Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Five Year Review.

Ovarian cancer is a malignant disease that affects thousands of patients every year. Currently, we use surgical techniques for early-stage cancer and chemotherapy treatment combinations for advanced stage cancer. Several novel therapies are currently being investigated, with gene therapy and stem cell therapy being the corner stone of this investigation. We conducted a thorough search on PubMed and gathered up-to-date information regarding epithelial ovarian cancer therapies. We present, in the current review, all novel treatments that were investigated in this field over the past five years, with a particular focus on local treatment.

Arterial Stiffness as a Cardiovascular Risk Factor for the Development of Preeclampsia and Pharmacopreventive Options.

Arterial Stiffness (AS) describes the rigidity of the arterial walls. Epidemiological studies have shown that increased AS is an independent predictive marker of Cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality in both pregnant and non-pregnant women. Preeclampsia (PE), a form of pregnancy-induced hypertension, affects approximately 5% of pregnancies worldwide. Preeclamptic women have a higher risk of CV Disease (CVD), mainly because PE damages the heart's ability to relax between contractions. Different pharmacological approaches for the prevention of PE have been tested in clinical trials (e.g., aspirin, enoxaparin, metformin, pravastatin, and sildenafil citrate). In current clinical practice, only low-dose aspirin is used for PE pharmacoprevention. However, low-dose aspirin does not prevent term PE, which is the most common form of PE. Compromised vascular integrity precedes the onset of PE and therefore, AS assessment may constitute a promising predictive marker of PE. Several non-invasive techniques have been developed to assess AS. Compared with normotensive pregnancies, both Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (cfPWV) and Augmentation Index (AIx) are increased in PE. In view of simplicity, reliability, and reproducibility, there is an interest in oscillometric AS measurements in pregnancies complicated by PE.

Augmentation index and pulse wave velocity in normotensive versus preeclamptic pregnancies: a prospective case-control study using a new oscillometric method.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate whether oscillometric AS measurements are different in pregnant women with and without preeclampsia (PE). STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective case-control study in singleton pregnancies that had been diagnosed with PE (n = 46) versus normotensive controls (n = 46) between 2014 and 2019. In the case group, pregnancies complicated by PE were classified as either early-onset (<34 weeks of gestation) or late-onset (≥34 weeks of gestation) PE and subgroup analysis was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index (Alx), and Alx at a heart rate of 75 beats per minute (Alx-75) were measured using a brachial cuff-based automatic oscillometric device (Mobil-O-Graph 24 h PWA). RESULTS: In pregnancies complicated by PE, in comparison with normotensive pregnancies, there were significant differences in PWV (p ˂ .001), and Alx-75 (p ˂ .001). In pregnancies complicated by early-onset PE, in comparison with pregnancies complicated by late-onset PE, there were significant differences in PWV (p = .006), and Alx-75 (p = .009). There was no significant difference in Alx in either of the analyses. CONCLUSIONS: PWV and Alx-75 are higher in pregnancies complicated by PE, in comparison with normotensive pregnancies, as well as in early-onset PE, in comparison with late-onset PE.Key messagesPulse wave velocity is higher in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia.Augmentation index at a heart rate of 75 beats per minute is higher in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia.Arterial stiffness assessment is a promising risk-stratification tool for future cardiovascular complications but further studies are required.

Functional and Reproductive Outcomes Following Surgical Management of Congenital Anomalies of the Cervix: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate surgical treatment for malformations of the cervix in terms of short- and long-term postoperative function and relevant reproductive outcomes. DATA SOURCES: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID No CRD42019128899). Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies up to October 2019 on Medline/PubMed (1966-2019), Scopus/Elsevier (1950-2019), and Google Scholar (up to 2019). Search terms included "congenital cervical malformations/anomalies," "uterocervical aplasia/dysgenesis/agenesis," "cervical aplasia/dysgenesis/ agenesis," "müllerian anomalies/dysgenesis/agenesis," "utero-vaginal anastomosis," "cervical reconstruction," "uterocervical reconstruction/canalization," "cervical canalization," "reproductive/pregnancy/functional outcome," "menstruation," "pregnancy," and "regular periods." METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Studies were chosen and included with clear description of preoperative diagnosis via sonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and surgical confirmation; assessment and clear description of gynecologic anatomy and any concomitant anomalies; meticulous description of the operative technique; follow-up of at least 6 weeks postoperatively; and postoperative end points including menstrual and reproductive outcomes. We included randomized controlled trials, case-control studies (both prospective and retrospective), and case reports. Data registries, studies without clearly described primary or secondary outcomes, and studies not in the English language were excluded from the analyses. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The literature search returned 745 studies; 546 records were initially excluded (397 not related to the topic, 15 not related to humans, 134 non-English language); 111 full-text articles were further excluded (patients underwent hysterectomy or no surgery); 88 studies with a total of 249 patients were suitable for analysis. Almost all patients had preoperative amenorrhea (248/249, 99.6%). Postoperatively, of 249 patients, resolution of menstruation occurred in 228 patients (91.6%), and hysterectomy was performed in 22 patients (8.8%); overall, there were 30 (12.0%) conceptions that resulted in 27 (10.8%) viable and 24 (9.6%) term pregnancies. Indications for hysterectomy were stenosis of the genital tract and sepsis. Coexisting vaginal agenesis and use of full thickness skin graft for creation of neocervix was associated with negative surgical outcomes. CONCLUSION: This review suggests that conservative surgical approaches result in better clinical and reproductive outcomes than more aggressive reconstructive surgeries for patients with malformations of the cervix.

