What Patients Say About Their Orthopaedic Hand and Wrist Surgeons: A Qualitative Analysis of Negative Reviews on Yelp.

Background Patients often turn to online reviews as a source of information to inform their decisions regarding care. Existing literature has analyzed factors associated with positive online patient ratings among hand and wrist surgeons. However, there is limited in-depth analysis of factors associated with low patient satisfaction for hand and wrist surgeons. The focus of this study is to examine and characterize extremely negative reviews of hand and wrist surgeons on Yelp.com. Methods A search was performed using the keywords "hand surgery" on Yelp.com for eight major metropolitan areas including Washington DC, Dallas, New York, Phoenix, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Boston, and Seattle. Only single-star reviews (out of a possible 5 stars) of hand and wrist surgeons were included. The complaints in the 1-star reviews were then categorized into clinical and nonclinical categories. Result A total of 233 single-star reviews were included for analysis, which resulted in 468 total complaints. Of these complaints, 81 (18.8%) were clinically related and 351 (81.3%) were nonclinical in nature. The most common clinical complaints were for complication (24 complaints, 6%), misdiagnosis (16 complaints, 4%), unclear treatment plan (16 complaints, 4%), and uncontrolled pain (15 complaints, 3%). The most common nonclinical complaints were for physician bedside manner (93 complaints, 22%), financially related (80 complaints, 19%), unprofessional nonclinical staff (61 complaints, 14%), and wait time (46 complaints, 11%). The difference in the number of complaints for surgical and nonsurgical patients was statistically significant ( p < 0.05) for complication and uncontrolled pain. Clinical Relevance Patient satisfaction is dependent on a multitude of clinical and nonclinical factors. An awareness of online physician ratings is essential for hand and wrist surgeons to maintain and improve patient care and patient satisfaction. We believe the results of our study could be used to further improve the quality of care provided by hand and wrist surgeons.

Large Variation in Listed Chargemaster Price for Total Joint Arthroplasty Among Top Orthopaedic Hospitals in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Chargemasters are lists of all services offered by a hospital and their associated cost. This study analyzes chargemaster data to determine price differences among different hospitals for total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: In May 2020, the chargemaster data for highly rated orthopaedic hospitals were accessed, and the diagnostic-related group (DRG) codes related to primary and revision total joint arthroplasty were analyzed (DRGs 466, 467, 468, 469, and 470). The prices listed for each hospital were averaged, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Furthermore, Medicare reimbursement was collected. A subanalysis was performed to determine relationships between geographic and demographic information. RESULTS: The median price for a major hip or knee joint arthroplasty without complications was $68,016 (range: $39,927 to $195,264). The median price of a revision of hip or knee arthroplasty without complications was $90,966 (range: $58,967 to $247,715). The cost of living in the city in which the hospitals are located was weakly correlated with procedure pricing, whereas the median income had no notable relationship to chargemaster pricing. CONCLUSION: The published cost of DRG codes in arthroplasty is widely variable among the top 20 US orthopaedic hospitals, with little correlation to the cost of living or median income of the area.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Kinematically and Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasties: Long-Term Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: The optimal alignment technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. We previously reported 6-month and 2-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing kinematically versus mechanically aligned TKA. In the present study, we report the mean 13-year (range, 12.6-14.4) follow-up results from this trial. METHODS: The original cohort included 88 TKAs (44 kinematically aligned using patient-specific guides and 44 mechanically aligned using conventional instrumentation), performed from 2008 to 2009. After institutional review board approval, the health records of the original 88 patients were queried. Revisions, reoperations, and complications were recorded. There were 26 patients who died, leaving 62 patients for follow-up. Of these, 48 patients (77%) were successfully contacted via phone. Reoperations and complications were documented. Furthermore, a battery of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (including Western Ontario and McMaster University Index, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Junior, Forgotten Joint Score, Modified-Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation, and patient satisfaction) were obtained. RESULTS: Of the original 88 patients in the study, 15 patients had at least one reoperation (17%) and 5 patients had undergone complete revision surgery (6%). There was no difference between the 2 alignment methods for major and minor reoperations (P = .66). The kinematically aligned total knees self-reported a nonstatistically significant (P = .16) improved satisfaction (96% versus 82%), but no difference in other PROMs compared to mechanically aligned TKAs. CONCLUSION: Kinematically aligned TKA demonstrates excellent mean 13-year results, comparable to mechanically aligned TKA with similar reoperations, complications, and PROMs.

