Serum Markers of Neurodegeneration Are Strongly Linked to Heart Failure Severity and Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is prevalent in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), affecting self-care and outcomes. Novel blood-based biomarkers have emerged as potential diagnostic tools for neurodegeneration. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess neurodegeneration in HFrEF by measuring neurofilament light chain (NfL), total tau (t-tau), amyloid beta 40 (Aß40), and amyloid beta 42 (Aß42) in a large, well-characterized cohort. METHODS: The study included 470 patients with HFrEF from a biobank-linked prospective registry at the Medical University of Vienna. High-sensitivity single-molecule assays were used for measurement. Unplanned heart failure (HF) hospitalization and all-cause death were recorded as outcome parameters. RESULTS: All markers, but not the Aß42:Aß40 ratio, correlated with HF severity, ie, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and NYHA functional class, and comorbidity burden and were significantly associated with all-cause death and HF hospitalization (crude HR: all-cause death: NfL: 4.44 [95% CI: 3.02-6.53], t-tau: 5.04 [95% CI: 2.97-8.58], Aß40: 3.90 [95% CI: 2.27-6.72], and Aß42: 5.14 [95% CI: 2.84-9.32]; HF hospitalization: NfL: 2.48 [95% CI: 1.60-3.85], t-tau: 3.44 [95% CI: 1.95-6.04], Aß40: 3.13 [95% CI: 1.84-5.34], and Aß42: 3.48 [95% CI: 1.93-6.27]; P < 0.001 for all). These associations remained statistically significant after multivariate adjustment including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. The discriminatory accuracy of NfL in predicting all-cause mortality was comparable to the well-established risk marker N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (C-index: 0.70 vs 0.72; P = 0.225), whereas the C-indices of t-tau, Aß40, Aß42, and the Aß42:Aß40 ratio were significantly lower (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Neurodegeneration is directly interwoven with the progression of HF. Biomarkers of neurodegeneration, particularly NfL, may help identify patients potentially profiting from a comprehensive neurological work-up. Further research is necessary to test whether early diagnosis or optimized HFrEF treatment can preserve cognitive function.

Excess renin is attributed to the combination of forward and backward failure in HFrEF.

AIMS: Regulation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) still raises questions, as a large proportion of patients show normal renin levels despite manifest disease. Experimental venous congestion results in reduced renal perfusion pressure and stimulates renin secretion. We hypothesized that excess renin levels are mainly a result of right ventricular failure as a sequalae of left ventricular dysfunction. The study aimed to link right ventricular function (RVF) with renin levels and to investigate further contributors to excess RAS activation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-two chronic HFrEF patients undergoing routine ambulatory care were consecutively enrolled in a prospective, registry-based, observational study. Laboratory parameters, including cardiac-specific markers renin, aldosterone, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), echocardiographic examination (n = 247), and right heart catheterization (n = 85), were documented. The relationship between renin and its respective parameters was analysed. Renin concentration was not associated with the New York Heart Association class or NT-proBNP. Systolic blood pressure, systemic vascular resistance, serum sodium, aldosterone, and lactate dehydrogenase were associated with increased renin levels (P < 0.035 for all). Renin levels similarly increased with worsening of RVF parameters such as fractional area change, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, tissue Doppler imaging, and inferior vena cava diameter (P < 0.011 for all), but not with pulmonary pressure. Excess renin levels were observed when worsening RVF was combined with reduced renal perfusion {625 µIU/mL [interquartile range (IQR): 182-1761] vs. 67 µIU/mL [IQR: 16-231], P < 0.001}, which was associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: While unrelated to classical indices of HF severity, circulating renin levels increase with the worsening of RVF, especially in the combined presence of forward and backward failure. This might explain normal renin levels in HFrEF patients but also excess renin levels in poor haemodynamic conditions.

Annular remodelling predicts outcome in isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation: a registry-based echocardiographic analysis.

