Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 78
Filtrar
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 23(1): 458, 2023 Jul 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37430196

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The rate of community antibiotic use is high in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) when compared to other nations, and in NZ, as in most other nations, antibiotics are very commonly prescribed for self-limiting upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). Resources that build knowledge, perceptions and understanding can potentially reduce unnecessary antibiotic consumption. METHODS: To inform the content of educational resources, we conducted an in-depth qualitative study with 47 participants via 6 focus groups of the knowledge, attitudes, and expectations of whanau Maori and Pacific peoples about antibiotics and URTIs. RESULTS: Focus groups with 47 participants identified four themes: Knowledge that might influence expectations to receive antibiotics for URTIs; Perceptions - the factors that influence when and why to seek medical care for URTI; Expectations - the features of successful medical care for URTI; Solutions - how to build community knowledge about URTI and their treatment and prevention. Knowledge that might reduce expectations to receive antibiotics for URTI included confidence in the use of alternative remedies, knowledge that URTI are usually caused by viruses, and concerns about antibiotic adverse effects. Participants commonly reported that they would confidently accept their doctor's recommendation that an antibiotic was not necessary for an URTI, provided that a thorough assessment had been performed and that treatment decisions were clearly communicated. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that building patients' knowledge and skills about when antibiotics are necessary, and increasing doctors' confidence and willingness not to prescribe an antibiotic for patients with an URTI, could significantly reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in NZ.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Povo Maori , Infecções Respiratórias , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Grupos Focais , Motivação , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Int J Psychiatry Med ; 57(2): 91-102, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33892599

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with depressive symptoms are common in primary care. Brief, simple therapies are needed. AIM: Is a focussed acceptance and commitment therapy (FACT) intervention more effective than the control group for patients with depressive symptoms in primary care at one week follow up?Design and setting: A randomised, blinded controlled trial at a single primary care clinic in Auckland, New Zealand. METHODS: Patients presenting to their primary care practice for any reason were recruited from the clinic waiting room. Eligible patients who scored ≥2 on the PHQ-2 indicating potential depressive symptoms were randomised using a remote computer to intervention or control groups. Both groups received a psychosocial assessment using the "work-love-play" questionnaire. The intervention group received additional FACT-based behavioural activation activities. The primary outcome was the mean PHQ-8 score at one week. RESULTS: 57 participants entered the trial and 52 had complete outcome data after one week. Baseline PHQ-8 scores were similar for intervention (11.0) and control (11.7). After one week, the mean PHQ-8 score was significantly lower in the intervention group (7.4 vs 10.1 for control; p<0.039 one sided and 0.078 two sided). The number needed to treat to achieve a PHQ-8 score ≤6 was 4.0 on intention to treat analysis (p = 0.043 two sided). There were no significant differences observed on the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: This is the first effectiveness study to examine FACT in any population. The results suggest that it is effective compared with control, at one week, for patients with depressive symptoms in primary care.


Assuntos
Terapia de Aceitação e Compromisso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Depressão/psicologia , Depressão/terapia , Humanos , Nova Zelândia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Diabet Med ; 36(6): 734-741, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30791130

