Nanoemulsions Based on Sunflower and Rosehip Oils: The Impact of Natural and Synthetic Stabilizers on Skin Penetration and an Ex Vivo Wound Healing Model.

Vegetable oils offer excellent biological properties, but their high lipophilicity limits their bioavailability. This work aimed to develop nanoemulsions based on sunflower and rosehip oils and to evaluate their wound-healing activity. The influence of phospholipids of plant origin on nanoemulsions' characteristics was investigated. A nanoemulsion prepared with a mixture of phospholipids and synthetic emulsifiers (Nano-1) was compared with another prepared only with phospholipids (Nano-2). The healing activity was evaluated in wounds induced in human organotypic skin explant culture (hOSEC) based on histological and immunohistochemical analysis. The hOSEC wound model was validated, showing that high nanoparticle concentration in the wound bed interferes with cell mobility and the ability to respond to the treatment. Nanoemulsions were 130 to 370 nm, with a concentration of 1013 particles/mL, and a low potential to induce inflammatory processes. Nano-2 was three times larger than Nano-1 but less cytotoxic and could target the oils to the epidermis. Nano-1 permeated intact skin to the dermis and showed a more prominent healing effect than Nano-2 in the hOSEC wound model. Changes in the lipid nanoemulsion stabilizers impacted the cutaneous and cellular penetration of the oils, cytotoxicity, and healing kinetics, resulting in versatile delivery systems.

Investigation of the antimicrobial effect of anodic iontophoresis on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria for skin infections treatment.

Iontophoresis, a non-invasive application of a constant low-intensity electric current, is a promising strategy to accelerate wound healing. Although its mechanisms are not yet fully elucidated, part of its action seems related to inhibiting bacteria growth. This work aimed to investigate the antimicrobial effect of iontophoresis using Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli strains, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. Anodic iontophoresis was applied to each bacterial suspension using Ag/AgCl electrodes, and bacteria viability was evaluated after 24 h incubation by counting colony-forming units. A Quality-by-Design approach was performed to assess the influence of the iontophoresis' intensity and application time on bacterial viability. Cell morphology was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Iontophoresis showed antimicrobial effects on the Gram-positive bacteria only at 5 mA and 60 min application. However, a linear relationship was observed between intensity and application time for the Gram-negative one, causing drastic morphological changes and up to 98 % death. The cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria seems more susceptible to disorganization triggered by iontophoresis-induced ion transport than Gram-positive ones. Therefore, anodic iontophoresis can be a powerful ally in controlling Gram-negative bacteria proliferation in wounds.

Sonodynamic therapy: Ultrasound parameters and in vitro experimental configurations.

Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) is a new therapeutic modality for noninvasive cancer treatment based on the association of ultrasound and sonosensitizer drugs. Up to date, there is not a consensus on the standardization of the experimental conditions for the in vitro studies to correctly assess cell viability during SDT. Therefore, this review article mainly describes how the main ultrasound parameters and experimental setups of ultrasound application in vitro studies can influence the SDT bioeffects/response. The sonodynamic action is impacted by the combination of frequency, intensity, duty cycle, and ultrasound application time. The variation of experimental setups in cell culture, such as the transducer position, cell-transducer distance, coupling medium thickness, or type of culture, also influences the sonodynamic response. The intensity, duty cycle, and sonication duration increase cytotoxicity and reactive oxygen species production. For similar ultrasound parameters, differences in the experimental configuration impact cell death in vitro. Four main experimental setups are used to assess for SDT in cell culture (i) a planar transducer placed directly in contact with the bottom of the culture microplate; (ii) microplate positioned in the transducer's far-field using a water tank; (iii) sealed cell culture tubes immersed in water away from the transducer; and (iv) transducer dipped directly into the well with cell culture. Because of the significant variations in the experimental setups, sonodynamic response can significantly vary, and the translation of these results for in vivo experimentation is difficult. Therefore, a well-designed and detailed in vitro experimental setup is vital for understanding the interactions among the biological medium, the sonosensitizer, and the ultrasound for the in vitro to in vivo translation in SDT.