Adverse events following infusion of T cells for adoptive immunotherapy: a 10-year experience.

BACKGROUND AIMS: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) currently recommends at least 4 h of recipient monitoring after T cell infusions to detect early infusion reactions. Recent catastrophic reactions to 'first-in-man' biologic agents have emphasized the importance of this rule for initial studies of new products. The value of such monitoring for better established agents is less obvious. METHODS: We reviewed infusion-related adverse events (AE) following administration of ex vivo-expanded T cell products (antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes, allodepleted T cells, and genetically modified T cells) on investigational new drug (IND) studies in our center. RESULTS: From 1998 to 2008, we infused 381 T cell products to 180 recipients, enrolled on 18 studies, receiving T cells targeting malignancies or post-transplant viral infections. There were no grade 3-4 infusion reactions during initial monitoring or 24-h follow-up. Twenty-four mild (grade 1-2) AE occurred in 21 infusions either during or immediately following infusion (up to 6 h), most commonly nausea and vomiting (10/24, 41.6%), probably because of the dimethyl sulfoxide cryoprotectant, and hypotension (20.8%), attributable to diphenhydramine pre-medication. Twenty-two additional non-severe events were reported within 24 h of infusion, most commonly culture-negative fever, chills and nausea. An increased risk of adverse events was associated with age [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-1.00, P = 0.05], while an increased risk of immediate infusion-related events was higher in patients reporting allergies (IRR 2.72, 95% CI 1.00-7.40, P = 0.05); sex, disease type and T cell source (allogeneic or autologous) had no effect on frequency of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Infusion of these T cell products was safe in the outpatient setting and associated with no severe reactions, so monitoring for 1 h after infusion is probably sufficient. As many of the AE were attributable to diphenhydramine premedication, a lower dose (0.25 mg/kg) should be selected.

Comparable outcomes of matched-related and alternative donor stem cell transplantation for pediatric severe aplastic anemia.

Matched sibling donor (MSD) bone marrow transplantation is the treatment of choice for pediatric patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA); however, only about 33% of patients will have an HLA-identical sibling. Alternative donor (AD) transplants may be an option for these patients, but such therapies have been associated with greater incidence of graft failure and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We retrospectively analyzed 36 pediatric patients who received 38 bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplants (15 MSD and 23 AD) for SAA at our institution from April 1997 to October 2005. Nineteen AD recipients received reduced intensity conditioning with cyclophosphamide, low-dose total body irradiation, and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or Campath. The 4-year overall survival for MSD recipients was 93% versus 89% for AD recipients treated with reduced intensity conditioning regimens at a median follow-up of 52 months (range, 6-99 months). No patient receiving Campath, compared with 3 of 9 patients receiving ATG, developed extensive, chronic GVHD. We conclude that, for children with SAA, AD transplantation is as effective as MSD transplantation. Further, compared with ATG, preparatory regimens containing Campath may be associated with a lower incidence of extensive, chronic GHVD.