RESUMO

AIMS: The study aim was to re-examine current work practices and evaluate time trends in the cardiovascular management of people with diabetes consulted by primary healthcare nurses in New Zealand. METHODS: Primary healthcare nurses in the Auckland region were surveyed in 2006-2008 and 2016, with about one-third of practice, home care and specialist nurses randomly selected to participate. Nurses completed a self-administered questionnaire about demographic and workplace details, and a telephone interview about clinical care provided for people with diabetes during nursing consultations. Information was collected on a representative sample of people with diabetes consulted on one randomly selected work-day in the previous week. RESULTS: Of all people with diabetes consulted by nurses, practice nurses consulted significantly more in 2016 (83%) compared with 60% in 2006-2008, whereas specialist nurse consultations decreased from 23% to 8% (P = 0.01). In 2016, in people with diabetes, BMI was higher, and total cholesterol lower, yet the proportions of those receiving lifestyle advice (dietary and activity) remained unchanged from 2006-2008 levels. Smoking prevalence in people with diabetes was unchanged between the two surveys, although more people were asked if they wished to stop in 2016 compared with 2006-2008 (98% vs. 73%). In 2016, hours of nurses' diabetes education were associated with increased routine assessments of risk factors in people with diabetes and checking laboratory results. CONCLUSIONS: Practice nurses are undertaking an increasing proportion of diabetes consultations. Although BMI in people with diabetes is increasing, the proportion of nurses offering lifestyle advice remains unchanged. Increasing diabetes education could strengthen the management of people with diabetes by community nurses.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus/enfermagem , Angiopatias Diabéticas/prevenção & controle , Enfermeiros de Saúde da Família , Padrões de Prática em Enfermagem/tendências , Atenção Primária à Saúde/tendências , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cardiologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cardiologia/tendências , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/enfermagem , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Angiopatias Diabéticas/epidemiologia , Angiopatias Diabéticas/enfermagem , Enfermeiros de Saúde da Família/estatística & dados numéricos , Enfermeiros de Saúde da Família/tendências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Padrões de Prática em Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Br J Surg ; 100(4): 482-9, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23339040

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Optimized perioperative care within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is designed to reduce morbidity after surgery, resulting in a shorter hospital stay. The present study evaluated this approach in the context of sleeve gastrectomy for patients with morbid obesity. METHODS: Patients were allocated to perioperative care according to a bariatric ERAS protocol or a control group that received standard care. These groups were also compared with a historical group of patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at the same institution between 2006 and 2010, selected using matched propensity scores. The primary outcome was median length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included readmission rates, postoperative morbidity, postoperative fatigue and mean cost per patient. RESULTS: Of 116 patients included in the analysis, 78 were allocated to the ERAS (40) or control (38) group and there were 38 in the historical group. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Median hospital stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS group (1 day) than in the control (2 days; P < 0·001) and historical (3 days; P < 0·001) groups. It was also shorter in the control group than in the historical group (P = 0·010). There was no difference in readmission rates, postoperative complications or postoperative fatigue. The mean cost per patient was significantly higher in the historical group than in the ERAS (P = 0·010) and control (P = 0·018) groups. CONCLUSION: The ERAS protocol in the setting of bariatric surgery shortened hospital stay and was cost-effective. There was no increase in perioperative morbidity. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01303809 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).


Assuntos
Gastrectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Protocolos Clínicos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Feminino , Gastrectomia/economia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/economia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Obesidade Mórbida/economia , Assistência Perioperatória/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Med J Malaysia ; 67(3): 309-15, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23082424

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine the validity of the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (Malay version) as a case-finding instrument for depression among women in a primary care clinic. METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted in a primary care clinic in Malaysia. Consecutive adult women patients who attended the clinic during data collection were given self-administered questionnaires, which included the PHQ-9 (Malay version). Systematic weighted random sampling was used to select participants for Composite International Diagnostic Interviews (CIDI). The PHQ-9 was validated against the CIDI reference standard. RESULTS: The response rate was 87.5% for the questionnaire completion (895/1023), and 96.8% for the CIDI interviews (151/156). The prevalence of depression was 12.1% (based on PHQ-9 scores of 10 and above). The PHQ-9 had a sensitivity of 87% (95% confidence interval 71% to 95%), a specificity of 82% (74% to 88%), positive LR 4.8 (3.2 to 7.2) and negative LR 0.16 (0.06 to 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: The Malay version of the PHQ-9 was found to be a valid and reliable case-finding instrument for depression in this study. Together with its brevity, it is a suitable case-finding instrument to be used in Malaysian primary care clinics.


