Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus docetaxel versus capecitabine plus docetaxel with planned crossover to the alternate single agent in metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus docetaxel (GD) and capecitabine plus docetaxel (CD) were compared in patients with metastatic breast cancer, where the alternate crossover monotherapy (GD→C or CD→G) was predetermined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to 3-week cycles of either gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 or capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) day 1. Upon progression, patients received crossover monotherapy. Primary end point was time to progression (TtP). Secondary end points evaluated overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Despite over-accrual of 475 patients, the trial matured with only 324 of 385 planned TtP events due to patient discontinuations. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status was not captured in this study. More CD patients (28%) discontinued due to AEs than GD patients (18.0%, P = 0.009). TtP [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.101, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.885-1.370, P = 0.387] and OS (HR = 1.031, 95% CI 0.830-1.280, P = 0.785) were not significantly different comparing GD and CD. ORR was not statistically different (P = 0.239) comparing GD (72 of 207, 34.8%) and CD (78 of 191, 40.8%). TtP, OS, and ORR were not significantly different comparing crossover groups. GD caused greater fatigue, hepatotoxicity, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia but not febrile neutropenia; CD caused more hand-foot syndrome, gastrointestinal toxicity, and mucositis. CONCLUSIONS: GD and CD produced similar efficacy and toxicity profiles consistent with prior clinical experience.

Phase II trial of oxaliplatin, leucovorin and fluorouracil in patients with advanced carcinoma of the esophagus.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced esophagus cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled. Up to one prior chemotherapy regimen was allowed. All patients had bi-dimensionally measurable disease. Patients received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 as a 2-h infusion on day 1. Leucovorin (500 mg/m2) followed by fluorouracil bolus (400 mg/m2) and 22-h continuous infusion fluorouracil (600 mg/m2) was administered on days 1 and 2. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor was not routinely administered unless the patient developed febrile neutropenia or prolonged neutropenia. Treatment was repeated every 14 days. RESULTS: Of the thirty-five patients enrolled, all were evaluated for toxicity and 34 were evaluated for response. The overall response rate was 40% (95% confidence interval, 24% to 57%) with complete and partial response rates of 3% and 37%, respectively. The median response duration was 4.6 months, and the median overall survival was 7.1 months. One-year survival was 31%. The major toxicity noted was cumulative neutropenia, with 29% developing grade 4 toxicity. There was one treatment-related death secondary to neutropenic sepsis. The most common non-hematologic toxicity encountered with this regimen was cumulative peripheral neuropathy, with 26% experiencing grade 2 or 3 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil shows significant anti-tumor activity and a favorable toxicity profile in patients with metastatic carcinoma of the esophagus.

A phase II trial of the epothilone B analog, BMS-247550, in patients with previously treated advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The epothilone B analog, BMS-247550, is a non-taxane microtubulin-stabilizing agent with preclinical activity in taxane-resistant cell lines and phase I activity in colorectal cancer. We conducted a phase II study of single-agent BMS-247550 in advanced colorectal cancer patients who had disease progression following treatment with irinotecan-5-fluorouracil-leucovorin (IFL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were required to have histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer; progressed on or after chemotherapy with IFL; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or =1; peripheral neuropathy grade < or =1; and adequate laboratory parameters. BMS-247550 40 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously over 3 h every 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for response every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled; all were evaluable for toxicity and 23 were evaluable for response. There were no complete or partial responses. Thirteen patients (56%) had stable disease after two cycles of therapy; five patients (20%) received six or more cycles. The median time to progression was 11 weeks; median overall survival was 36 weeks. There was considerable grade 3/4 hematological toxicity, including neutropenia (48%) and leukopenia (36%). Grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities included grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction (12%) and peripheral neuropathy (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent BMS-247550 (40 mg/m(2)) administered every 21 days demonstrated no activity in advanced colorectal cancer. Peripheral neuropathy was treatment-limiting.