AIMS: Depending on volume status, secondary tricuspid regurgitation (sTR) has a strong dynamic component. In contrast, associated structural dilatation of the tricuspid annulus and the right heart chambers may be less volume dependent. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of right heart remodelling in isolated severe sTR (isoTR). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 36 000 patients from the longitudinal echocardiographic database of our tertiary centre were screened for severe isoTR [vena contracta (VC) ≥ 7 mm] in the absence of atrial fibrillation (AF), other valve disease, and/or reduced systolic left ventricular function. Echocardiographic examinations were re-read, focusing on right ventricular (RV) parameters and on quantitative and qualitative parameters of isoTR. All-cause mortality was defined as the primary endpoint. Two hundred and sixteen patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Severe TR was predominant; only few were classified in the new grades massive [n = 23 (10%)] and torrential TR [n = 4 (2%)]. During a median follow-up of 35 months (20-53), all-cause mortality was 31% (n = 67). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed no association of VC, effective regurgitant orifice area, or regurgitant volume with all-cause mortality. However, indexed RV end-diastolic diameter (P < 0.001), indexed right atrial dimensions (P = 0.019), and particularly tricuspid valve (TV) annulus diameter diastole index (P = 0.002) and TV annulus diameter systole index (P = 0.001) were significantly associated with outcome. CONCLUSION: Severe isolated TR in the absence of AF is a rare finding with a grim prognosis. Tricuspid annular diameter dimensions rather than quantitative measures of TR proved to be of significant prognostic value indicating a continuous remodelling leading to a 'point of no return' with a dismal outcome.

The 'peptide for life' initiative in the emergency department study.

AIMS: Natriuretic peptide (NP) uptake varies in Emergency Departments (EDs) across Europe. The 'Peptide for Life' (P4L) initiative, led by Heart Failure Association, aims to enhance NP utilization for early diagnosis of heart failure (HF). We tested the hypothesis that implementing an educational campaign in Western Balkan countries would significantly increase NP adoption rates in the ED. METHODS AND RESULTS: This registry examined NP adoption before and after implementing the P4L-ED study across 10 centres in five countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia. A train-the-trainer programme was implemented to enhance awareness of NP testing in the ED, and centres without access received point-of-care instruments. Differences in NP testing between the pre-P4L-ED and post-P4L-ED phases were evaluated. A total of 2519 patients were enrolled in the study: 1224 (48.6%) in the pre-P4L-ED phase and 1295 (51.4%) in the post-P4L-ED phase. NP testing was performed in the ED on 684 patients (55.9%) during the pre-P4L-ED phase and on 1039 patients (80.3%) during the post-P4L-ED phase, indicating a significant absolute difference of 24.4% (95% CI: 20.8% to 27.9%, P < 0.001). The use of both NPs and echocardiography significantly increased from 37.7% in the pre-P4L-ED phase to 61.3% in the post-P4L-ED phase. There was an increased prescription of diuretics and SGLT2 inhibitors during the post-P4L-ED phase. CONCLUSIONS: By increasing awareness and providing resources, the utilization of NPs increased in the ED, leading to improved diagnostic accuracy and enhanced patient care.

CILP-1 Is a Biomarker for Backward Failure and Right Ventricular Dysfunction in HFrEF.

