Nonlinear EEG Analysis During Motor and Cognitive Tasks in Patients With Long COVID: A Dynamic Systems Approach.

Introduction. Nonlinear EEG provides information about dynamic properties of the brain. This study aimed to compare nonlinear EEG parameters estimated from patients with Long COVID in different cognitive and motor tasks. Materials and Methods. This 12-month prospective cohort study included 83 patients with Long COVID: 53 symptomatic and 30 asymptomatic. Brain electrical activity was evaluated by EEG in 4 situations: (1) at rest, (2) during the Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A), (3) during the TMT Part B (TMT-B), and (4) during a coordination task: the Box and Blocks Test (BBT). Nonlinear EEG parameters were estimated in the time domain (activity and complexity). Assessments were made at 0 to 3, 3 to 6, and 6 to 12 months after inclusion. Results. There was a decrease in activity and complexity during the TMT-A and TMT-B, and an increase of these parameters during the BBT in both groups. There was an increase in activity at rest and during the TMT-A in the COVID-19 group at 0 to 3 months compared to the control, an increase in activity in the TMT-B in the COVID-19 group at 3 to 6 months compared to the control, and reduced activity and complexity at rest and during the TMT-A at 6 to 12 months compared to the control. Conclusion. The tasks followed a pattern of increased activity and complexity in cognitive tasks, which decreased during the coordination task. It was also observed that an increase in activity at rest and during cognitive tasks in the early stages, and reduced activity and complexity at rest and during cognitive tasks in the late phases of Long COVID.

Post-coronavirus disease 2019 functional impairments, limitations, and restrictions: A prospective cohort study based on the international classification of functioning, disability, and health.

Background: Current knowledge regarding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is constantly evolving, and the long-term functional impairments, limitations, and restrictions have not yet been well established. Objective: to evaluate the impact of post-COVID condition on the human functioning through the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) classification. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study with 53 individuals with post-COVID condition at 3 time points: 0 to 3 (baseline), 3 to 6, and 6-12 months (follow-up). Outcomes were organized in dichotomous variable: No impairment (0); presence of impairment (≥1) in body function, structure, activities, and participation domains according to the ICF checklist. Chi-square test was used to determine the differences of 3 time points, and association with persistent symptoms. Results: A statistically significant difference was observed between the periods, with greater disabilities at 6-12 than at 0-3 months in mental, sensory, pain, and movement-related functions; cardiovascular, immunological, and respiratory systems. In terms of activity and participation, a greater limitation at 6-12 months was observed than at 0-3 months in learning and applying knowledge, general tasks, and mobility. In the domain of interpersonal interactions and relationships, there was a statistically significant difference between the 6-12 and 3-6 months groups. Associations between COVID-19 symptoms and ICF components at the first follow-up were: anosmia and dysgeusia with weight maintenance, fatigue and irritability with pain, brain fog with watching and listening, walking difficulty with pain, and headache with pain, watching, and listening. At the second follow-up were: anosmia and dysgeusia with energy and drive functions, attention, memory, and emotional functions; dizziness with watching and listening; fatigue with emotional function, pain, undertaking multiple tasks, lifting and carrying objects, and driving; irritability with energy and drive, emotional function, undertaking multiple tasks, lifting and carrying objects, and walking; walking difficulty with energy and driving, emotional function, respiration, muscle power, cardiovascular system, undertaking multiple tasks, lifting and carrying objects, and walking; and headache with emotional function, watching, and listening. Conclusions: Individuals with COVID-19 persistent symptoms showed impairments in structure and function, activity limitations, and participation restrictions during the 1-year follow-up period.

Can the choice reaction time be modified after COVID-19 diagnosis? A prospective cohort study / O tempo de reação de escolha pode ser modificado após o diagnóstico de COVID-19? Um estudo de coorte prospectiva

