Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Orthop ; 95: 166-173, 2024 Apr 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38595072

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Revisions due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are underestimated in national arthroplasty registries. Our primary objective was to assess the validity in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register (DKR) of revisions performed due to PJI against the Healthcare-Associated Infections Database (HAIBA). The secondary aim was to describe the cumulative incidences of revision due to PJI within 1 year of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) according to the DKR, HAIBA, and DKR/HAIBA combined. METHODS: This longitudinal observational cohort study included 56,305 primary TKAs (2010-2018), reported in both the DKR and HAIBA. In the DKR, revision performed due to PJI was based on pre- and intraoperative assessment disclosed by the surgeon immediately after surgery. In HAIBA, PJI was identified from knee-related revision procedures coinciding with 2 biopsies with identical microbiological pathogens. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of revision due to PJI in the DKR (vs. HAIBA, within 1 year of TKA) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Cumulative incidences were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The DKR's sensitivity for PJI revision was 58% (CI 53-62) and varied by TKA year (41%-68%) and prosthetic type (31% for monoblock; 63% for modular). The specificity was 99.8% (CI 99.7-99.8), PPV 64% (CI 62-72), and NPV 99.6% (CI 99.6-99.7). 80% of PJI cases not captured by the DKR were caused by non-reporting rather than misclassification. 33% of PJI cases in the DKR or HAIBA were culture-negative. Considering potential misclassifications, the best-case sensitivity was 64%. The cumulative incidences of PJI were 0.8% in the DKR, 0.9% in HAIBA, and 1.1% when combining data. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of revision due to PJI in the DKR was 58%. The cumulative incidence of PJI within 1 year after TKA was highest (1.1%) when combining the DKR and HAIBA, showing that incorporating microbiology data into arthroplasty registries can enhance PJI validity.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Incidência , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Sistema de Registros , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Reoperação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Acta Orthop ; 94: 616-624, 2023 Dec 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38153296

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We aimed to examine the temporal trends in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) revision incidence after knee arthroplasty (KA) from 1997 through 2019. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 115,120 primary KA cases from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register were followed until the first PJI revision. We computed cumulative incidences and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of PJI revision by calendar periods and several patient- and surgical-related risk factors. Results were analyzed from 0-3 months and from 3-12 months after KA. RESULTS: The overall 1-year PJI revision incidence was 0.7%, increasing from 0.5% to 0.7% (1997 through 2019). The incidence of PJI revision within 3 months increased from 0.1% to 0.5% (1997 through 2019). The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) within 1 year of primary KA was 5.1 comparing 2017-2019 with 2001-2004. The PJI revision incidence from 3-12 months of KA decreased from 0.4% to 0.2%, with an aHR of 0.5 for 2017-2019 vs. 2001-2004. Male sex, age 75-84 (vs. 65-74), and extreme obesity (vs. normal weight) were positively associated with the risk of PJI revision within 3 months, whereas only male sex was associated from 3-12 months. Partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) vs. total KA was associated with a lower risk of PJI revision both within 3 months and 3-12 months of KA. CONCLUSION: We observed an increase in PJI revision within 3 months of KA, and a decrease in PJI revision incidence from 3-12 months from 1997 through 2019. The reasons for this observed time-trend are thought to be multifactorial. PKA was associated with a lower risk of PJI revision.


Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Artroplastia do Joelho , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Incidência , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Artrite Infecciosa/etiologia , Artrite Infecciosa/cirurgia , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 77: 102114, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35121405

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION/AIM: The epidemiology, demographic, clinical, treatment, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) characteristics of desmoid tumor (DT) patients treated at two sarcoma centers in Denmark is described. METHODS: Using Danish health registers, we studied DT patients treated at two sarcoma centers between 2009 and 2018. For each patient, ten persons from the general population were randomly matched on birth year, sex, and region of residence. RESULTS: Of the 179 DT patients identified, 76% were female and the median patient age was 38 years at diagnosis (interquartile range: 31-50). An average annual incidence of DTs over the study period was 3.2 per 1000,000 individuals with the observed annual incidence of DTs ranging from 2.2 (2011) to 4.3 (2017) per 1000,000 individuals. No notable linear time trend in incidence was observed. Anatomical DT sites included extra-abdominal (49%), abdominal wall (40%), and intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal areas (8%). In total, 56% of patients were initially treated surgically. However, while 75% of patients diagnosed with DT between 2009 and 2014 were initially treated surgically, this was true for only 32% of patients diagnosed with DT between 2015 and 2018. A total of 56% of DT patients used chemotherapeutic agents, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, NSAIDs, opioids, antidepressants, or steroids at some point during the three years before their DT diagnoses. In contrast, 70% of surgically treated and 63% of non-surgically treated patients used one of these drugs in the subsequent three years, including NSAIDs (45% surgical vs. 33% non-surgical), opioids (39% surgical vs. 27% non-surgical), and steroids (22% surgical vs. 18% non-surgical). The average number of inpatient and outpatient visits, days of hospitalization, and additional surgical procedures were higher among DT patients than the comparison cohort. CONCLUSION: DTs are rare but have a large impact on patients' health, HRU, and medication utilization.


