Ejection fraction-velocity ratio for the assessment of aortic bioprosthetic valves in patients with systolic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: The continuity equation (CE) represents the 'gold standard' for the evaluation of aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis, but it is time-consuming and subject to error, and can be technically demanding. Recently, a new echocardiographic nonflow corrected index was introduced and demonstrated excellent accuracy in quantifying the effective orifice area (EOA) in native aortic valves and bioprostheses. This new index, the ejection fraction (EF)-velocity ratio (EFVR), is obtained by dividing the percentage left ventricular EF by the maximum aortic gradient. OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of this echocardiographic index for quantifying the EOA in patients with aortic bioprosthesis and left ventricular dysfunction. METHODS: A total of 70 patients (25 women and 45 men) with aortic bioprosthesis and left ventricular dysfunction (EF of 49% or less) were studied. The mean (+/- SD) age of the study population was 71.4+/-9 years. The EOA was evaluated, both by the CE and by the EFVR. RESULTS: A significant linear correlation between the CE and the EFVR was found (r=0.80; P<0.0001). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed good agreement between the CE and the EFVR. An EFVR value of 1.15 or less was found to have a good sensitivity (89%) and good specificity (91%) in identifying patients with an EOA of 1.0 cm2 or smaller, with positive and negative predictive values of 79% and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The EFVR, a simple index that is less time-consuming than the CE, allows the identification of patients with aortic bioprosthesis stenosis with excellent sensitivity and specificity. It may be taken into consideration in clinical practice for the evaluation of patients with aortic bioprosthesis stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction.

Central and peripheral haemodynamic determinants of effort tolerance in patients with heart failure.

We studied central and peripheral hemodynamics and exercise tolerance in 24 patients with left ventricular dysfunction. All were in NYHA class II or III, and echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction was < 35% without pharmacologic influences. Patients underwent to treadmill test (Naughton protocol), cardiopulmonary upright bicycle test, and supine bicycle test with haemodynamic measurements. All tests were exhaustive. Average exercise time was 9 +/- 3.4 min, (range 3-20). Average ejection fraction (.28 +/- 0.65) dis not correlate with working capacity (r = .32), nor did left ventricular filling pressure (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure) at rest and at peak exercise (r = .29 and r = .02). Stroke volume and stroke volume index were on average depressed, with no variations during work; cardiac output and cardiac index were also depressed, with a significant increase at peak exercise (both p < .001). Systemic and pulmonary resistances were increased, but systemic resistances tended to decrease during effort (p < .001), while pulmonary resistances did not (p = NS). We subdivided patients according to systemic vascular resistances lower or higher than 1500 dynes.cm.sec-5 at rest; this identifies two different working capacities (low systemic vascular resistances 11.7 +/- 4.4 min, high systemic vascular resistances 6.9 +/- 3.2 min, p < .05). Patients were then divided in two groups: group I (rest stroke volume > 60 ml) and group II (rest stroke volume < 60 ml). Group I worked 11 +/- 5 min, group II 8.5 +/- 3 min (p < .05). We performed a linear regression analysis between cardiac output and systemic vascular resistances at rest and during exercise in the two groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[The electrocardiographic anomalies and 2D-echocardiographic findings during the recovery phase of the stress test in the postinfarct patient]. / Anomalie elettrocardiografische e reperti ecocardiografici 2D durante la fase di recupero del test ergometrico nel post-infarto.

BACKGROUND: The appearance or the increase of repolarization abnormalities in the EKG during post exercise (ET) recovery phase (R) is considered a marker of ischemia. METHODS: In order to evaluate the real meaning of these changes we compared the EKG data with eventual modifications of left ventricular kinesis analyzed by 2D-ECHO. 10 male patients with previous myocardial infarction, mean age 50 +/- 4.8 y, underwent exercise testing on a treadmill (Bruce's protocol) and continuous 2D-ECHO observation from the end of exercise along the whole R. Patients were divided in two groups: Group A (6 patients) and Group B (4 patients), all free of symptoms. RESULTS: Group A showed ischemic EKG markers during exercise which increased during R; Group B showed ischemic EKG markers only during R. The 2D-ECHO showed in Group A an impairment of left ventricular kinesis at peak exercise without increase or extension during R (WMSI at rest 1.32; peak ET 1.60; R 1.60); in Group B the kinetic alterations appeared only in R (WMSI at rest 1.33, peak ET 1.42; R 1.80), strictly related to EKG markers. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest : 1) that the increase of EKG abnormalities already present during exercise do not seem to imply more severe ischemia; 2) that EKG changes appearing during R are markers of ischemia which occur in the R.

Influence of thrombolysis on signal-averaged electrocardiogram and late arrhythmic events after acute myocardial infarction.

The influence of intravenous thrombolysis on both prevalence of ventricular late potentials and incidence of late arrhythmic events was evaluated in 174 consecutive patients surviving a first acute myocardial infarction; 106 patients (61%) received thrombolysis (group A) and 68 (34%) had conventional therapy (group B). In group A, 18 patients (17%) had late potentials compared with 23 (34%) in group B (p less than 0.05); mean left ventricular ejection fraction was not different (0.50 +/- 0.09 vs 0.50 +/- 0.10; p = not significant [NS]). Of 63 patients who underwent coronary arteriography because of postinfarction ischemia, 28 (44%) had a closed infarct-related artery; of these, 11 (39%) had late potentials compared with 3 of 35 (9%) with a patent artery (p less than 0.01). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was not significantly different between the 2 groups (0.49 +/- 0.09 vs 0.53 +/- 0.09; p = NS). At a mean follow-up of 14 +/- 8 months, 8 of 161 patients (5%) had a late arrhythmic event; 6 of 8 (75%) with and 28 of 153 (18%) without events had late potentials (p less than 0.001). In group A, 4 of 99 patients (4%) had events compared with 4 of 62 (6%) in group B (p = NS, relative risk 1.6). Of 24 patients with anterior wall AMI and left ventricular dyskinesia, 6 events occurred. In this group of patients, a higher rate of events was observed (25%); 3 of 16 (19%) treated with thrombolysis had an event compared with 3 of 8 (37%) treated conventionally (p = NS, relative risk 2.6).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Functional evaluation 10 days and 3 weeks after acute myocardial infarction: comparative significance and prognostic value.

Early functional evaluation after non-complicated acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is widely recommended because of its prognostic value in the short term. In fact it seems to have a prognostic value within 15-20 days of the AMI, but in this period the patient is particularly controlled and is often still hospitalized. To evaluate the real significance of an early functional evaluation within 10 days of the AMI (mean 8.6 days +/- 1.2) as compared to an identical functional evaluation performed at 3 weeks after AMI (mean 20.16 days +/- 5.38) 25 patients with uncomplicated myocardial infarction were studied. Significant statistical differences were found between the first (ET1) and second (ET2) functional evaluations: they concern the maximal heart rate reached (P less than 0.001), the maximal pressure-rate product (P less than 0.05), the percentage increment of heart rate (P less than 0.01) and the total work performed (P less than 0.001). Agreement between ET1 and ET2 was found in 19 cases; 12 patients showed markers of ischaemia both at ET1 and ET2, while seven were free from ischaemia at both times. In six cases a disagreement between ET1 and ET2 was found: in particular, three cases had ischaemic ET1 and nonischaemic ET2; the reverse was seen in the other three. During follow-up (mean 215.4 days +/- 85.5), the total number of new events (reinfarctions, angina or surgery) among the 25 patients was eight; none occurred within the first 30 days after the AMI.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)