ABSTRACT Assessment of cognitive processing speed through choice reaction time (CRT) can be an objective tool to assess cognitive functions after COVID-19 infection. Objective: This study aimed to assess CRT in individuals after acute COVID-19 infection over 1 year. Methods: We prospectively analyzed 30 individuals (male: 9, female: 21) with mild-moderate functional status after COVID-19 and 30 individuals (male: 8, female: 22) without COVID-19. Cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms were evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), respectively. CRT (milliseconds) was evaluated by finding the difference between the photodiode signal and the electromyographic (EMG) onset latency of anterior deltoid, brachial biceps, and triceps during the task of reaching a luminous target. CRT was evaluated three times over 1 year after COVID-19: baseline assessment (>4 weeks of COVID-19 diagnosis), between 3 and 6 months, and between 6 and 12 months. Results: The multiple comparison analysis shows CRT reduction of the anterior deltoid in the COVID-19 group at 3-6 (p=0.001) and 6-12 months (p<0.001) compared to the control group. We also observed CRT reduction of the triceps at 6-12 months (p=0.002) and brachial biceps at 0-3 (p<0.001), 3-6 (p<0.001), and 6-12 months (p<0.001) in the COVID-19 compared to the control group. Moderate correlations were observed between MoCA and CRT of the anterior deltoid (r=-0.63; p=0.002) and brachial biceps (r=-0.67; p=0.001) at 6-12 months in the COVID-19 group. Conclusions: There was a reduction in CRT after acute COVID-19 over 1 year. A negative correlation was also observed between MoCA and CRT only from 6 to 12 months after COVID-19 infection.

RESUMO A avaliação da velocidade de processamento cognitivo por meio do tempo de reação de escolha (TRE) pode ser uma ferramenta objetiva para acompanhar as alterações cognitivas após a COVID-19. Objetivo: Avaliar o TRE em pacientes após infecção aguda por COVID-19 ao longo de um ano. Métodos: Foram avaliados 30 indivíduos (sexo masculino: nove; feminino: 21) com estado funcional leve-moderado após infecção por COVID-19 e 30 (sexo masculino: oito; feminino: 22) sem COVID-19. A avaliação foi feita pelo Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) e pela Escala Hospitalar de Ansiedade e Depressão. O TRE (milissegundos) foi avaliado pela diferença entre o sinal luminoso e a latência de início da atividade muscular (EMG) do deltoide anterior (DA), do bíceps braquial (BB) e do tríceps durante uma tarefa de alcance. O TRE foi avaliado ao longo de um ano: avaliação inicial (>4 semanas após diagnóstico de COVID-19), em 3-6 meses e em 6-12 meses. Resultados: Houve redução do TRE do DA no grupo COVID-19 em 3-6 meses (p=0,001) e 6-12 meses (p<0,001) em comparação com o grupo de controle. Também foi observada redução na TRE do tríceps em 6-12 meses (p=0,002) e do BB em 0-3 meses (p<0,001), 3-6 meses (p<0,001) e 6-12 meses (p<0,001) no grupo COVID-19 em comparação com o grupo de controle. Correlações moderadas foram observadas entre MoCA e TRE do DA (r=-0,63; p=0,002) e BB (r=-0,67; p=0,001) aos 6-12 meses no grupo COVID-19. Conclusões: Houve redução do TRE após COVID-19 ao longo de um ano, além de correlação negativa entre MoCA e TRE no período de seis a 12 meses após COVID-19.

Use of artificial intelligence as an instrument of evaluation after stroke: a scoping review based on international classification of functioning, disability and health concept.

INTRODUCTION: To understand the current practices in stroke evaluation, the main clinical decision support system and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies need to be understood to assist the therapist in obtaining better insights about impairments and level of activity and participation in persons with stroke during rehabilitation. METHODS: This scoping review maps the use of AI for the functional evaluation of persons with stroke; the context involves any setting of rehabilitation. Data were extracted from CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, CINAHL, PEDRO Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, AAAI Publications, ACM Digital Library, MathSciNet, and arXiv up to January 2021. The data obtained from the literature review were summarized in a single dataset in which each reference paper was considered as an instance, and the study characteristics were considered as attributes. The attributes used for the multiple correspondence analysis were publication year, study type, sample size, age, stroke phase, stroke type, functional status, AI type, and AI function. RESULTS: Forty-four studies were included. The analysis showed that spasticity analysis based on ML techniques was used for the cases of stroke with moderate functional status. The techniques of deep learning and pressure sensors were used for gait analysis. Machine learning techniques and algorithms were used for upper limb and reaching analyses. The inertial measurement unit technique was applied in studies where the functional status was between mild and severe. The fuzzy logic technique was used for activity classifiers. CONCLUSION: The prevailing research themes demonstrated the growing utility of AI algorithms for stroke evaluation.

Can the choice reaction time be modified after COVID-19 diagnosis? A prospective cohort study.

