Evolution of the profiles of new psychotropic drug users before and during the COVID-19 crisis: an original longitudinal approach through multichannel sequence analysis using the French health-care database.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on mental health. An increase in the use of anxiolytic, hypnotic, and antidepressant drugs has been highlighted in France, but with no information at the individual level (trajectories) or concerning patient characteristics. The objective of this study was to describe the profile of new psychotropic drug users since the beginning of the pandemic. We formed two historical cohorts using the Pays-de-la-Loire regional component of the National Health Data System (SNDS): a "COVID-19 crisis cohort" (2020-2021) and a "control cohort" (2018-2019). We analyzed reimbursements for psychotropic medications (anxiolytics, antidepressants, hypnotics, mood stabilizers, and antipsychotics) using a multichannel sequence analysis and performed clustering analysis of sequences. The proportion of new consumers of psychotropic drugs was higher in the COVID-19 crisis cohort (18.0%) than that in the control cohort (16.0%). In the COVID-19 cohort, three clusters of psychotropic drug users were identified, whereas four clusters were identified in the control cohort. A time lag in treatment initiation was observed in the COVID-19 crisis cohort (September) compared with the control cohort (July). This study is one of the first to analyze the profile of psychotropic treatment users during the COVID-19 crisis. Our analysis sheds light on changes in patterns of psychotropic drug use during the COVID-19 pandemic, possibly associated with changes in prescribing conditions and mental health conditions during the crisis. This study also provides an example of the application of an innovative longitudinal analysis methodology in the field of pharmacoepidemiology.

Characterization of antipsychotic utilization before clozapine initiation for individuals with schizophrenia: an innovative visualization of trajectories using French National Health Insurance data.

AIMS: Despite recommendations to initiate clozapine after two unsuccessful trials of antipsychotics, clozapine is underprescribed and initiated too late. The aim of this study was to describe different antipsychotic treatment sequences in the 36 months before the initiation of clozapine and to characterize clusters of treatment trajectories. METHODS: Using the French National Health Insurance database, a historical cohort study of the population in an area in western France was performed. The data from all new users of clozapine with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in the period of 2017-2018 were evaluated. All outpatient reimbursements for antipsychotics during the 36 months before clozapine initiation were analysed. Successive reimbursements for identical treatments were grouped into treatment trials (TTs), and different trajectories were clustered using a state sequence analysis. RESULTS: The results showed 1191 TTs for 287 individuals. The mean number of TTs per individual was 3.2. Risperidone, aripiprazole and haloperidol were the main treatments delivered. The frequencies of antipsychotics used differed between monotherapies and combination therapies. A three-cluster typology was identified: one cluster (n = 133) of 'less treated' younger individuals with fewer TTs and shorter TT durations; a second cluster (n = 53) of 'more treated' individuals with higher numbers of TTs and combinations of antipsychotics; and a third cluster (n = 103) of 'treatment-stable' older individuals with longer TT durations. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the median number of TTs during the 36 months before clozapine prescription was higher than the two recommended. The different trajectories were associated with individual characteristics and treatment differences, suggesting that additional studies of clinical parameters are needed to understand barriers to clozapine prescription.

(De)Prescribing of proton pump inhibitors: what has changed in recent years? an observational regional study from the French health insurance database.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most widely prescribed drug classes in the community and at hospital. The significant misuse of PPIs requires the implementation for a deprescribing strategy. Numerous studies aiming at evaluating the impact of deprescribing interventions have been set up, implying a precisely known evolution of consumption of PPIs in the population studied without intervention. The main objective of the study was to study overall changes in PPI prescribing and deprescribing in a regional population of chronic consumers without intervention, according to health insurance databases. METHODS: This historical cohort study was based on the French National Health Data System databases. All adult patients living in the Pays de la Loire area and covered by the French National Health Insurance and who had at least one reimbursement for a PPI dispensing between 01 October 2016 and 31 December 2020 were included. Only chronic consumer patients were included, defined as patients who has had PPI dispensed for 3 consecutive months with a temporal coverage of at least 80%. Patients under 18 years of age and patients who received parenteral PPIs only were excluded. RESULTS: The percentage of chronic treatment discontinuation in 2017 was 12.5% and remained stable to reach 12.4% in 2020. The number of new chronic patients increased from year to year to reach 77,222 patients in 2020, with an increasing rate of 1.2 to 2% between 2017 and 2020. The prevalent patient population increased from year to year to reach 167 751 patients in 2020, with an increasing rate of 4.2 to 4.4% between 2017 and 2020. Regarding the initiation of PPI therapy, in 2020, 87.1% of treatment initiations were done by general practitioners. They renewed 2,402,263 prescriptions (89.3%) between 2017 and 2020. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a stagnation over the last 4 years in the deprescribing of chronic PPI treatments in a French region despite the information on their inappropriate use reported by national agencies and in the literature with increasing frequency. This reinforces the interest of setting up a deprescribing project.

