Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med Sci Sports Exerc ; 54(11): 1936-1946, 2022 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36007161

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Estimating physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep from wrist-worn accelerometer data requires reliable detection of sensor nonwear and sensor wear during both sleep and wake. PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop an algorithm that simultaneously identifies sensor wake-wear, sleep-wear, and nonwear in 24-h wrist accelerometer data collected with or without filtering. METHODS: Using sensor data labeled with polysomnography ( n = 21) and directly observed wake-wear data ( n = 31) from healthy adults, and nonwear data from sensors left at various locations in a home ( n = 20), we developed an algorithm to detect nonwear, sleep-wear, and wake-wear for "idle sleep mode" (ISM) filtered data collected in the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The algorithm was then extended to process original raw data collected from devices without ISM filtering. Both algorithms were further validated using a polysomnography-based sleep and wake-wear data set ( n = 22) and diary-based wake-wear and nonwear labels from healthy adults ( n = 23). Classification performance (F1 scores) was compared with four alternative approaches. RESULTS: The F1 score of the ISM-based algorithm on the training data set using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation was 0.95 ± 0.13. Validation on the two independent data sets yielded F1 scores of 0.84 ± 0.60 for the data set with sleep-wear and wake-wear and 0.94 ± 0.04 for the data set with wake-wear and nonwear. The F1 score when using original, raw data was 0.96 ± 0.08 for the training data sets and 0.86 ± 0.18 and 0.97 ± 0.04 for the two independent validation data sets. The algorithm performed comparably or better than the alternative approaches on the data sets. CONCLUSIONS: A novel machine-learning algorithm was designed to recognize wake-wear, sleep-wear, and nonwear in 24-h wrist-worn accelerometer data that are applicable for ISM-filtered data or original raw data.


Assuntos
Sono , Punho , Acelerometria , Adulto , Humanos , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Comportamento Sedentário
2.
Med Sci Sports Exerc ; 52(8): 1834-1845, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32079910

RESUMO

Studies using wearable sensors to measure posture, physical activity (PA), and sedentary behavior typically use a single sensor worn on the ankle, thigh, wrist, or hip. Although the use of single sensors may be convenient, using multiple sensors is becoming more practical as sensors miniaturize. PURPOSE: We evaluated the effect of single-site versus multisite motion sensing at seven body locations (both ankles, wrists, hips, and dominant thigh) on the detection of physical behavior recognition using a machine learning algorithm. We also explored the effect of using orientation versus orientation-invariant features on performance. METHODS: Performance (F1 score) of PA and posture recognition was evaluated using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation on a 42-participant data set containing 22 physical activities with three postures (lying, sitting, and upright). RESULTS: Posture and PA recognition models using two sensors had higher F1 scores (posture, 0.89 ± 0.06; PA, 0.53 ± 0.08) than did models using a single sensor (posture, 0.78 ± 0.11; PA, 0.43 ± 0.03). Models using two nonwrist sensors for posture recognition (F1 score, 0.93 ± 0.03) outperformed two-sensor models including one or two wrist sensors (F1 score, 0.85 ± 0.06). However, two-sensor models for PA recognition with at least one wrist sensor (F1 score, 0.60 ± 0.05) outperformed other two-sensor models (F1 score, 0.47 ± 0.02). Both posture and PA recognition F1 scores improved with more sensors (up to seven; 0.99 for posture and 0.70 for PA), but with diminishing performance returns. Models performed best when including orientation-based features. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers measuring posture should consider multisite sensing using at least two nonwrist sensors, and researchers measuring PA should consider multisite sensing using at least one wrist sensor and one nonwrist sensor. Including orientation-based features improved both posture and PA recognition.


Assuntos
Acelerometria/instrumentação , Acelerometria/métodos , Exercício Físico , Postura/fisiologia , Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis , Feminino , Humanos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Masculino , Comportamento Sedentário
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...