded. At discharge, 142 patients had atrial fibrillation. Acenocoumarol and dabigatran 110 mg twice daily were prescribed to 52.1 and 6.3% of these patients, respectively. At 1 year after discharge, there was a trend for patients treated with acenocoumarol to have lower mRS than patients prescribed dabigatran (2.3 ±â€Š2.4 and 4.1 ±â€Š2.2, respectively; P = 0.060). Adverse outcome rates and the incidence of stroke during follow-up did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of MI was almost three times higher in patients prescribed dabigatran than in those prescribed acenocoumarol, but this difference did not reach significance (11.1 and 4.0%, respectively; P = 0.254). The incidence of cardiovascular death was also almost three times higher in the former, but again this difference was not significant (33.3 and 12.2%, respectively; P = 0.237). In real-world patients with acute ischemic stroke, dabigatran 110 mg twice daily is as effective as acenocoumarol in preventing stroke but appears to be associated with worse long-term functional outcome and higher incidence of MI.

No Association Observed Between Blood Pressure Variability During the Acute Phase of Ischemic Stroke and In-Hospital Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that blood pressure (BP) variability confers increased cardiovascular risk independently of BP. We aimed to evaluate the association between BP variability during the acute phase of ischemic stroke and the in-hospital outcome. METHODS: We prospectively studied 608 consecutive patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke (39.5% males, age: 79.1±6.6 years). Variability in BP was assessed with the SD and with the coefficient of variation of systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) during the first 2 and the first 3 days of hospitalization. The outcome was assessed with dependency rates at discharge and with in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Patients who were dependent at discharge did not differ from patients who were independent in any index of BP variability. Independent predictors of dependency at discharge were age (relative risk (RR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.25, P < 0.001), history of prior ischemic stroke (RR 2.08, 95% CI 1.02-4.24, P = 0.04), and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.44-1.86, P < 0.001). Patients who died during hospitalization did not differ in any index of BP variability from patients who were discharged. DBP at admission was independently and directly associated with in-hospital mortality (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.09, P < 0.001). Other independent predictors of in-hospital mortality were history of atrial fibrillation (RR 3.30, 95% CI 1.46-7.49, P = 0.004) and NIHSS at admission (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.13-1.23, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not support the hypothesis of an association between BP variability and in-hospital outcomes among patients admitted for ischemic stroke.

Comparative effects of more versus less aggressive treatment with statins on the long-term outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There are no studies that compared the effects of different intensities of statin treatment on the long-term outcome of patients with recent ischemic stroke. We aimed to evaluate these effects. METHODS: We prospectively studied 436 consecutive patients who were discharged after acute ischemic stroke (39.2% males, age 78.6 ± 6.7 years). Statin treatment was categorized in equipotent doses of atorvastatin. One year after discharge, the functional status was assessed with the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Adverse outcome was defined as mRS between 2 and 6. The occurrence of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction and death was recorded. RESULT: Adverse outcome rates were lower in patients treated with atorvastatin 20 mg/day or more potent doses of statins than in patients treated with atorvastatin 10 mg/day (63.5, 38.2 and 48.2%, respectively; p = 0.004). In binary logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of adverse outcome were the mRS at discharge (relative risk (RR) 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.77-3.07, p < 0.001) whereas more aggressive treatment with statins independently predicted favorable outcome (atorvastatin 20 vs. 10 mg/day, RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.87, p = 0.026; atorvastatin 40 mg/day or more potent dose of statins vs. atorvastatin 10 mg/day, RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.62-4.44, p = NS). The incidence of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality showed a trend for being lower in patients treated with atorvastatin 40-80 mg/day or rosuvastatin 10-40 mg/day than in those treated with less potent doses of statins. CONCLUSION: More aggressive statin treatment improves the long-term functional outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke more than less aggressive treatment.