Epirubicin and gemcitabine as first-line treatment in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma represents a rare disease, for which chemotherapy actually remains unsatisfactory. From August 1998 to November 2001, 28 chemo-radio-immunonaive patients were consecutively enrolled in the trial: 22/6 males/females; median age 63 years (range, 45-79); median ECOG PS 1 (range, 0-2). They were treated with epirubicin (100 mg/m2 iv on day 1) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 iv on days 1 and 8) every 4 weeks for 6 cycles. Patients who responded to chemotherapy (n = 6) were subsequently treated with interleukin-2 (4,500,000 IU) subcutaneously every other day, until progression. A total of 124 epirubicin-gemcitabine cycles were administered (median, 6/patient; range, 2-6). Twenty-six patients were evaluated for toxicity. According to WHO criteria, we observed grade III-IV hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity respectively in 3 patients (11%) and 1 patient (3%). No red cell transfusions were required and no toxic deaths occurred. Two patients (8%) could not be evaluated for response (no therapy performed). According to WHO criteria, the final responses were: partial in 4 patients (14%), stable disease in 19 patients (69%), and progression in 3 patients (10%). In 26 patients, the median survival was 55 weeks (range, 7-222) and median time to progression 30 weeks (range, 4-156). At the time of this writing, no patient is alive. The 1-year survival was 32%, 2-year survival 11%, and 4% at 3 and 4 years. All patients were at stage III, and time to progression was 58 weeks and survival 63.5 weeks, without any toxicity. This multi-center phase II clinical trial showed that epirubicin plus gemcitabine, as a first-line treatment in malignant pleural mesothelioma, has promising activity with a good tolerability profile and symptom palliation. The role of interleukin-2 in maintenance therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma is encouraging and requires further study.

Platinum-etoposide chemotherapy in elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer: results of a randomized multicenter phase II study assessing attenuated-dose or full-dose with lenograstim prophylaxis--a Forza Operativa Nazionale Italiana Carcinoma Polmonare and Gruppo Studio Tumori Polmonari Veneto (FONICAP-GSTPV) study.

PURPOSE: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is increasingly diagnosed in elderly patients, who are at higher risk of treatment-related morbidity and mortality. We conducted a randomized two-stage phase II study to assess the therapeutic index of two different platinum/etoposide regimens, attenuated-dose (AD) and full-dose (FD) plus prophylactic lenograstim. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SCLC patients older than 70 years were randomized to receive four courses of cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2, and etoposide 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 2, and 3 every 3 weeks (AD); or cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2, and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1, 2, and 3 every 3 weeks, plus lenograstim 5 mg/kg days 5 through 12, every 3 weeks (FD). A combined primary end point named therapeutic success (TS), which took into account activity, toxicity, and compliance, was used. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were enrolled. Seventy-five percent and 72% of the patients in the AD and FD arms, respectively, completed the treatment as per protocol. Response rate was 39% and 69% in the AD and FD arms, respectively, and 1-year survival probability was 18% and 39%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated in both groups, with no grade 3 to 4 myelotoxicity in the AD arm, and 12% myelotoxicity in the FD arm. Overall, the observed TSs were 10 (36%) of 28 patients and 42 (63%) of 67 patients for AD and FD treatments, respectively. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with SCLC a full-dose cisplatin/etoposide regimen combined with prophylactic lenograstim is active and feasible, while attenuated doses of the same regimen are associated with a poor therapeutic outcome.