A look at the potential association between PICOT framing of a research question and the quality of reporting of analgesia RCTs.

BACKGROUND: Methodologists have proposed the formation of a good research question to initiate the process of developing a research protocol that will guide the design, conduct and analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and help improve the quality of reporting such studies. Five constituents of a good research question based on the PICOT framing include: Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Time-frame of outcome assessment. The aim of this study was to analyze if the presence a structured research question, in PICOT format, in RCTs used within a 2010 meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of femoral nerve blocks after total knee arthroplasty, is independently associated with improved quality of reporting. METHODS: Twenty-three RCT reports were assessed for the quality of reporting and then examined for the presence of the five constituents of a structured research question based on PICOT framing. We created a PICOT score (predictor variable), with a possible score between 0 and 5; one point for every constituent that was included. Our outcome variable was a 14 point overall reporting quality score (OQRS) and a 3 point key methodological items score (KMIS) based on the proper reporting of allocation concealment, blinding and numbers analysed using the intention-to-treat principle. Both scores, OQRS and KMIS, are based on the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. A multivariable regression analysis was conducted to determine if PICOT score was independently associated with OQRS and KMIS. RESULTS: A completely structured PICOT score question was found in 2 of the 23 RCTs evaluated. Although not statistically significant, higher PICOT was associated with higher OQRS [IRR: 1.267; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.984, 1.630; p = 0.066] but not KMIS (1.061 (0.515, 2.188); 0.872). These results are comparable to those from a similar study in terms of the direction and range of IRRs estimates. The results need to be interpreted cautiously due to the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that PICOT framing of a research question in anesthesia-related RCTs is not often followed. Even though a statistically significant association with higher OQRS was not found, PICOT framing of a research question is still an important attribute within all RCTs.

Recipient ineligibility after liver transplantation assessment: a single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Candidacy for liver transplantation is determined through standardized evaluation. There are limited data on the frequency and reasons for denial of transplantation after assessment; analysis may shed light on the short-term utility of the assessment. We sought to describe the frequency and reasons for ineligibility for liver transplantation among referred adults. METHODS: We studied all prospectively followed recipient candidates at a single centre who were deemed unsuitable for liver transplantation after assessment. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years and older and completion of a standard liver transplantation evaluation over a 3-year period. Patients were excluded if they had a history of prior assessment or liver transplantation within the study period. Demographic and baseline clinical data and reasons for recipient ineligibility were recorded. RESULTS: In all, 337 patients underwent their first liver transplantation evaluation during the study period; 166 (49.3%) fulfilled inclusion criteria. The mean age was 55.4 years, and 106 (63.9%) were men. The 3 most common reasons for denial of listing were patient too well (n = 82, 49.4%), medical comorbidities and/or need for medical optimization (n = 43, 25.9%) and need for addiction rehabilitation (n = 28, 16.9%). CONCLUSION: Ineligibility for transplantation after assessment was common, occurring in nearly half of the cohort. Most denied candidates could be identified with more discriminate screening before the resource-intensive assessment; however, the assessment likely provides unforeseen positive impacts on patient care.

