SARS-CoV-2 Variant Vaccine Boosters Trial: Preliminary Analyses

BackgroundProtection from SARS-CoV-2 vaccines wanes over time and is compounded by emerging variants including Omicron subvariants. This study evaluated safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 variant vaccines. MethodsThis phase 2 open-label, randomized trial enrolled healthy adults previously vaccinated with a SARS-CoV-2 primary series and a single boost. Eligible participants were randomized to one of six Moderna COVID19 mRNA vaccine arms (50{micro}g dose): Prototype (mRNA-1273), Omicron BA.1+Beta (1 or 2 doses), Omicron BA.1+Delta, Omicron BA.1 monovalent, and Omicron BA.1+Prototype. Neutralization antibody titers (ID50) were assessed for D614G, Delta, Beta and Omicron BA.1 variants and Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/BA.5 subvariants 15 days after vaccination. ResultsFrom March 30 to May 6, 2022, 597 participants were randomized and vaccinated. Median age was 53 years, and 20% had a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. All vaccines were safe and well-tolerated. Day 15 geometric mean titers (GMT) against D614G were similar across arms and ages, and higher with prior infection. For uninfected participants, Day 15 Omicron BA.1 GMTs were similar across Omicron-containing vaccine arms (3724-4561) and higher than Prototype (1,997 [95%CI:1,482-2,692]). The Omicron BA.1 monovalent and Omicron BA.1+Prototype vaccines induced a geometric mean ratio (GMR) to Prototype for Omicron BA.1 of 2.03 (97.5%CI:1.37-3.00) and 1.56 (97.5%CI:1.06-2.31), respectively. A subset of samples from uninfected participants in four arms were also tested in a different laboratory at Day 15 for neutralizing antibody titers to D614G and Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2.12.2 and BA.4/BA.5. Omicron BA.4/BA.5 GMTs were approximately one third BA.1 GMTs (Prototype 517 [95%CI:324-826] vs. 1503 [95%CI:949-2381]; Omicron BA.1+Beta 628 [95%CI:367-1,074] vs. 2125 [95%CI:1139-3965]; Omicron BA.1+Delta 765 [95%CI:443-1,322] vs. 2242 [95%CI:1218-4128] and Omicron BA.1+Prototype 635 [95%CI:447-903] vs. 1972 [95%CI:1337-2907). ConclusionsHigher Omicron BA.1 titers were observed with Omicron-containing vaccines compared to Prototype vaccine and titers against Omicron BA.4/BA.5 were lower than against BA.1 for all candidate vaccines. Clinicaltrials.govNCT05289037

BA.2 omicron differs immunologically from both BA.1 omicron and pre-omicron variants

BackgroundSeveral studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 omicron is an immune escape variant and current vaccines and infection with pre-omicron variants provide limited protection against BA.1. Meanwhile, however, omicron BA.2 has become the dominant variant in many countries and has replaced BA.1. As BA.2 has several mutations especially in the receptor binding and the N terminal domain compared to BA.1, we analyzed whether BA.2 shows further immune escape relative to BA.1. MethodsWe characterized neutralization profiles against the new BA.2 omicron variant in plasma samples from a variety of individuals with different numbers of exposures to infection/vaccination, including samples from previously virus-naive, BA.2 omicron-infected individuals. To illustrate antigenic differences of the two omicron sub-variants and pre-omicron variants we performed antigenic cartography and generated antibody landscapes. ResultsUnvaccinated individuals after a single exposure to BA.2 had limited cross-neutralizing antibodies to pre-omicron variants and to BA.1. Consequently, our antigenic map, which included all Variants of Concern and both BA.1 and BA.2 omicron sub-variants, showed that both omicron sub-variants are distinct to pre-omicron variants, but that the two omicron variant are also antigenically distinct from each other. The antibody landscapes illustrate that cross-neutralizing antibodies against the whole antigenic space, as described in our maps, are generated only after three or more exposures to antigenically close variants but also after two exposures to antigenically distinct variants. ConclusionsHere, we describe the antigenic space inhabited by the relevant SARS-CoV-2 variants, the understanding of which will have important implications for further vaccine strain adaptations.

Mapping SARS-CoV-2 antigenic relationships and serological responses

During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, multiple variants with differing amounts of escape from pre-existing immunity have emerged, causing concerns about continued protection. Here, we use antigenic cartography to quantify and visualize the antigenic relationships among 16 SARS-CoV-2 variants titrated against serum samples taken post-vaccination and post-infection with seven different variants. We find major antigenic differences caused by substitutions at spike positions 417, 452, 484, and possibly 501. B.1.1.529 (Omicron BA.1) showed the highest escape from all sera tested. Visualization of serological responses as antibody landscapes shows how reactivity clusters in different regions of antigenic space. We find changes in immunodominance of different spike regions depending on the variant an individual was exposed to, with implications for variant risk assessment and vaccine strain selection. One sentence summaryAntigenic Cartography of SARS-CoV-2 variants reveals amino acid substitutions governing immune escape and immunodominance patterns.

Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Neutralization Data up to 2021-12-22

The rapid spread of the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant (B.1.1.529) resulted in international efforts to quickly assess its escape from immunity generated by vaccines and previous infections. Numerous laboratories published Omicron neutralization data as preprints and reports. The understandable limitations and variability in such rapid reporting of early results however made it difficult to make definitive statements about the data. Here, we aggregate and analyze Omicron neutralization data from 23 reporting laboratories up to 2021-12-22. There are enough data to identify multiple trends and make two definitive points. First, in twice-vaccinated individuals, titer fold drop of Omicron relative to wild type is more than 19x, likely substantially more given the number of measurements below the limit of detection of the assay. Second, out to one month post third vaccination with an mRNA vaccine, or twice vaccinated after an earlier infection, the titer fold drop to Omicron is substantially less at approximately 7x. This substantially lower fold drop and somewhat higher titers after 3rd vaccination are strong early evidence for the utility of booster vaccination.