The Most Highly Cited Publications on Basketball Originate From English-Speaking Countries, Are Published After 2000, Are Focused on Medicine-Related Topics, and Are Level III Evidence.

Purpose: To identify the 50 most highly cited research publications in the sport of basketball. Methods: Using the Clarivate Analytics Web of Knowledge database and the search term "basketball", we identified 2,704 articles. These articles were filtered by the total number of citations and the top 50 most cited articles with a central focus on basketball were selected for this analysis. For each article, we further identified and analyzed author name, publication year, country of origin, journal name, article type, main research topic area, competitive level, gender of study population, and the level of evidence. Results: Medicine-related topics, particularly those involving knee injuries, are more common than nonmedical topics (coaching, sports psychology etc.) among the highest cited articles. Articles originated from 13 different countries, with 48% originating in the United States. Only four authors had more than one article included in the top 50 most cited articles. Conclusion: A majority of the top 50 research articles were from English-speaking countries, published after 2000, primarily focused on medicine-related topics, and were Level III evidence. Publications examining knee injuries were the most highly cited and appear to be of high interest to current investigators. The prestige of an author's name appeared to be less influential to the number of citations. Clinical Relevance: The top 50 most cited articles list will provide researchers, medical students, residents, and fellows with a foundational list of the most important and influential academic contributions to the basketball literature.

Characterizing negative reviews of orthopedic spine surgeons and practices.

Background: Recent evidence suggests that patients prefer subjective and crowd-sourced information over data-driven or quality-based outcomes when choosing a surgeon. Online physician rating and review websites continue to increase in popularity, and over half of patients use them to research physicians. Specifically, Yelp.com is the most frequently utilized online resource by patients. Data regarding the characteristics of negative reviews for spine surgeons and practices is lacking. Methods: Orthopedic Spine surgeons and practices in 8 major US metropolitan regions were surveyed for one-star reviews on Yelp.com. The factors noted in the reviews were recorded and they were classified according to their clinical or nonclinical nature. Reviews were also subclassified into nonsurgical or surgical episodes of care. Results: A total of 6,286 Yelp reviews were discovered, 671 (10.6%) of which were rated one-star. The majority of negative reviews (76.4%) were from patients who did not report surgery by the surgeon or practice. Of all comments, 491 (77.6%) related to nonclinical complaints. The most common factors noted in negative reviews were related to bedside manner, rude or unprofessional staff, and wait time. Conclusion: Choosing a surgeon is a complex process for patients. The large majority of negative reviews were related to nonclinical issues such as poor bedside manner or rude staff and most of these were written by patients that did not undergo a surgical procedure. This may explain the large discrepancy that has been observed between quality metrics and online crowd-sourced reviews. Paying attention to these nonclinical factors may represent the most feasible and valuable targets to improve a surgeon's practice and attract future patients.