Assuntos
Depressão/diagnóstico , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Malásia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Psicológicos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Adulto Jovem
8.
Diabet Med ; 25(11): 1302-8, 2008 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19046220

RESUMO

AIMS: To investigate the association between ethnicity and risk of first cardiovascular (CV) event for people with Type 2 diabetes in New Zealand. METHODS: A prospective cohort study using routinely collected data from a national primary health care diabetes annual review programme linked to national hospital admission and mortality data. Ethnicity was recorded as European, Maori, Pacific, Indo-Asian, East-Asian or Other. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate factors associated with first CV event. Data was collected from 48,444 patients with Type 2 diabetes, with first data collected between 1 January 2000 and 20 December 2005, no previous cardiovascular event at entry and with complete measurements. Risk factors included ethnicity, gender, socio-economic status, body mass index, smoking, age at diagnosis, duration of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, serum lipids, glycated haemoglobin and urine albumin : creatinine ratio. The main outcome measures were time to first fatal or non-fatal CV event. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 2.4 years. Using combined European and Other ethnicities as a reference, hazard ratios for first CV event were 1.30 for Maori (95% confidence interval 1.19-1.41), 1.04 for Pacific (0.95-1.13), 1.06 for Indo-Asian (0.91-1.24) and 0.73 for East-Asian (0.62-0.85) after controlling for all other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnicity was independently associated with time to first CV event in people with Type 2 diabetes. Maori were at 30% higher risk of first CV event and East-Asian 27% lower risk compared with European/Other, with no significant difference in risk for Pacific and Indo-Asian peoples.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnologia , Angiopatias Diabéticas/etnologia , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Idoso , Albuminúria/etnologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidade , Angiopatias Diabéticas/metabolismo , Angiopatias Diabéticas/mortalidade , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Nova Zelândia/etnologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Fatores Socioeconômicos
9.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (3): CD001733, 2007 Jul 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17636683

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Healing of venous leg ulcers is improved by the use of compression bandaging but some venous ulcers remain unhealed, and some people are unsuitable for compression therapy. Pentoxifylline, a drug which helps blood flow, has been used to treat venous leg ulcers. An earlier version of this review included 9 randomised controlled trials, but more research has been since been conducted and an updated review is required. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of pentoxifylline (oxpentifylline or Trental 400) for treating venous leg ulcers, compared with placebo, or other therapies, in the presence or absence of compression therapy. SEARCH STRATEGY: For this second update we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cinahl (date of last search was February 2007), and reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing pentoxifylline with placebo or other therapy in the presence or absence of compression, in people with venous leg ulcers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Details from eligible trials were extracted and summarised by one author using a coding sheet. Data extraction was independently verified by one other author. MAIN RESULTS: Twelve trials involving 864 participants were included. The quality of trials was variable. Eleven trials compared pentoxifylline with placebo or no treatment; in seven of these trials patients received compression therapy. In one trial pentoxifylline was compared with defibrotide in patients who also received compression. Combining 11 trials that compared pentoxifylline with placebo or no treatment (with or without compression) demonstrated that pentoxifylline is more effective than placebo in terms of complete ulcer healing or significant improvement (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.24). Significant heterogeneity was associated with differences in sample populations (hard-to-heal samples compared with "normal" healing samples). Pentoxifylline plus compression is more effective than placebo plus compression (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.13). Pentoxifylline in the absence of compression appears to be more effective than placebo or no treatment (RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.49 to 3.39). A comparison between pentoxifylline and defibrotide found no statistically significant difference in healing rates. More adverse effects were reported in people receiving pentoxifylline (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.22). Nearly three-quarters (72%) of the reported adverse effects were gastrointestinal. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Pentoxifylline is an effective adjunct to compression bandaging for treating venous ulcers and may be effective in the absence of compression. The majority of adverse effects were gastrointestinal disturbances.


Assuntos
Úlcera da Perna/tratamento farmacológico , Pentoxifilina/uso terapêutico , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Bandagens , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Humanos , Úlcera da Perna/terapia , Pentoxifilina/administração & dosagem , Polidesoxirribonucleotídeos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagem
10.
BMJ ; 333(7562): 279, 2006 Aug 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16861253