BACKGROUND: CILP-1 regulates myocardial fibrotic response and remodeling and was reported to indicate right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in pulmonary hypertension (PH) and heart failure (HF). This study examines CILP-1 as a potential biomarker for RVD and prognosis in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients on guideline-directed medical therapy. METHODS: CILP-1 levels were measured in 610 HFrEF patients from a prospective registry with biobanking (2016-2022). Correlations with echocardiographic and hemodynamic data and its association with RVD and prognosis were analyzed. RESULTS: The median age was 62 years (Q1-Q3: 52-72), 77.7% of patients were male, and the median NT-proBNP was 1810 pg/mL (Q1-Q3: 712-3962). CILP-1 levels increased with HF severity, as indicated by NT-proBNP and NYHA class (p < 0.0001, for both). CILP-1 showed a weak-moderate direct association with increased left ventricular filling pressures and its sequalae, i.e., backward failure (LA diameter rs = 0.15, p = 0.001; sPAP rs = 0.28, p = 0.010; RVF rs = 0.218, p < 0.0001), but not with cardiac index (CI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). CILP-1 trended as a risk factor for all-cause mortality (crude HR for 500 pg/mL increase: 1.03 (95%CI: 1.00-1.06), p = 0.053) but lost significance when it was adjusted for NT-proBNP (adj. HR: 1.00 (95%CI: 1.00-1.00), p = 0.770). No association with cardiovascular hospitalization was observed. CONCLUSIONS: CILP-1 correlates with HFrEF severity and may indicate an elevated risk for all-cause mortality, though it is not independent from NT-proBNP. Increased CILP-1 is associated with backward failure and RVD rather than forward failure. Whether CILP-1 release in this context is based on elevated pulmonary pressures or is specific to RVD needs to be further investigated.

Renin Trajectories and Outcome in Stable Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) on Contemporary Therapy: A Monocentric Study from an Austrian Tertiary Hospital Outpatient Clinic.

Introduction: The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is the main target of neurohumoral therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) effectively reducing mortality. Reasonably, renin might serve as a biomarker for risk prediction and therapy response. Renin indeed bears some additional value to clinical risk models, albeit the effect is not pronounced. Whether assessing renin trajectories can overcome the weaknesses of single renin measurements has not been reported. Methods: A total of 505 patients with stable HFrEF were enrolled prospectively and followed through routine clinical visits. Active plasma renin concentration was documented up to 5 years. Changes in renin were analyzed throughout the disease course, and survival was compared for different renin trajectories within the first year. Results: Baseline renin levels were not related to all-cause mortality (crude HR for an increase of 100 µiE/ml: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.99-1.02), p = 0.414) but associated with unplanned HF hospitalizations (crude HR: 1.01 (95% CI: 1.00-1.02), p = 0.015). Renin increased during the disease course from baseline to 1-year and 2-year FUP (122.7 vs. 185.6 µIU/ml, p = 0.039, and 122.7 vs. 258.5 µIU/ml, p = 0.001). Both survival and unplanned HF hospitalization rates were comparable for different renin trajectories at 1-year FUP (p = 0.546, p = 0.357). Conclusions: Intriguingly, renin is not a good biomarker to indicate prognosis in HF, while renin trajectories over a 1-year period do not have an additional value. Rapid physiologic plasma renin variations, but also opposing effects of angiotensinogen-derived metabolites under presence of RAS blockade, might obscure the predictive ability of renin.

Obesity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with and without diabetes: risk factor or innocent bystander?

AIMS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a condition that commonly coexists with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. Whether the obesity-related survival benefit generally observed in HFpEF extends to individuals with concomitant T2DM is unclear. This study sought to examine the prognostic role of overweight and obesity in a large cohort of HFpEF with and without T2DM. METHODS AND RESULTS: This large-scale cohort study included patients with HFpEF enrolled between 2010 and 2020. The relationship between body mass index (BMI), T2DM, and survival was assessed. A total of 6744 individuals with HFpEF were included, of which 1702 (25%) had T2DM. Patients with T2DM had higher BMI values (29.4 kg/m2 vs. 27.1 kg/m2, P < 0.001), higher N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide values (864 mg/dL vs. 724 mg/dL, P < 0.001), and a higher prevalence of numerous risk factors/comorbidities than those without T2DM. During a median follow-up time of 47 months (Q1-Q3: 20-80), 2014 (30%) patients died. Patients with T2DM had a higher incidence of fatal events compared with those without T2DM, with a mortality rate of 39.2% and 26.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). In the overall cohort, using the BMI category 22.5-24.9 kg/m2 as the reference group, the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause death was increased in patients with BMI <22.5 kg/m2 [HR: 1.27 (confidence interval 1.09-1.48), P = 0.003] and decreased in BMI categories ≥25 kg/m2. After multivariate adjustment, BMI remained significantly inversely associated with survival in non-T2DM, whereas survival was unaltered at a wide range of BMI in patients with T2DM. CONCLUSION: Among the various phenotypes of HFpEF, the T2DM phenotype is specifically associated with a greater disease burden. Higher BMI is linked to improved survival in HFpEF overall, while this effect neutralises in patients with concomitant T2DM. Advising BMI-based weight targets and weight loss may be pursued with different intensity in the management of HFpEF, particularly in the presence of T2DM.

