Clinical impact and cost-consequence analysis of ePlex® blood culture identification panels for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections: a single-center randomized controlled trial.

To assess clinical impact and perform cost-consequence analysis of the broadest multiplex PCR panels available for the rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections (BSI). Single-center, randomized controlled trial conducted from June 2019 to February 2021 at a French University hospital with an institutional antimicrobial stewardship program. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with optimized antimicrobial treatment 12 h after transmission of positivity and Gram stain results from the first positive BC. This percentage was significantly higher in the multiplex PCR (mPCR) group (90/105 = 85.7% %, CI95% [77.5 ; 91.8] vs. 68/107 = 63.6%, CI95% [53.7 ; 72.6]; p < 10- 3) at interim analysis, resulting in the early termination of the study after the inclusion of 309 patients. For patients not optimized at baseline, the median time to obtain an optimized therapy was much shorter in the mPCR group than in the control group (6.9 h, IQR [2.9; 17.8] vs. 26.4 h, IQR [3.4; 47.5]; p = 0.001). Early optimization of antibiotic therapy resulted in a non-statistically significant decrease in mortality from 12.4 to 8.8% (p = 0.306), with a trend towards a shorter median length of stay (18 vs. 20 days; p = 0.064) and a non-significant reduction in the average cost per patient of €3,065 (p = 0.15). mPCR identified all the bacteria present in 88% of the samples. Despite its higher laboratory cost, the use of multiplex PCR for BSI diagnosis leads to early-optimised therapy, seems cost-effective and could reduce mortality and length of stay. Their impact could probably be improved if implemented 24/7.

2017 French health authority guidelines for neonates at risk of early-onset sepsis: Adherence and barriers in a tertiary hospital.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the adherence to the French Health Authority's 2017 guidelines concerning early-onset sepsis (EOS) in neonates. This 6-month prospective observational study was conducted in 2020 in a tertiary hospital maternity unit. Neonates were classified according to their risk of EOS and the level of appropriate surveillance was analyzed. The risk of EOS was determined for 69.9% of the 1024 included neonates. Of the 123 neonates with a moderate or high risk of EOS, the optimal clinical surveillance was 88%. Even in a tertiary hospital, with training of caregivers, adherence to guidelines was incomplete. Some corrective measures are suggested and should be applied to enhance the adherence.