RESUMO
CONTEXT: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D) is associated with an increased risk of fragility fracture despite normal areal bone mineral density (BMD). The contribution of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PN) to volumetric BMD (vBMD) and bone microarchitecture in T2D is not explored. OBJECTIVE: To assess vBMD and microarchitectural properties of bone using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in patients of T2D with or without PN. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study of patients of T2D divided into two groups [patients with T2D without PN (Group A) and T2D with PN (Group B)]. All patients underwent clinical examination, biochemical evaluation, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and HR-pQCT of the radius and tibia. RESULTS: A total of 296 patients were included in the study [Group A (n = 98), Group B (n = 198)]. HR-pQCT demonstrated a significant difference in total vBMD[mg/cm3] at tibia (291.6 ± 61.8 vs. 268.2 ± 63.0; p-0.003); cortical vBMD[mg/cm3] at tibia [912.5 (863.3, 962.4) vs. 853.8 (795.3, 913.2) p-0.000], among groups A and B respectively. Among the microarchitecture parameters, there was a significant difference in cortical porosity at the tibia (2.5% ±1.7% vs. 3%±1.7%; p-0.004), trabecular number[mm-1] at the tibia [1.080 (0.896, 1.237) vs. 1.140 (0.983, 1.286), p-0.045] and trabecular thickness[mm] at the radius [0.228 (0.217, 0.247) Vs. 0.238 (0.224, 0.253); p-0.006], among groups A and B respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite comparable areal BMD, T2D patients with PN have diminished vBMD and deteriorated skeletal microarchitecture, compared to those without PN.
RESUMO
Sjogren's syndrome is a known cause of renal tubular acidosis (RTA). However, osteomalacia associated with Sjogren's syndrome is rare and seldom reported in literature. We report a case of pseudofractures of both femora due to osteomalacia as a result of RTA secondary to Sjogren's syndrome, which was initially misdiagnosed as a stress fracture. A man in his 30s presented with hip pain and was initially misdiagnosed to have stress fractures because of the 'through and through' extension of the 'fracture' lines at the neck of both femora. The patient had a normal serum biochemistry profile except for elevated alkaline phosphatase levels. On further evaluation, he was found to have distal RTA secondary to Sjogren's syndrome. The patient responded to sodium bicarbonate therapy with clinical, biochemical and radiological improvement. A high index of suspicion for RTA should be kept in a patient with osteomalacia with a normal calcium profile and vitamin D level.
Assuntos
Osteomalacia , Síndrome de Sjogren , Humanos , Síndrome de Sjogren/complicações , Síndrome de Sjogren/diagnóstico , Masculino , Osteomalacia/etiologia , Osteomalacia/diagnóstico , Adulto , Acidose Tubular Renal/diagnóstico , Acidose Tubular Renal/etiologia , Acidose Tubular Renal/complicações , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Fraturas de Estresse/etiologia , Fraturas de Estresse/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas de Estresse/diagnóstico , Bicarbonato de Sódio/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CNO) occurs late in diabetes and may cause fracture, deformity, and higher mortality. Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) affects bone metabolism and contributes to mortality. However, there is no data on prevalence of CNO and its outcomes with coexisting DKD (or chronic kidney disease [CKD]). METHODS: To ascertain the prevalence of CKD (pick CKD or DKD) among patients with CNO and delineate the remission of active CNO and subsequent lower extremity amputation and all-cause mortality during prospective follow-up. Consecutive patients with diabetic CNO (active or inactive) were enrolled and subsequently divided into those with and without CKD (pick CKD or DKD) (Group A and Group B, respectively). A preestablished timeframe of 36 weeks was utilized to evaluate the remission proportion of active CNO. RESULTS: A total of 493 CNO patients were observed and 449 subjects (150 patients had active CNO) were further evaluated. The overall prevalence of diabetic nephropathy (DKD or CKD?) CNO was 43.7%. The proportion of patients achieving remission was significantly lower in Group A compared to Group B (OR 0.468, CI [0.239-0.934], P = .025), however, the median time for achieving remission was similar between the 2 groups (14 weeks vs 16 weeks, P = .885). Overall, all-cause mortality was notably higher Group A compared to Group B (OR 2.23, 95% CI [1.474-3.368]) over a median follow-up of 4 years. No significant differences were observed in rates of diabetic foot ulcers (58.2% vs 54.9%; P = .584) and amputations (17.4% vs 15.12%; P = .889) between Group A and Group B. CONCLUSION: Patients of CNO with coexisting CKD have poor prognosis both in terms of likelihood of active CNO remission and higher mortality.
RESUMO
Introduction: This article concisely overviews the complex relationship between obesity and bone health. Obesity, characterized by excessive fat accumulation, has been traditionally associated with higher bone mineral density. Also, recent data suggest a favorable bone microarchitecture profile in these patients. However, the increase in bone mineral density does not necessarily confer protection against fractures, and the risk of fractures may vary depending on the skeletal sites. Factors affecting bone health: Various factors, including mechanical factors, hormones, cytokines, inflammation, and bone marrow adiposity, contribute to the adverse effect of obesity on bone. The article explores these factors alongside non-invasive techniques and tools like the Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) to evaluate fracture risk. Bone and Adipose tissue: This article also highlights the essential roles of hormones such as vitamin D, Parathormone (PTH), FGF-23 (Fibroblast Growth Factor 23), which affect bone health, and some of the hormones secreted from the adipose tissues such as adiponectin and leptin. Obesity Paradox and Sarcopenic Obesity: The article delves into the intriguing obesity paradox, where an increased BMI correlates with higher bone mineral density but not necessarily reduced fracture risk. Sarcopenic obesity, a combination of excessive fat accumulation and reduced muscle mass, further complicates the relationship between obesity and bone health. Conclusions: Physicians should keep a comprehensive approach to treating obese patients with osteoporosis, including lifestyle modifications, weight management, fall prevention strategies, and pharmacological interventions. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship between obesity and bone health.
RESUMO
Bone fragility is an emerging complication of diabetes. People with diabetes are at a significantly higher risk of fractures compared to the general population. Bone fragility occurs in diabetes as a result of complex and poorly understood mechanisms occurring at the cellular level contributed by vascular, inflammatory and mechanical derangements. Bone mineral density (BMD) as assessed by DEXA is low in type 1 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes has a high risk of fracture despite a normal to raised BMD. DEXA thus underestimates the fracture risk in diabetes. Data are scare regarding the efficacy of the available therapies in this low bone turnover state.
RESUMO
Background: Bisphosphonates, synthetic analogs of endogenous pyrophosphates, are pivotal in managing various bone disorders, primarily osteoporosis, which affects millions globally. While osteoporosis, especially postmenopausal osteoporosis, significantly benefits from bisphosphonate therapy, considerations arise regarding their administration and potential side effects. Clinical application of Bisphosphonates: Bisphosphonates, divided into nitrogen-containing and non-nitrogenous groups, exert their influence through distinct mechanisms, with the former being notably more potent. The role of bisphosphonates in other diseases, such as Paget's bone and skeletal metastasis disease is also discussed. Detailed information on the administration routes, dosage regimens, and considerations for drug holidays is provided. The article navigates through the chemical structure, generations, and mechanism of action of bisphosphonates. The article covers administration routes, dosage regimens, and drug holidays, in addition to discussing potential adverse effects and contraindications. Conclusions: Bisphosphonates hold an unrivaled legacy in the management of osteoporosis. The ubiquitous availability and the cost-effectiveness of these time-tested medications make them an invaluable asset in the osteoporosis treatment landscape, especially in developing nations like India.