Long-term survival results of a randomized trial comparing gemcitabine/cisplatin and methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare long-term survival in patients with locally advanced and metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) or methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin (MVAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Efficacy data from a large randomized phase III study of GC versus MVAC were updated. Time-to-event analyses were performed on the observed distributions of overall survival time and progression-free survival. RESULTS: Four hundred and five patients were randomized, 203 to the GC arm and 202 to the MVAC arm. At the time of this analysis, 347 patients have died (GC 176, MVAC 171). Overall survival was similar in both arms (HR 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.34, P = 0.66) with a median survival of 14.0 months (95% CI 12.3-15.5 months) in the GC, and 15.2 months (95% CI 13.2-17.3 months) in the MVAC arm. The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months with GC (95% CI 6.8-8.8) and 8.3 months with MVAC (95% CI 7.3-9.7) with a HR of 1.09 (95% CI 0.89-1.34). Significant prognostic factors favoring overall survival included performance status (>70), TNM staging (M0 vs. M1), low/normal alkaline phosphatase expression, number of sites of disease <3, and the absence of visceral metastasis. By adjusting for these prognostic factors, the HR was 0.99 for overall survival and 1.01 for progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term overall and progression-free survival following treatment with GC or MVAC are similar. These results strengthen the role of GC as a standard of care in patients with locally advanced and metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC).

A phase III trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: This randomized phase III study compared the overall survival (OS) of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine (PG) versus standard gemcitabine (G) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer and no prior systemic therapy (including 5-fluorouracil as a radiosensitizer) were randomized to receive either 1,250 mg/m(2) gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) after gemcitabine on day 8 (PG arm) of each 21-day cycle, or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle (G arm). RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-five patients with well-balanced baseline characteristics were randomly assigned (283 PG, 282 G). OS was not improved on the PG arm (6.2 months) compared with the G arm (6.3 months) (P=0.8477). Progression-free survival (3.9 versus 3.3 months; P=0.1109) and time to treatment failure (3 versus 2.2 months; P=0.2680) results were similar. Tumor response rate (14.8% versus 7.1%; P=0.004) was significantly better on the PG arm. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (45.1% versus 12.8%), thrombocytopenia (17.9% versus 6.2%), anemia (13.9% versus 2.9%), febrile neutropenia (9.9% versus 0.4%; all P <0.001) and fatigue (15% versus 6.6%; P=0.002) were significantly more common on the PG arm. Four treatment-related deaths occurred on the PG arm and none in the G arm. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed plus gemcitabine therapy did not improve OS. Single-agent gemcitabine remains the standard of care for advanced pancreatic cancer.

A phase II trial of gemcitabine in combination with 5-fluorouracil (24-hour) and folinic acid in patients with chemonaive advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine (Gemzar) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus folinic acid (FA) both have proven activity in the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The present study was initiated to investigate the efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with 5-FU-FA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients, median age 60 years (range 34-70) with inoperable, stage IV, pancreatic cancer were enrolled into the study and treated on an outpatient basis. All except one patient received at least one cycle of treatment with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2), followed by FA (200 mg/m2) and 5-FU (750 mg/m2) administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 42-day schedule. No patient had received prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. All 38 patients were assessed for efficacy, toxicity and time to progressive disease. RESULTS: Two patients (5%), achieved a partial response and thirty-four patients (89%) achieved stable disease. There were two early deaths (< or = 4 weeks). The median time to progression was 7.1 months (range 0.4-18.1+; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 5.3-7.9 months). Three patients had a progression-free interval of greater than 12 months and 12 of 38 patients (32%) survived longer than 12 months. The median overall survival was 9.3 months (range 0.5-26.5; 95% CI: 7.3-13.0 months). The incidence of grade 3 and 4 toxicities was low. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and 5-FU-FA is active and well tolerated and seems to offer an improvement in progression-free interval over both gemcitabine monotherapy and 5-FU-FA therapy.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study was initiated to determine the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 was given on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day schedule, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 to chemonaive patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: Of the 41 patients enrolled (median age 57, and 61% male), median Karnofsky performance status was 80%. Patients received a median of 4.2 cycles (range 1-11). In 35 evaluable patients, one complete response (CR) and three partial responses (PR) were observed, for an overall response rate of 11% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 3.2% -26.7%). Stable disease (SD) > 3 months occurred in 20 (57%) patients; 6 survived > or = 1 year. Median time to progressive disease was 4.3 months (95% CI: 3.0-5.7 months). For all patients, median survival was 8.2 months (95% CI: 6.1-10.6 months) with a one-year survival rate of 27%. Therapy was well tolerated. Grade 3-4 neutropenia (no grade 3-4 infection), thrombocytopenia (no bleeding), nausea/vomiting, and alopecia were reported in 29%, 13%, and 2.6% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is a moderately active treatment for patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer without compromising tolerability.

