Safety and Immunogenicity of Accelerated Heterologous Two-dose Ebola Vaccine Regimens in Adults With and Without HIV in Africa.

BACKGROUND: Shorter prophylactic vaccine schedules may offer more rapid protection against Ebola in resource-limited settings. METHODS: This randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial conducted in five sub-Saharan African countries included people without HIV (PWOH, n = 249) and people living with HIV (PLWH, n = 250). Adult participants received one of two accelerated Ebola vaccine regimens (MVA-BN-Filo, Ad26.ZEBOV administered 14 days apart [n = 79] or Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo administered 28 days apart [n = 322]) or saline/placebo (n = 98). The primary endpoints were safety (adverse events [AEs]) and immunogenicity (Ebola virus [EBOV] glycoprotein-specific binding antibody responses). Binding antibody responders were defined as participants with a > 2.5-fold increase from baseline or the lower limit of quantification if negative at baseline. RESULTS: The mean age was 33.4 years, 52% of participants were female, and among PLWH, the median (interquartile range) CD4+ cell count was 560.0 (418.0-752.0) cells/µL. AEs were generally mild/moderate with no vaccine-related serious AEs or remarkable safety profile differences by HIV status. At 21 days post-dose 2, EBOV glycoprotein-specific binding antibody response rates in vaccine recipients were 99% for the 14-day regimen (geometric mean concentrations [GMCs]: 5168 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay units (EU)/mL in PWOH; 2509 EU/mL in PLWH), and 98% for the 28-day regimen (GMCs: 6037 EU/mL in PWOH; 2939 EU/mL in PLWH). At 12 months post-dose 2, GMCs in PWOH and PLWH were 635 and 514 EU/mL, respectively, for the 14-day regimen and 331 and 360 EU/mL, respectively, for the 28-day regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated 14- and 28-day Ebola vaccine regimens were safe and immunogenic in PWOH and PLWH in Africa. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02598388.

Safety and immunogenicity of the two-dose heterologous Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccine regimen in infants: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled trial in Guinea and Sierra Leone.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of the Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola virus (EBOV) vaccine regimen in infants aged 4-11 months in Guinea and Sierra Leone. METHODS: In this phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled trial, we randomly assigned healthy infants (1:1 in a sentinel cohort, 5:2 for the remaining infants via an interactive web response system) to receive Ad26.ZEBOV followed by MVA-BN-Filo (Ebola vaccine group) or two doses of meningococcal quadrivalent conjugate vaccine (control group) administered 56 days apart. Infants were recruited at two sites in west Africa: Conakry, Guinea, and Kambia, Sierra Leone. All infants received the meningococcal vaccine 8 months after being randomly assigned. The primary objective was safety. The secondary objective was immunogenicity, measured as EBOV glycoprotein-binding antibody concentration 21 days post-dose 2, using the Filovirus Animal Non-Clinical Group ELISA. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03929757) and the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR201905827924069). FINDINGS: From Aug 20 to Nov 29, 2019, 142 infants were screened and 108 were randomly assigned (Ebola vaccine n=75; control n=33). The most common solicited local adverse event was injection-site pain (Ebola vaccine 15 [20%] of 75; control four [12%] of 33). The most common solicited systemic adverse events with the Ebola vaccine were irritability (26 [35%] of 75), decreased appetite (18 [24%] of 75), pyrexia (16 [21%] of 75), and decreased activity (15 [20%] of 75). In the control group, ten (30%) of 33 had irritability, seven (21%) of 33 had decreased appetite, three (9%) of 33 had pyrexia, and five (15%) of 33 had decreased activity. The frequency of unsolicited adverse events was 83% (62 of 75 infants) in the Ebola vaccine group and 85% (28 of 33 infants) in the control group. No serious adverse events were vaccine-related. In the Ebola vaccine group, EBOV glycoprotein-binding antibody geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) at 21 days post-dose 2 were 27 700 ELISA units (EU)/mL (95% CI 20 477-37 470) in infants aged 4-8 months and 20 481 EU/mL (15 325-27 372) in infants aged 9-11 months. The responder rate was 100% (74 of 74 responded). In the control group, GMCs for both age groups were less than the lower limit of quantification and the responder rate was 3% (one of 33 responded). INTERPRETATION: Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo was well tolerated and induced strong humoral responses in infants younger than 1 year. There were no safety concerns related to vaccination. FUNDING: Janssen Vaccines & Prevention and Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a 2-dose Ebola vaccine regimen of Ad26.ZEBOV followed by MVA-BN-Filo in healthy adult pregnant women: study protocol for a phase 3 open-label randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Risks to mother and fetus following Ebola virus infection are very high. Evaluation of safety and immunogenicity of non-replicating Ebola vaccine candidates is a priority for use in pregnant women. This is the protocol for a randomized, open-label, single-center phase 3 clinical trial of the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of the 2-dose Ebola vaccine regimen in healthy adult pregnant women. This 2-dose regimen has been shown to be safe, judged effective, and approved in non-pregnant populations. METHODS: A total of 2000 adult (≥ 18 years of age) pregnant women will be enrolled from antenatal care facilities in Western Rwanda and randomized (1:1) to receive the 2-dose Ebola vaccine regimen (Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo (group A)) or control (unvaccinated pregnant women (group B)). The primary objectives are to (1) assess adverse maternal/fetal outcomes in randomized pregnant women up to 1.5 months after delivery and (2) assess adverse neonatal/infant outcomes in neonates/infants born to randomized women up to 3.5 months after birth. The frequency and relatedness of all serious adverse events in women and newborns from randomization or birth, respectively, until study end will be reported. The reactogenicity and unsolicited adverse events of the 2-dose Ebola vaccine regimen in all vaccinated pregnant women (group A) will be reported. We will also assess the immunogenicity of the 2-dose Ebola vaccine regimen in 150 pregnant women who are anticipated to receive both vaccine doses within the course of their pregnancy (a subset of the 1000 pregnant vaccinated women from group A) compared to 150 non-pregnant women vaccinated after delivery (a subset of group B). The persistence of maternal antibodies in 75 infants born to women from the group A subset will be assessed. Exploratory analyses include assessment of acceptability of the 2-dose Ebola vaccine regimen among group A and assessment of maternal antibodies in breast milk in 50 women from group A and 10 controls (women from group B prior to vaccination). DISCUSSION: This study is intended to support a label variation to relax restrictions on use in pregnant women, a vulnerable population with high medical need. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04556526 . September 21, 2020.

