Postoperative urinary retention after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: influence of peri-operative factors and trial of void protocol.

PURPOSE: Transient postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is common after pelvic floor surgery. We aimed to determine the association between peri-operative variables and POUR and to determine the number of voids required for post-void residuals (PVRs) to normalize postoperatively. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 992 patients undergoing pelvic floor surgery at a tertiary referral centre from January 2015 to October 2017. Variables assessed included: age, BMI, ASA score, anaesthesia type, type of surgery, length of postoperative stay, surgeon, bladder protocol used, and number of PVRs required to "pass" the protocol. RESULTS: Significant risk factors for POUR included: placement of MUS during POP surgery, anterior repair and hysterectomy with concomitant sacrospinous vault suspension. A total of 25.1% were discharged requiring catheterization. Patients receiving a concomitant mid-urethral sling (MUS) were 2.2 (95% CI1.6-2.9) and 2.3 (95% CI 1.8-3.1) times more likely to have elevated PVR after their second TOV and third TOV (p < 0.0001), respectively, compared with those without concomitant MUS. Permitting a third TOV allowed an additional 10% of women to pass the voiding protocol before discharge. The median number of voids to pass protocol was 2. An ASA > 2 and placement of MUS were associated with increasing number of voids needed to pass protocol. CONCLUSIONS: While many women passed protocol by the second void, using the 3rd void as a cut point to determine success would result in fewer women requiring catheterization after discharge. Prior to pelvic floor surgery, women should be counselled regarding POUR probability to allow for management of postoperative expectations.

The Role of Interventional Radiology in the Management of Obstetric and Gynaecological Haemorrhage

Aim We will review our experience of emergent arterial embolization used to treat haemodynamically unstable patients with obstetric and gynaecological haemorrhage. Methods This is a retrospective study of patients with haemodynamically unstable obstetric and gynaecological haemorrhage treated with emergent arterial embolization from 2010 to 2015. Results 22 patients (average age 41 (SD +/-9) years) had emergent arterial embolization. 63% had post-partum haemorrhage (PPH). 82% of cases were performed with conscious sedation and local anaesthesia. Embolization was technically successful in all cases. Embolization was clinically successful in 95% (21/22). In one case of PPH the patient represented six days later with recurrent bleeding and was treated with surgical suturing of the cervix. There were no complications or deaths. Conclusion Arterial embolization is a highly successful treatment of obstetric and gynaecological haemorrhage in unstable patients.