Cardio-Oncology Care Delivered in the Non-academic Environment.

OPINION STATEMENT: It is a fact that the field of Cardio-Oncology is growing rapidly throughout the USA and abroad. Cancer and heart disease continue to be the leading causes of death in the USA, and oncologic therapies are evolving to the point that cancer survivors are increasing yearly, some living long enough to develop cardiovascular disease, and others living with sequelae from their cancer therapy. The financial burdens to the healthcare system continue to present barriers for the delivery of healthcare, especially for patients with heart disease and cancer as chronic diseases. Collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists is paramount to ensure timely cancer care while minimizing cardiotoxicity. The field of Cardio-Oncology is the perfect model for the current management of these patients, positioned to break down silos, avoid delays in cancer care, and treating potential short- and long-term sequela of cancer therapy in a cost-efficient manner. While cardio-oncology programs initially sprang from the academic and defined cancer centers, it is rapidly growing in the nonacademic settings. This paper explores reasons that occurred and explores some of the unique aspects to cancer care and cardio-oncology delivery in the nonacademic setting. The ultimate goal is to achieve the best cancer care with the least degree of disruption to therapy that also minimizes cardiotoxicity, lowering costs, and improving outcomes for patients.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Cardio-Oncology: Advantages, Importance of Expediency, and Considerations to Navigate Pre-Authorization.

Diagnosis of acute and late cardiotoxicity from cancer therapeutics has become increasingly important as the scope of cardio-oncology increases exponentially, both in terms of the number of people affected and the types of therapies it encompasses. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a tool that can offer unparalleled diagnostic information compared with other imaging modalities, but its utilization is often delayed, at the expense of patient care, due to the need for insurance pre-authorization. This paper highlights situations in which CMR is preferred as the diagnostic modality and provides examples of diagnoses more likely to be approved by insurance companies. It also provides specific cardio-oncology diagnoses or questions to help the clinical cardio-oncologist navigate the pre-authorization process.

Reaching Across the Aisle: Cardio-Oncology Advocacy and Program Building.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This study aims to assess the current state of cardio-oncology in reference to advocacy efforts, access to care, and perspective of stakeholders in their ability to provide patient care as well as development of "across the aisle" synergy among cardiologists and oncologists and academic and non-academic centers in various worldwide locations. RECENT FINDINGS: During the last decade, there has been a significant and diverse growth in cardio-oncology. We reviewed the experience from cardiologists and oncologists across different healthcare systems, the global trends, the role of collaborative networks, and the importance of advocacy efforts. Cardio-oncology will continue to grow, but there is an unmet need to increase awareness, improve education, and expand access to care to larger segments of the cancer population in order to have a more significant impact on their health. The growing collaboration through professional societies and collaborative networks provides an opportunity to advance the cardiovascular care of cancer patients to meet the projected needs in a growing and more diverse population.

Perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic impact on cardio-oncology: results from the COVID-19 International Collaborative Network survey.

BACKGROUND: Re-allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in delays in care delivery to patients with cardiovascular disease and cancer. The ability of health care providers to provide optimal care in this setting has not been formally evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of COVID-19 resource re-allocation on scheduling, testing, elective procedures, telemedicine access, use of new COVID-19 therapies, and providers' opinions on healthcare policies among oncology and cardiology practitioners. METHODS: An electronic survey was conducted by a cardio-oncology collaborative network through regional and state chapters of the American College of Cardiology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the International Cardio-Oncology Society. Descriptive statistics were reported by frequency and proportion for analyses, and stratified categorically by geographic region and specialty. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred fifteen providers (43 countries) participated: 986 cardiologists, 306 oncologists, and 118 trainees/internal medicine. 63% (195/306) of oncologists vs 92% (896/976) of cardiologists reported cancellations of treatments/elective procedures (p = 0.01). 46% (442/970) of cardiologists and 25% (76/303) of oncologists modified the scope of their practice (p = < 0.001). Academic physicians (74.5%) felt better supplied with personal protective equipment (PPE) vs non-academic (74.5% vs 67.2%; p = 0.018). Telemedicine was less common in Europe 81% (74/91), and Latin America 64% (101/158), than the United States, 88% (950/1097) (p = < 0.001). 95% of all groups supported more active leadership from medical professional societies. CONCLUSIONS: These results support initiatives to promote expanded coverage for telemedicine, increased access to PPE, better testing availability and involvement of medical professional societies to help with preparedness for future health care crisis.