Phase I trial of gemcitabine (Gemzar), 24 h infusion 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer.

Gemcitabine (Gemzar) has a significant impact upon survival and quality of life for patients with pancreatic cancer, compared with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). This phase I study was initiated to define the recommended dose of 5-FU delivered as a 24 h infusion in combination with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and folinic acid (200 mg/m2) in patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer, treated on an outpatient basis. Drugs were administered weekly for 4 weeks out of 6 weeks. Sixteen chemonaive patients (median age 59 years, range 51-66) were enrolled, 15 had stage IV and one stage III disease. The median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 70 (range 60-80). Six patients received 5-FU 750 mg/m2, eight received 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 and two received 5-FU 1250 mg/m2. The maximum tolerated dose of 5-FU was 1000 mg/m2. Hepatotoxicity was dose limiting. One patient who received 5-FU 1250 mg/m2 died as a result of hepatorenal failure. There was one partial response, nine patients had stable disease for more than 3 months and 13 patients had improved KPS. The median time to progressive disease was 31 weeks (range 5-50 weeks). A phase 11 trial is underway to further assess the activity of this combination at the recommended dose of 750 mg/m2 5-FU.

A review of hemolytic uremic syndrome in patients treated with gemcitabine therapy.

BACKGROUND: Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a rare condition that occasionally is reported in cancer patients. Recently it has been observed that gemcitabine rarely may be associated with this condition. METHODS: The manufacturer's safety database and literature were reviewed for any report regarding gemcitabine associated with renal and hematologic abnormalities. Descriptive analysis was used to examine each case for an association between gemcitabine therapy and HUS and to identify its incidence and risk factors. RESULTS: Through December 31, 1997, 12 cases were identified that fit either the clinical (uremia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and thrombocytopenia) or pathologic (renal biopsy) criteria for HUS. There were 7 males (58%) and 5 females (42%) with a median age of 55.5 years (range, 37-73 years). The median duration of gemcitabine therapy was 5.8 months (range, 3.8-13.1 months). Six patients died, five improved, and one patient's outcome was unknown. Among the six deaths, three patients died of cancer progression, one patient died of an unrelated myocardial infarction, and two patients died of HUS or HUS-related complications. For the five patients who improved, treatment was comprised of dialysis, plasmapheresis, splenectomy, or a combination. Attempts to correlate patient demographics, primary malignancy, and cumulative gemcitabine dose failed to identify consistent risk factors in predisposing patients to HUS. Confounding factors were common, including mitomycin-C and/or 5-fluorouracil exposure, advanced stage tumors, or preexisting renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a patient exposure of 78,800, a crude overall incidence rate of 0.015% (range, 0.008-0.078%) was determined, showing that HUS associated with gemcitabine treatment appears to be rare. Nonetheless, as with other cancer treatments, clinicians should weigh the appropriate risk/benefit ratio in using gemcitabine to treat their patients.

Aerosolized amphotericin B inhalations as prophylaxis of invasive aspergillus infections during prolonged neutropenia: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial.

We performed a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic inhalations with aerosolized amphotericin B (aeroAmB) to reduce the incidence of invasive aspergillus (IA) infections in patients after chemotherapy or autologous bone marrow transplantation and an expected duration of neutropenia of at least 10 days. From March 1993 until April 1996, 382 patients with leukemias, relapsed high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphomas, or solid tumors were randomized with a 13:10 ratio to receive either prophylactic aeroAmB inhalations at a dose of 10 mg twice daily or no inhalation prophylaxis in an unblinded fashion. The incidence of proven, probable, or possible IA infections was 10 of 227 (4%) in patients who received prophylactic aeroAmB. This did not differ significantly from the 11 of 155 (7%) incidence in patients who received no inhalation prophylaxis (P =.37). Moreover, no differences in the overall mortality (13% v 10%; P =.37) or in the infection-related mortality (8% v 7%; P =.79) were found. In contrast to other nonrandomized trials, we observed no benefit from prophylactic aeroAmB inhalations, but the overall incidence of IA infections was low.

