Lower incidence of inappropriate shock therapy in patients with combined cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) compared with patients with non-CRT defibrillators (ICDs).

INTRODUCTION: A significant number of patients experience inappropriate shock therapy (IST) from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). An increasing number of patients with advanced heart failure receive combined ICD and cardiac resynchronisation therapy devices (CRT-D). The incidence of IST in this group is less well described. We aimed to assess the incidence and predictors of IST in CRT-D patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data on patients who received an ICD and CRT-D between October 2007 and January 2009 at our institution were studied. The primary outcome measures were the IST event rate and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients with ICD/CRT-D (100/85) were included in the analysis. Eighteen patients experienced 35 episodes of IST during the follow-up (21 ± 13 months). There was a significantly lower IST cumulative event rate in the CRT-D vs. ICD group, 5% (CI: 1-13%) vs. 19% (95% CI: 11-30%) by 24 months, (p = 0.017). The majority of the IST was caused by atrial arrhythmias with atrial fibrillation accounting for 28 episodes of IST in nine patients. Multivariate analysis using Cox hazard model including baseline characteristics and coexisting appropriate shock therapy showed that a history of atrial fibrillation/flutter was the strongest independent predictor of IST with a hazard ratio of 3.53 (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Patients with CRT-D had a significantly lower incidence of IST compared with patients receiving an ICD. Given that atrial arrhythmia remained the commonest trigger for IST, our finding lends support to the hypothesis that CRT may reduce atrial fibrillation burden in patients receiving CRT-D.

Trends, indications and outcomes of cardiac implantable device system extraction: a single UK centre experience over the last decade.

BACKGROUND: The rising number of device implantation has seen a parallel in the rising numbers of lead extraction. Herein we have analysed our experience in cardiac device and lead extraction in a single tertiary centre over the last decade. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients undergoing lead extractions performed between 2001 and 2010. Procedural success and complications as defined by the Heart Rhythm Society policy. RESULTS: A total of 745 leads were extracted with a procedural success of 98.9% [382 cases; partial success in 6.9% (26) cases] and failure in 1.1% (4). Major complication rate was 1% (four cases) and minor complication rate was 3.6%. By both univariate and multivariate analysis only duration of lead implantation was an indicator for success (p < 0.0001). The mean implantation time for failed lead extraction was 203 ± 64 months compared with 71.8 ± 16.5 months in the successful cohort (p < 0.0001). Laser-assisted extraction was required in 176 cases. With regard to extraction indication, lead malfunction/recall showed a significant increase during the study period (p = 0.03). On time trend analysis the rise in coronary sinus (CS) lead extraction over time was significant. (p = 0.02) Despite a trend for increased laser use over time this did not achieve statistical significance, p = 0.06. CONCLUSIONS: A decade's experience of percutaneous lead extraction suggests that a high procedural success rate with a low complication rate is achieved in a high-volume centre. During this time, an increase in both defibrillator and CS lead explantation and a rising trend in laser assistance with almost 50% of cases needing laser usage were observed.

Evaluation of a real-time hybrid three-dimensional echo and X-ray imaging system for guidance of cardiac catheterisation procedures.

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is made possible by image guidance technology. X-ray fluoroscopy provides high contrast images of catheters and devices, whereas 3D ultrasound is better for visualising cardiac anatomy. We present a system in which the two modalities are combined, with a trans-esophageal echo volume registered to and overlaid on an X-ray projection image in real-time. We evaluate the accuracy of the system in terms of both temporal synchronisation errors and overlay registration errors. The temporal synchronisation error was found to be 10% of the typical cardiac cycle length. In 11 clinical data sets, we found an average alignment error of 2.9 mm. We conclude that the accuracy result is very encouraging and sufficient for guiding many types of cardiac interventions. The combined information is clinically useful for placing the echo image in a familiar coordinate system and for more easily identifying catheters in the echo volume.

Male gender and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease predict a poor clinical response in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

AIMS: Current guidelines advocate cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) in patients with class III/IV New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure, depressed left ventricular function and a broad QRS. However, a significant proportion of patients do not derive any benefit from CRT. The aim of this study was to identify clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic predictors of response to CRT. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing CRT in our institution was performed. A favourable clinical response to CRT was defined as an improvement in NYHA Heart failure class of ≥ 1 and lack of hospitalisation with heart failure. Comparisons were made between responders and non-responders in terms of baseline characteristics and potential predictors of CRT response (QRS width, presence of left bundle branch block, atrial fibrillation, evidence of mechanical dyssynchrony on echocardiography and LV lead position). RESULTS: A total of 164 patients had full follow-up data. The mean follow-up was 293 days. Of patients undergoing CRT, 90 (58.9%) had a favourable clinical response to CRT. Predictors of a lack of clinical response to CRT were male gender (p = 0.012) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (0.008). Pre-implant echocardiographic dyssynchrony assessment appeared not to predict response to CRT (p = 0.87); however, there was a trend towards a positive response in those patients with significant dyssynchrony (p = 0.09) defined as interventricular delay > 40 ms or maximal LV delay of > 80 ms. CONCLUSION: Male gender and coexisting COPD were shown to be independent predictors of non-response to CRT in this cohort of patients fulfilling current criteria for CRT.