RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the profile of the informal primary caregiver (IPC) of adult patients with type2 diabetes (T2D) and the possible factors associated with caregiver collapse (CC). DESIGN: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional and analytical study. SITE: Ambulatory Care Medical Unit. PARTICIPANTS: Mexican CPIs of adult patients with T2D. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Data were collected through a prolective design using the Zarit scale and a structured survey on sociodemographic factors. A descriptive statistical analysis and univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were performed. RESULTS: The CPI profile is assumed by: women, people aged 36-58, daughters, people with a secondary and high school educational level, married, Catholic, with income <8,900 Mexican pesos, own home, inhabited by a maximum of 5 inhabitants, with support networks, who have dedicated >5years to the care of their patient, without training and with chronic diseases. The risk factors that increase the risk of CC are: being a woman (OR=11.03; 95%CI: 1.49-81.95), having a history of more than 5years of having assumed the role of caregiver (OR=2, 65; 95%CI: 1.07-6.55), living in one's own house (OR=3.03; 95%CI: 1.04-8.82), with 6 or more inhabitants (OR=2.41; 95%CI: 1.08-5.38). The support of other family members and/or friends was associated as a protective factor (OR=0.15; 95%CI: 0.07-0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Prevention programs are required to avoid CC and complications, as well as interventions to improve the quality of life of the CPI and patients in care, incorporating strategies to generate and/or increase their family and social support networks.
RESUMO
Introducción: La evaluación del paciente con dolor abdominal agudo no traumático es un reto diagnóstico. El uso de pruebas de laboratorio y gabinete son herramientas útiles que nos permiten obtener información complementaria sobre cada paciente y con ello confirmar o descartar un diagnóstico y determinar su plan de acción. Objetivo: Estimar la frecuencia de uso de en el servicio de urgencias del Hospital General Regional No.72 en pacientes con dolor abdominal no traumático. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo, observacional, transversal y descriptivo donde se revisaron 126 expedientes clínicos de pacientes ≥20 años, que acudieron a urgencias por, los cuales contaban con una estancia de al menos 8 h y a quienes se practicó alguna; se excluyeron expedientes clínicos de mujeres embarazadas. Los datos se analizaron con estadística descriptiva. Resultados: Se realizaron 827 pruebas a 126 pacientes. Los principales estudios utilizados fueron: biometría hemática (99,2 %), glucosa, urea, creatinina, electrólitos y tiempos de coagulación (en el 100 % de los pacientes). Los estudios de gabinete más utilizados fueron: ultrasonido (31,7 %) y tomografía abdominal (11,9 %). Las cinco patologías más prevalentes fueron: colecistitis, infección urinaria, gastroenteritis, enfermedad ácido péptica y pancreatitis. Conclusiones: El dolor abdominal es una patología de etiología multivariada, por lo que su estudio adecuado es esencial para el manejo de las personas y la implementación de un sistema de gestión de calidad centrado en el paciente.
Introduction: The evaluation of the patient with non-traumatic acute abdominal pain is a diagnostic challenge. The use of laboratory and cabinet tests are useful tools allowing to obtain complementary information about each patient and thereby confirm or rule out a diagnosis and determine its action plan. Objective: To estimate the frequency of use of laboratory and cabinet tests in the emergency department at the Regional General Hospital No.72, in patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain from August to September 2017. Methods: A retrospective, observational, cross-sectional and descriptive study was carried out. One hundred twenty six (126) clinical records of patients ≥20 years old were reviewed, these subjects attended the emergency room for non-traumatic acute abdominal pain, and had a stay of at least 8 hours. They underwent some laboratory and cabinet tests. Clinical records of pregnant women were excluded. The data was analyzed with descriptive statistics. Results: Eight hundred twenty seven (827) tests were performed on 126 patients. The main studies used were blood count (99.2%), glucose, urea, creatinine, electrolytes and coagulation times (in 100% of patients). The most used cabinet studies were ultrasound (31.7%) and abdominal tomography (11.9%). The five most prevalent pathologies were cholecystitis, urinary infection, gastroenteritis, acid peptic disease and pancreatitis. Conclusions: Abdominal pain is a pathology of multivariate etiology, so adequate study is essential for the management of people and the implementation of a quality management system focused on the patient.