Phase II study of gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

In this phase II study, the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine were studied in 42 patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had received up to one prior chemotherapy regimen in an adjuvant setting. Ten patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-eight patients (67%) had visceral disease spread at entry. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was administered weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The mean number of completed cycles was 3.9 and the mean dose delivered was 942.2 mg/m2. Ninety-seven percent of injections were administered as assigned. No complete responses were observed, but there were six partial responses and 24 patients with stable disease lasting 2-9 months. The overall response rate was 14.3% (95% CI 5.4-28.5%). The median survival for all patients was 15.2 months. Maximum WHO grade 3 and 4 toxicities were observed in five patients for nausea and vomiting, one patient for diarrhea, one patient for pain, seven patients for alanine transaminase, and eight patients for segmented neutrophils. There were no grade 3 and 4 toxicities for alopecia. These data confirm modest single-agent gemcitabine activity in advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Gemcitabine's favorable toxicity profile makes it an ideal candidate for combination chemotherapy.

Gemcitabine plus dose-escalated epirubicin in advanced breast cancer: results of a phase I study.

Gemcitabine has shown single-agent activity in metastatic breast cancer. Epirubicin is also widely used for the adjuvant and treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The toxicity profiles and modes of action are different which provides a good rationale for studying both drugs in combination. In a phase I study gemcitabine at a fixed dose of 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28 day cycle was combined with escalated weekly doses of epirubicin starting with an initial dose of 10 mg/m2. Patients had stage IV metastatic disease without previous chemotherapy except as adjuvant treatment. Nineteen patients were included in the study which defined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of epirubicin at 20 mg/m2. Myelosuppression was the dose limiting toxicity with leucopenia WHO grade 3 and 4 in 40.0% and 20.0%, neutropenia WHO grade 3 and 4 without neutropenic fever in 20.0% and 40.0% and thrombocytopenia WHO grade 4 in 20.0%. At the epirubicin 15 mg/m2 dose level, leucopenia (11.1% WHO grade 3) and neutropenia (12.5 and 37.5% WHO grade 3 and 4) were reported. Symptomatic toxicity was generally mild: nausea/vomiting in about 20% of patients (WHO grade 3 or 4) on both 15 and 20 mg/m2 epirubicin dose levels. Alopecia WHO grade 3 and 4 was seen in 2 patients at MTD. Four of 19 evaluable patients had a partial response. We conclude that the combination of gemcitabine and epirubicin is well tolerated and has promising activity. A phase II study is underway with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and epirubicin 15 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle.

Monitoring of multiple myeloma patients by simultaneously measuring marker substances of bone resorption and formation.

Fifteen patients (13 males and two females; mean age, 63 years; age range, 46-84 years) with multiple myeloma were studied prospectively (range of follow-up period, 2-6 months) to elucidate the diagnostic validity of biochemical markers of bone formation (bone alkaline phosphatase and the C-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen) and bone resorption (urinary excretion of pyridinium cross-links) for monitoring these patients. Eleven of 15 patients received melphalan i.v. and prednisone p.o. every 4 weeks. All patients were given pamidronate i.v. for inhibition of bone resorption. The mean values of the urinary excretion of pyridinium cross-links were significantly higher in the patients fulfilling the criteria of 'progression' or 'relapse' than in those showing 'response' and those in the 'plateau phase' (P < 0.05). In contrast, neither bone alkaline phosphatase nor C-terminal propeptide serum values differed significantly between these two groups (P > 0.05). The concentrations of both bone formation markers were significantly lower in the patients than in the samples obtained from apparently healthy persons (P < 0.001). There was a significant inverse correlation between the number of pamidronate courses and the serum concentrations of bone alkaline phosphatase (P < 0.05). A lack of correlation was observed between the urinary excretion of pyridinium cross-links and all other laboratory parameters measured (serum concentrations of total protein, calcium, creatinine and (beta 2-microglobulin). In conclusion, the urinary excretion of pyridinium cross-links might be a useful parameter for monitoring multiple myeloma patients. Decreased values of bone formation markers may be due to a suppressive effect of the bisphosphonate agents administered or reflect the severity of osteolytic lesions which have been described as being associated with unbalanced bone remodelling.