Individuals with HFpEF and concomitant diabetes show a distinct phenotype particularly associated with a higher disease burden and worse outcome. The obesity paradox observed in individuals with heart failure may not be generalized to HFpEF patients with concomitant diabetes.

Contemporary insights into the epidemiology, impact and treatment of secondary tricuspid regurgitation across the heart failure spectrum.

AIM: Tricuspid regurgitation secondary to heart failure (HF) is common with considerable impact on survival and hospitalization rates. Currently, insights into epidemiology, impact, and treatment of secondary tricuspid regurgitation (sTR) across the entire HF spectrum are lacking, yet are necessary for healthcare decision-making. METHODS AND RESULTS: This population-based study included data from 13 469 patients with HF and sTR from the Viennese community over a 10-year period. The primary outcome was long-term mortality. Overall, HF with preserved ejection fraction was the most frequent (57%, n = 7733) HF subtype and the burden of comorbidities was high. Severe sTR was present in 1514 patients (11%), most common among patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (20%, n = 496). Mortality of patients with sTR was higher than expected survival of sex- and age-matched community and independent of HF subtype (moderate sTR: hazard ratio [HR] 6.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.88-6.80, p < 0.001; severe sTR: HR 9.04; 95% CI 8.27-9.87, p < 0.001). In comparison to HF and no/mild sTR patients, mortality increased for moderate sTR (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.48-1.69, p < 0.001) and for severe sTR (HR 2.19, 95% CI 2.01-2.38, p < 0.001). This effect prevailed after multivariate adjustment and was similar across all HF subtypes. In subgroup analysis, severe sTR mortality risk was more pronounced in younger patients (<70 years). Moderate and severe sTR were rarely treated (3%, n = 147), despite availability of state-of-the-art facilities and universal health care. CONCLUSION: Secondary tricuspid regurgitation is frequent, increasing with age and associated with excess mortality independent of HF subtype. Nevertheless, sTR is rarely treated surgically or percutaneously. With the projected increase in HF prevalence and population ageing, the data suggest a major burden for healthcare systems that needs to be adequately addressed. Low-risk transcatheter treatment options may provide a suitable alternative.

Metabolomics implicate eicosanoids in severe functional mitral regurgitation.

AIMS: Secondary, or functional, mitral regurgitation (FMR) was recently recognized as a separate clinical entity, complicating heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and entailing particularly poor outcome. Currently, there is a lack of targeted therapies for FMR due to the fact that pathomechanisms leading to FMR progression are incompletely understood. In this study, we sought to perform metabolomic profiling of HFrEF patients with severe FMR, comparing results to patients with no or mild FMR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Targeted plasma metabolomics and untargeted eicosanoid analyses were performed in samples drawn from HFrEF patients (n = 80) on optimal guideline-directed medical therapy. Specifically, 17 eicosanoids and 188 metabolites were analysed. Forty-seven patients (58.8%) had severe FMR, and 33 patients (41.2%) had no or non-severe FMR. Comparison of eicosanoid levels between groups, accounting for age, body mass index, and sex, revealed significant up-regulation of six eicosanoids (11,12-EET, 13(R)-HODE, 12(S)-HETE, 8,9-DiHETrE, metPGJ2, and 20-HDoHE) in severe FMR patients. Metabolites did not differ significantly. In patients with severe FMR, but not in those without severe FMR, levels of 8,9-DiHETrE above a cut-off specified by receiver-operating characteristic analysis independently predicted all-cause mortality after a median follow-up of 43 [interquartile range 38, 48] months [hazard ratio 12.488 (95% confidence interval 3.835-40.666), P < 0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: We report the up-regulation of various eicosanoids in patients with severe FMR, with 8,9-DiHETrE appearing to predict mortality. Our observations may serve as a nucleus for further investigations into the causes and consequences of metabolic derangements in this important valvular abnormality.

