Real-world safety and effectiveness of tenofovir alafenamide for 144 weeks in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a prodrug of tenofovir, delivers high levels of active drug to hepatocytes and is given in a lower dose than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). TAF reduces viral replication in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) similar to TDF and has shown a lower risk of the renal and bone toxicities associated with TDF use. This post-marketing surveillance study examined the safety and effectiveness of TAF in treatment-naïve and -experienced CHB patients who received TAF for 144 weeks at real-world clinical sites in Japan. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), renal and bone events, and changes in selected laboratory parameters. Effectiveness was based on the proportion of patients with HBV DNA levels below the lower limit of quantitation or <29 IU/mL. This analysis included 580 patients; 18.4% of whom were treatment-naïve. The cumulative incidence of ADRs was 0.21 per 100 person-months, and the incidence of serious ADRs was 0.01 (95% CI, 0.00-0.04) per 100 person-months. There were no ADRs of declines in estimated glomerular filtration rates, renal failure or proximal tubulopathy. The most common ADR was hypophosphataemia in seven (1.2%) patients. Two (0.4%) patients each had decreased blood phosphorus, bone mineral density decreased, dizziness and alopecia. Overall, the proportion of virologically suppressed patients increased from 68.8% at baseline to 97.5% at Week 144. These results confirm the real-world safety and effectiveness of TAF in Japanese patients with CHB and are consistent with the findings of other evaluations of the safety and efficacy of TAF in CHB.

The safety and effectiveness of remdesivir in a postmarketing surveillance study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and to assess mortality and health status in participants receiving remdesivir in real-world settings in Japan. METHODS: This postmarketing surveillance study used an all-case surveillance method for enrollment. Participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection administered remdesivir from July 2020 to November 2021 in Japan were eligible for inclusion. The observation period was from remdesivir treatment initiation to 4 weeks after the end of treatment or treatment discontinuation. Clinical status and outcomes were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plots and compared across subgroups at baseline, Day 14, Day 28, and the final observation point. RESULTS: The analysis included 2128 participants (mean age, 67 years; 71.4 % male; 84.1 % with current comorbidities). ADRs and serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs) were reported among 10.4 % and 1.2 % participants, respectively. Overall, 191/2127 participants died (mortality rate [95 % confidence interval], 11.10 [9.66-12.75] per 100 person-months), 1511/2127 showed clinical improvement (117.8 [112.0-123.9] per 100 person-months), 1392/2127 recovered (103.9 [98.6-110.0] per 100 person-months), and 216/324 were extubated (107.0 [93.6-122.3] per 100 person-months). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ADRs and SADRs was low, and no new safety concerns were identified. Observed mortality and clinical improvement results were consistent with prior studies, confirming remdesivir's benefits in real-world settings in Japan.

Real-world Safety and Effectiveness of 24-week Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin Treatment in Patients Infected with Rare Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes 3, 4, 5, or 6 in Japan.

Objectives Real-world evidence on the safety and effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals in patients infected with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes (GTs) 3, 4, 5, or 6 in Japan is limited. This prospective observational study assesses the real-world safety profile and treatment effectiveness among patients prescribed sofosbuvir with ribavirin (SOF+RBV) for HCV GT3-6 infection in Japan. Methods Adults receiving 24-week SOF+RBV treatment for HCV GT3-6 infection were prospectively enrolled and observed through 24 weeks post-treatment for treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) considered related to SOF and/or RBV by treating physicians and for a sustained virologic response at 12 and 24 weeks post-treatment (SVR12, SVR24). Incidence rates of related AEs and serious AEs (SAEs) were calculated. Proportions of patients experiencing related AEs/SAEs and those achieving SVR12 and SVR24 were assessed overall and by baseline characteristics, including treatment experience and cirrhosis status. Results Among the 50 patients included in the safety analysis, 92% had GT3 infection. The incidence rates of related AEs and SAEs were low overall (1.52 and 0.25 per 100 person-weeks, respectively), with 6.0% and 14.0% patients experiencing AEs related to SOF or RBV, respectively. There were no marked differences in the occurrence of related AEs/SAEs by patient baseline characteristics. SVR12 and SVR24 were achieved in 83.7% (41/49) and 82.2% (37/45) of patients, respectively. Lower effectiveness was observed among treatment-experienced patients and patients with cirrhosis at baseline. Conclusion This study demonstrated that SOF+RBV treatment for HCV GT3-6 infection was safe, effective, and an important treatment option for this difficult-to-treat patient population in Japan.

Real-world use of sunitinib in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: efficacy, safety and biomarker analyses in 1689 consecutive patients.

OBJECTIVE: This prospective, post-marketing study collected sunitinib safety and efficacy data in Japanese patients with unresectable/metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Retrospective analysis investigated adverse events as potential sunitinib efficacy biomarkers. METHODS: Patients administered sunitinib, after its release, were registered until reaching a pre-specified number of cases. Primary starting dose was 50 mg/day orally on a 4-weeks-on and 2-weeks-off schedule. Physicians completed investigation forms at 6-week intervals for 24 weeks. Associations between baseline characteristics and adverse events were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards model and compared by χ(2) test. The log-rank test compared survival in subpopulations based on selected factors. RESULTS: Of note, 1689 patients receiving sunitinib were registered between June 2008 and November 2009. Most of them were males (75%), aged <65 years (56%), and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1 (90%), metastatic disease (88%) and previous systemic therapy (66%). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 70%, with reduced platelet count the most common (34%). Characteristics significantly associated with Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were female sex, age ≥ 55 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2, history of several medical conditions and prior treatment. Objective response rate was 22%. Median progression-free survival was 22.7 weeks. Median overall survival was not reached; however, 24-week overall survival rate was 84%. Improved overall survival was associated with higher relative dose intensity during the first 6 weeks and specific adverse events: hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, hypothyroidism, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib demonstrated acceptable safety and useful efficacy in Japanese patients with unresectable/metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Potential biomarkers associated with greater efficacy were relative dose intensity and specific adverse events.