Pharmacokinetics of high-dose cytarabine and its deamination product--a reappraisal.

Cytarabine is intracellularly activated and correlations have been established between the pharmacokinetic behaviour of active metabolites and their antileukemic effect. Recently, a good response to high-dose treatment of leukemias has additionally been attributed to a so-called low deamination phenotype of cytarabine inactivation. Consequently, these findings would support plasma level monitoring of cytarabine and its metabolite uracil arabinoside in high-dose cytarabine regimens. This pharmacokinetic study presents data attempting to reevaluate these observations. Thirty-seven patients were treated by 3-h high-dose cytarabine infusions (9 patients 1000 mg/m2, 28 patients 3000 mg/m2) as part of their treatment for acute leukemia. Serial blood samples during and post infusion were analysed for cytarabine (araC) and its deamination product uracil arabinoside (araU) using HPLC with UV-detection. Considerable interindividual variation was observed in end-infusion plasma concentrations of araC (1000 mg/m2: 2.1-fold, 3000 mg/m2: 5.5-fold) and araU (1000 mg/m2: 2.7-fold, 3000 mg/m2: 2.9-fold). The median ratio of end infusion concentrations araU/araC (on a molar basis) was 5.6 (S.D. 3.0), extreme ratio values were 2 and 14. No differences of the araU/araC ratio were found between the two dosages used. Minimum plasma araC concentrations at the end of infusion were 10.5 micromol/l and 22.0 micromol/l at a dose of 1000 and 3000 mg/m2, respectively. In our European study population a "fast" deamination phenotype of cytarabine (araU/araC ratio > 14) was not be observed.

Prophylactic strategies to meet infectious complications in fludarabine-treated CLL.

Fludarabine has emerged as salvage therapy in chlorambucil-resistant CLL. However, encouraging response rates have been compromised by a high incidence of serious infectious complications. Prophylactic measures to reduce the frequency of infections are needed, but up to now, there are no established standards for supportive therapy in fludarabine-treated CLL. Clinicians have observed an increasing frequency of life-threatening opportunistic infections but only some of these may be explained by fludarabine-induced impairment of cell-mediated immunity. Neutrocytopenia commonly found during initial fludarabine treatment may not have been addressed sufficiently as risk factor for infections. Thus, G-CSF supplementation may improve the rate of infectious complications by reducing the duration of fludarabine-induced neutrocytopenia. The changing spectrum of infectious complications should stimulate additional trials on the value of IVIG replacement in fludarabine-treated CLL patients and on the role of low-dose co-trimoxazole in patients at high risk of Pneumocystis carinii infections.

Increases of sICAM-1 during neutropenic pneumonia in leukemic patients.

Aggressive chemotherapy of leukemia increases the risk of severe infections during treatment-induced myelosuppression. However, the assessment of an infectious origin of neutropenic fever is often difficult. Leukocyte adhesion molecules such as E-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) are involved in early inflammatory response. We studied plasma concentrations of their soluble isoforms during 48 treatment courses with myeloablative chemotherapy in 32 leukemic patients. There were 35 febrile episodes during neutropenia. Pneumonia was clinically and microbiologically documented in 15 cases, six had proven infections but normal chest radiograph, and 14 were classified as fever of unknown origin. Longitudinal studies revealed a sustained increase of sICAM-1 plasma levels associated with pneumonia. Increase of sICAM-1 plasma levels distinguished patients with pneumonia from those with fever not related to pneumonia (positive predictive value 0.87, negative predictive value 0.94). Plasma levels of sICAM-1 were elevated in both, fungal and non-fungal pneumonia. Increases of sICAM-1 paralleled first radiographic evidence of pulmonary infiltrations in most cases. In contrast, no elevation of sVCAM-1 or sE-selectin was documented during febrile events prior to recovery of leukocyte counts.

