Care at door-steps for persons with severe mental disorders: A pilot experience from Karnataka district mental health program.

BACKGROUND: Public funded outreach services for persons with severe mental disorders (SMDs), a norm in developed nations, is non-existent in India. We share our pilot experience with an indigenous model named 'Care at Doorsteps' (CADs) for persons with SMDs who dropped out from clinical care of District Mental Health Program (DMHP) at three sites of Karnataka, a south Indian state. AIM: The objectives of this study were to identify the reasons for drop outs from routine care and to assess the burden of illness and disability after the intervention. METHODOLOGY: Six-month prospective observational study on patients aged 18-60 years, diagnosed as Schizophrenia or bipolar disorder was conducted. Three home visits were made by the team and provided medications, also offered brief psychoeducation and counselling. Care-givers were interviewed to identify the reasons for drop outs and their expectations from the treating team. Patients were also assessed using the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale (IDEAS) and Burden Assessment Schedule (BAS) during each visit. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients (50 males and 46 females) were followed up, of which 85 had a diagnosis of schizophrenia and 11 with bipolar illness. Common reasons for drop out were: single caregiver (breadwinner) unable to accompany the patient, loss of faith in medical treatment and financial constraints. Symptomatic improvement and restoration of productive work were the priority expectations. Over the course, the mean CGI-S showed significant reduction (4.81 ± 1.57, 4.46 ± 1.32 and 4.11 ± 1.39 respectively; p = 0.001). Mean score on BAS showed a significant reduction (85.76 ± 12.15, 83.46 ± 11.30, 84.27 ± 11.82; p = 0.04). Mean total IDEAS scores did not show significant change (13.27 ± 4.78, 12.82 ± 4.24, 13.17 ± 4.40; p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: Meaningful assertive outreach care is feasible in India and is found to be useful for persons with SMDs by utilising the already existing public sector resources.

Addressing the mental health concerns of migrant workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: An experiential account.

The COVID pandemic has affected the world in a drastic manner taking a toll of not only human lives but also the economy and lifestyle. Of all the population suffering, the underprivileged and vulnerable groups have faced the maximum economic burden. Within India, an ample quota of people migrates annually for elementary occupations in service, sales, building and domestic industries. Generally, they are exposed to discrimination, work-rights exploitation and job insecurity. The onset of COVID 19 has accentuated these issues in unprecedented ways. The Apex Court of the country took note of this plight and gave directions to the governments to take care of the immediate needs of the migrant workers. This article attempts to reflect the mental health concerns of the migrant workers who were temporarily sheltered at relief camps across Bengaluru city in the state of Karnataka, during the ongoing COVID pandemic. The article ends with giving recommendations.

Service utilization in a tertiary psychiatric care setting in South India.

OBJECTIVE: To carry out an audit reviewing the utilization of psychiatric services and types of disorders presenting to a tertiary care psychiatry hospital in a developing Asian country. METHOD: Consecutive adult patients who came for detailed consultation in 1 year were included in this study. A senior consultant psychiatrist reconfirmed the diagnosis in each patient who underwent detailed psychiatric evaluation. Psychiatric evaluation consists of clinical history from the patients and the relatives and a mental state examination. Data was obtained from the detailed work up evaluation psychiatry records of these patients. RESULTS: Mood disorder was the most common diagnosis followed by substance use disorders and psychotic disorders (ICD 10). There is a substantial delay of more than 2-5 years for seeking treatment in most disorders including schizophrenia. More than 80% of the population directly seeks treatment at this tertiary hospital. Sixty-four percent of the patients came for at least one follow up. CONCLUSION: The result suggests the urgent need for strengthening community care in India and similar low and middle-income countries for early and optimal treatment.

Expanding the schizophrenia phenotype: a composite evaluation of neurodevelopmental markers.

Minor physical anomalies (MPAs) and neurologic soft signs (NSSs) have been consistently reported to be more frequent in schizophrenia subjects and their first-degree relatives. We aimed at coassessing both these neurodevelopmental markers in neuroleptic-naive recent-onset schizophrenia (NRS) subjects in comparison to healthy control (HC) subjects to explore the predictive validity of this composite endophenotype. We administered the Modified Waldrop Scale (MWS) and the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES) to evaluate MPAs and NSSs, respectively, in 40 NRS and 30 matched HC subjects. Schizophrenia subjects had significantly higher frequencies of MPAs and NSSs than HC. Minor physical anomaly total scores were correlated with greater severity of illness, whereas NES scores did not show any relationship with clinical variables. Schizophrenia and HC subjects were most accurately classified (82.9%) when MPAs and NSSs were considered as a composite phenotype rather than independently. Minor physical anomalies and NSSs constitute independent neurodevelopmental markers of schizophrenia and would afford greater predictive validity when used as a composite endophenotype in genetic association studies.