Assuntos
Fibromatose Agressiva , Sarcoma , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Fibromatose Agressiva/diagnóstico , Fibromatose Agressiva/epidemiologia , Fibromatose Agressiva/terapia , Humanos , Masculino
4.
Injury ; 49 Suppl 1: S66-S71, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29929697

RESUMO

The aim for this review is to present general considerations in relation to malalignment after osteosynthesis with plate fixation and its consequences after fractures in adults in each of the following anatomical locations: humerus, forearm, femur, tibia. Recommendations for accepted malalignment in humerus diaphyseal fracture is varus <20 degrees, valgus <15 degrees, sagittal deformity <5 degrees and rotation <30 degrees. Recommendations when treating fractures of the forearm is anatomical reduction. Varus of ulna leads to loss of pronation. Valgus of ulna leads to loss of both pronation and supination. Recommendations for acceptable malalignment in femoral fractures is rotational deformity <15 degrees, increasing varus deformity in intertrochanteric fractures increases load on implant. Cortical-step-sign, profile of lesser trochanter, evaluation of ipsilateral neck anteversion are intraoperative methods to avoid rotational malalignment. Recommendations for accepted malalignment in the tibia is shortening <10mm, varus/valgus <5 degrees, sagittal deformity <10 degrees. Fixation of fibula leads to less rotational and valgus malalignment, but not enough to affect union rate of tibia, complications rate or functional score at 12 months. To avoid malalignment in plating, pre-contoured anatomical plates are available from most manufactures. Being aware that most such plates fit a 50-percentile Caucasian population is important in pre-surgical planning. Evaluation of the contralateral bone and the characteristics of the plate may help in planning additional bending of pre-shaped plates and bending tools should always be available when applying a plate, even a so-called anatomical one.


Assuntos
Mau Alinhamento Ósseo/fisiopatologia , Placas Ósseas/efeitos adversos , Fraturas do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas do Úmero/fisiopatologia , Fraturas da Tíbia/fisiopatologia , Densidade Óssea , Mau Alinhamento Ósseo/diagnóstico por imagem , Mau Alinhamento Ósseo/etiologia , Competência Clínica , Fraturas do Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Humanos , Fraturas do Úmero/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Úmero/cirurgia , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia
5.
J Hand Surg Am ; 42(11): 894-903, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28927881

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review the average 4-year outcomes of a cohort of patients with wrist arthritis, treated by a single surgeon with a novel prosthetic hemiarthroplasty of the midcarpal joint. We hypothesized that midcarpal hemiarthroplasty would improve range of motion and grip strength of patients with wrist arthritis, with a complication profile comparable with that of alternative solutions for wrist arthritis. METHODS: We reviewed a series of 20 patients treated with a midcarpal hemiarthroplasty at an average of 4 years following surgery. Patients were evaluated objectively with grip strength, wrist range of motion, serial radiographs, and subjectively surveyed with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Mayo scores. RESULTS: Range of motion increased by a mean 33° in flexion-extension and 10° in radial-ulnar deviation compared with preoperative range of motion. Mean grip strength improved to 20.8 kg from 14.1 kg, and Mayo and DASH scores also significantly improved. Three patients had a manipulation under anesthesia for stiffness. One patient required open reduction internal fixation of an unstable fourth carpometacarpal joint after falling. Two patients were revised to a total wrist arthroplasty and 1 to a wrist fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Midcarpal hemiarthroplasty provides improved wrist range of motion, grip strength, and patient-reported outcome scores compared with preoperative values, with a complication profile comparable with that of other surgical options for patients with wrist arthritis. Advantages of midcarpal arthroplasty include retention of the native distal carpal row, preservation of midcarpal motion, as well as the option for conversion to a total wrist arthroplasty should revision be required. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.


Assuntos
Artrite/cirurgia , Hemiartroplastia/métodos , Prótese Articular , Articulação do Punho/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Artrite/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulações do Carpo/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Força da Mão , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Articulação do Punho/diagnóstico por imagem
6.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 176(39)2014 Sep 22.
Artigo em Dinamarquês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25294326

RESUMO

Correct treatment of traumatic facial lacerations is essential to achieve the best cosmetic and functional outcome. This article discusses wound management, anatomy and techniques to repair lacerations of scalp, eyelid, nose, lip and ear. Scalp lacerations should be sutured in layers. Injury to the eyelid mandates a careful examination of the eye. Accurate adaptation of the lid margin is required. Nasal septum haematoma must be drained and the nares and alar margins aligned. The key to proper repair of lip laceration is alignment of the vermillion border. Injury to the ear can often be closed in one layer.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Faciais/terapia , Orelha/lesões , Pálpebras/lesões , Traumatismos Faciais/patologia , Traumatismos do Nervo Facial/terapia , Humanos , Lacerações/terapia , Lábio/lesões , Lábio/patologia , Lábio/cirurgia , Nariz/lesões , Couro Cabeludo/lesões , Suturas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...