Inpatient Teleneurology Follow-up Has Comparable Outcomes to In-Person Neurology Follow-up.

Background and Objectives: Community emergency departments often transfer patients for lack of neurology coverage, potentially burdening patients and accepting facilities. Telestroke improves access to acute stroke care, but there is a lack of data on inpatient teleneurology and telestroke care. Methods: From our prospective telestroke registry, we retrospectively reviewed 3702 consecutive patients who were seen via telestroke between September 2015 and December 2018. Patients who required transfer after initial telestroke evaluation or who were kept at hospitals without consistent neurology coverage were excluded from analysis. We compared baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and hospital outcomes in patients who were subsequently followed remotely by a teleneurology neurohospitalist and those followed in person by a neurohospitalist. Results: There were 447 (23%) patients followed by a teleneurology neurohospitalist and 1459 (77%) patients followed in person by a neurohospitalist. Both groups presented with similar stroke severity. In multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in discharge disposition, stroke readmission rates, or 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores. Length of stay was shorter with teleneurology follow-up. In the subgroup of patients who received tissue plasminogen activator, patients showed no differences in outcomes and had similar complication rates. Teleneurology follow-up resulted in a 3% transfer rate for higher level of care after admission. There remained no difference in outcomes in a subanalysis without Comprehensive Stroke Centers. A higher proportion of non-Hispanic Black patients and a lower proportion of Hispanic patients in the teleneurology follow-up group were possibly due to spoke location demographics. Discussion: Teleneurology follow-up resulted in comparable outcomes to in-person neurology follow-up, with few transfers after admission. For select neurology and ischemic stroke patients, teleneurology follow-up provides an alternative to transfer for hospitals lacking neurology coverage.

Non-contrast head CT-based thrombolysis for wake-up/unknown onset stroke is safe: A single-center study and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that tPA can be safely administered past the standard 4.5 h window with good outcomes when selected with multi-model imaging, which is often lacking outside of comprehensive stroke centers. AIM: We aim to analyze the safety and outcomes of wake up/unknown onset (WUS/UNK) patients treated based on non-contrast head CT (NCCT) at our institution and in the literature. METHODS: Suspected stroke patients from January 2015 to December 2018 receiving tPA within 4.5 h (standard window-SW) and with WUS/UNK based on NCCT and clinical-imaging mismatch were identified. We compared baseline characteristics, tPA metrics, and outcome data, with primary outcome as symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). A meta-analysis was performed evaluating NCCT-based treatment of WUS/UNK patients. RESULTS: Of 1827 patients treated at our hub or through telestroke, 93 underwent WUS/UNK-based treatment. There was no statistical difference in sICH between WUS/UNK and SW: 1% vs. 4% (OR 0.3; 95% confidence interval 0.0-1.9). 90-day modified Rankin scale outcomes were similar between SW and WUS/UNK-treated patients. Seven studies encompassing 485 WUS/UNK patients were included in a pooled analysis with a 2.1% incidence of sICH. In our meta-analysis, three studies compared NCCT-based treated WUS/UNK patients with SW patients with no difference in rate of hemorrhage: 2.1% vs 3.4% (OR 1.01; 95% confidence interval 0.45-2.28). INTERPRETATION: Our single-center analysis and meta-analysis suggest that tPA can be safely administered based on NCCT with comparable rates of sICH for select WUS/UNK stroke patients.

Variability and Delay in Telestroke Physician Alert among Spokes in a Telestroke Network: A Need for Metric Benchmarks.

INTRODUCTION: Telestroke has increased access to acute management of ischemic stroke in areas that lack stroke care expertise, yet delays persist in evaluation and treatment. We describe variation in time to alert a telestroke physician of suspected acute ischemic stroke patients potentially eligible for acute stroke therapies among community hospitals in our telestroke network, and explore demographic and spoke-related characteristics associated with delays. METHODS: From our telestroke registry, we identified suspected acute ischemic stroke patients who arrived within 6 hours of symptom onset and underwent video consultation at 1 of 17 community hospitals in our hub-and-spoke network. We compared time between patient arrival to telestroke alert (door-to-page-time) and to tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administration for eligible patients (door-to-needle-time). We identified factors associated with prolonged metrics. RESULTS: Of 1020 cases between 9/2015 and 3/2017, 47% received tPA. Sixty percent had door-to-page-time more than 15 minutes (median 19.5; IQR, 11-34). Door-to-page-time more than 15 minutes was associated with an 8-fold increase in likelihood of door-to-needle-time more than 60 minutes. Patients with severe stroke experienced faster door-to-page-times. Hospitals with more beds had prolonged door-to-page-time. Full time in-house neurology presence, even when not covering emergent consultations, was associated with faster door-to-page-time over telestroke. Seventy-one percent of patients underwent CT brain prior to the telestroke physician alert; this scenario delayed door-to-page and door-to-needle times. CONCLUSIONS: Door-to-page-time varied considerably among spokes. Awaiting CT scan prior to alerting the telestroke consultant of a stroke code delayed metrics. Telestroke physician alert standards are needed, as are educational initiatives on acute ischemic stroke management and workflow.

Benchmarking Telestroke Proficiency: Page-to-Needle Time Among Neurovascular Fellows and Attendings.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Formal telestroke training for neurovascular fellows (NVFs) is necessary because of growing use of telestroke technologies in the management of acute ischemic stroke; yet, educational approaches and training benchmarks are not formalized. Time between telestroke consultant page and tissue-type plasminogen activator administration (page-to-needle time, PTNT) can provide an objective measure of proficiency. We compared PTNT between NVFs and neurovascular attendings (NVAs) and evaluated changes in PTNT with experience. METHODS: We identified suspected acute ischemic stroke patients in our telestroke registry from July 2013 to December 2015 who received tissue-type plasminogen activator. Using multivariable quantile regression, we estimated the difference and 95% confidence interval in median PTNT between NVFs and NVAs. We also report the coefficient of change in PTNT over increasing number of telestroke consults. RESULTS: NVFs evaluated 53.7% of 618 tissue-type plasminogen activator cases over telestroke. NVAs had significantly shorter PTNT compared with NVFs, with a difference in median PTNT of -9 minutes (95% confidence interval, -12.3 to -5.7). This difference persisted when adjusted for relative tissue-type plasminogen activator contraindications. For each additional telestroke consult, PTNT decreased by 0.07 minutes for NVFs or NVAs (P=0.02 and <0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PTNT improves by ≈1 minute for every 14 consults for both NVFs and NVAs. Our findings support the importance of integrating telestroke training into supervised neurovascular fellowships to increase proficiency prior to independent practice and suggest that PTNT can be a benchmark for tracking proficiency.