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness of antibiotics in acute purulent rhinitis (many guidelines advise against their use on the basis of one study that showed no effect). DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and reference lists of retrieved articles. REVIEW METHODS: Meta-analysis of data from double blind randomised placebo controlled trials comparing antibiotics with placebo for acute purulent rhinitis (duration less than 10 days). RESULTS: Seven studies were retrieved; four contributed data on benefits of antibiotics, and four contributed data on harms of antibiotics. The pooled relative risk of benefit for persistent purulent rhinitis at five to eight days with antibiotics was 1.18 (95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.33). The numbers needed to treat ranged from 7 to 15 when the pooled relative risk was applied to the range of control event rates. The relative risk for adverse effects with antibiotics was 1.46 (1.10 to 1.94). The numbers needed to harm for adverse effects ranged from 12 to 78. No serious harms were reported in the placebo arms. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotics are probably effective for acute purulent rhinitis. They can cause harm, usually in the form of gastrointestinal effects. Most patients will get better without antibiotics, supporting the current "no antibiotic as first line" advice.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Rinite/tratamento farmacológico , Resfriado Comum/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Supuração , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Respir Med ; 99(12): 1477-84, 2005 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16291073

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To review the seven Cochrane reviews of non-antibiotic treatment for the common cold. METHODS: Each Cochrane review was read and summarized, and results presented as relative risks and, where possible, numbers needed to treat. RESULTS: The main theme that runs through these Cochrane reviews is the variable quality of the primary studies. In general, the reviewers are fairly cautious about the benefits of any of the treatments other than first-dose decongestants and antihistamine-decongestant combinations. For antihistamines alone, the reviewers were clear about the lack of efficacy except in the high-quality studies in which a global improvement in symptoms was noted. Some studies were statistically significant, but the Cochrane reviewers were guarded about how clinically significant they were. For Echinacea, problems were found with the quality of the studies and the wide range of different forms of this substance. Heated humidified air seemed to be effective in the UK and Israel, but not the USA, making definitive statements about efficacy difficult. Over-the-counter medication for cough seemed to have no documented benefit in children under the age of 5 years. Letosteine (a mucolytic) may be effective in children but is not available in the UK. Bisolvon (a mucolytic) was found to be effective for cough in only one study. For older children and adults, dextromethorphan may be effective (two out of three studies showed benefit), and guiafenesin (an expectorant) showed mixed benefit in two trials. Dexbrompheniramine (a sedating antihistamine)/pseudoephedrine (6 mg/120 mg twice daily for 1 week) was significantly more effective than placebo for severity of cough, whereas, in another study, loratadine (a non-sedating antihistamine)/pseudoephedrine (5 mg/120 mg twice daily for 4 days) did not show any difference between the study groups. Vitamin C may have a small role in preventing the common cold, with possibly a greater role in high-intensity physical activity and sub-arctic conditions. Zinc lozenges seemed to be effective, but the issue of unblinding due to taste was a methodological issue of concern to the reviewers. The benefits and harms are calculated as numbers needed to treat for one person to benefit (NNTB) and numbers needed to treat for one person to harm (NNTH), and were calculated by the author. CONCLUSION: Most non-antibiotic treatments for the common cold are probably not effective. The most promising are dextromethorphan, bisolvon and guiaphenesin for cough, antihistamine-decongestant combinations for a wide range of symptoms, nasal decongestants (at least for the first dose) and possibly zinc lozenges.


Assuntos
Resfriado Comum/tratamento farmacológico , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Adulto , Ácido Ascórbico/administração & dosagem , Criança , Resfriado Comum/prevenção & controle , Echinacea , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos H1/uso terapêutico , Temperatura Alta , Humanos , Umidade , Descongestionantes Nasais/uso terapêutico , Medicamentos sem Prescrição/uso terapêutico , Fitoterapia , Placebos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Respiratórias/prevenção & controle , Zinco/administração & dosagem
12.
BMJ ; 331(7521): 884, 2005 Oct 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16166106

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity of two written screening questions for depression with the addition of a question inquiring if help is needed. DESIGN: Cross sectional validation study. SETTING: 19 general practitioners in six clinics in New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: 1025 consecutive patients receiving no psychotropic drugs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of the two screening questions, the help question, combinations of the screening and help questions, and diagnosis by general practitioners. RESULTS: The help question alone had a sensitivity of 75% (95% confidence interval 60% to 85%) and a specificity of 94% (93% to 96%). The positive likelihood ratio for the help question was 13.0 (9.5 to 17.8) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.27 (0.17 to 0.44). The likelihood ratio for patients wanting help today was 17.5 (11.8 to 31.9). The general practitioner diagnosis had a sensitivity of 79% (65% to 88%) and a specificity of 94% (92% to 95%). CONCLUSION: Adding a question inquiring if help is needed to the two screening questions for depression improves the specificity of a general practitioner diagnosis of depression.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Humanos
13.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (3): CD000247, 2005 Jul 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16034850