Phase I/II investigation of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and carboplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and tolerability of the three-drug combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and carboplatin (TIC) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The specific objectives of the study were: (i) to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum-tolerated dose of ifosfamide administered as part of the combination; and (ii) to determine the overall response rate and overall survival of patients treated with this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated, stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled in one of three cohorts. Patients received paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) as a 1-h infusion on day 1 with carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 6 mg.min/ml on day 2. For dose level I, ifosfamide was administered at a dose of 2 g/m(2) on days 1 and 2. For dose levels II and III, the dose of ifosfamide was decreased to 1.5 g/m(2) on days 1 and 2 and the dose of carboplatin was decreased to AUC 5 mg.ml/min. Therapy for dose levels I and III included filgrastim support (5 micro g/kg/day), which was initiated on day 3 and continued until after day 11 or until an absolute neutrophil count >10 000/ micro l. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days. Once the phase II dose was established, a full cohort of patients received therapy at this dose level to examine further the regimen's activity and tolerability. RESULTS: Neutropenia was the DLT encountered for dose levels I and II. No DLT was encountered in the initial six patients treated at dose level III, and therefore this dose level was declared the recommended phase II dose. A total of 49 patients were treated at the recommended phase II dose. The predominant non-hematological toxicity encountered with this triplet regimen was cumulative peripheral neuropathy. Of the 65 eligible patients enrolled in this study, 17 (26%) responded. There were 15 patients with partial responses (23%), two with regression, and 26 with stabilization of disease (40%). Median progression-free and overall survival were 4.8 and 9.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination TIC is well-tolerated. This triplet regimen produced response and survival rates in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer similar to those of other current combination chemotherapy regimens.

A phase II Hoosier Oncology Group study of vinorelbine and estramustine phosphate in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to evaluate the combined anti-microtubular regimen of vinorelbine and estramustine phosphate (EMP) in hormone refractory prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Weekly vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 (or 15 mg/m2 if a history of prior pelvic radiotherapy) was combined with EMP at 280 mg orally tds for 3 days (the day before, the day of and the day after vinorelbine infusion). After 8 weeks of therapy the combination was given every other week. RESULTS: From February 1998 to February 1999, 23 men were enrolled with a median age of 69 years (range 50-83 years). The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at entry was 160 ng/ml (range 0-802 ng/ml). A median of 13 weeks of therapy was administered and the median follow-up was 14.8 months. Eleven patients (48%) had lower extremity edema requiring diuretic therapy, two (9%) had grade 2 granulocytopenia and four patients [17%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5% to 39%] had a thromboembolic episode. There was no treatment-related mortality. Fifteen of 21 patients (71%; 95% CI 49% to 89%) had at least a 50% decrease in the PSA for at least 2 months with a median time to serologic progression of 3.5 months (range 0.75-10.5 months). One of eight patients (12.5%; 95% CI 0% to 53%) with measurable disease had a confirmed partial response. The estimated median survival was 15.1 months and the actual one year overall survival was 71% (95% CI 51% to 88%). CONCLUSIONS: Weekly vinorelbine with short course oral EMP is an active regimen as evaluated by rate of PSA response, time to progression and median survival. However, the toxicities of EMP, even when given as a short course, are still problematic.

CI-980 in advanced melanoma and hormone refractory prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: CI-980 is a novel chemotherapeutic agent that inhibits polymerization of tubulin. Preclinical studies have indicated a high level activity of this agent against various tumor cell lines. METHODS: 13 malignant melanoma patients who had failed prior chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy and 13 hormone refractory prostate cancer patients, including 4 who had received prior chemotherapy, were treated in 2 separate NCI-supported clinical trials. Subjects received a recommended phase II dose of CI-980 of 4.5 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion for 72 hours every 3 weeks. RESULTS: No activity was seen in either study. Toxicity was tolerable with neutropenia being the most common, significant toxicity. Among the melanoma patients, 15% and 31% developed grade 3 and grade 4 neutropenia, while 7% and 38% of the prostate patients developed grade 3 and grade 4 neutropenia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CI-980 at this dose and schedule is ineffective against malignant melanoma and hormone refractory prostate cancer.