Characterizing Negative Online Reviews of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The growing focus on subjective patient experiences has created an increase in popularity for physician rating websites. The purpose of this study was to characterize extremely negative reviews of pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: Pediatric orthopaedic surgeons were randomly selected using the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America comprehensive list of surgeons. A search was then performed on Healthgrades.com, Vitals.com, and Yelp.com for 1-star reviews. Reviews were classified into clinical and nonclinical categories. Statistical analyses were performed regarding the frequency of reviews and complaints for each respective category. RESULTS: Of the 279 one-star reviews categorized, 248 reviews (88.9% of reviews) included nonclinical complaints, and 182 reviews (65.2% of reviews) included clinical complaints. Nonsurgical patients were associated with 255 reviews, and the remaining 24 were related to surgical patients. Of the 430 comments within reviews, 248 referenced nonclinical aspects of care, and 182 referenced clinical care. Clinical factors most frequently noted included clinical disagreement (37%), unclear treatment plan (25%), complication (17%), misdiagnosis (15%), uncontrolled pain (13%), and delay in care (8%). The most addressed nonclinical factors included physician bedside manner (68%), time spent with provider (21%), wait time (18%), unprofessional staff (17%), scheduling issues (9%), cost (8%), and billing (8%). Compared with surgical reviews, nonsurgical reviews were more likely to contain nonclinical complaints (rate ratio: 1.5; P<0.05) and less likely to contain clinical complaints (rate ratio: 0.7; P<0.05). The most common complaint by surgical patients was complications (91.7%). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the factors associated with negative reviews of pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. The majority of reviews of pediatric orthopaedic surgeons were left by nonsurgical patients and were related to nonclinical aspects of care. We also found surgeon-dependent factors such as poor physician bedside manner, unclear treatment plan, or parents' disagreement with treatment plan were the most common reasons for negative reviews. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

National and geographic trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for orthopedic shoulder and upper extremity surgery from 2000 to 2020.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of information regarding financial trends in orthopedic upper extremity surgery. If progress is to be made in advancing agreeable reimbursement models, a more comprehensive understanding of these trends is needed. The purpose of this study was to assess national and geographic trends in Medicare reimbursement rates for shoulder and elbow surgical procedures over the past 2 decades. METHODS: The 10 most billed Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for both orthopedic shoulder surgery and elbow/upper arm surgery were determined. Medicare reimbursement data for these CPT codes were compiled between 2000 and 2020 and adjusted for inflation. The percentage change for each procedure and the average change in reimbursement each year were analyzed. Data from 2000, 2010, and 2020 were organized by state. The total percent change in physician fee and the percent change per year were tabulated for each CPT code using inflation-adjusted data and averaged by state. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2020, when corrected for inflation, shoulder and elbow procedures decreased on average by 29.3% and 24.5%, respectively. Shoulder procedures experienced a greater numerical yet statistically insignificant decline in mean reimbursement percent decrease (P = .16), average percent decrease per year (P = .11), a more negative compound annual growth rate (P = .14), and a greater R-squared value as compared with elbow and upper arm procedures. For shoulder procedures, the average percent difference in inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement rates from 2000 to 2020 varied from -22.6% in Alaska to -34.1% in Michigan; division data varied from -27.8% in the Mountain Division to -31.2% in the East North Central Division; and region data varied from -28.3% in the West to -30.5% in the Northeast. For elbow and upper arm procedures, the average percent difference in inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement rates from 2000 to 2020 varied from -17.6% in Alaska to -29.8% in Michigan; division data varied from -23.0% in the Mountain Division to -26.7% in the East North Central Division; and region data varied from -23.5% in the West to -25.7% in the Northeast. DISCUSSION: Inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement in upper extremity surgery has decreased markedly between 2000 and 2020. The degree of decrease varies geographically. If access to quality and sustainable surgical orthopedic care is to persist in the United States, increased awareness of these trends is important. The trends identified in this study can serve to customize regional health care policymaking.

The Majority of Complaints About Orthopedic Sports Surgeons on Yelp Are Nonclinical.