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It has long been believed that antibiotics have no role in treating common colds yet they are often prescribed in the belief that they may prevent secondary bacterial infections. Given the increasing concerns about antibiotic resistance it is important to examine the evidence for the benefit of antibiotics for the common cold. OBJECTIVES: To determine:(1) the efficacy of antibiotics, in comparison with placebo, for reducing general symptoms and specific nasopharyngeal symptoms of acute upper respiratory tract infections; (2) if antibiotics have any influence on acute purulent rhinitis; (3) whether antibiotics cause significant adverse outcomes in patients with acute upper respiratory tract infections. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2005); MEDLINE (January 1966 to March, Week 1, 2005); EMBASE (1980 to December 2004), the Family Medicine Database (1908, volume 1 to 1993, volume 13; this database was discontinued in 1993), and reference lists of articles, and we contacted principal investigators. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing any antibiotic therapy against placebo in people with acute upper respiratory tract infections and with less than seven days of symptoms, or acute purulent rhinitis less than ten days in duration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: All analyses used the fixed-effect model unless otherwise stated. The overall quality of the included trials was variable. People receiving antibiotics did no better in terms of lack of cure or persistence of symptoms than those on placebo (relative risk (RR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 1.04), based on a pooled analysis of six trials with a total of 1147 patients. Overall, the relative risk of adverse effects in the antibiotic group was RR 1.8 (95% CI 1.01 to 3.21), using a random-effects model. Adult patients had a significantly greater risk of adverse effects with antibiotics than with placebo (RR 2.62, 95% CI 1.32 to 5.18) (random-effects model) while there was no greater risk in children (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.63). The pooled relative risk for persisting acute purulent rhinitis with antibiotics compared to placebo was 0.57 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.87) (random-effects model), based on 6 studies with 772 participants. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence of benefit to warrant the use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections in children or adults. Antibiotics cause significant adverse effects in adults. The evidence on acute purulent rhinitis and acute clear rhinitis suggests a benefit for antibiotics for these conditions but their routine use is not recommended.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Resfriado Comum/tratamento farmacológico , Rinite/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
14.
Respir Med ; 99(3): 255-61, 2005 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15733498

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to review the four Cochrane reviews of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections. METHODS: Each Cochrane review was read and summarized, and results presented as odds ratios (as in the Internet version) and, where relevant, numbers needed to treat. RESULTS: The reviews of antibiotics for acute otitis media have concluded that benefit is not great with a number needed to treat for a benefit (NNTB) of 15. Recent US guidelines are recommending a delay in prescriptions in children over the age of 6 months. For streptococcal tonsillitis, the Cochrane reviewers suggest that antibiotic use seems to be discretionary rather than prohibited or mandatory. This is because the benefit in terms of symptoms is only about 16h (NNTB from 2 to 7 at day 3 for pain) compared with placebo, and that serious complications, such as rheumatic fever and glomerulonephritis, are now rare in developed countries. The reviewers do, however, suggest that antibiotics are considered in populations in whom these complications are more common. This is an area of debate, as the Infectious Disease Society of America (2002) recommends routine treatment. [Clin. Infect. Dis. 35 (2002) 113] There is good evidence and consensus that there is no indication for antibiotics for the common cold. The situation with acute purulent rhinitis is less clear, as new evidence suggests that antibiotics may be effective for acute purulent rhinitis (NNTB from 6 to 8). However, as most people with acute purulent rhinitis improve without antibiotics, giving antibiotics is not justified as an initial treatment. For acute maxillary sinusitis, the evidence suggests that antibiotics are effective for people with radiologically confirmed sinusitis. The reviewers suggest that clinicians should weigh up the modest benefits (NNTB from 3 to 6) against the potential for adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The use of antibiotics for acute otitis media, sore throat and streptococcal tonsillitis, common cold and acute purulent rhinitis, and acute maxillary sinusitis seems to be discretionary rather than prohibited or mandatory, at least for non-severe cases.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Resfriado Comum/tratamento farmacológico , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Sinusite Maxilar/tratamento farmacológico , Otite Média/tratamento farmacológico , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Rinite/tratamento farmacológico , Supuração/tratamento farmacológico
15.
J Wound Care ; 13(3): 90-2, 2004 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15045801

