RESUMO
PURPOSE: Ki-67 is recommended by international/national guidelines for risk stratification in early breast cancer (EBC), particularly for defining "intermediate risk," despite inter-laboratory/inter-observer variability and cutoff uncertainty. We investigated Ki-67 (> 10%- < 40%, determined locally) as a prognostic marker for intermediate/high risk in EBC, pN0-1 patients. METHODS: This prospective, non-interventional, real-world study included females ≥ 18 years, with pN0/pN1mi/pN1, HR+ , HER2-negative EBC, and locally determined Ki-67 ranging 10%-40%. The primary outcome was changes in treatment recommendations after disclosing the Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score®(RS) assay result. RESULTS: The analysis included 567 patients (median age, 57 [range, 29-83] years; 70%/1%/29%/ with pN0/pN1mi/pN1 disease; 81% and 19% with RS results 0-25 and 26-100, respectively). The correlations between local and central Ki-67, local Ki-67, and the RS, and central Ki-67 and the RS results were weak (r = 0.35, r = 0.3, and r = 0.46, respectively), and discrepancies were noted in both directions (e.g., local Ki-67 was lower or higher than central Ki-67). After disclosing the RS, treatment recommendations changed for 190 patients (34%). Changes were observed in pN0 and pN1mi/pN1 patients and in patients with centrally determined Ki-67 ≤ 10% and > 10%. Treatment changes were aligned with RS results (adding chemotherapy for patients with higher RS results, omitting it for lower RS results), and their net result was 8% reduction in adjuvant chemotherapy use (from 32% pre-RS results to 24% post-RS results). CONCLUSION: The Oncotype DX® assay is a tool for individualizing treatments that adds to classic treatment decision factors. The RS result and Ki-67 are not interchangeable, and Ki-67, as well as nodal status, should not be used as gatekeepers for testing eligibility, to avoid under and overtreatment.
RESUMO
Background: At the end of the 19th century, Sir George Thomas Beatson first discovered the positive influence of a bilateral oophorectomy on the development of breast cancer lesions in women with advanced disease. Since then, endocrine therapy has been a key component of the treatment of both early (EBC) and advanced-stage (MBC) hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. Summary: This review discusses the evolution of this therapeutic approach from the introduction of high-dose estrogen therapy leading to the development of several antiestrogen therapies. Recently, the new generation of drugs includes selective estrogen receptor modulators, orally administered selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), as well as more unique agents such as complete estrogen receptor antagonists, proteolysis targeting chimeric, and selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonists. These drugs are under evaluation in various levels of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) being evaluated in both early and metastatic settings. As of today, the options in EBC are ranging from short-term neoadjuvant endocrine therapy to monitor the responsiveness of Ki-67 to combined endocrine therapy in MBC, introducing the combination of endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibition as well as PARP inhibition in patients with luminal breast cancer presenting with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. The results of global RCTs are settled in global and local guidelines to optimize the individual therapy of our patients with luminal EBC. Key Messages: Endocrine intervention in hormone-sensitive breast cancer remains one of the most important options in all settings of early and metastatic breast cancer.