Perception of Canadian ophthalmologists on immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery: insights and implications.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perception of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) among Canadian ophthalmologists. DESIGN: An anonymous survey was sent to all active members of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society. METHODS: Basic demographic information, cataract surgery practice patterns, and perceived advantages, disadvantages, and concerns regarding ISBCS were collected from respondents. RESULTS: A total of 352 ophthalmologists answered the survey. Among these, 94 respondents (27%) practice ISBCS routinely, 123 (35%) practice ISBCS in exceptional cases, and 131 (37%) do not practice ISBCS. ISBCS practitioners were significantly younger than nonpractitioners (p < 0.001) and had a shorter duration of practice (p < 0.001). The prevalence of ISBCS practitioners also varied significantly by province (p < 0.001): most practitioners who routinely practice ISBCS were from Quebec (n = 44; 48%), where financial disincentives are lowest in the country. The main work setting of ISBCS practitioners was academic centres (n = 39; 42%) as opposed to private or community settings (p < 0.001). The main reason for performing ISBCS was more efficient operating theatre use (n = 142; 65%). The main concerns regarding ISBCS were the risk of bilateral complications (n = 193; 57%) and the lack of refractive outcomes for second-eye surgery (n = 184; 52%). The COVID-19 pandemic positively influenced the view of 152 respondents (43%), but this was mostly among practitioners who already performed ISBCS routinely (n = 77; 84%). CONCLUSIONS: ISBCS practitioners are more likely younger ophthalmologists working in academic centres. Quebec has the highest prevalence of ISBCS practitioners. ISBCS practitioners were positively influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic to offer ISBCS more often compared with non-ISBCS practitioners.

Perception of visual outcomes in patients after delayed compared with immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-reported visual outcomes of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) compared with delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS). SETTING: Tertiary university teaching hospital of Laval University, Quebec City, Canada. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. METHODS: The Catquest-9SF questionnaire was administered on the day of surgery for ISBCS patients and on the day of first-eye surgery for DSBCS patients who underwent cataract surgery between August and September 2021. The questionnaire was administered again 1 month postoperatively for ISBCS patients and 1 month postoperatively after each surgery for DSBCS patients. RESULTS: 186 patients (ISBCS: n = 152 vs DSBCS: n = 34) were included. At 1 month postoperatively, the Catquest-9SF score of ISBCS patients was significantly lower than that of DSBCS patients after first-eye surgery ( P < .001). Furthermore, the ISBCS group achieved significantly better scores on multiple tasks of the Catquest-9SF, such as reading text in the newspaper ( P < .001) or reading text on television ( P < .001). In multiple linear regression analysis, the type of surgery was the factor most associated with a lower Catquest-9SF score (ß = -0.391, P < .001). 1 month after the second-eye surgery, DSBCS patients had achieved similar Catquest-9SF scores compared with ISBCS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with DSBCS patients, ISBCS patients had significantly greater perceived visual function and fewer vision-related limitations in their daily activities at 1 month postoperatively. This difference lost significance 1 month after the second-eye surgery of DSBCS patients. This patient-reported outcome study did not find evidence of perceived bilateral visual impairment in the early postoperative period after ISBCS.

Immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery: an academic teaching center's experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and outcomes of immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) at a Canadian academic teaching center. SETTING: Tertiary university teaching hospital of Laval University, Quebec City, Canada. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: 2003 consecutive patients (4006 eyes) who underwent ISBCS under topical anesthesia from January 2019 to December 2019 were included. All charts were retrospectively reviewed. Outcome measures included intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative uncorrected distance (UCVA) and pinhole (PHVA) visual acuities, and autorefraction measurements. RESULTS: 4006 eyes from 1218 (60.8%) female and 785 (39.2%) male patients with a mean age of 74 ± 8 years had a mean preoperative visual acuity of 0.503 logMAR (Snellen 20/63). The mean axial length was 23.53 ± 1.37 mm. Most eyes had monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted (n = 3738, 93.3%) followed by toric (n = 226, 5.6%), multifocal (n = 25, 0.6%), and multifocal toric (n = 17, 0.4%) IOLs. Intraoperative complications included 14 (0.3%) posterior capsule ruptures with 5 (0.1%) requiring sulcus IOL placement, and 7 (0.2%) partial zonulysis, with 3 requiring capsular tension rings (0.07%). There were no cases of endophthalmitis or toxic anterior segment syndrome. Mean 5-week postoperative UCVA was 0.223 (Snellen 20/33), PHVA was 0.153 (Snellen 20/28) with a mean spherical equivalent of -0.21 diopters. CONCLUSIONS: ISBCS performed following International Society of Bilateral Cataract Surgeons recommended guidelines is a safe procedure. This cohort of 4006 eyes had very few complications, with none attributable to the surgery being done bilaterally. The UCVA, PHVA, and refractive outcomes were good.

Low Vision and Dry Eye: Does One Diagnosis Overshadow the Other?

SIGNIFICANCE: The prevalence of dry eye disease and low vision increases with age; they share risk factors and can be the result of underlying common causes. They are generally studied separately; however, combining these perspectives is relevant for research on assistive technology given that sustained focus affects the tear film because of decreased blinking rates. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to elucidate to which extent dry eye disease risk factors, signs, and symptoms are assessed in low vision patients who receive an eye examination as part of their vision rehabilitation services. METHODS: Using a retrospective chart review, dry eye disease risk factors, signs, or symptoms were extracted from 201 randomly selected files that contained an eye examination in the past 5 years from two vision rehabilitation centers. RESULTS: Demographic variables of charts from the two sites did not differ (mean visual acuity, 0.85 logMAR [standard deviation, 0.53; range, 0 to 2.3]; mean age, 71.2 years [standard deviation, 19 years; range, 24 to 101 years]). Fifty charts (25%) mentioned at least one dry eye disease symptom. Sixty-one charts (30.3%) reported systemic medications that can exacerbate dry eye disease, whereas 99 (49.2%) contained at least one systemic disease thought to contribute to dry eye disease symptoms; 145 (72.1%) mentioned at least one type of ocular surgery. Artificial tears were documented in 74 charts (36.8%). Few specific dry eye tests were performed, with the exception of corneal integrity assessment reported in 18 charts (8.95%). CONCLUSIONS: Low vision patients have multiple risk factors for dry eye disease; however, dry eye disease tests were not frequently performed in comprehensive low vision eye examinations in this sample. More efforts should be made to assess dry eye disease to enhance comfort and functional vision, especially with the increasing demands of digital devices as visual aids.