Assessments of different batches and dose levels of a two-dose Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo vaccine regimen.

Two phase 3 clinical studies were conducted in the USA to bridge across different Ad26.ZEBOV manufacturing processes and sites, and to evaluate the immunogenicity of different dose levels of Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo. Study 1 evaluated the immunological equivalence of three batches of Ad26.ZEBOV administered as dose 1, followed by one batch of MVA-BN-Filo as dose 2. In Study 2, immunogenic non-inferiority of intermediate (Ad26.ZEBOV: 2 × 1010 viral particles [vp], MVA-BN-Filo: 5 × 107 infectious units [Inf.U]) and low (8 × 109 vp, 5 × 107 Inf.U) doses of Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo were evaluated against the full clinical dose (5 × 1010 vp, 1 × 108 Inf.U). In Study 1, equivalence was demonstrated for two of three batch comparisons post-dose 1 and all three batches after the full regimen. Study 2 demonstrated a dose-dependent response; however, non-inferiority against the full clinical dose was not met. All regimens were well tolerated and immune responses were observed in all participants, regardless of manufacturing process or dose. Consistency of immunogenicity of different Ad26.ZEBOV batches was demonstrated and a dose-dependent response was observed after Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo vaccination. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02543268; NCT02543567.

Safety and Immunogenicity of a 2-Dose Heterologous Vaccine Regimen With Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola Vaccines: 12-Month Data From a Phase 1 Randomized Clinical Trial in Nairobi, Kenya.

BACKGROUND: During the 2014 West African Ebola outbreak, Ebola vaccine development was accelerated. The phase 1 VAC52150EBL1003 study was performed to investigate 2-dose heterologous vaccination with Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo in an African population located in a high-altitude setting in Nairobi, Kenya. METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers were randomized to receive one of four 2-dose vaccination schedules. The first vaccination was administered at baseline (Ad26.ZEBOV or MVA-BN-Filo), followed by the second vaccination with the alternate vaccine after either 28 or 56 days. Each schedule had a placebo comparator group. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of these regimens. RESULTS: Seventy-two volunteers were randomized into 4 groups of 18 (15 received vaccine, and 3 received placebo). The most frequent solicited systemic adverse event was headache (frequency, 50%, 61%, and 42% per dose for MVA-BN-Filo, Ad26.ZEBOV, and placebo, respectively). The most frequent solicited local AE was injection site pain (frequency, 78%, 63%, and 33% per dose for MVA-BN-Filo, Ad26.ZEBOV, and placebo, respectively). No differences in adverse events were observed among the different vaccine regimens. High levels of binding and neutralizing anti-Ebola virus glycoprotein antibodies were induced by all regimens and sustained to day 360 after the first dose. CONCLUSIONS: Two-dose heterologous vaccination with Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo was well tolerated and highly immunogenic against Ebola virus glycoprotein. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02376426.

