Documentation of prenatal contraceptive counseling and fulfillment of permanent contraception: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Barriers exist for the provision of surgery for permanent contraception in the postpartum period. Prenatal counseling has been associated with increased rates of fulfillment of desired postpartum contraception in general, although it is unclear if there is impact on permanent contraception specifically. Thus, we aimed to investigate the association between initial timing for prenatal documentation of a contraceptive plan for permanent contraception and fulfillment of postpartum contraception for those receiving counseling. METHODS: This is a planned secondary analysis of a multi-site cohort study of patients with documented desire for permanent contraception at the time of delivery at four hospitals located in Alabama, California, Illinois, and Ohio over a two-year study period. Our primary exposure was initial timing of documented plan for contraception (first, second, or third trimester, or during delivery hospitalization). We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression to analyze fulfillment of permanent contraception before hospital discharge, within 42 days of delivery, and within 365 days of delivery between patients with a documented plan for permanent contraception in the first or second trimester compared to the third trimester. Covariates included insurance status, age, parity, gestational age, mode of delivery, adequacy of prenatal care, race, ethnicity, marital status, and body mass index. RESULTS: Of the 3103 patients with a documented expressed desire for permanent contraception at the time of delivery, 2083 (69.1%) had a documented plan for postpartum permanent contraception prenatally. After adjusting for covariates, patients with initial documented plan for permanent contraception in the first or second trimester had a higher odds of fulfillment by discharge (aOR 1.57, 95% C.I 1.24-2.00), 42 days (aOR 1.51, 95% C.I 1.20-1.91), and 365 days (aOR 1.40, 95% C.I 1.11-1.75), compared to patients who had their first documented plan in the third trimester. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had a documented prenatal plan for permanent contraception in trimester one and two experienced higher likelihood of permanent contraception fulfillment compared to those with documentation in trimester three. Given the barriers to accessing permanent contraception, it is imperative that comprehensive, patient-centered counseling and documentation regarding future reproductive goals begin early prenatally.

Permanent contraception is a highly desired form of postpartum contraception in the United States, however there are several barriers to accessing it. In this paper, we investigate whether the timing of when a patient has a documented plan for postpartum contraception has an impact on if they achieve postpartum contraception. This is a cohort study from four hospitals in Illinois, Ohio, California, and Alabama for patients with a desire for postpartum permanent contraception documented in their medical record. We specifically investigated the trimester (first, second, or third) where a patient had a plan for permanent contraception first documented. We then used univariate and multivariate models to determine the relationship between the timing of a plan for permanent contraception and if a patient achieved the procedure at three time-points: hospital discharge, 42-days, and 365-days. Our findings showed that of the 3103 patients in our cohort, only 69.1% of them had a documented plan for postpartum contraception at any point before going to the hospital for their delivery admission. We additionally found that patients who had a documented plan for permanent contraception in the first or second trimester had a higher odds of receiving their postpartum contraception procedure compared to people who had their first documented plan in the third trimester. This showed us the importance of earlier counseling regarding contraception for pregnant patients. There are many barriers to accessing postpartum contraception, so having patient focused counseling about future goals around reproductive health early on in pregnancy is critical.

