Atraumatic Spontaneous Transvaginal Small Bowel Evisceration: A Rare Surgical Emergency.

Abdominal pain ranks as the predominant cause for emergency department consultations. Although rare, transvaginal evisceration of the small intestine necessitates immediate surgical intervention due to its potential to induce intestinal ischemia and peritonitis. Key risk factors include postmenopausal status, a history of gynecologic surgery, and heightened abdominal pressure. Clinical presentation typically involves pain and protrusion of intestinal contents or even abdominal viscera. Diagnosis relies on thorough clinical assessment, and treatment strategies should be tailored to each patient. Here, we describe the case of a 65-year-old female patient with a non-traumatic evisceration of the ileum, who had undergone total abdominal hysterectomy following anterior colpocele a year ago, subsequently necessitating exploratory laparotomy and repair of the vaginal ampulla.

Ischemic Stroke as an Initial Manifestation of Antiphospholipid Syndrome in an Adolescent: A Case Report.

Cerebrovascular diseases in pediatric patients are relatively rare. Ischemic stroke in adolescents is associated with a poor prognosis. The most common causes include systemic diseases, such as heart disease and hypercoagulation disorders. It is important to mention that one of the most common acquired hypercoagulation states is the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Patients with this disease may present stroke as the first clinical manifestation, which not only increases morbidity in these patients but presents a diagnostic challenge. This case presents one example of how APS can present as a pediatric stroke. The diagnostic approach should always be through the presence of specific antibodies accompanied by the presence of a thromboembolic episode proven by catheterization or an imaging study. In the brain, the preferred imaging study is magnetic resonance imaging. Management is based on anticoagulation therapy and continuous monitoring in the intensive care unit.

Risk-Benefit Comparison Between Endoloop and Endostapler Devices for the Closure of Appendiceal Stumps in Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

Introduction Acute appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdomen and the most frequent surgical emergency in the world. Since the nineteenth century, surgical resolution has been the most accepted treatment worldwide, and laparoscopic appendectomy is currently preferred as the treatment of choice because it has several benefits. The closure of the appendiceal stump is the most crucial step during appendectomy since its inadequate management can cause post-surgical complications. Throughout recent years, several methods have been proposed to perform this closure. This study was performed to compare the post-surgical outcomes of the use of endoloop and endostapler devices. Methods This is a retrospective study of 290 patients aged 18 to 83 who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy between 2016 and 2020. Demographic data, clinical history, tomographic findings, and laboratory data were collected, as well as appendicular base management technique, severity degree of appendicitis at hospital admission, postoperative complications at 30 days, hospital readmission, and in-hospital stay. Statistical tests and binary logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors, with a significance level of p<0.05. Results Demographic data and clinical history did not show statistically significant differences. The presence of a pre-surgical abscess with tomography was 1.58 times higher in the endostapler group. Post-surgical results showed that the use of endostapler devices represented a 2.7 times higher risk of post-surgical abscess. The endostapler group was also found to have 1.87 times the risk of post-surgical sepsis. Conclusion Our study shows that the use of an endoloop reduces the risk of postoperative abscess by 16.5% and protects against the development of post-surgical sepsis by 30%.