A phase II study of 9-aminocamptothecin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: 9-Aminocamptothecin (9-AC) is a synthetic analogue of camptothecin. Phase I studies, identified the maximum tolerated dose as 1416 micrograms/m2/day x 3 as continuous intravenous infusion (CVI) with dose-limiting neutropenia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with measurable disease. Patients were initially treated at 1416 micrograms/m2/d x 3 by CVI followed by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. This dose was decreased to 1100 micrograms/m2/d after the first 13 patients. Cycles were repeated every 14 days until tumor progression. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were treated, thirteen at 1416 micrograms/m2/d and 45 at 1100 micrograms/m2/d. Fifty percent had adenocarcinoma and 17% squamous cell carcinoma. Seventy-one percent had stage IV disease. Five patients had a partial response (response duration 9-28 weeks) for an overall response rate of 8.6%, (95% confidence intervals (CI): 2.9%-19%). Median time to progression was 2.3 months and the median survival for the entire study population 5.4 months with a one-year survival rate of 30%. The one-year survival rate for 27 patients who received second line chemotherapy was 56.7%. Toxicities at 1416 micrograms/m2/d included grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in six and five of 13 patients, respectively; at 1100 micrograms/m2/d these toxicities were observed in 12 and three of 45 patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: 9-AC has modest single-agent activity in previously untreated NSCLC. Its further evaluation at the dose and schedule employed in this study does not seem indicated. Exploration of more prolonged administration schedules may be warranted.

Phase II trial of uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a University of Chicago phase II consortium study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Uracil and tegafur in a 4:1 molar concentration ratio (UFT; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT) has broad anti-tumor activity for cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract. However, there are no published data regarding the efficacy of leucovorin-modulated UFT in patients with pancreatic cancer. The objective of this trial was to determine the activity and evaluate the toxicity of UFT plus oral calcium leucovorin in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with advanced measurable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were enrolled onto the trial. Patients received 300 mg/m2/d UFT plus 90 mg/d leucovorin administered orally in divided doses every eight hours for 28 days repeated every 35 days. Objective tumor response was evaluated after two courses of therapy. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. No objective responses were seen. The median (range) time to progression and survival were 14 (1.6-37), and 15 (1.9-62) weeks, respectively. Toxicity was mild with severe (grade 3 or 4) hyperbilirubinemia, pain, diarrhea, transaminitis, venous thrombus, weakness, renal failure, confusion, and edema/ascites seen in three (21%), one (7%), two (14%), one (7%), one (7%), one (7%), one (7%), one (7%), and two (14%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the 14 patients evaluable, UFT 300 mg/m2/d plus oral leucovorin 90 mg/d administered for 28 days did not demonstrate anti-tumor activity against advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma; however, this oral regimen was well tolerated and devoid of neutropenia, significant oral mucositis or diarrhea.

Phase II and pharmacodynamic studies of pyrazine diazohydroxide (NSC 361456) in patients with advanced renal and colorectal cancer.