Assessment of cognitive processing speed through choice reaction time (CRT) can be an objective tool to assess cognitive functions after COVID-19 infection. Objective: This study aimed to assess CRT in individuals after acute COVID-19 infection over 1 year. Methods: We prospectively analyzed 30 individuals (male: 9, female: 21) with mild-moderate functional status after COVID-19 and 30 individuals (male: 8, female: 22) without COVID-19. Cognitive and neuropsychiatric symptoms were evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), respectively. CRT (milliseconds) was evaluated by finding the difference between the photodiode signal and the electromyographic (EMG) onset latency of anterior deltoid, brachial biceps, and triceps during the task of reaching a luminous target. CRT was evaluated three times over 1 year after COVID-19: baseline assessment (>4 weeks of COVID-19 diagnosis), between 3 and 6 months, and between 6 and 12 months. Results: The multiple comparison analysis shows CRT reduction of the anterior deltoid in the COVID-19 group at 3-6 (p=0.001) and 6-12 months (p<0.001) compared to the control group. We also observed CRT reduction of the triceps at 6-12 months (p=0.002) and brachial biceps at 0-3 (p<0.001), 3-6 (p<0.001), and 6-12 months (p<0.001) in the COVID-19 compared to the control group. Moderate correlations were observed between MoCA and CRT of the anterior deltoid (r=-0.63; p=0.002) and brachial biceps (r=-0.67; p=0.001) at 6-12 months in the COVID-19 group. Conclusions: There was a reduction in CRT after acute COVID-19 over 1 year. A negative correlation was also observed between MoCA and CRT only from 6 to 12 months after COVID-19 infection.

A avaliação da velocidade de processamento cognitivo por meio do tempo de reação de escolha (TRE) pode ser uma ferramenta objetiva para acompanhar as alterações cognitivas após a COVID-19. Objetivo: Avaliar o TRE em pacientes após infecção aguda por COVID-19 ao longo de um ano. Métodos: Foram avaliados 30 indivíduos (sexo masculino: nove; feminino: 21) com estado funcional leve-moderado após infecção por COVID-19 e 30 (sexo masculino: oito; feminino: 22) sem COVID-19. A avaliação foi feita pelo Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) e pela Escala Hospitalar de Ansiedade e Depressão. O TRE (milissegundos) foi avaliado pela diferença entre o sinal luminoso e a latência de início da atividade muscular (EMG) do deltoide anterior (DA), do bíceps braquial (BB) e do tríceps durante uma tarefa de alcance. O TRE foi avaliado ao longo de um ano: avaliação inicial (>4 semanas após diagnóstico de COVID-19), em 3­6 meses e em 6­12 meses. Resultados: Houve redução do TRE do DA no grupo COVID-19 em 3­6 meses (p=0,001) e 6­12 meses (p<0,001) em comparação com o grupo de controle. Também foi observada redução na TRE do tríceps em 6­12 meses (p=0,002) e do BB em 0­3 meses (p<0,001), 3­6 meses (p<0,001) e 6­12 meses (p<0,001) no grupo COVID-19 em comparação com o grupo de controle. Correlações moderadas foram observadas entre MoCA e TRE do DA (r=-0,63; p=0,002) e BB (r=-0,67; p=0,001) aos 6­12 meses no grupo COVID-19. Conclusões: Houve redução do TRE após COVID-19 ao longo de um ano, além de correlação negativa entre MoCA e TRE no período de seis a 12 meses após COVID-19.

Effect of stem cell treatment on functional recovery of spinocerebellar ataxia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Spinocerebellar ataxia is a hereditary neurodegenerative disease characterized by changes in balance, locomotion and motor coordination. Stem cell therapies are currently being investigated as an alternative to delay the evolution of the disease, and some experimental studies have investigated the effect of stem cell treatment on spinocerebellar ataxia. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to investigate whether the application of stem cells produced an effect on functional recovery in individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia. METHODS: The studies included in this review investigated the efficacy and safety of a protocol for the application of mesenchymal stem cells extracted from umbilical cord and adipose tissue. Two studies used intrathecal route for application and one study used intravenous route. RESULTS: Studies have shown clinical improvement in the scores of the ICARS (International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale), ADL (Activities of Daily Living Scale), BBS (Berg Balance Scale) and SARA (Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia), but lacked statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: There was low evidence for recommending stem cell therapy in individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia, and no statistical difference was observed for improving functional recovery of patients. Further studies are needed with different designs, largest sample sizes and placebo control, to fully understand anticipated outcomes of cellular therapy for spinocerebellar ataxia.