The Outcome of Fertility-Sparing and Nonfertility-Sparing Surgery for the Treatment of Adenomyosis. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the operative issues and specific dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia outcomes in women who had undergone fertility-sparing surgery, as well as determine the expected outcome for extirpative surgery. DATA SOURCES: PROSPERO (ID no. 125692). Search was conducted for eligible studies up to March 31, 2019, on MEDLINE/PubMed (1966-2019), Scopus/Elsevier (1950-2019), and Google Scholar (up to 2019). The search terms applied for the search strategy were as follows: adenomyosis, adenomyomas, uterus-sparing surgery, fertility-sparing surgery, pain, dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, uterine volume, adenomyotic volume, case-control studies, cohort studies, and prospective studies. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: A total of 443 studies were initially identified. Exclusion criteria was as follows: (1) inadequate description of preoperative adenomyosis or absence of postoperative histology confirmation of adenomyosis, (2) no statement of use of a standardized instrument for measurement of pain, bleeding, or adenomyotic/uterine volume, (3) follow-up <12 months postoperatively, (4) study population <20 women, and (5) non-English language. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Nineteen studies with a total of 1843 patients with adenomyosis were included. Twelve studies were further analyzed in the meta-analysis. Complete excision of adenomyosis was associated with improvement in pain, menorrhagia, and reduction of uterine volume by a factor of 6.2, 3.9, and 2.3, respectively; the partial excision of adenomyosis was associated with improvement in pain, menorrhagia, and reduction of uterine volume by a factor of 5.9, 3.0, and 2.9, respectively; the studies with a mixed volume of patients with complete and partial excision of adenomyosis reported improvement in pain, menorrhagia, and reduction of uterine volume by a factor of 4.0, 6.3, and 5.1, respectively. CONCLUSION: The surgical treatment of adenomyosis results in the satisfactory control of pain and bleeding, as well as in the reduction of uterine volume. Further research is warranted to investigate the long-term control of symptoms to identify any parameters related to the recurrence of adenomyosis, as well as to compare the conservative surgical treatment of adenomyosis with other treatment options.

Pain Perception during Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine Device Insertion in Nulliparous Women: A Systematic Review.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) still remain underused in adolescents. Pain during insertion might prevent adolescents to opt for a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and critically appraise published data with respect to the efficacy of various substances (analgesics or not) in preventing pain during levonorgestrel-releasing IUD insertion in nulliparous women as a proxy for adolescents. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A comprehensive computerized systematic literature search of all English language studies between 2006 and 2016 was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Evidence Based Medicine Reviews (Cochrane Database and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Google Scholar. Relevant article reference lists were manually searched. RESULTS: The computerized database search revealed 31 citations of relevance, 9 of which with a total of 355 treated women and 345 controls fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria. In women treated with misoprostol (n = 150) vs placebo (n = 145), the median visual analogue scale (VAS) score ± SD were 5.7 ± 2.1 vs 5.1 ± 2.2, respectively. In the previously mentioned population, there was a nonsignificant change in VAS score (odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-2.40). In women treated with lidocaine (n = 140) vs placebo (n = 136), the median VAS score ± SD were 4.6 ± 2.1 vs 5.8 ± 2, respectively. In the aforementioned population, there was a significant decrease in VAS score (odds ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.91). CONCLUSION: In nulliparous women, lidocaine treatment seems to be a reasonable choice. However, further studies are required to examine the different routes and modes of administration as well as optimal quantities.