Understanding Medical Students' Concerns about Explicit Informed Consent for Pelvic Exams Under Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Medical student involvement in procedures, including pelvic exams under anesthesia (EUAs), is a fundamental part of medical education. While guidelines exist regarding informed consent for medical student participation, there is ongoing debate and uncertainty regarding the requirement and modality of obtaining explicit consent for pelvic EUAs. This study aims to explore the perceptions and experiences of medical students who do not favor an explicit informed consent process for pelvic EUAs. METHODS: An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed to third- and fourth-year medical students at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine who had completed their obstetrics and gynecology core clerkship. The questionnaire included both quantitative and qualitative sections. Qualitative analysis was conducted using a mixed inductive and deductive coding approach, with key patterns, categories, and themes identified through content analysis. RESULTS: Among the 201 students included in the analysis, 50 students did not endorse an explicit informed consent process for pelvic EUAs. Themes that emerged from their open-ended responses included: (1) the belief that medical student involvement is implicitly included in patient agreements at teaching hospitals; (2) the perception that pelvic EUAs are an essential first step in gynecologic surgery; (3) the view that pelvic EUAs are comparable to other medical procedures; (4) concern that explicit consent would limit educational opportunities; and (5) the belief that pelvic EUAs are not harmful or traumatic to patients. DISCUSSION: The findings highlight the justifications provided by medical students who do not support explicit informed consent for pelvic EUAs. While some arguments align with previous ethical analyses, this study provides empirical and qualitative insights into students' perspectives. The belief that patients implicitly consent to medical student involvement at teaching hospitals warrants further examination, as patient awareness and understanding may vary. The differentiation between pelvic exams and other EUAs, as well as the perception of minimal harm, should be critically evaluated in the context of trauma-informed care and patient autonomy. Furthermore, the interconnectedness of educational and surgical aspects of pelvic EUAs should be clarified in patient-physician communication. CONCLUSION: Understanding the perspectives of medical students who do not favor explicit consent for pelvic EUAs is crucial for developing and implementing consent processes. The findings emphasize the need for enhanced patient-physician communication, standardized frameworks for learner involvement, and curricular adaptations to address patient perceptions and trauma-informed care. Future research should explore these themes in larger and more diverse cohorts to inform best practices in obtaining informed consent for medical student participation in pelvic EUAs.

Single-Visit Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Initiation Among Adolescents Before and During COVID-19.

PURPOSE: Single-visit long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is cost-effective and convenient. Our objective was to compare incidence of single-visit LARC placement and associated factors during the year before the COVID-19 pandemic (March 15, 2020) and the first year of the pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health records from a large healthcare system. Eligible adolescents were aged 10-19 years and received outpatient LARC from March 15, 2019 to March 14, 2021. Logistic regression models determined the relationship of patient and provider characteristics on single-visit LARC before and during COVID-19. RESULTS: One thousand six adolescents initiated LARC during the study period. Fewer adolescents received single-visit LARC during COVID-19 (289/506, 57.1%) compared to before (315/500, 63.0%), although changes in odds of single-visit LARC were not statistically significant. Concordance between county of patient residence and the location of the LARC placement facility was associated with single-visit LARC before (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.75) and during (aOR = 1.74) the pandemic (both p < .05). During the pandemic, a few factors were associated with reduced odds of single-visit LARC: (1) public insurance (aOR = 0.49, p < .01), (2) nonobstetricians/nongynecologists providers (pediatrics [aOR = 0.35, p < .01], family medicine [aOR = 0.53, p < .01], or internal medicine [aOR = 0.14, p < .05]), and (3) advanced practice practitioners (aOR = 0.49, p < .01). DISCUSSION: Incidence of single-visit LARC was similar before and during the pandemic. Certain factors were associated with lower odds of single-visit LARC insertion, suggesting differential access during the pandemic for subgroups of adolescents. Our findings may guide policy and programmatic interventions to improve access to single-visit LARC for all adolescent populations.