Pyrazine diazohydroxide (PZDH) is a novel antitumor agent that forms DNA adducts via the reactive pyrazine diazonium ion. In a recent Phase I study of PZDH, we identified a recommended Phase II dose of 100 mg/m2/day x 5, given as a 5-min i.v. bolus with the cycles repeated every 42 days (N. J. Vogelzang, et al, Cancer Res., 54: 114-119, 1994). There was a moderate negative correlation between serum chloride concentration and logarithm platelet nadir, suggesting the hypothesis that PZDH is activated in an acidic environment, leading to more toxicity in acidotic patients. Therefore, the University of Chicago Phase II cooperative network conducted two Phase II studies of PZDH in renal cancer (15 patients, 2 with liver metastases) and in 5-fluorouracil-refractory colorectal cancer (14 patients, 13 with liver metastases) to determine efficacy in each disease and to correlate safety and tolerance of the drug with PZDH pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and with arterial blood gas measurements. There were no responses seen in either tumor type. The primary toxicity of PZDH was myelosuppression with neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count, < 1000/microl) and thrombocytopenia (<50,000 cells/microl), seen in 41 and 24% of all cycles, respectively. Other grade 3 and 4 toxicities were rare. Pharmacodynamic analysis revealed no significant correlation between plasma levels at 5, 60, and 120 min; WBCs; absolute neutrophil and platelet count nadirs; and initial serum chloride or blood pH levels. The colorectal patients experienced significantly more thrombocytopenia than did the renal cancer patients (median platelet nadir after cycle 1 was 151 x 10(3)/microl for renal patients versus 76 x 10(3)/microl for colon patients; P = 0.04), suggesting either that prior 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin reduced bone marrow reserve or that colorectal patients with liver metastases experienced more PZDH toxicity. Regression analyses revealed a possible relationship (P = 0.06) between serum pH and thrombocytopenia (i.e., for each increase of 0.03 in pH, there was a 34% increase in the platelet nadir), but there was no relationship between serum chloride and thrombocytopenia. Curiously, an increase in alkaline phosphatase was associated with an increase in the platelet nadir (P = 0.02). If PZDH continues to be developed as an antineoplastic agent, further studies of these relationships are suggested.

Phase II trial of uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

UNLABELLED: Although UFT 300 mg/m2/day and leucovorin 90 mg/day administered orally in divided doses administered every 8 hours for 28 days repeated every 35 days could be administered safely to patients with advanced hepatomas and good performance status, this combination and schedule has limited activity in treating advanced hepatoma. BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil has yielded higher response rates in hepatoma when compared to treatment with 5-fluorouracil as a single agent, although the impact on survival has been negligible. This study was conducted to determine the activity and evaluate the toxicity of uracil and tegafur in a 4:1 molar concentration ratio (UFT; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT) plus oral calcium leucovorin in the treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (hepatoma). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with advanced measurable hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled onto the trial. All patients had a Karnofski performance status > or = 60%, platelet count > or = 75,000/micro L, total bilirubin < or = 2.0 x institutional upper limit of normal but otherwise normal liver and kidney function profile and bidimensionally measurable disease by CT or ultrasound examination. None of these patients received prior cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation therapy for advanced disease. Fourteen patients received 300 mg/m2/d UFT plus 90 mg/d leucovorin administered orally in divided daily doses every 8 hours for 28 days repeated every 35 days. Two patients registered for the trial but did not receive study medication. Objective tumor response, the primary purpose of this trial, was evaluated after two courses of therapy. Other end-points included toxicity, time to progression, and overall survival. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were evaluable for response and toxicity, respectively. No complete or partial responders were observed in this trial. Three patients had stable disease lasting 17 to 22 weeks. Toxicity was mild with severe (grade 3 or 4) liver pain, diarrhea, anorexia/nausea, fatigue, dyspnea, hyperbilirubinemia, anemia, and edema seen in 3 (21%), 2 (14%), 3 (21%), 2 (14%), 1 (7%), 1 (7%), 1 (7%) and 1 (7%) patients, respectively. The most frequent grade I and 2 toxic effects included fever of unknown origin, dyspnea, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. CONCLUSION: UFT 300 mg/m2/d plus oral leucovorin 90 mg/d administered for 28 days did not demonstrate antitumor activity against advanced hepatomas. Further treatment using this regimen is not recommended for this disease.

Phase II trial of 150-minute weekly infusion of gemcitabine in advanced colorectal cancer: minimal activity in colorectal cancer.

Metastatic colorectal cancer is very common in the Western hemisphere and current treatment modalities are not effective. In this study a prolonged (150-minute) infusion of gemcitabine at a constant dose rate of 10 mg/m2/min administered weekly for 3 consecutive weeks repeated every 4 weeks revealed a response rate of 4% (90% CI < 1%-18%). There were no complete responses. Treatment with gemcitabine produced moderate to severe toxicity as grade 3-4 neutropenia requiring dose modification was seen in 40% of patients treated. When used in this dose and schedule, gemcitabine does not appear to be effective for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.