PURPOSE: To examine and characterize extremely negative Yelp reviews of orthopedic sports surgeons in the United States. METHODS: A search for reviews was performed using the keywords "Orthopedic Sports Medicine" on Yelp.com for 8 major metropolitan areas. Single-star reviews were isolated for analysis, and individual complaints were then categorized as clinical or nonclinical. The reviews were classified as surgical or nonsurgical. RESULTS: A total of 11,033 reviews were surveyed. Of these, 1,045 (9.5%) were identified as 1-star, and 289 were ultimately included in the study. These reviews encompassed 566 total complaints, 133 (23%) of which were clinical, and 433 (77%) of which were nonclinical in nature. The most common clinical complaints concerned complications (32 complaints; 6%), misdiagnosis (29 complaints; 5%), and uncontrolled pain (21 complaints; 4%). The most common nonclinical complaints concerned physicians' bedside manner (120 complaints; 21%), unprofessional staff (98 complaints; 17%), and finances (78 complaints; 14%). Patients who had undergone surgery wrote 47 reviews that resulted in 114 complaints (20.5% of total complaints), whereas nonsurgical patients were responsible for 242 reviews and a total of 452 complaints (81.3% of total complaints). The difference in the number of complaints by patients after surgery and patients without surgery was statistically significant (P < 0.05) for all categories except for uncontrolled pain, delay in care, bedside manner of midlevel staff, and facilities. CONCLUSION: Our study of extremely negative Yelp reviews found that 77% of negative complaints were nonclinical in nature. The most common clinical complaints were complications, misdiagnoses and uncontrolled pain. Only 16% of 1-star reviews were from surgical patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients use online review platforms when choosing surgeons. A comprehensive understanding of factors affecting patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction is needed. The results of our study could be used to guide future quality-improvement measures and to assist surgeons in maintaining favorable online reputations.

Temporal Analysis of Medicare Physician Reimbursement and Procedural Volume for all Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Procedures Billed to Medicare Part B From 2000 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in annual arthroplasty volume among the Medicare population, as well as assess true Medicare reimbursement to physicians for all hip and knee arthroplasty procedures billed to Medicare since year 2000. METHODS: The publicly available Medicare Part B National Summary Data File from years 2000 to 2019 was utilized. Collected data included true physician reimbursements for all primary total hip and knee, unicompartmental knee, and revision hip/knee arthroplasty procedures from 2000 to 2019. Monetary data was adjusted for inflation to year 2019 dollars. Change was assessed and compared by procedure type. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2019, physicians billed Medicare Fee-for-service for 8,363,821 hip and knee arthroplasty procedures. During this time, the annual number of included arthroplasty procedures billed to Medicare increased by 100%. From 2000 to 2019 across all included procedures, the mean physician reimbursement after adjusting for inflation decreased by -$729.82 (-38.9%) per procedure. This varied by procedure type. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty was the only procedure to experience an increased mean reimbursement when adjusting for inflation, increasing by $241.40 (+16.6%) per procedure from 2000 to 2019. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates decreasing Medicare reimbursement to physicians within hip and knee arthroplasty from 2000 to 2019 when adjusting for inflation. This study is important for informing the potential development of more equitable payment models and maintaining access for arthroplasty care moving forward.

A Comprehensive Monetary Analysis of Inpatient Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties Billed to Medicare by Hospitals: 2011-2017.

BACKGROUND: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been a recent target of reimbursement reform. As such, the purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in Medicare reimbursement to hospitals for TJA patients from 2011 to 2017. METHODS: The Inpatient Utilization and Payment Public Use File was queried for all primary total hip and knee arthroplasty episodes. This file includes all services billed to Medicare via the Inpatient Prospective Payment System. Extracted data included hospital charges and amount paid by Medicare. All data were adjusted for inflation to 2017 US dollars. Multiple linear mixed-model regression analyses were conducted to assess change over time, and geo-modelling was used to represent reimbursement by location. RESULTS: A total of 3,368,924 primary TJA procedures were billed to Medicare by hospitals from 2011 to 2017 and included in the study. The mean inflation-adjusted Medicare payment to hospitals for DRG 469 decreased from $22,783.66 to $19,604.62 per procedure (-$3179.04; -14.0%; P < .001) and decreased from $13,290.79 to $11,771.54 for DRG 470 (-$1519.25; -11.4%, P = .011) from 2011 to 2017. Meanwhile, the mean charge submitted by hospitals increased by $6483.39 and $5115.60 for DRGs 469 and 470, respectively (+7.4% for 469, +9.3% for 470; P < .001). Medicare reimbursement to hospitals varied by state. CONCLUSION: During the study period, the mean Medicare reimbursement to hospitals decreased for TJA from 2011 to 2017. Meanwhile, the average charge submitted by hospitals increased. As alternative payment models continue to undergo evaluation and development, these data are important for the advancement of more agreeable reimbursement models in arthroplasty care.