Les pratiques des professionnels de santé assurant le suivi gynécologique en Pays de la Loire.

INTRODUCTION: In France, four health care categories ensure primary care gynecological follow-up: general practitioners (GP), medical gynecologists, obstetrician gynecologists and midwives. PURPOSE OF RESEARCH: To describe private health professionals’ ensuring gynecological follow-up in Pays de la Loire (France) in 2018, as well as their respective activities. RESULTS: Our study population was composed of 3764 health professionals, a majority of those being GP. Proportion of aged 60 or older GP in Loire-Atlantique was 25.5%, this proportion was higher in Sarthe (49%). 80% of medical gynecologists were at least 60 years of age and mainly settled in Loire-Atlantique and Maine-et-Loire. Obstetrician gynecologists were older in Mayenne, Sarthe and Vendée. Midwives were relatively younger: 71% were under 50 years of age.On a regional basis, 1 658 155 medical consultations, for any type of gynecological reasons, were identified. Among them, 41.3% were done by GP, 24.3% by gynecologists and 34.4% by midwives. GPs aged 60 or older who represented 30.5% of all GP in Pays de la Loire ensured 26.3% of GP gynecological follow-up, with wide departmental discrepancies. CONCLUSIONS: Medical gynecologist specialty is unequally distributed within the Pays de la Loire area and many professionals are aged 60 or older. Inadequate access to healthcare in this specific field due to the lack of healthcare professional will be soon problematic. Obstetrician gynecologist specialty is better spread, due to care facility locations. A larger volume of activities is taken on by midwives, whereas a wider range of activities is carried out by physicians, according to medical classification.

What about regular hematological monitoring during clozapine treatment? A compliance analysis using the French health insurance database.

BACKGROUND: The inherent risk of agranulocytosis associated with clozapine requires the realization of weekly white blood cell monitoring (WBCM) during the 18 first weeks of treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the compliance with WBCM during clozapine initiation for schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD: The analysis was conducted using SNDS data on a cohort of new users of clozapine in 2018. We analyzed all reimbursements for WBCM from 2 weeks before the index date to 18 weeks after (optimal monitoring during hospitalization was assumed). The primary outcome was the proportion of good realization of WBCM according to different thresholds of completion (70%; 80%; 90%). Descriptive and comparative analyses with chi-squared test or Student's t-test were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety-six subjects were included. Rates of patients with WBCM realization over 70%, 80%, and 90% of WBCM expected were, respectively, 78.1%, 70.0%, and 56.9% for subjects with schizophrenia and 71.3%, 63.2%, and 47.8% for PD subjects. Only hospitalization during the follow-up period for schizophrenia subjects was significantly associated with good WBCM realization. CONCLUSIONS: We observed rather good results for compliance with clozapine initial monitoring. Other studies are needed to confirm our results.

Advocacy for better metabolic monitoring after antipsychotic initiation: based on data from a French health insurance database.

Background: Nearly 3% of the population is treated by antipsychotic. The aim of this study was to assess the conformity of monitoring with guidelines to prevent Metabolic Syndrome. Research design and method: The analysis was conducted using SNIIRAM data (2013 to 2017) on a cohort of patients who received at least eight antipsychotic dispensings in the first year. Glucose and lipid testings were recorded according to refunds at initiation [between -3 and 0.5 months], 3 months [between 2 and 4 months], and 12 months [between 11 and 13 months] after, and assuming optimal testing during hospitalization (exclusive of psychiatric unit). Descriptive and comparative analysis, «chi-squared test or Student's t-test¼, were performed as well as multivariate analysis with logistic regression. Results: 18 760 patients were selected, 14 421 were still alive and monitored at the end of the follow up. In the recommended period, only 2.89% of patients had three complete testings and 50.6% one or two complete testings Non-optimal testing was more likely to occur in children and adults (vs elderly), in patients with less than 3 prescribers, and with universal medical coverage. Conclusion: Monitoring remains dramatically insufficient. New actions involving patients, practitioners, and authorities are warranted.