CONTEXTE: Les candidats à une greffe du foie sont sélectionnés au moyen d'une évaluation standardisée. On dispose de peu de données au sujet de la fréquence et des motifs des refus de transplantation consécutifs à cette évaluation. Une analyse pourrait faire la lumière sur l'utilité de l'évaluation à court terme. Nous avons voulu décrire la fréquence de ces refus et les raisons pour lesquelles des adultes adressés pour consultation se voient refuser la greffe. MÉTHODES: Nous avons étudié tous les candidats à la greffe suivis prospectivement dans 1 seul centre et à qui, après évaluation, la greffe du foie a été refusée. Les critères d'inclusion étaient l'âge de 18 ans et plus et les résultats de l'évaluation standard en vue de la greffe du foie sur une période de 3 ans. Les patients étaient exclus s'ils avaient déjà subi une évaluation ou une greffe du foie au cours de la période de l'étude. Les données démographiques et cliniques de départ, de même que les raisons de l'exclusion des candidats ont été consignées. RÉSULTANTS: En tout, 337 patients ont subi leur première évaluation en vue d'une greffe du foie au cours de la période de l'étude; 166 (49,3 %) répondaient aux critères d'inclusion. L'âge moyen était de 55,4 ans et 106 (63,9 %) étaient des hommes. Les 3 raisons les plus souvent invoquées pour refuser l'accès à la greffe chez ces candidats étaient qu'ils étaient suffisamment bien (n = 82, 49,4 %), qu'ils présentaient des comorbidités et(ou) qu'ils devaient améliorer leur état de santé (n = 43, 25,9 %) ou qu'il leur fallait une cure de désintoxication (n = 28, 16,9 %). CONCLUSIONS: De nombreux patients, soit près de la moitié de la cohorte, ont été jugés mauvais candidats à la greffe après l'évaluation. Il serait possible de reconnaître les patients qui sont mauvais candidats à la greffe en faisant un dépistage plus précis avant même d'aller de l'avant avec l'évaluation standard, qui draine d'importantes ressources. Toutefois, l'évaluation a probablement des répercussions positives imprévues sur le soin des patients.

Ultra high magnification endoscopy: Is seeing really believing?

Endoscopy is an indispensible diagnostic and therapeutic instrument for gastrointestinal diseases. Endocytoscopy and confocal endomicroscopy are two types of ultra high magnification endoscopy techniques. Standard endoscopy allows for 50 × magnification, whereas endocytoscopy can magnify up to 1400 × and confocal endomicroscopy can magnify up to 1000 ×. These methods open the realm of real time microscopic evaluation of the GI tract, including cellular and subcellular structures. Confocal endomicroscopy has the additional advantage of being able to visualize subsurface structures. The use of high magnification endoscopy in conjunction with standard endoscopy allows for a real-time microscopic assessment of areas with macroscopic abnormalities, providing "virtual biopsies" with valuable information about cellular and subcellular changes. This can minimize the number of biopsies taken at the time of endoscopy. The use of this technology may assist in detecting pre-malignant or malignant changes at an earlier state, allowing for earlier intervention and treatment. High magnification endoscopy has shown promising results in clinical trials for Barrett's esophagus, esophageal adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell cancer, gastric cancer, celiac disease, colorectal cancer, and inflammatory bowel disease. As the use of high magnification endoscopy techniques increases, the clinical applications will increase as well. Of the two systems, only confocal endomicroscopy is currently commercially available. Like all new technologies there will be an initial learning curve before operators become proficient in obtaining high quality images and discerning abnormal from normal pathology. Validated criteria for the diagnosis of the various gastrointestinal diseases will need to be developed for each method. In this review, the basic principles of both modalities are discussed, along with their clinical applicability and limitations.

The quality of reporting of RCTs used within a postoperative pain management meta-analysis, using the CONSORT statement.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are routinely used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses that help inform healthcare and policy decision making. The proper reporting of RCTs is important because it acts as a proxy for health care providers and researchers to appraise the quality of the methodology, conduct and analysis of an RCT. The aims of this study are to analyse the overall quality of reporting in 23 RCTs that were used in a meta-analysis by assessing 3 key methodological items, and to determine factors associated with high quality of reporting. It is hypothesized that studies with larger sample sizes, that have funding reported, that are published in journals with a higher impact factor and that are in journals that have adopted or endorsed the CONSORT statement will be associated with better overall quality of reporting and reporting of key methodological items. METHODS: We systematically reviewed RCTs used within an anesthesiology related post-operative pain management meta-analysis. We included all of the 23 RCTs used, all of which were parallel design that addressed the use of femoral nerve block in improving outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Data abstraction was done independently by two reviewers. The two main outcomes were: 1) 15 point overall quality of reporting score (OQRS) based on the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and 2) 3 point key methodological item score (KMIS) based on allocation concealment, blinding and intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-three RCTs were included. The median OQRS was 9.0 (Interquartile Range = 3). A multivariable regression analysis did not show any significant association between OQRS or KMIS and our four predictor variables hypothesized to improve reporting. The direction and magnitude of our results when compared to similar studies suggest that the sample size and impact factor are associated with improved key methodological item reporting. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of reporting of RCTs used within an anesthesia related meta-analysis is poor to moderate. The information gained from this study should be used by journals to register the urgency for RCTs to be clear and transparent in reporting to help make literature accessible and comparable.

