RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are chronic malignant diseases that typically necessitate diverse strategies to achieve remission. Systemic interferon alpha (IFN-α, subtypes 2a and 2b) has been used for MF/SS since 1984, however its production was recently stopped and so the recombinant pegylated (PEG) form of IFN α-2a remains as single IFN alternative treatment, even though not approved for MF/SS. OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness and safety of PEG IFN α-2a in monotherapy and in combination with other treatments using time to next treatment (TTNT) as a measure of clinical therapeutic benefit in real world setting. METHODS: We conducted an international and multicenter retrospective study of patients with MF and SS at any stage, treated with PEG IFN α-2a, from July 2012 to February 2022. Patients were included across 11 centers in 10 countries. Primary endpoints were to determine TTNT of PEG IFN α-2a and the adverse events (AE) in MF/SS. RESULTS: In total 105 patients were included, mean age was 61 (22-86 years); 42 (40%) with disease stage IA-IIA, 63 (60%) with stage IIB-IVB. PEG IFN α-2a was combined with other therapies in 67 (64%) patients, usually with extracorporeal photopheresis (36%) and bexarotene (22%). Fifty-seven percent of stage I-IIA patients achieved ORR, whereas 51% of stage IIB-IVB. Combination therapy showed a TTNT of 10.4 months, while 7 months in monotherapy (p=0.0099). Overall, TTNT was 9.2 months, ORR was 53% (56/105), CR and PR were 13% and 40%, respectively.AE were described in 69% (72) of the patients. Flu-like symptoms (27%), lymphopenia (23%) and elevated liver function (10%) were the most frequently reported. Grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 23 (21%) patients, which were mostly related to myelosuppression. LIMITATIONS: retrospective data analysis and unrestricted number of combination therapies. CONCLUSIONS: PEG IFN α-2a for MF/SS showed ORR of 53%, TTNT of 9.2 months, superiority of combination regimens in comparison to monotherapy and doses of 180 mcg/weekly related to higher ORR.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Guidelines addressing melanoma in-transit metastasis (ITM) recommend immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as a first-line treatment option, despite the fact that there are no efficacy data available from prospective trials for exclusively ITM disease. The study aims to analyze the outcome of patients with ITM treated with ICI based on data from a large cohort of patients treated at international referral clinics. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients treated between January 2015 and December 2020 from Australia, Europe, and the USA, evaluating treatment with ICI for ITM with or without nodal involvement (AJCC8 N1c, N2c, and N3c) and without distant disease (M0). Treatment was with PD-1 inhibitor (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and/or CTLA-4 inhibitor (ipilimumab). The response was evaluated according to the RECIST criteria modified for cutaneous lesions. RESULTS: A total of 287 patients from 21 institutions in eight countries were included. Immunotherapy was first-line treatment in 64 (22%) patients. PD-1 or CTLA-4 inhibitor monotherapy was given in 233 (81%) and 23 (8%) patients, respectively, while 31 (11%) received both in combination. The overall response rate was 56%, complete response (CR) rate was 36%, and progressive disease (PD) rate was 32%. Median PFS was ten months (95% CI 7.4-12.6 months) with a one-, two-, and five-year PFS rate of 48%, 33%, and 18%, respectively. Median MSS was not reached, and the one-, two-, and five-year MSS rates were 95%, 83%, and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Systemic immunotherapy is an effective treatment for melanoma ITM. Future studies should evaluate the role of systemic immunotherapy in the context of multimodality therapy, including locoregional treatments such as surgery, intralesional therapy, and regional therapies.