A Comprehensive Analysis of Medicare Reimbursement to Physicians for Common Arthroscopic Procedures: Adjusted Reimbursement Has Fallen Nearly 30% From 2000 to 2019.

PURPOSE: To analyze and objectively measure the trends in inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement rates for the 20 most commonly performed orthopaedic arthroscopic surgical procedures from 2000 to 2019. METHODS: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services website was used to find the top 20 most commonly performed arthroscopic procedures using the Public Use File data file for calendar year 2017. By use of the Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool, national reimbursement averages were calculated from 2000-2019 and data were analyzed. Averages were adjusted for inflation using the Consumer Price Index. Current Procedural Terminology codes that did not exist in 2000 were unable to be analyzed in this study. RESULTS: When adjusted for inflation, Medicare reimbursement for the 20 most commonly performed arthroscopic procedures from 2000-2019 has decreased substantially (-29.81%). The mean Medicare reimbursement to physicians was $906 in 2000 and $632 in 2019. During this same period, the annual change in the adjusted mean reimbursement rate for all included arthroscopic procedures was -1.8% whereas the average compound annual growth rate was -1.9%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that when adjusted for inflation, Medicare reimbursement to physicians has decreased by nearly 30% during the past 20 years for the most common arthroscopic procedures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This analysis will give orthopaedic surgeons and hospital administrators a better understanding of the financial trends surrounding one of the fastest-growing techniques in surgery. Additionally, these financial-trend data will be increasingly important as the population in the United States continues to age and new payment models are introduced.

Acetabular Distraction Technique for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Discontinuities: Excellent Short-Term Implant Survivorship and Good Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic discontinuity is a challenging complication in revision total hip arthroplasty. One technique that has garnered enthusiasm with limited data is acetabular distraction. Acetabular distraction provides stability via elastic recoil of the pelvis. The aim of this study is to report implant survivorship, radiographic results, clinical outcomes, and complications in the largest independent series of discontinuities treated with acetabular distraction. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all revision total hip arthroplasties with a pelvic discontinuity between 2005 and 2017. Of the 162 patients, 31 were treated with distraction. Mean age was 67 years, with 71% female. Mean body mass index was 28 kg/m2, and mean follow-up was 3 years. RESULTS: The 2-year survivorship free from revision for aseptic loosening, re-revision for any reason, and reoperation were 97%, 93%, and 87%, respectively. There were 3 re-revisions including 1 for aseptic loosening, 1 conversion to a dual mobility for instability, and 1 two-stage exchange for infection. At last follow-up, 3 acetabular components did not have evidence of osteointegration. Only patients with osteointegration to both the ilium and ischium had evidence of a healed discontinuity. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 43 preoperatively to 77 postoperatively (P < .0001). The most common complication was a partial sciatic nerve palsy that occurred in 4 patients. CONCLUSION: In this series utilizing pelvic distraction, there was excellent 2-year survivorship free from revision for aseptic loosening. Despite several discontinuities persisting, 90% of patients had radiographic evidence of implant osteointegration, and clinical outcomes improved significantly. The most common complication was a partial sciatic nerve palsy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Case Series.

Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Their Surgical Implications.

