DMEK for the treatment of interface fluid syndrome secondary to failed DSAEK graft: A case report and review of the literature.

Purpose: To report a case of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for the management of post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) interface fluid syndrome (IFS) secondary to failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) graft, and to provide a literature review on endothelial keratoplasty (EK) for this indication. Observations: A 52-year-old patient presented with LASIK interface fluid accumulation and a non-functioning primary DSAEK graft. Past ophthalmic history was relevant for: (1) phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation with later refinement by LASIK; (2) combined PIOL explantation and refractive lens exchange due to accelerated endothelial cell loss (ECL); (3) primary DSAEK due to corneal decompensation.A secondary EK graft (DMEK) was performed, and the patient was prospectively followed for 6 months (M6). DMEK surgery was uneventful, without postoperative graft detachment. Corneal clearing and resolution of interface fluid accumulation occurred during the first postoperative month. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 20/800 Snellen to 20/25 Snellen at 3-month follow-up, remaining stable at M6. Due to a persistent rise in intraocular pressure (IOP), the patient underwent uneventful non-penetrating deep sclerectomy 2 months after DMEK, with controlled IOP and without accelerated ECL. Conclusions and Importance: DMEK is feasible, effective, and safe in the management of IFS in cases where corneal endothelial failure plays a major role, even in complex eyes with previous EK grafts. Aggressive postoperative IOP control is warranted to decrease the risk of interface fluid recurrence and damage to the optic nerve. Studies with larger patient numbers are encouraged to ascertain the role of EK for this indication.

Unsupervised feature extraction of anterior chamber OCT images for ordering and classification.

We propose an image processing method for ordering anterior chamber optical coherence tomography (OCT) images in a fully unsupervised manner. The method consists of three steps: Firstly we preprocess the images (filtering the noise, aligning and normalizing the resolution); secondly, a distance measure between images is computed for every pair of images; thirdly we apply a machine learning algorithm that exploits the distance measure to order the images in a two-dimensional plane. The method is applied to a large (~1000) database of anterior chamber OCT images of healthy subjects and patients with angle-closure and the resulting unsupervised ordering and classification is validated by two ophthalmologists.

Supraciliary microstent implantation for open-angle glaucoma: multicentre 3-year outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the safety and effectiveness of CyPass supraciliary microstent implantation alone in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) followed up for up to 3 years. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This registry study included subjects with primary or secondary OAG who underwent CyPass Micro-Stent implantation alone at 12 sites in four European countries to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) and/or use of IOP-lowering medications. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of adverse events. Secondary efficacy outcomes included mean changes from baseline in IOP and IOP-lowering medications. Eyes were subgrouped into those with low (< 21 mm Hg) and high (> 21 mm Hg) baseline IOP. RESULTS: This study included 225 eyes of 178 patients, with mean baseline IOP of 22.6 ± 6.7 mm Hg and a mean 2.2 ± 1.2 medications per eye. Common ocular adverse events included device obstruction (10.2%), IOP elevation > 10 mm Hg during follow-up (8.9%), retinal complications (4.4%) and loss of > 2 lines of best-corrected visual acuity (2.7%). Seventy-one eyes (31.6%) required secondary glaucoma surgery, with trabeculectomy (33 eyes) and second microstent implantation (13 eyes) being most common. At months 6-36, mean IOP reductions ranged from 4.4 to 5.1 mm Hg (15.8%-19.5%) and mean medication reductions from 0.2 to 1.2 (9.1%-54.5%). Mean IOP reduction was greater in eyes with higher than lower baseline IOP. Both subgroups showed reductions of 0.5-1.0 medication at 12-18 months. CONCLUSION: CyPass microstent implantation demonstrated a safety profile consistent with other minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries and effectively lowered IOP for up to 3 years in eyes with OAG.

Effect of intravitreal injection of dexamethasone 0.7 mg (Ozurdex®) on intraocular pressure in patients with macular edema.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of Ozurdex® on intraocular pressure in patients with macular edema alone (group 1) or associated with glaucoma or ocular hypertension (group 2). METHODS: A clinical, retrospective, observational, comparative study included 92 eyes with macular edema treated with a single injection of Ozurdex®; 27 eyes were previously diagnosed with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. RESULTS: The mean intraocular pressure (group 1 vs. group 2) after injection was 12.1 versus 19.9 mm Hg, (p < 0.05; day 1); 17.5 versus 19.7 mm Hg (p < 0.05; month 1); 18.4 versus 20.9 mm Hg (p < 0.05; month 2); 15 versus 17.4 mm Hg (p < 0.05; month 3); 13.9 versus 16.7 mm Hg (p > 0.05; month 6); 13.8 versus 15.1 mm Hg (p > 0.05; month 9) and 13.1 versus 16.4 mm Hg (p > 0.05; month 12). Thirty eyes (32.6%) showed ocular hypertension (intraocular pressure >21 mm Hg) after the injection: 21.5% of group 1 and 59.3% of group 2. In group 2, 27 eyes (100%) needed medical treatment to reduce intraocular pressure in comparison to 8 patients (12.3%) in group 1 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal injection of Ozurdex® was associated with ocular hypertension in 32.6% of the eyes. Previous glaucoma or ocular hypertension are risk factors for this increase.

Upper eyelid tarsoconjunctival flap for the treatment of Ahmed valve plate exposure.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe a new technique for the treatment of Ahmed valve plate exposure used in a patient with recurrent valvular plate exposure. BACKGROUND: An important complication of glaucoma drainage devices is its exposure. The treatment options reported include the use of different grafts covered by mucosa or conjunctiva. Despite these treatments many valves reexpose, especially in patients with previously damaged conjunctiva. METHODS: We report the case of a patient with Acanthamoeba keratitis and secondary angle closure glaucoma, who underwent a penetrating keratoplasty and an Ahmed valve implantation, and presented with repeated valvular plate exposure. After consecutive unsuccessful coverage methods, a novel use of a tarsoconjunctival flap was performed to solve this complication. CONCLUSIONS: Upper eyelid tarsoconjunctival flap is a useful option to cover exposed valvular plates in patients where traditional methods have failed.

Conjunctivitis and Total IgE in Lacrimal Fluid: Lacrytest Screening.

Total tear IgE has been considered to play an important role in allergic conjunctivitis, and measurement has been considered useful for diagnosis. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether Lacrytest(®), a new commercialised method to detect IgE levels in lacrimal fluid, could constitute a screening test for the diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis. This was a cross-sectional study. Patients with seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis and a control group were included. Clinical history, ophthalmic examination, skin prick test and conjunctival provocation test were obtained. Lacrytest(®) was later performed in all groups. Fifty-four patients were enrolled: thirty with IgE-mediated conjunctivitis and, nine with vernal keratoconjunctivitis and fifteen controls. Lacrytest(®) was negative in all controls, positive in 20% of the IgE-mediated conjunctivitis group and in 88.9% of the vernal keratoconjunctivitis group. Global statistically-significant differences were found among the three groups (P = .003). Sensitivity of the test in the IgE-mediated conjunctivitis group was 20%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 38.46%, while in VKC sensitivity was 88.88%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 93.75%. Our data confirm that this test is not useful for screening allergic conjunctivitis. Lacrytest(®), while not providing any useful information to an allergist, could be helpful for ophthalmologists to confirm an IgE-mediated or VKC conjunctivitis.