The influence of gemcitabine on the CD4/CD8 ratio in patients with solid tumours.

Gemcitabine (dFdC) is a novel pyrimidine antimetabolite with documented antineoplastic activity against metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCL), pancreatic carcinoma, ovarian and breast cancer. The side effects of gemcitabine are generally mild; severe infections are reported in less than Ilo of patients. In contrast, other new nucleoside analogues such as the purine antimetabolite fludarabine lead to a significant alteration of the CD4/CD8 lymphocyte ratio associated with an increased risk for opportunistic infections. This study investigates the effect of gemcitabine on different lymphocyte subsets during consecutive applications. 16 patients with solid rumours (3 non-small cell lung cancer, 3 pancreas, 3 testicular, 2 breast, ovarian germ-cell, 1 ovarian, 1 small cell lung, 1 gastric cancer, 1 carcinoma of unknown primary); 15 patients were previously treated, received at least 3 applications of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) as a 30 min infusion, at days 1, 8, 15; q 4 weeks). Lymphocytes surface antigens were analysed by standard technique flow cytometry prior to every infusion. The median number of leukocytes before therapy was 7823/mu l, with lymphocytes 875/mu l, including 68% T-cells (CD3(+)), 9% B-cells (CD19(+); CD20(+)) and 15% NK-cells (CD56(+); CD16(+); CD3(-)), the CD4/CD8 ratio was 1.7. After gemcitabine therapy the median number of leukocytes was 5136/mu l, with lymphocytes 1012/mu l, including 77% T-cells, 8% B-cells and 10% NK-cells and a CD4/CD8 ratio of 2.2. Severe complications or opportunistic infections were not seen in these 16 patients. No significant change of CD4/CD8 ratios and NK-ccll numbers was seen in our patients with solid tumours during weekly treatment with gemcitabine. A severely increased risk for opportunistic infections following treatment with the new antimetabolite gemcitabine appears unlikely.

Neutrophilic dermal infiltrates in granulocytopenic patients with acute leukemia.

Acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis (AFND, Sweet's syndrome) is clinically characterized by fever, neutrophilic leukocytosis, and tender dermal plaques. Histological examination typically reveals infiltration of the dermis by neutrophils. In three patients (2 female, 1 male, 54-59 years) with acute leukemia (2 myelogenous, 1 lymphoblastic) dermal plaques developed during febrile episodes in chemotherapy-induced pancytopenia. The clinical appearance was compatible with AFND. The diagnosis was substantiated by skin biopsies which showed dense neutrophilic dermal infiltrates without leukemic cells. Leukocytoclastic vasculitis was considered as differential diagnosis. Plasma levels of soluble adhesion molecules ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin regulating leukocyte transendothelial migration were in the normal range. Systemic glucocorticoids were avoided because of the high risk of infection during prolonged bone marrow aplasia. The lesions were treated with topical steroids and resolved without scarring within 1-5 weeks. AFND has been reported in association with acute leukemia at normal or elevated white blood cell counts. Although implausible from a pathophysiological point of view, similar neutrophilic dermal infiltrates were found in three patients during chemotherapy-induced pancytopenia with white blood cell counts distinctly below 1 x 10(9)/l.

Infusion-related toxicity of three different amphotericin B formulations and its relation to cytokine plasma levels.

A prospective study was performed to compare the infusion-associated toxicity of three different amphotericin B preparations and to correlate acute side-effects with plasma levels of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1-RA) during and after the infusions. Six adult neutropenic patients with acute leukaemia suffering from suspected or documented systemic fungal infections were treated on three consecutive days with conventional amphotericin B (AmB), liposomal AmB (AmBisome) and AmB mixed in lipid emulsion (AmB/lipid). Drugs were given over 1-2 h. Drug-induced toxicity was monitored every 30 min for 4 h. Plasma levels of the three cytokines were determined using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques. Four of six patients showed toxicity after AmB and AmB/lipid infusions; only one patient reacted to liposomal AmB. Clinical toxicity was associated with increases in TNF-alpha plasma levels during two of four infusions of AmB and three of four infusions of AmB/lipid. Major increases in IL-6 occurred during three of four infusions of AmB and during all four AmB/lipid infusions associated with clinical toxicity. Three of four AmB infusions and all four AmB/lipid infusions accompanied by clinical toxicity were associated with major increases in IL-1-RA plasma concentrations. Liposomal AmB was better tolerated than AmB and AmB/lipid. This formulation also caused the lowest liberation of all three cytokines tested. The severity of clinical symptoms did not correlate closely with absolute cytokine plasma levels. The findings provide further evidence that expression of TNF-alpha, IL-6 and IL-1-RA plays an important role in mediating AmB-related acute toxicity in vivo.