Knowledge and understanding of the complex anatomy and biomechanical function of the native posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is vitally important when evaluating PCL injury and possible reconstruction. The PCL has important relationships with the anterior cruciate ligament, menisci, tibial spines, ligament of Humphrey, ligament of Wrisberg, and the posterior neurovascular structures. Through various experimental designs, the biomechanical role of the PCL has been elucidated. The PCL has its most well-defined role as a primary restraint/stabilizer to posterior stress and it seems this role is greatest at higher degrees of knee flexion. The natural history of high-grade deficiency leads to increased contact pressures and degeneration of both the medial and patellofemoral compartments. There is still considerable debate regarding whether high-level athletes can return to sport at the same level with conservative treatment of a high-grade PCL tear, and whether greater laxity in the knee correlates with decreased subjective and objective outcomes. Poor surgical outcomes after PCL reconstruction have been attributed to many factors, the most common of which include: additional intra-articular pathology, poor fixation methods, insufficient knowledge of PCL anatomy, improper tunnel placement, and poor surgical candidates.

Intraosseous Regional Administration of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and perioperative antibiotics are commonly administered to try to mitigate the chance of infection. Intraosseous regional administration (IORA) of prophylactic antibiotics during TKA is a method of antibiotic delivery that has been shown to achieve markedly higher tissue concentrations at much lower doses. Other advantages include ease of administration, ability to time the antibiotic delivery with the surgical start time for maximal effectiveness, and less systemic side effects. The concept is similar to a Bier block, except that IORA involves the use of antibiotics instead of local anesthetic to perfuse the limb and is given via intraosseous rather than intravenous access. DESCRIPTION: After standard patient preparation and draping, the tourniquet is inflated and an intraosseous needle is inserted into the proximal medial face of the tibia, just medial and slightly above the level of the tubercle. A large syringe containing the desired antibiotic (typically 500 mg vancomycin suspended in normal saline solution) is connected to the needle and the solution is administered over 1 to 2 minutes. The intraosseous needle can then be removed and the surgical procedure proceeds as it normally would per surgeon preference and technique. ALTERNATIVES: Systemic administration of intravenous antibiotics, vancomycin powder, and antibiotic-impregnated cement are alternative options that can be utilized during TKA. RATIONALE: IORA has several distinct advantages over other methods of antibiotic delivery, including the ability to (1) deliver antibiotic directly to the surgical bed and avoid systemic delivery, (2) precisely time and quickly administer antibiotics to achieve highest concentrations at the start of and throughout the surgical procedure, and (3) avoid several common and potentially serious side effects, especially those associated with antibiotics such as vancomycin. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: This technique for antibiotic delivery achieves markedly higher tissue concentrations compared with systemic administration, without prolonged preoperative infusion times. Intraosseous delivery optimizes timing and reduces the risk of systemic side effects while simultaneously providing equal or enhanced antibiotic prophylaxis in TKA. This delivery mechanism is especially useful in patients who are at high risk for infection and in the revision TKA setting. Further, there is little to no additional risk and the use of this method does not substantially prolong operative time. IMPORTANT TIPS: The proximal aspect of the tibia is the optimal injection site because the cortex is thinner in this region, making needle insertion easier. Additionally, the metaphyseal bone allows faster flow rates for the infusion. We have found that insertions made slightly more proximally are easier and have faster flow rates. Of note, although the antibiotic is infused into the tibia, as seen in the attached technique video, intraosseous administration achieves rapid uptake into the vascular tree. Therefore, all tissues distal to the tourniquet, including the femur and patella, will receive this optimal dose as well.We prefer the use of a power driver (EZ-IO; Teleflex); however, manual needles (Cook Medical) can also be utilized. Longer needles are available if needed for obese patients.Flow rates are variable and the infusion typically takes 1 to 2 minutes to complete. If the flow rate is slow, twisting and withdrawing the needle slightly (2 to 4 mm) may increase the rate. This contrasts with the 1 to 2-hour intravenous infusion time required when vancomycin is administered systemically.In our experience, intraosseous injection is still successful in the case of a previous high tibial osteotomy, although the flow rate may be slower.In complex revision cases with compromised proximal tibial bone, the medial malleolus is an alternative site for intraosseous administration.Choice of antibiotic: as vancomycin is difficult to adequately administer intravenously, it is ideally suited for IORA. We have studied and utilized a 500-mg dose of vancomycin suspended in a solution of 140 mL of normal saline solution (prepared by our pharmacy). Of note, we have not found rapid infusion of intraosseous vancomycin to cause red-man syndrome as it would with rapid systemic infusion. This is because of the lower dose of 500 mg and the use of the tourniquet, which keeps the antibiotic in the local tissues about the knee without allowing systemic exposure. All patients, regardless of weight or the size of their limb, receive the dose of 500 mg of vancomycin.As cefazolin does not have the same difficulties with intravenous administration, we continue to use standard intravenous prophylaxis with an appropriate weight-based dose of cefazolin prior to incision.Indications for IORA of vancomycin include clinical scenarios in which vancomycin would be administered intravenously. These indications include revision TKA, obesity (body mass index >40 kg/m2), diabetes, beta-lactam allergy, known colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), patients coming from institutions with a high prevalence of MRSA, previous ligamentous surgical procedure or osteotomies, and current or recent smokers. IORA can be utilized even in the primary TKA setting if the patient is considered high-risk as defined by the criteria above. We also use IORA during reimplantation following 2-stage exchange for PJI and in patients undergoing irrigation and debridement for acute PJI when the organism has been identified preoperatively.