Biomarkers in heart failure clinical trials. A review from the Biomarkers Working Group of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.

The approval of new heart failure (HF) therapies has slowed over the past two decades in part due to the high costs of conducting large randomized clinical trials that are needed to adequately power major clinical endpoint studies. Several biomarkers have been identified reflecting different elements of HF pathophysiology, with possible applications in diagnosis, risk stratification, treatment monitoring, and even in the design of clinical trials. Biomarkers could potentially be used to refine study inclusion criteria to enable enrolment of patients who are more likely to respond to a therapeutic intervention, despite being at sufficient risk to meet pre-determined study endpoint rates. When there is a close relationship between biomarker levels and clinical endpoints, changes in biomarker levels after a given treatment can act as a surrogate endpoint, potentially reducing the duration and cost of a clinical trial. Natriuretic peptides have been widely used in clinical trials with a variable amount of added value, which such variation being probably due to the absence of a close pathophysiological connection to the study drug. Notable exceptions to this include sacubitril/valsartan and vericiguat. Future studies should seek to adopt unbiased approaches for discovery of true companion diagnostics; with -omics-based tools, biomarkers might be more precisely selected for use in clinical trials to identify responses that closely reflect the biological effects of the drug under investigation. Finally, biomarkers associated with cardiac damage and remodelling, such as cardiac troponin, could be employed as safety endpoints provided that standardization between different assays is achieved.

Congestion in heart failure: a circulating biomarker-based perspective. A review from the Biomarkers Working Group of the Heart Failure Association, European Society of Cardiology.

Congestion is a cardinal sign of heart failure (HF). In the past, it was seen as a homogeneous epiphenomenon that identified patients with advanced HF. However, current evidence shows that congestion in HF varies in quantity and distribution. This updated view advocates for a congestive-driven classification of HF according to onset (acute vs. chronic), regional distribution (systemic vs. pulmonary), compartment of distribution (intravascular vs. extravascular), and clinical vs. subclinical. Thus, this review will focus on the utility of circulating biomarkers for assessing and managing the different fluid overload phenotypes. This discussion focused on the clinical utility of the natriuretic peptides, carbohydrate antigen 125 (also called mucin 16), bio-adrenomedullin and mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, ST2 (also known as interleukin-1 receptor-like 1), cluster of differentiation 146, troponin, C-terminal pro-endothelin-1, and parameters of haemoconcentration. The utility of circulation biomarkers on top of clinical evaluation, haemodynamics, and imaging needs to be better determined by dedicated studies. Some multiparametric frameworks in which these tools contribute to management are proposed.

Cardiac remodelling - Part 2: Clinical, imaging and laboratory findings. A review from the Study Group on Biomarkers of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.

In patients with heart failure, the beneficial effects of drug and device therapies counteract to some extent ongoing cardiac damage. According to the net balance between these two factors, cardiac geometry and function may improve (reverse remodelling, RR) and even completely normalize (remission), or vice versa progressively deteriorate (adverse remodelling, AR). RR or remission predict a better prognosis, while AR has been associated with worsening clinical status and outcomes. The remodelling process ultimately involves all cardiac chambers, but has been traditionally evaluated in terms of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. This is the second part of a review paper by the Study Group on Biomarkers of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to ventricular remodelling. This document examines the proposed criteria to diagnose RR and AR, their prevalence and prognostic value, and the variables predicting remodelling in patients managed according to current guidelines. Much attention will be devoted to RR in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction because most studies on cardiac remodelling focused on this setting.

