Stigma experienced as worse than symptoms of schizophrenia: A qualitative study about The OpusPanel.

AIM: Former patients and relatives of people who have received treatment in OPUS, a Danish specialized early intervention for first episode psychosis, have since 2009 worked to reduce stigma and increase hope related to schizophrenia and psychosis. They established The OpusPanel to share their own stories of living with an invisible disorder with new patients, health care professionals, politicians, and members of the public. The impact of The OpusPanel on stigma has not previously been explored or evaluated. The article aims to evaluate and gain an in-depth understanding of The OpusPanel's anti-stigma impact. METHODS: In a qualitative design, 27 people with different affiliations to The OpusPanel were interviewed using semi-structured interview guides to capture their individual experiences of listening to, interacting with, or being part of The OpusPanel. Interview guides were constructed following a focus group interview with members of The OpusPanel. Analysis of the multi-perspectival dataset was facilitated through an interpretative phenomenological approach with investigator triangulation. Preliminary results were returned to the focus group members to ensure relevance and accuracy. RESULTS: The study found that almost all interviewees described a sense of hopefulness and decreased stigma after having experienced a member from The OpusPanel present their story or participating as panel members themselves. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that attending presentations or participating in The OpusPanel reduces stigmatizing views about others or oneself. The study may inform The OpusPanel and similar initiatives for challenging stigma related to schizophrenia or psychosis.

Examination of gaze behaviour in social anxiety disorder using a virtual reality eye-tracking paradigm: protocol for a case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Social anxiety disorder (SAD) has an early onset, a high lifetime prevalence, and may be a risk factor for developing other mental disorders. Gaze behaviour is considered an aberrant feature of SAD. Eye-tracking, a novel technology device, enables recording eye movements in real time, making it a direct and objective measure of gaze behaviour. Virtual reality (VR) is a promising tool for assessment and diagnostic purposes. Developing an objective screening tool based on examination of gaze behaviour in SAD may potentially aid early detection. The objective of this current study is, therefore to examine gaze behaviour in SAD utilising VR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A case-control study design is employed in which a clinical sample of 29 individuals with SAD will be compared with a matched healthy control group of 29 individuals. In the VR-based eye-tracking paradigm, participants will be presented to stimuli consisting of high-res 360° 3D stereoscopic videos of three social-evaluative tasks designed to elicit social anxiety. The study will investigate between-group gaze behaviour differences during stimuli presentation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the National Committee on Health Research Ethics for the Capital Region of Denmark (H-22041443). The study has been preregistered on OSF registries: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XCTAKAll participants will be provided with written and oral information. Informed consent is required for all the participants. Participation is voluntarily, and the participants can at any time terminate their participation without any consequences. Study results; positive, negative or inconclusive will be published in relevant scientific journals.

Virtual reality-assisted cognitive behavioural therapy for outpatients with alcohol use disorder (CRAVR): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a brain disorder linked to over 200 health conditions. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is considered the best practice in the treatment of AUD, but more than 60% of patients relapse within the first year after treatment. Psychotherapy combined with virtual reality (VR) has received increasing interest in the treatment of AUD. However, existing studies have primarily investigated the use of VR for cue reactivity. We therefore aimed to investigate the effect of VR-assisted CBT (VR-CBT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is an assessor-blinded, randomised clinical trial being conducted at three outpatient clinics in Denmark. We will randomise 102 patients to 14 individual sessions of either manualised VR-CBT or CBT. The VR-CBT group will receive exposure to immersive high-risk VR situations from a pub, bar/party, restaurant, supermarket and at-home (30 videos) to activate high-risk-related beliefs and cravings for subsequent modification using CBT techniques. The treatment period is 6 months, and follow-up visits will be performed 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after inclusion. The primary outcome measure is the change in total alcohol consumption from baseline to 6 months after inclusion, measured with the Timeline Followback Method. Key secondary outcome measures include changes in the number of heavy drinking days, alcohol cravings, cognition, and symptoms of depression and anxiety. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval has been obtained by the research ethics committee in the Capital Region of Denmark (H-20082136) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (P-2021-217). All patients will receive both oral and written information about the trial and written informed consent will be obtained from each patient before inclusion. The study results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT05042180.

Patient Outcomes of Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Compared With Assertive Community Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: In many European countries, flexible assertive community treatment (FACT) has replaced assertive community treatment (ACT) despite limited evidence for FACT's effectiveness in improving functional and patient-reported outcomes. This study evaluated the effectiveness of FACT relative to ACT in improving functioning, client satisfaction, and the working alliance. METHODS: The authors used a nonblinded, quasi-experimental controlled study design to compare outcomes of patients treated by ACT teams that were reconfigured to FACT teams with those of patients treated by a remaining ACT team. Patients from nine ACT teams in the Capital Region of Denmark were included. Six of the nine ACT teams were reconfigured to FACT in 2018 and 2019 by integrating them with community mental health teams. The remaining three ACT teams were used as control groups. Assignment to treatment was based solely on administrative considerations. RESULTS: The study included 131 patients (FACT, N=74; ACT, N=57). Patients treated by FACT teams had poorer personal and social functioning than patients assigned to ACT teams (adjusted difference in means=-2.9, 95% CI=-5.8 to -0.1). No between-group differences were found in client satisfaction or working alliance. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated by FACT teams had significantly lower functioning than patients treated by ACT teams, but the clinical relevance or causality of this finding remains unclear. Given the reconfiguration of the FACT teams during follow-up, along with substantial drop-out rates and baseline differences between the two groups, these results must be interpreted with caution. The findings require further examination in a randomized controlled trial that includes fidelity measures of the treatment models.