Characterizing extremely negative reviews of total joint arthroplasty practices and surgeons on yelp.com.

BACKGROUND: Although physicians tend to prefer data-driven quality metrics, emerging evidence suggests that patients prefer crowd-sourced information containing patient narrative descriptions of the care experience. Currently, yelp.com is the most commonly accessed Web resource among patients who use online information to choose a surgeon. The purpose of this study is to characterize extremely negative reviews of total joint arthroplasty surgeons and practices on yelp.com. METHODS: We searched yelp.com for one-star (out of 5) reviews of total joint providers and practices in 8 major US metropolitan areas. These reviews were then classified into categories based on content: clinical, nonclinical, or both. Reviews were further subcategorized as "surgical" and "nonsurgical" representing reviews of a nonsurgical experience (eg, initial office visit). RESULTS: A higher proportion of reviews came from patients who did not report prior surgery by the surgeon or practice named in the review than form those who reported surgery (240 reviews, 75.0%, 95% confidence interval: 70.0%-79.4% vs 80 reviews, 25.0%, 95% confidence interval: 20.6%-30.0%, P < .0001). Compared with surgical reviews, nonsurgical reviews were more likely to contain nonclinical complaints (92.1% vs 53.8%, P < .0001) and less likely to contain clinical complaints (21.3% vs 78.7%, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of extremely negative reviews of total joint arthroplasty surgeons and practices were related to nonclinical concerns posted by patients who did not report prior surgery by the surgeon or practice being reviewed. The results of this study may help explain the wide disparity commonly observed between conventional quality metrics and crowd-sourced online reviews.

Tourniquet Use in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty has become a controversial topic. There are several benefits of its use including improved visualization, decreased blood loss, shorter operative times, and improved antibiotic delivery. Conversely, there are several significant downsides associated with tourniquet use including postoperative pain, neuromuscular injuries, wound complications, reperfusion injury, increased risk of thrombosis, patellar tracking issues, delayed rehabilitation including decreased postoperative range of motion, and its negative effect on patients with vascular disease. However, objectively, the literature does not definitively push us toward or away from the use of a tourniquet. Furthermore, several alternatives have been developed to help mitigate some of the adverse effects associated with its use. This article summarizes the evidence for and against tourniquet use and provides an evidence-based approach to help guide surgeons in their own practice.