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors influencing patient concordance with compression stockings after venous leg ulcer healing. METHOD: In 2001 patients discharged from a specialist leg ulcer service in New Zealand were approached to participate in a structured interview about their use of compression stockings in the first six months following venous leg ulcer healing. Univariate analyses were performed to identify significant associations between factors and stocking use. Multiple logistic regression was employed to model the factors associated with frequency of stocking use. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients were identified, of whom 129 (79%) agreed to participate. Sixty-seven (52%) reported wearing stockings every day for the first six months after their ulcers had healed, 21 (16%) stated that they had worn the most days, seven (5%) had worn them occasionally and 29 (22%) had not worn them at all after their ulcer had healed. Five (4%) did not provide data. Two factors distinguished those who wore stockings from those who did not 75% of the time: the belief that wearing stockings was worthwhile and the belief that stockings were uncomfortable to wear. Commonly cited factors, such as age, sex, difficulty in applying stockings and cosmetic appearance were not significantly related to stocking use. Cost did not seem to influence the decision to purchase compression stockings. CONCLUSION: Many factors previously thought to influence concordance appear to have little impact on compression-stocking use in people whose venous leg ulcers had healed.


Assuntos
Bandagens/estatística & dados numéricos , Cooperação do Paciente , Úlcera Varicosa , Cicatrização , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Seguimentos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Avaliação das Necessidades , Nova Zelândia , Pesquisa Metodológica em Enfermagem , Cooperação do Paciente/psicologia , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Úlcera Varicosa/prevenção & controle , Úlcera Varicosa/psicologia
16.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (3): CD000247, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12137610

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The common cold is considered to be caused by viruses and it has long been believed that antibiotics have no role in treating this condition. In many countries doctors will often prescribe antibiotics for the common cold in the belief that they may prevent secondary bacterial infection and in some cases to respond to patient demand. There is also increasing concern over the resistance of common bacteria to commonly used antibiotics. A crucial step in reducing the use of antibiotics for the common cold is to examine the evidence to see if there is any benefit or if there is benefit for some subgroups or symptom constellations. OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine the efficacy of antibiotics in comparison with placebo in the treatment of acute upper respiratory tract infections (common colds) in terms of the proportion of patients in whom the clinical outcome was considered to be a reduction in general symptoms and specific nasopharyngeal symptoms. (2) To determine whether there are significant adverse outcomes associated with antibiotic therapy for patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute upper respiratory tract infection. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Family Medicine Database, and reference lists of articles, and we contacted principal investigators. The most recent search was in May 2001 SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing any antibiotic therapy with placebo in acute upper respiratory tract infections with less than 7 days of symptoms DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: All analyses used fixed effects unless otherwise stated Main results: Nine trials involving 2249 (2157 analysed) people aged between two months and 79 years (and adults with no upper age limit) years were included. The overall quality of the included trials was variable. People receiving antibiotics did not do better in terms of lack of cure or persistence of symptoms than those on placebo (odds ratio 0.8, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.59 to 1.08). Only one study Taylor et al (1977) specifically reported persistence of clear rhinitis with a small benefit to those on antibiotics. Two studies found a significant benefit for antibiotics compared with placebo for runny nose (clear) odds ratio 0.42 (0.22-0.78). Two studies also found a significant benefit in patients with sore throat odds ratio 0.27 95% CI (0.10-0.74). Only one study reported work time lost with 22% of those on antibiotic treatment and 25% of those on placebo but this was not significant. Adult patients treated with antibiotics had a significant increase in adverse effects (odds ratio 3.6 95% CI 2.21 to 5.89) while there was no significant increase in children odds ratio 0.90 95% CI (0.44-1.82). REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is not enough evidence of important benefits from the treatment of upper respiratory tract infections with antibiotics to warrant their routine use in children or adults and there is a significant increase in adverse effects associated with antibiotic use in adult patients.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Resfriado Comum/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
17.
J Fam Pract ; 51(4): 324-8, 2002 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11978254