Safety and Immunogenicity of a 2-Dose Heterologous Vaccination Regimen With Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola Vaccines: 12-Month Data From a Phase 1 Randomized Clinical Trial in Uganda and Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: Ebola vaccine development was accelerated in response to the 2014 Ebola virus infection outbreak. This phase 1 study (VAC52150EBL1004) assessed safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of heterologous 2-dose Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo vaccination regimens in the Lake Victoria Basin of Tanzania and Uganda in mid-level altitude, malaria-endemic settings. METHODS: Healthy volunteers aged 18-50 years from Tanzania (n = 25) and Uganda (n = 47) were randomized to receive placebo or active vaccination with Ad26.ZEBOV or MVA-BN-Filo (first vaccination), followed by MVA-BN-Filo or Ad26.ZEBOV (second vaccination) dose 2, respectively, with intervals of 28 or 56 days. RESULTS: Seventy-two adults were randomized to receive vaccine (n = 60) or placebo (n = 12). No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. The most frequent solicited local and systemic adverse events were injection site pain (frequency, 70%, 66%, and 42% per dose for MVA-BN-Filo, Ad26.ZEBOV, and placebo, respectively) and headache (57%, 56%, and 46%, respectively). Adverse event patterns were similar among regimens. Twenty-one days after dose 2, 100% of volunteers demonstrated binding antibody responses against Ebola virus glycoprotein, and 87%-100% demonstrated neutralizing antibody responses. Ad26.ZEBOV dose 1 vaccination induced more-robust initial binding antibody and cellular responses than MVA-BN-Filo dose 1 vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Heterologous 2-dose vaccination with Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo against Ebola virus is well tolerated and immunogenic in healthy volunteers. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02376400.

Assessment of occlusion with the T-Scan system in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.

Dental occlusion varies among individuals, and achieving correct physiological occlusion after osteotomy is essential for the complex functioning of the stomatognathic system. The T-Scan system records the centre of force, first contact, maximum bite force, and maximum intercuspation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the usefulness and consistency of T-Scan in assessing occlusion before and after orthognathic surgery. Occlusal information was evaluated for 30 healthy adults with normal occlusion and 40 patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. T-Scan had a high degree of reliability for consecutive measurements (Pearson correlation, r = 0.98). For most parameters, occlusal distribution was better after surgery than before surgery. More teeth contributed to occlusion at maximum intercuspation after surgery than before surgery (14 vs. 10). In addition, the difference in the posterior force distribution was reduced after surgery (17.6 ± 13.8 vs. 22.7 ± 21.4 before surgery), indicating better occlusal force distribution after surgery. The maximum percentage force on teeth (p = 0.004) and the number of teeth contributing to occlusion (p < 0.001) also differed significantly. Thus, T-Scan is good for assessing occlusal discrepancies and can be used to portray the pre- and post-operative occlusal contact distribution during treatment planning and follow-up.

Tracking of the inferior alveolar nerve: its implication in surgical planning.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to assess the correlation between the mandibular canal tracing done on cone beam CT (CBCT) data, with the size, shape, and position of the neurovascular bundle (NB) obtained by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six human cadaver mandibles were scanned with a CBCT Promax® scanner (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland) and with an Ingenia® 3.0 T MR system (Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The NB was segmented from the MRI dataset, while the mandibular canal (MC) tracing was done on the CBCT images. Quantitative 3D analysis was made for the full-segmented nerves and for three defined regions of specific clinical interest, namely angle, body, and mental region. RESULTS: From the 3D MRI analysis, the nerve thickness (for the angle, body, and mental region) ranges from 0.8 to 5.2 mm, while the thickness of the mandibular canal tracing is approximately 2.00 mm on both sides as chosen in the tracing software. The mean volume of the NB on the left is 828.49 ± 215.54 mm3 and on the right 792.98 ± 264.57 mm3. For the nerve tracing, the mean value is 351.92 ± 16.42 and 339.69 ± 16.12 mm3 on the left and right sides, respectively. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant differences between NB and MC volume measurements (p = 0.0005). The Bland-Altman plots show an increasing slope for thickness and volume, indicating that the absolute differences between neurovascular bundle, estimated by MRI, and the mandibular canal, drawn on the CBCT images, increase with larger mean values. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should be aware of the shortcomings of nerve tracing in the different regions of the mandible. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tracing of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) underestimates shape and volume. Whenever nerve tracing instead of well-recognizable anatomical bony landmarks is used for surgical planning that need precision, a wider safe margin is recommended.

Modified Mandibular Inferior Border Sagittal Split Osteotomy Reduces Postoperative Risk for Developing Inferior Border Defects.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a modified sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) surgical technique on the incidence of persisting inferior border defects. The secondary aim was to identify risk factors associated with the development of these complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient charts and radiographs of 276 consecutive patients who underwent bilateral SSO, performed by a single surgeon in 2 different centers from July 2012 to September 2014, were retrospectively examined. The predictor variable was length of advancement. The outcome variable was the presence or absence of an inferior border defect. Other variables included age and side of the jaw. In all cases the same surgical technique was used. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). RESULTS: The analysis included 408 operation sites in 204 patients (132 female and 72 male patients; median age, 22 years; age range, 13 to 66 years). In 5.1% of operation sites an osseous defect at the lower border of the mandible was observed. Age at the time of surgery (P < .0001) and length of advancement (P = .0111) were identified as risk factors for the development of a persisting osseous defect at the inferior border of the osteotomy gap after SSO. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the findings previously reported by our research group that the modified inferior border osteotomy technique in SSO results in a substantial lower frequency of persisting inferior border defects. Surgeons are advised to ensure that the lingual cortex of the inferior border is not included in the split during mandibular advancements, and in cases in which the advancement is more than 10 mm and/or the patient is older than 30 years, surgeons might want to consider using a bone graft or a bone graft substitute.