Massive avascular malformations causing life threatening portal hypertension.

 We present an unusual case of extensive avascular malformations (AVMs) causing non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. This phenomenon, though previously described, is a rare clinical entity which, in the setting of life threatening portal hypertension, may require vascular decompression either by surgery or a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

Crohn's Disease Exacerbation Induced by Edwardsiella tarda Gastroenteritis.

Exacerbations of Crohn's disease are not infrequently associated with bacterial gastroenteritis. The recognition of synchronous infections in such patients is vital for the initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Furthermore, the detection of active bacterial infections may lead the clinician to delay starting biological therapy. We report here a man presenting with an exacerbation of his Crohn's disease during a trip to Thailand. Stool cultures were positive for the unusual gut pathogen Edwardsiella tarda. The patient's symptoms resolved with concurrent antibiotic and steroid therapy. This finding demonstrates the value of performing stool culture in all patients presenting with exacerbations of inflammatory bowel diseases.

Femoral nerve block improves analgesia outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Femoral nerve blockade (FNB) is a common method of analgesia for postoperative pain control after total knee arthroplasty. We conducted a systematic review to compare the analgesia outcomes in randomized controlled trials that compared FNB (with and without sciatic nerve block) with epidural and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). METHODS: We identified 23 randomized controlled trials that compared FNB with PCA or epidural analgesia. These studies included 1,016 patients, 665 with FNB, 161 with epidural, and 190 with PCA alone. RESULTS: All 10 studies of single-shot FNB (SSFNB) used concurrent PCA opioids. SSFNB was found to reduce PCA morphine consumption at 24 h (-19.9 mg, 95% credible interval [CrI]: -35.2 to -4.6) and 48 h (-38.0 mg, 95% CrI: -56.0 to -19.7), pain scores with activity (but not at rest) at 24 and 48 h (-1.8 visual analog pain scale, 95% CrI: -3.3 to -0.02 at 24 h; -1.5 visual analog pain scale, 95% CrI: -2.9 to -0.02 at 48 h) and reduce the incidence of nausea (0.37 odds ratio, 95% CrI: 0.1 to 0.9) compared with PCA alone. SSFNB had similar morphine consumption and pain scores compared with SSFNB plus sciatic nerve block, and SSFNB plus continuous FNB. CONCLUSIONS: SSFNB or continuous FNB (plus PCA) was found to be superior to PCA alone for postoperative analgesia for patients having total knee arthroplasty. The impact of adding a sciatic block or continuous FNB to a SSFNB needs to be studied further.

Characterization of rainbow trout CHK2 and its potential as a genotoxicity biomarker.

Checkpoint kinase 2 (CHK2) plays a central and conserved role in the eukaryotic DNA damage response. Few cell cycle checkpoint proteins have been examined in aquatic organisms, and this study is the first to characterize CHK2 expression in a fish species. CHK2 was cloned from Oncorhynchus mykiss, the rainbow trout. The coding region extends over 5741 nucleotides in the genome, including 13 introns, and specifies a predicted 533 amino acid protein. Southern blot analysis revealed that CHK2 exists as a single copy in the rainbow trout genome. Recombinant protein representing the FHA domain was used to generate polyclonal anti-CHK2 antibodies. While CHK2 transcript levels were relatively low in gill and high in brain, the opposite was true for protein levels. Both gill and brain cell cultures were treated with bleomycin, which induces double-strand DNA breaks. There was no effect on levels of CHK2 in gill cells, suggesting that the protein is constitutively active in this tissue. In contrast, brain cells upregulated CHK2 in a dose-dependent manner. The tissue specific expression of CHK2 and its ability to respond to bleomycin treatment suggests that some checkpoint proteins may serve as suitable biomarkers for DNA damage in rainbow trout and other fish species.