Cardio-Oncology Education and Training: JACC Council Perspectives.

The innovative development of cancer therapies has led to an unprecedented improvement in survival outcomes and a wide array of treatment-related toxicities, including those that are cardiovascular in nature. Aging of the population further adds to the number of patients being treated for cancer, especially those with comorbidities. Such pre-existing and developing cardiovascular diseases pose some of the greatest risks of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Addressing the complex cardiovascular needs of these patients has become increasingly important, resulting in an imperative for an intersecting discipline: cardio-oncology. Over the past decade, there has been a remarkable rise of cardio-oncology clinics and service lines. This development, however, has occurred in a vacuum of standard practice and training guidelines, although these are being actively pursued. In this council perspective document, the authors delineate the scope of practice in cardio-oncology and the proposed training requirements, as well as the necessary core competencies. This document also serves as a roadmap toward confirming cardio-oncology as a subspecialty in medicine.

Implementing a Cardio-oncology Center of Excellence: Nuts and Bolts, Including Coding and Billing.

Cardio-oncology is rapidly expanding as part of cancer therapy in both the acute phase and later stages after treatment. The shifting paradigm of cancer becoming a chronic disease requires long-term follow-up for ongoing cardiac toxicity. As more cancer patients enter the survivorship phase, there needs to be identification of those at risk and strategies for how best to monitor long-term cancer therapy-related cardiac disease. This article serves as a template decide if a cardio-oncology program should be started and expanded as a center of excellence for the discipline as well as to help in implementing and financially sustaining a program.

Preparing the Cardiovascular Workforce to Care for Oncology Patients: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

Cardiovascular disease and cancer are the 2 main causes of death in the United States. They intersect on multiple levels, sharing common causal mechanisms and epidemiological risk factors. The growing prevalence and complexity of cardiovascular disease and cancer have resulted in the development of the discipline of cardio-oncology. Preparing the cardiovascular workforce for the care of a growing population of cancer patients is necessary to enhance the delivery of high-quality cardiovascular care for patients with cancer. The goal of this review is to present the dedicated efforts of the cardio-oncology community to meet the growing need for education and training of cardiovascular practitioners providing care to cancer patients and survivors. Integration in general cardiology training programs and the efforts of the stakeholder organizations serve as an example of how a multidimensional, innovative approach can address provider education and training needs in a relatively new discipline.

Hypertension Across a Woman's Life Cycle.

Hypertension accounts for 1 in 5 deaths among American women, posing a greater burden for women than men, and is among their most important risk factors for death and development of cardiovascular and other diseases. Hypertension affects women in all phases of life, with specific characteristics relating to risk factors and management for primary prevention of hypertension in teenage and young adult women; hypertension in pregnancy; hypertension during use of oral contraceptives and assisted reproductive technologies, lactation, menopause, or hormone replacement; hypertension in elderly women; and issues of race and ethnicity. All are detailed in this review, as is information relative to women in clinical trials of hypertension and medication issues. The overarching message is that effective treatment and control of hypertension improves cardiovascular outcomes. But many knowledge gaps persist, including the contribution of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy to cardiovascular disease risk, the role of hormone replacement, blood pressure targets for elderly women, and so on.