Association Among Race, Ethnicity, Insurance Type, and Postpartum Permanent Contraception Fulfillment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association among race, ethnicity, insurance type, and fulfillment of permanent contraception requests. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort of patients who delivered at 20 or more gestational weeks in a 2-year time period at four hospitals across the United States: University of California San Francisco, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, MetroHealth Medical Center in Cleveland, and University of Alabama at Birmingham. All patients included had permanent contraception documented as their postpartum contraceptive plan. We used modified Poisson models to estimate the associations among race and ethnicity, insurance type, and fulfillment of permanent contraception before hospital discharge, within 6 weeks of delivery, and within 1 year of delivery, adjusting for age, parity, gestational age, delivery type, marital status, body mass index, insurance type, adequacy of prenatal care, and hospital site. RESULTS: Of 2,945 people in our cohort, 1,243 (42.2%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 820 (27.8%) were Hispanic, and 882 (30.0%) were non-Hispanic White. Overall, 1,731 of 2,945 patients (58.2%) who desired postpartum permanent contraception received it before hospital discharge, 1,746 of 2,945 (59.3%) received it within 6 weeks of delivery, and 1,927 of 2,945 (65.4%) received it within 1 year of delivery. Across all racial and ethnic groups, patients with Medicaid insurance were less likely to have their desired postpartum permanent contraception procedure fulfilled compared with patients with private insurance. In unadjusted models, non-Hispanic Black patients were less likely to have their desired postpartum permanent contraception procedure fulfilled. In an examination of interaction with insurance type, non-Hispanic Black patients with private insurance were less likely to have permanent contraception fulfilled compared with non-Hispanic White patients with private insurance before adjustment. After adjustment, there were no significant associations between race and postpartum permanent contraception fulfillment among those with Medicaid or private insurance. CONCLUSION: In unadjusted models, we find marked racial disparities in fulfillment of permanent contraception. Controlling for individual- and facility-level factors eliminated associations among race, ethnicity, insurance type, and fulfillment, likely because covariates are mediators on the pathway between racism and fulfillment.

Medicaid and Fulfillment of Postpartum Permanent Contraception Requests.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between Medicaid insurance and fulfillment of postpartum permanent contraception requests. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 43,915 patients across four study sites in four states, of whom 3,013 (7.1%) had a documented contraceptive plan of permanent contraception at the time of postpartum discharge and either Medicaid insurance or private insurance. Our primary outcome was permanent contraception fulfillment before hospital discharge; we compared individuals with private insurance with individuals with Medicaid insurance. Secondary outcomes were permanent contraception fulfillment within 42 and 365 days of delivery, as well as the rate of subsequent pregnancy after nonfulfillment. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used. RESULTS: Patients with Medicaid insurance (1,096/2,076, 52.8%), compared with those with private insurance (663/937, 70.8%), were less likely to receive desired permanent contraception before hospital discharge (P≤.001). After adjustment for age, parity, weeks of gestation, mode of delivery, adequacy of prenatal care, race, ethnicity, marital status, and body mass index, private insurance status was associated with higher odds of fulfillment at discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.48, 95% CI 1.17-1.87) and 42 days (aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.13-1.80) and 365 days (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08-1.71) postpartum. Of the 980 patients with Medicaid insurance who did not receive postpartum permanent contraception, 42.2% had valid Medicaid sterilization consent forms at the time of delivery. CONCLUSION: Differences in fulfillment rates of postpartum permanent contraception are observable between patients with Medicaid insurance and patients with private insurance after adjustment for clinical and demographic factors. The disparities associated with the federally mandated Medicaid sterilization consent form and waiting period necessitate policy reassessment to promote reproductive autonomy and to ensure equity.

Decision-making regarding immediate vs. interval postpartum levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion timing.

BACKGROUND: Understanding decision-making for contraception initiation timing postpartum may help guide patients in selecting a contraceptive method most aligned with their reproductive goals. The objective of this study was to explore the decision-making process in patients who chose immediate postplacental (IPP) levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG IUD) insertion versus interval insertion at the postpartum follow-up visit. METHODS: We recruited English-speaking, reproductive-aged adult postpartum participants who received either an IPP or interval postpartum LNG IUD from September to December 2017 at MetroHealth Medical Center. We conducted interviews over the phone utilizing a pilot-tested, semi-structured interview guide. Interview topics included past experiences with contraception, provider counseling, intrapartum factors, and current experiences after IUD insertion. RESULTS: We interviewed 20 participants (12 IPP and eight interval IUD recipients). Participants receiving an IPP IUD described convenience, desire for immediate contraception, pain control and availability of alternative contraception options as influential for their decision. Patients who received an interval IUD performed outside research, focused on the events surrounding delivery, and generally favored additional recovery time before obtaining an IUD. Patients who received interval IUDs were often not aware that IPP IUDs were available. Early, frequent, and comprehensive counseling was viewed favorably when compared to counseling upon arrival to the laboring unit. While overall there was congruence of participant expectations and experiences, unexpected expulsion affected desire for future IUD use in some participants. CONCLUSION: Providers should be mindful that prior experience and knowledge as well as delivery room considerations affect insertion timing decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: N/A.

