RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of lung cancer may precipitate cardiotoxic events. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the cardiotoxicity associated with ICIs in patients with lung cancer. METHODS: A literature search was conducted across four electronic databases (Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, OVID EMBASE and Google Scholar) from inception through 31st May 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the impact of ICIs on cardiac outcomes in lung cancer patients were considered for inclusion. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled and analysis was performed using a random-effects model. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was followed to assess confidence in the estimates of effect (i.e., the quality of evidence). RESULTS: A total of 30 studies including 16,331 patients, were included in the analysis. Pooled results showed that single ICI (RR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.13-4.12; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%) or a combination of single ICI plus chemotherapy (RR: 1.38 [1.05-1.82]; p = 0.02) significantly increased the risk of cardiac adverse events when compared with chemotherapy alone. No significant difference was noted when a dual ICI (RR: 0.48 [0.13-1.80]; p = 0.27) was compared with single ICI. In addition, there was no significant association between the use of ICIs and incidence of cardiac failure (RR: 1.11 [0.48-2.58]; p = 0.80), or arrhythmia (RR: 1.87; [0.69-5.08]; p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Compared with chemotherapy alone, use of a single ICI or a combination of single ICI plus chemotherapy significantly increased the risk of cardiotoxicity. However, employing dual immunotherapy did not result in a significant increase in the risk of cardiotoxicity when compared to the use of a single ICI.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the comparative efficacy of dexamethasone (DXM) as monotherapy in comparison to surgery among the patients of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception till September 2023. Data was extracted, pooled and analyzed from all the studies that assessed the comparative efficacy of DXM as monotherapy in contrast with surgery as the primary treatment of CSDH. RESULTS: A total of 6 studies involving 704 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Comparison of surgery to DXM revealed there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding mortality [RR=1.09; 95% CI; 0.52-2.28â¯P = 0.83]. However, a significantly higher incidence of secondary surgical intervention was observed in the DXM group [RR 4.24; 95% CI; 2.06-8.71â¯P < 0.0001]. No significant difference in performance was observed in terms of poor postoperative outcomes within hospital stay [RR 1.12, 95% CI, 0.40-3.19â¯P=0.83] and at 6 months [RR 0.92, 95%CI, 0.40-2.13â¯P=0.85]. CONCLUSION: DXM had a significantly higher incidence of secondary surgical intervention. However, there was no difference regarding mortality and other safety outcomes between surgery and DXM for the patients with CSDH. Observational studies showed that DXM was associated with a lower risk of poor postoperative outcomes within hospital stay and had shorter duration of hospital stay, but the recurrence rate was lower in the surgery group.