Guideline directed medical therapy and reduction of secondary mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is the recommended initial treatment for secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR), however, supported by only little comprehensive evidence. This study, therefore, sought to assess the effect of GDMT titration on SMR and to identify specific substance combinations able to reduce SMR severity. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 261 patients who completed two visits with an echocardiographic exam available within 1 month at each visit. After comprehensively defining GDMT titration as well as SMR reduction, logistic regression analysis was applied in order to assess the effects of overall GDMT titration and specific substance combinations on SMR severity. SMR severity improved by at least 1° in 39.3% of patients with subsequent titration of GDMT and was accompanied by reverse remodelling and clinical improvement. The effects of GDMT titration were significantly associated with SMR reduction (adj. odds ratio 2.91, 95% confidence interval 1.34-6.32, P = 0.007). Moreover, angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) as well as the combined dosage effects of (i) renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) and mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists (MRA), (ii) beta-blockers (BB) and MRA, as well as (iii) RASi, BB, and MRA were all significantly associated with SMR improvement (P < 0.044 for all). CONCLUSION: The present study provides comprehensive evidence for the effectiveness of contemporary GDMT to specifically improve SMR. Our data indicate that GDMT titration conveys a three-fold increased chance of reducing SMR severity. Moreover, the dosage effects of ARNi, as well as the combination of RASi and MRA, BB and MRA, and all three substances in the aggregate are able to significantly improve SMR.

Malnutrition outweighs the effect of the obesity paradox.

BACKGROUND: High body mass index (BMI) is paradoxically associated with better outcome in patients with heart failure (HF). The effects of malnutrition on this phenomenon across the whole spectrum of HF have not yet been studied. METHODS: In this observational study, patients were classified by guideline diagnostic criteria to one of three heart failure subtypes: reduced (HFrEF), mildy reduced (HFmrEF), and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Data were retrieved from the Viennese-community healthcare provider network between 2010 and 2020. The relationship between BMI, nutritional status reflected by the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and survival was assessed. Patients were classified by the presence (PNI < 45) or absence (PNI ≥ 45) of malnutrition. RESULTS: Of the 11 995 patients enrolled, 6916 (58%) were classified as HFpEF, 2809 (23%) HFmrEF, and 2270 HFrEF (19%). Median age was 70 years (IQR 61-77), and 67% of patients were men. During a median follow-up time of 44 months (IQR 19-76), 3718 (31%) of patients died. After adjustment for potential confounders, BMI per IQR increase was independently associated with better survival (adj. hazard ratio [HR]: 0.91 [CI 0.86-0.97], P = 0.005), this association remained significant after additional adjustment for HF type (adj. HR: 0.92 [CI 0.86-0.98], P = 0.011). PNI was available in 10 005 patients and lowest in HFrEF patients. PNI was independently associated with improved survival (adj. HR: 0.96 [CI 0.95-0.97], P < 0.001); additional adjustment for HF type yielded similar results (adj. HR: 0.96 [CI 0.96-0.97], P < 0.001). Although obese patients experienced a 30% risk reduction, malnutrition at least doubled the risk for death with 1.8- to 2.5-fold higher hazards for patients with poor nutritional status compared with normal weight well-nourished patients. CONCLUSIONS: The obesity paradox seems to be an inherent characteristic of HF regardless of phenotype and nutritional status. Yet malnutrition significantly changes trajectory of outcome with regard to BMI alone: obese patients with malnutrition have a considerably worse outcome compared with their well-nourished counterparts, outweighing protective effects of high BMI alone. In this context, routine recommendation towards weight loss in patients with obesity and HF should generally be made with caution and focus should be shifted on nutritional status.