The kinetics of integrilin limited by obesity: a multicenter randomized pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: KILO tested 2 novel weight-based eptifibatide dosing strategies compared with standard dosing in obese patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Eptifibatide dosing is weight adjusted for patients up to 121 kg. Patients above this weight receive the same maximal dose, although it is unknown if this provides adequate eptifibatide concentration or platelet inhibition. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients weighing ≥125 kg undergoing elective PCI were randomized to 1 of 3 eptifibatide dosing regimens: standard dosing using a weight of 121 kg, actual body weight (ABW)-based dosing with no upper limit, or ideal body weight (IBW)-based dosing. Boluses of 180 µg/kg were given 10 minutes apart, followed by a 2.0 µg/kg per minute infusion. Plasma eptifibatide concentrations were drawn at 12 to 18 hours after initiating the infusion. Platelet aggregation was assessed at baseline and 10 minutes after the second bolus. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were randomized to standard (n = 22), ABW (n = 23), or IBW (n = 22) dosing. The median (25th, 75th) steady-state plasma eptifibatide concentrations were 1,740 ng/mL (1,350, 2,350), 1,780 ng/mL (1,510, 2,350), and 1,055 ng/mL (738, 1,405), respectively (P < .001). Ten-minute median (25th, 75th) platelet aggregation units were 7 (0, 21), 2 (0, 8), and 14 (8, 20), respectively (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Actual body weight eptifibatide dosing leads to higher plasma concentrations and greater platelet inhibition than standard or IBW dosing in obese patients undergoing PCI. Current recommendations for eptifibatide dosing may be inadequate in patients >121 kg. Further study is warranted to define the optimal dosing of eptifibatide and other medications in obese patients.

Nurse consultation support to primary care practices to increase delivery of health behavior services.

Tobacco use, lack of physical activity, poor diet, and alcohol use are the key preventable causes of death in the United States. This study tested the use of nurses as consultants to primary care practices to assist practice clinicians and staff in identifying and carrying out plans to help their adult patients improve these health behaviors. A pre-post chart audit was conducted, and 17 of 20 practices (85%, p = <.01) increased documentation of health behavior delivery a mean absolute increase of 5.5% after the intervention. Nurse consultation may be an effective strategy to increase health behavior delivery to patients in primary care.

Nurses as practice change facilitators for healthy behaviors.

This study used nurses as practice change consultants to help primary care medical practices improve their delivery of health behavior services to patients. Nurse consultants worked with 20 practices from 2 healthcare systems. In each practice, the nurses helped clinicians and staff to develop a practice-specific protocol so that they could identify and intervene with the health behavior of their patients. As a result of the nurse consultant intervention, health behavior delivery was improved. This article describes the specific methods and the lessons learned through this study. We encourage practices to use nurse consultants as one way of improving quality of care.

Evaluating cultural competence among behavioral health professionals.

Persistent racial and ethnic disparities in access and utilization of behavioral health services have highlighted the need for cultural competence among providers. In response, many agencies are now implementing education and training programs to ensure that behavioral health professionals improve their skills when serving diverse ethnic, racial, and cultural populations. The evaluation of these trainings is vital to ensure that they both improve the cultural competence of providers and promote recovery among persons with severe mental illnesses. This paper discusses the philosophical and practical issues related to measuring cultural competence, based on the evaluation of statewide cultural competence trainings for behavioral health professionals. The evaluation process illustrates the challenges of operationalizing cultural competence, balancing the needs of program implementers and evaluators, and developing a robust and feasible evaluation design, which assesses outcomes both for persons in recovery and providers.

Using a general internal medicine consult service to teach residents and care for patients.

A general medicine consult service can be difficult to manage because house staff are unaccustomed to the consultant role, the required knowledge is new and diverse, and the curriculum may be poorly defined. Within the last 3 decades, perioperative consultation has been more rigorously studied and a more evidence-based method has emerged. The consultative service at the University of Tennessee has developed a systematic approach to medical consultation that provides efficient, evidence-based patient care along with resident education. The curricular model, which reflects the newly required competencies of the American Board of Internal Medicine and the Residency Review Committee, is transferable to most training settings.