Pulmonary toxicity during infusion of liposomal amphotericin B in two patients with acute leukemia.

Pulmonary toxicity with acute dyspnea occurred during infusion of a liposomal amphotericin B preparation (AmBisome) in two adult leukemic patients. The preparation was administered as a one hour infusion at a dose of 3 mg/kg body weight. Within 15 min after starting the infusion, both patients experienced sudden onset of dyspnea and chest tightness. Physical examination showed the patients to be anxious and restless with tachycardia and orthopnea but without other cardiopulmonary findings. No elevation of body temperature, rigors or chills were recorded. Symptoms disappeared within minutes after discontinuing the infusion. At present, the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying these side effects are unknown.

[Prophylaxis against mycoses in neutropenic patients]. / Mykose-Prophylaxe bei neutrozytopenischen Patienten.

During the last years, the proportion of cancer patients who develop systemic fungal infections has increased steadily. These infections are characterised by high mortality, especially in patients with persistent granulocytopenia and in those receiving allogeneic bone marrow transplants. The most important pathogens in neutropenic patients are Candida and Aspergillus spp. Usually, Candida infections arise from overgrowth in the gastrointestinal tract, while Aspergillus infections are acquired by inhalation of spores. Prophylaxis of systemic fungal infections seems mandatory since optimal strategies for diagnosis and treatment of these infections are lacking. Treatment with the non-absorbable polyenes nystatin and amphotericin B is useful for prophylaxis of superficial fungal infections, provided that compliance of the patients is optimal. The imidazoles ketoconazole and miconazole can reduce the incidence of superficial fungal infections, but there are conflicting data regarding their value for prevention of systemic mycoses. There are several studies indicating that prophylactic use of fluconazole reduces the incidence of mucosal and systemic fungal infections, especially in patients receiving allogeneic bone marrow transplants. Fluconazole shows reduced activity against several Non-albicans spp. and is not active against Aspergillus spp. Itraconazole has in vitro and in vivo activity against several Aspergillus spp. but high serum and tissue levels are necessary. However, bioavailability of itraconazole is reduced in patients with raised gastric pH and no i.v. formulation is available. Although there is some evidence for its prophylactic activity against Aspergillus infections in neutropenic patients, more studies are necessary to confirm these findings. Intravenous amphotericin B cannot be recommended for routine prophylactic use because of its toxicity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[A lethal course in pseudomembranous enterocolitis during the parenteral administration of vancomycin and imipenem]. / Letaler Verlauf einer pseudomembranösen Enterokolitis unter parenteraler Gabe von Vancomycin und Imipenem.

A 48-year-old woman required mechanical ventilation after aortic valve replacement for decompensated aortic valve stenosis when bleeding complications developed and rethoracotomy had to be performed. Acute renal failure necessitated haemodialysis. Septic fever of unknown aetiology failed to respond to oxacillin, cefotaxim and tobramycin. The endotracheal cannula and central venous catheter were changed on the 24th postoperative day and the antibiotic treatment altered to 250 mg imipenem and 125 mg vancomycin three times daily intravenously. The fever soon subsided, but recurred on the 32nd postoperative day, accompanied by increasing leucocytosis. The patient was obstipated but had no intraabdominal signs. Four days later ultrasonography demonstrated thickening of the intestinal wall and coloscopy showed typical pseudomembranous colitis. Intestinal contents were positive for Clostridium difficile toxin. Despite immediate rectal and intragastric administration of 250 mg vancomycin four times daily the patient died of pseudomembranous colitis, confirmed at autopsy. The case demonstrates that vancomycin cannot always prevent the development of pseudomembranous colitis.