Cardiac remodelling - Part 1: From cells and tissues to circulating biomarkers. A review from the Study Group on Biomarkers of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.

Cardiac remodelling refers to changes in left ventricular structure and function over time, with a progressive deterioration that may lead to heart failure (HF) development (adverse remodelling) or vice versa a recovery (reverse remodelling) in response to HF treatment. Adverse remodelling predicts a worse outcome, whilst reverse remodelling predicts a better prognosis. The geometry, systolic and diastolic function and electric activity of the left ventricle are affected, as well as the left atrium and on the long term even right heart chambers. At a cellular and molecular level, remodelling involves all components of cardiac tissue: cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells and leucocytes. The molecular, cellular and histological signatures of remodelling may differ according to the cause and severity of cardiac damage, and clearly to the global trend toward worsening or recovery. These processes cannot be routinely evaluated through endomyocardial biopsies, but may be reflected by circulating levels of several biomarkers. Different classes of biomarkers (e.g. proteins, non-coding RNAs, metabolites and/or epigenetic modifications) and several biomarkers of each class might inform on some aspects on HF development, progression and long-term outcomes, but most have failed to enter clinical practice. This may be due to the biological complexity of remodelling, so that no single biomarker could provide great insight on remodelling when assessed alone. Another possible reason is a still incomplete understanding of the role of biomarkers in the pathophysiology of cardiac remodelling. Such role will be investigated in the first part of this review paper on biomarkers of cardiac remodelling.

Neutrophil Activation/Maturation Markers in Chronic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophils are critically involved in the immune response. Inflammatory stimuli alter the expression status of their surface molecule toolset, while inflammation-stimulated granulopoiesis might also influence their maturation status. Data on neutrophil status in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are scarce. The present study aims to evaluate the role of neutrophil CD11b, CD66b and CD64 expression in HFrEF. METHODS: A total of 135 HFrEF patients and 43 controls were recruited. Mean fluorescence intensity of the activation/maturation markers CD11b, CD66b and CD64 was measured on neutrophils by flow cytometry. CD10 (neprilysin) expression was simultaneously determined. RESULTS: Neutrophil CD64 expression was higher in HFrEF compared with controls, while CD11b/CD66b levels were similar. Neutrophil CD11b and CD66b showed a significant direct correlation to neutrophil CD10 expression (rs = 0.573, p < 0.001 and rs = 0.184, p = 0.033). Neutrophil CD11b and CD66b correlated inversely with heart failure severity reflected by NT-proBNP and NYHA class (NT-proBNP: rs = -0.243, p = 0.005 and rs = -0.250, p = 0.004; NYHA class: p = 0.032 and p = 0.055), whereas no association for CD64 could be found. Outcome analysis did not reveal a significant association between the expression of CD11b, CD66b and CD64 and all-cause mortality (p = ns). CONCLUSIONS: The results underline the potential role of neutrophils in HFrEF disease pathophysiology and risk stratification and should stimulate further research, characterizing subpopulations of neutrophils and searching for key molecules involved in the downward spiral of inflammation and heart failure.

Prediction of Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest Using Neurofilament Light Chain is Improved by a Proteomics-Based Multimarker Panel.

BACKGROUND: Continuous advances in resuscitation care have increased survival, but the rate of favorable neurological outcome remains low. We have shown the usefulness of proteomics in identifying novel biomarkers to predict neurological outcome. Neurofilament light chain (NfL), a marker of axonal damage, has since emerged as a promising single marker. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of NfL in comparison with and in addition to our established model. METHODS: NfL was measured in plasma samples drawn at 48 h after cardiac arrest using single-molecule assays. Neurological function was recorded on the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale at discharge from the intensive care unit and after 6 months. The ability to predict a dichotomized outcome (CPC 1-2 vs. 3-5) was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included in this analysis, of whom 21 (30%) showed a favorable outcome (CPC 1-2), compared with 49 (70%) with an unfavorable outcome (CPC 3-5) at discharge. NfL increased from CPC 1 to 5 (16.5 pg/ml to 641 pg/ml, p < 0.001). The addition of NfL to the existing model improved it significantly (Wald test, p < 0.001), and the combination of NfL with a multimarker model showed high areas under the ROC curve (89.7% [95% confidence interval 81.7-97.7] at discharge and 93.7% [88.2-99.2] at 6 months) that were significantly greater than each model alone. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of NfL with other plasma and clinical markers is superior to that of either model alone and achieves high areas under the ROC curve in this relatively small sample.

