A cross-sectional study of relationships between periodontal disease and general health: The Hitachi Oral Healthcare Survey.

BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study performed to clarify the relationship between periodontal disease and non-communicable diseases (NCDs), such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) by introducing dental examinations into the annual health examinations conducted by Japanese companies, and to highlights the importance of a medical system that connects dental and medical professionals. METHODS: A total of 1.022 Hitachi Ltd. employees were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. We examined correlations and odds ratios (ORs) between the dental and overall health of employees using stratification and multiple logistic regression analyses based on the periodontal health indicators, general health indicators, and occlusal force. RESULTS: The adjusted OR of PPD for obesity (OR, 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.84; p = 0.009), IGT (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.00-2.20; p = 0.049), and COPD (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.02-1.88; p = 0.038) significantly differed. The adjusted OR of body mass index (OR, 1.28; 95% CI 1.15-1.42; p < 0.001), haemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) (OR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.89-9.98; p < 0.001), fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels (OR, 1.08; 95% CI 1.04-1.11; p < 0.001), postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity ratio (%FEV1) (OR, 0.95; 95% CI 0.91-1.00; p = 0.031) and smoking (OR, 2.32; 95% CI 1.62-3.33; p < 0.001) for severe periodontal disease also significantly differed. Occlusal force was significantly reduced in employees aged 50-59 years compared to those aged 40-49 years. Both PPD, HbA1c, FBG levels were significantly associated with occlusal force among employees with moderate/severe periodontitis. PPD was significantly associated with occlusal force among employees with and moderate COPD, and ASCVD. %FEV1 was significantly associated with occlusal force among employees with IGT. CONCLUSIONS: This cross-sectional study revealed mutual relationships among periodontal disease, NCDs, and occlusal force on Japanese corporate workers. We demonstrated that a comprehensive, regional healthcare system centred on annual integrated dental and physical health examinations in the workplace will benefit employees and positively impact corporate health insurance.

[General anesthesia by propofol infusion for delivery by cesarean section compared with sevoflurane anesthesia using bispectral index (BIS) monitoring].

BACKGROUND: We compared the postoperative effects of propofol and sevoflurane used for anesthesia during elective cesarean section, using bispectral index (BIS) monitoring. METHODS: Fourteen parturients were randomized into two groups (Propofol group; P group, Sevoflurane group; S group). All patients received thiopental and suxamethonium for induction and had orotracheal intubation in rapid sequence. All patients received 1% sevoflurane until delivery. In the P group, sevoflurane was stopped after delivery and propofol infusion was started, to achieve target BIS values below 60; the infusion rate was 6. 17 +/- 0.98 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1). Patients in the S group received 1% sevoflurane. All patients were given fentanyl and vecuronium as required. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in their times for beginning drinking, walking, eating or removal of urinary catheters after the operations. There were no significant differences in total blood loss or intraoperative dose of oxytocin, but postoperative and total doses of oxytocin were significantly higher in those in the P group. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing the effects of propofol and sevoflurane on the postoperative condition of parturients, no differences could be detected. We can choose to use propofol instead of sevoflurane for cesarean section.