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To test the use of a delayed prescription compared with instructions to take antibiotics immediately in patients presenting to family physicians with upper respiratory tract infections (common colds). STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled single-blind study. POPULATION: Subjects were 129 patients presenting with the common cold who requested antibiotics or whose physicians thought they wanted them. All patients were in a family practice in Auckland, New Zealand, consisting of 15 physicians (9 male, 6 female) who had completed medical school between 1973 and 1992. OUTCOMES MEASURED: Outcomes were antibiotic use (taking at least 1 dose of the antibiotic), symptom scores, and responses to the satisfaction questions asked at the end of the study. RESULTS: Patients in the delayed-prescription group were less likely to use antibiotics (48%, 95% CI, 35%-60%) than were those instructed to take antibiotics immediately (89%, 95% CI, 76%-94%). Daily body temperature was higher in the immediate-prescription group. The lack of difference in the symptom score between the 2 groups suggests that there is no danger in delaying antibiotic prescriptions for the common cold. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed prescriptions are a safe and effective means of reducing antibiotic consumption in patients with the common cold. Clarification of patient expectations for antibiotics may result in a lower prescription rate. When the patient demands a prescription, delaying its delivery has the potential to provide gentle education.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Resfriado Comum/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Nova Zelândia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Método Simples-Cego , Fatores de Tempo
18.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (1): CD001733, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11869606

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Healing of venous leg ulcers is improved by the use of compression bandaging but some venous ulcers remain unhealed, and some people are unsuitable for compression therapy. Pentoxifylline, a drug which helps blood flow, has been used to treat venous leg ulcers but to date there has been no systematic review. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of pentoxifylline (oxpentifylline or Trental 400) for treating venous leg ulcers, compared with placebo, or other therapies, in the presence or absence of compression therapy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases and Wounds Groups specialised registers (date of last search was May 2001), and reference lists of relevant articles. We hand searched relevant journals and conference proceedings, and contacted Hoechst (the manufacturer of the drug) and experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing pentoxifylline with placebo or other therapy in the presence or absence of compression, in patients with venous leg ulcers. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Details from eligible trials were extracted and summarised by one reviewer using a coding sheet. Data extraction was independently verified by one other reviewer. MAIN RESULTS: Nine trials involving 572 adults were included. The quality of trials was variable. Eight trials compared pentoxifylline with placebo; in five of these trials patients received compression therapy. In one trial pentoxifylline was compared with defibrotide in patients who also received compression. Combining eight trials that compared pentoxifylline with placebo (with or without compression) demonstrated that pentoxifylline is more effective than placebo in terms of complete ulcer healing or significant improvement (relative risk of healing with pentoxifylline compared with placebo 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.19 -1.66). Pentoxifylline plus compression is more effective than placebo plus compression (relative risk of healing with pentoxifylline 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.54). A comparison between pentoxifylline and defibrotide found no difference in healing rates. More adverse effects were reported in patients receiving pentoxifylline, although this was not statistically significant (relative risk of adverse effects with pentoxifylline 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.80). Nearly half of the reported adverse effects were gastrointestinal. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Pentoxifylline appears to be an effective adjunct to compression bandaging for treating venous ulcers. There was no cost effectiveness data available and healthcare commissioners may therefore conclude that it not be considered a routine adjunct. Pentoxifylline in the absence of compression may be effective for treating venous leg ulcers, although the evidence should be cautiously interpreted. The majority of adverse effects are gastrointestinal disturbances (indigestion, diarrhoea and nausea).


Assuntos
Úlcera da Perna/tratamento farmacológico , Pentoxifilina/uso terapêutico , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Bandagens , Humanos , Úlcera da Perna/terapia , Pentoxifilina/administração & dosagem , Vasodilatadores/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...