Prevalence and County-Level Distribution of Births in Catholic Hospitals in the US in 2020.

This study uses American Hospital Association data to examine the volume and distribution of births in Catholic US hospitals and quantify county-level patterns of Catholic and non-Catholic hospital births.

Nonfulfillment of desired postpartum permanent contraception and resultant maternal and pregnancy health outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Up to half of the patients requesting postpartum permanent contraception do not undergo the desired procedure. Although nonfulfillment of desired postpartum permanent contraception is associated with increased risk of pregnancy within 12 months of delivery, its long-term reproductive and maternal health outcomes are less clear. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the association of fulfillment of postpartum permanent contraception with number and timing of subsequent pregnancies and maternal health outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective single-center cohort chart review study of health outcomes in the 4 years following delivery (2016-2018) for 1331 patients with a documented contraceptive plan of female permanent contraception at time of postpartum discharge from 2012 to 2014. Rates of permanent contraception fulfillment within 90 days of delivery and clinical and demographic characteristics associated with permanent contraception were calculated. We determined number of and time to subsequent pregnancies, and diagnoses of medical comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, depression, anxiety, asthma, anemia), sexually transmitted infection, and pregnancy comorbidities (preterm birth, gestational diabetes mellitus, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, postpartum hemorrhage, low birthweight, intrauterine fetal demise) in the 4 years following delivery. RESULTS: Of the 1331 patients desiring permanent contraception postpartum, 588 (44.1%) had their requests fulfilled within 90 days of delivery and 743 (55.8%) did not. Patients who achieved permanent contraception fulfillment tended to have attended more outpatient prenatal visits, delivered via cesarean delivery, and were older, married, college-educated, and privately insured. Patients who received their desired postpartum permanent contraception were less likely to have subsequent intrauterine pregnancies (P<.001). In those who did not achieve permanent contraception, 22 (9.0%) subsequent pregnancies occurred within 6 months of previous deliveries, and 223 (91.0%) occurred after short interpregnancy intervals (within 18 months). Of 178 continued pregnancies, 26 (14.6%) were delivered preterm. There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of ever attending an outpatient, preventive, or emergency room visit, or in most nonreproductive health outcomes investigated. CONCLUSION: Nonfulfillment of desired postpartum permanent contraception is associated with subsequent maternal reproductive and nonreproductive health ramifications. Given the barriers to permanent contraception, alternative plans for contraception should be discussed proactively if permanent contraception is not provided.

Dismantling Structural Barriers: Resident Clinics Refocused on Equity.

Disparities in health by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status within obstetrics and gynecology are well described and prompt evaluation for structural barriers. Academic medicine has a historical role in caring for marginalized populations, with medical trainees often serving as first-line clinicians for outpatient care. The ubiquitous approach of concentrating care of marginalized patients within resident and trainee clinics raises ethical questions regarding equity and sends a clear message of value that is internalized by learners and patients. A path forward is elimination of the structural inequities caused by maintenance of clinics stratified by training level, thereby creating an integrated patient pool for trainees and attending physicians alike. In this model, demographic and insurance information is blinded and patient triage is guided by clinical acuity and patient preference alone. To address structural inequities in our health care delivery system, we implemented changes in our department. Our goals were to improve access and patient experience and to send a unified message to our patients, learners, and faculty-our clinical staff, across all training levels, are committed to giving the highest standard of care to all people, regardless of insurance status or ability to pay. Academic medical centers must look internally for structural barriers that contribute to health care disparities within obstetrics and gynecology as we aim to make progress toward equity.