Tailored Risk Stratification in Severe Mitral Regurgitation and Heart Failure Using Supervised Learning Techniques.

Background: Secondary mitral regurgitation (sMR) in the setting of heart failure (HF) has considerable impact on quality of life, HF rehospitalizations, and mortality. Identification of high-risk cohorts is essential to understand disease trajectories and for risk stratification. Objectives: This study aimed to provide a structured decision tree-like approach to risk stratification in patients with severe sMR and HF. Methods: This observational study included 1,317 patients with severe sMR from the entire HF spectrum. Clinical, echocardiographic, and laboratory data were extracted for all patients. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Survival tree analysis, a supervised learning technique, was applied to identify patient subgroups at risk of mortality and further stratified by HF subtype (preserved, mildly reduced, and reduced ejection fraction). Results: Using supervised learning (survival tree method), 8 distinct subgroups were identified that differed significantly in long-term survival. Subgroup 7, characterized by younger age (≤66 years), higher hemoglobin (>12.7 g/dL), and higher albumin levels (>40.6 g/L) had the best survival. In contrast, subgroup 5 displayed a 20-fold risk of mortality (hazard ratio: 20.38 [95% CI: 10.78-38.52]); P < 0.001 and had older age (>68 years), low serum albumin (≤40.6 g/L), and higher NT-proBNP levels (≥9,750 pg/mL). Unique subgroups were further identified for each type of HF subtypes. Conclusions: Supervised machine learning reveals heterogeneity in the sMR risk spectrum, highlighting the clinical variability in the population. A decision tree-like model can help identify differences in outcomes among subgroups and can help provide tailored risk stratification.

Inflammation-Based Scores as a Common Tool for Prognostic Assessment in Heart Failure or Cancer.

Background: Inflammation-based scores are widely tested in cancer and have been evaluated in cardiovascular diseases including heart failure. Objectives: We investigated the impact of established inflammation-based scores on disease severity and survival in patients with stable heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) paralleling results to an intra-institutional cohort of treatment naïve cancer patients. Methods: HFrEF and cancer patients were prospectively enrolled. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR), the monocyte-to-lymphocyte-ratio (MLR), the platelet-to-lymphocyte-ratio (PLR), and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) at index day were calculated. Association of scores with disease severity and impact on overall survival was determined. Interaction analysis was performed for the different populations. Results: Between 2011 and 2017, a total of 818 patients (443 HFrEF and 375 cancer patients) were enrolled. In HFrEF, there was a strong association between all scores and disease severity reflected by NT-proBNP and NYHA class (p ≤ 0.001 for all). In oncologic patients, association with tumor stage was significant for the PNI only (p = 0.035). In both disease entities, all scores were associated with all-cause mortality (p ≤ 0.014 for all scores). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed the discriminatory power of all scores in the HFrEF and the oncologic study population, respectively (log-rank p ≤ 0.026 for all scores). A significant interaction with disease (HFrEF vs. cancer) was observed for PNI (p interaction = 0.013) or PLR (p interaction = 0.005), respectively, with higher increase in risk per inflammatory score increment for HFrEF. Conclusion: In crude models, the inflammatory scores NLR, MLR, PLR, and PNI are associated with severity of disease in HFrEF and with survival in HFrEF similarly to cancer patients. For PNI and PLR, the association with increase in risk per increment was even stronger in HFrEF than in malignant disease.