System Architecture of a European Platform for Health Policy Decision Making: MIDAS.

Background: Healthcare data is a rich yet underutilized resource due to its disconnected, heterogeneous nature. A means of connecting healthcare data and integrating it with additional open and social data in a secure way can support the monumental challenge policy-makers face in safely accessing all relevant data to assist in managing the health and wellbeing of all. The goal of this study was to develop a novel health data platform within the MIDAS (Meaningful Integration of Data Analytics and Services) project, that harnesses the potential of latent healthcare data in combination with open and social data to support evidence-based health policy decision-making in a privacy-preserving manner. Methods: The MIDAS platform was developed in an iterative and collaborative way with close involvement of academia, industry, healthcare staff and policy-makers, to solve tasks including data storage, data harmonization, data analytics and visualizations, and open and social data analytics. The platform has been piloted and tested by health departments in four European countries, each focusing on different region-specific health challenges and related data sources. Results: A novel health data platform solving the needs of Public Health decision-makers was successfully implemented within the four pilot regions connecting heterogeneous healthcare datasets and open datasets and turning large amounts of previously isolated data into actionable information allowing for evidence-based health policy-making and risk stratification through the application and visualization of advanced analytics. Conclusions: The MIDAS platform delivers a secure, effective and integrated solution to deal with health data, providing support for health policy decision-making, planning of public health activities and the implementation of the Health in All Policies approach. The platform has proven transferable, sustainable and scalable across policies, data and regions.

An ensemble-based feature selection framework to select risk factors of childhood obesity for policy decision making.

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of childhood obesity makes it essential to study the risk factors with a sample representative of the population covering more health topics for better preventive policies and interventions. It is aimed to develop an ensemble feature selection framework for large-scale data to identify risk factors of childhood obesity with good interpretability and clinical relevance. METHODS: We analyzed the data collected from 426,813 children under 18 during 2000-2019. A BMI above the 90th percentile for the children of the same age and gender was defined as overweight. An ensemble feature selection framework, Bagging-based Feature Selection framework integrating MapReduce (BFSMR), was proposed to identify risk factors. The framework comprises 5 models (filter with mutual information/SVM-RFE/Lasso/Ridge/Random Forest) from filter, wrapper, and embedded feature selection methods. Each feature selection model identified 10 variables based on variable importance. Considering accuracy, F-score, and model characteristics, the models were classified into 3 levels with different weights: Lasso/Ridge, Filter/SVM-RFE, and Random Forest. The voting strategy was applied to aggregate the selected features, with both feature weights and model weights taken into consideration. We compared our voting strategy with another two for selecting top-ranked features in terms of 6 dimensions of interpretability. RESULTS: Our method performed the best to select the features with good interpretability and clinical relevance. The top 10 features selected by BFSMR are age, sex, birth year, breastfeeding type, smoking habit and diet-related knowledge of both children and mothers, exercise, and Mother's systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Our framework provides a solution for identifying a diverse and interpretable feature set without model bias from large-scale data, which can help identify risk factors of childhood obesity and potentially some other diseases for future interventions or policies.

Architecture for a Multimodal and Domain-Independent Clinical Decision Support System Software Development Kit.

Digitalization of the decision-making process in healthcare has been promoted to improve clinical performance and patient outcomes. The implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) using Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) is widely developed in order to achieve this purpose within clinical information systems. Nevertheless, due to several factors such as (i) incompleteness of CPG clinical knowledge, (ii) out-of-date contents, or (iii) knowledge gaps for specific clinical situations, guideline-based CDSSs may not completely satisfy clinical needs. The proposed architecture aims to cope with guideline knowledge gaps and pitfalls by harmonizing different modalities of decision support (i.e. guideline-based CDSSs, experience-based CDSSs, and data mining-based CDSSs) and information sources (i.e. CPGs and patient data) to provide the most complete, personalized, and up-to-date propositions to manage patients. We have developed a decisional event structure to retrieve all the information related to the decision-making process. This structure allows the tracking, computation, and evaluation of all the decisions made over time based on patient clinical outcomes. Finally, different user-friendly and easy-to-use authoring tools have been implemented within the proposed architecture to integrate the role of clinicians in the whole process of knowledge generation and validation. A use case based on Breast Cancer management is presented to illustrate the performance of the implemented architecture.