Shared Decision-Making: The Way Forward for Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling.

There are multi-level barriers that impact uptake of postpartum contraception and result in disparities, including clinical barriers such as provider bias. Fortunately, clinicians have direct control over their contraceptive counseling practices, and thus reducing structural barriers is actionable through high quality contraceptive counseling that equips patients with the knowledge and guidance they need to fulfill their reproductive desires. Yet, many commonly employed contraceptive counseling strategies, like One Key Question and WHO tiered contraceptive counseling, are not patient-driven, do not account for the important nuances of contraceptive choices, and are not focused specifically on the postpartum period. Given the history of eugenics and reproductive coercion in the US, supporting patient through their contraceptive decision-making process is especially vital. Additionally, contraceptive preferences vary based on patient-level factors and fluctuate over time and counseling should account for such differences. Shared contraceptive decision-making occurs when patients provide input on their values, desires, and preferences and clinicians share medical knowledge and evidence-based information without judgement. This approach is considered the most ethically sound form of counseling, as it maximizes patient autonomy. Shared decision-making also has clinical benefits, including increased patient satisfaction. In sum, shared contraceptive decision-making should be universally adopted to promote ethical, high-quality care and reproductive autonomy.

Ethics of a Mandatory Waiting Period for Female Sterilization.

Due to a history of coerced sterilization, a federal Medicaid sterilization policy mandates that a specific consent form be signed by a patient at least thirty days prior to when the patient undergoes sterilization. However, in contemporary obstetrical practice, the Medicaid sterilization policy serves as a policy-level barrier to autonomously desired care. We review the clinical and ethical implications of the current Medicaid sterilization policy. After discussing the utility and impact of waiting periods for other surgical procedures, we explore the psychology of time required for decision-making and consider scientific understanding of regret. We argue that the current Medicaid sterilization waiting period is clinically and ethically unjustifiable and that the policy ought to be revised in light of the goals, preferences, and concerns of the people most affected by it. While the need for continued protection against coercion remains, the current mandated waiting period does little to enforce the high-quality shared decision-making that is desired for sterilization counseling.

Ethical Issues in Providing and Promoting Contraception to Women with Opioid Use Disorder.

Women with opioid use disorder (OUD) face unique challenges meeting their reproductive goals. Because the rate of unintended pregnancy in this population is almost 80 percent, there has been a push to increase the use of contraceptives among reproductive-aged women with OUD.1 The patient-level ethical issues of such initiatives, however, are often overlooked. This review discusses the ethical issues in two realms: obtaining contraception when it is desired and avoiding contraceptive coercion when contraception is not desired. It is important that access to reproductive education and care be improved to ensure autonomous decision making by women with OUD. It is also necessary to be mindful of the history of oppressive and coercive contraception and sterilization policies in the United States. These policies have left a legacy of mistrust and continue to be manifested in the form of more subtly oppressive policies in contemporary medical practice. Such policies point to the ongoing stigmatization of, and implicit biases held against, women with OUD. Based on these ethical issues, solutions are suggested at the clinical, systemic, and societal levels.

Fulfillment of Desired Postpartum Permanent Contraception: a Health Disparities Issue.

Women of color experience marked disparities in fulfillment of desired postpartum permanent contraception. While many attribute the disparity to the required Medicaid sterilization consent form and 30-day waiting period established in response to forced and coerced sterilizations, the policy does not entirely explain the disparity; racial and ethnic disparities persist even within strata of insurance type. We therefore propose framing postpartum permanent contraception as a health disparities issue that requires multi-level interventions to address. Based on the literature, we identify discrete levels of barriers to postpartum permanent contraception fulfillment at the patient, physician, hospital, and policy levels that interact and compound within and between individual levels, affecting each individual patient differently. At the patient level, sociodemographic characteristics such as age, race and ethnicity, and parity impact desire for and fulfillment of permanent contraception. At the physician level, implicit bias and paternalistic counseling contribute to barriers in permanent contraception fulfillment. At the hospital level, Medicaid reimbursement, operating room availability, and religious affiliation influence fulfillment of permanent contraception. Lastly, at the policy level, the Medicaid consent form and waiting period pose a known barrier to fulfillment of desired postpartum permanent contraception. Unpacking each of these discrete barriers and untangling their collective impact is necessary to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in permanent contraception fulfillment.

Variation in the interpretation and application of the Medicaid sterilization consent form among Medicaid officials.

OBJECTIVE: The Medicaid consent policy has been identified as a major barrier to desired permanent contraception, particularly for low-income communities and communities of color. As each state may modify their state Medicaid sterilization consent form, variation in the form has been reported. This study aims to characterize state-level variation in Medicaid Title XIX consent form interpretation and application. STUDY DESIGN: We aimed to collect primary data from Medicaid officials in all 50 United States from January to May 2020 via a 25-question electronic survey regarding state-level consent form implementation. Questions targeted consent form details and definitions, insurance and billing, clinician correspondence, and administrative processes. We used Qualtrics XM to collect survey responses. We performed descriptive statistics on the survey responses. There were no exclusion criteria. RESULTS: We had 41 responses from 36/50 states (72% participation rate). Heterogeneity existed in the key definitions of "Premature Delivery" and "Emergency Abdominal Surgery." One in five respondents reported the consent form was only available in English. Variation among Current Procedural Terminology codes covered in each state's sterilization policy were noted. Nearly a quarter of respondents did not know how Medicaid informed healthcare providers of consent form denials. Most participants (90%) were unaware of differences between state sterilization policies. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates variation in terms of consent form definitions, procedures covered, correspondence with clinicians, and administrative review processes among state Medicaid offices regarding the sterilization consent form. Greater transparency is necessary in order to reduce administrative barriers to desired permanent contraception. IMPLICATIONS: Inconsistent interpretation poses an administrative barrier to care, raises concern regarding appropriate clinician reimbursement, and can potentially lead to unnecessarily denying patients the contraceptive option of their choice. Permanent contraception policies should be equitable no matter insurance status, preserve reproductive autonomy and effectively protect vulnerable populations.

Medical Student Attitudes on Explicit Informed Consent for Pelvic Exams Under Anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain an overview of medical student attitudes on the need for explicit consent for pelvic exams under anesthesia performed for educational purposes DESIGN: From February to October 2020, 201 medical students at a single medical school in the United States participated in a cross-sectional survey after completion of the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Outcome measures included endorsement of need for explicit informed consent for educational pelvic exams under anesthesia, and knowledge of informed consent processes for such exams. SETTING: University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine PARTICIPANTS: Third- and fourth-year medical students RESULTS: Overall, 75% of medical students endorsed a need for explicit informed consent for educational pelvic exams under anesthesia, which extended to prostate, rectal, and breast exams under anesthesia. Additionally, 45% and 77% of these participants indicated that consent for educational pelvic exams under anesthesia should take the form of a separate signature line on the surgical consent form and/or a verbal form, respectively. Only 40% of students correctly identified institutional policy for obtaining informed consent for educational pelvic exams under anesthesia. Rotation with the oncologic surgical service (p = 0.02) and correct identification of institutional informed consent policies (p = 0.002) were associated with decreased perceptions of the importance of explicit informed consent for educational pelvic exams under anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students at the institution studied largely support explicit informed consent for educational pelvic and other sensitive exams under anesthesia, but a knowledge gap on institutional informed consent policy exists. Medical students support increased transparency and bodily autonomy. Due to the agreement of patients and medical students and the ethical rationale for this position, it may be appropriate for physicians and institutions to consider new processes of obtaining explicit informed consent for pelvic exams under anesthesia by medical students.