[Incidence of Catheter-Related Thrombosis in Patients with Long-Term Indwelling Central Venous Port Who Received Chemotherapies for Unresectable Advanced Digestive Cancers].

BACKGROUND: Most patients with unresectable advanced digestive cancers require placement of a fully implantable venous access port to facilitate safe delivery of anti-cancer drugs. Anti-VEGF therapies are commonly used even though they increase the risk of thrombosis. The objective of this study was to assess the incidence of radiologically confirmed catheter-related thrombosis(CRT)in patients with advanced digestive cancers. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 88 patients with advanced digestive cancers who had adapted implantable ports placed in our institution for chemotherapy. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer, 26 with gastric cancer, 12 with pancreatic cancer, 8 with esophageal cancer, and 3 with other cancers. During follow-up, 22 patients(25%)received anti-VEGF therapies, while 66 patients(75%)did not. Four out of 88 patients(4.5%)had asymptomatic CRT. The incidence of CRT was the same(4.5%)regardless of whether the patient received anti-VEGF therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with digestive cancers who had implantable venous access ports, the incidence of the CRT was 4.5% with no association with anti-VEGF therapies.

Cetuximab retreatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who exhibited a clinical benefit in response to prior cetuximab: A retrospective study.

Clinical benefits of cetuximab retreatment in patients with metastatic colorectal (mCRC) have been reported. In the present study, the effect of cetuximab retreatment on predictive markers was investigated by evaluating the clinical benefit of initial cetuximab treatment prior to cetuximab retreatment. Between November 2012 and March 2017, 14 patients with KRAS proto-oncogene GTPase exon 2 wild-type mCRC who exhibited a clinical benefit (confirmed stable disease for at least 6 months or a clinical response) to an initial cetuximab-based regimen, who received multiple lines of chemotherapy following disease progression and ultimately received a second cetuximab and irinotecan regimen, were retrospectively analyzed. For retreatment, patients received bi-weekly irinotecan (120-150 mg/m2) combined with cetuximab (400 mg/m2 as an initial dose, followed by 250 mg/m2, weekly). The median age of the 14 patients (11 males, 3 females) was 68 years (32-77). The median progression-free survival (PFS) following prior cetuximab-based therapy was 6.6 months (range, 4.1-18.4). Initial cetuximab treatment was administered as a first-line treatment in 11 patients, a second-line treatment in 1 patient and a third-line treatment in 2 patients. The median interval time between the last cycle of initial cetuximab-based therapy and the first cycle of cetuximab retreatment was 13.1 months (range, 6.0-37.1). The objective response rate of cetuximab retreatment was 21.4% and the median PFS was 4.4 months (95% confidence interval, 1.4-5.6). The Spearman's correlation coefficient for the PFS following retreatment and duration of initial cetuximab-based regimens demonstrated a more marked correlation compared with that between the PFS following retreatment and the interval time between the two regimens (r=0.45, P=0.11 vs. r=0.08, P=0.79). Cetuximab retreatment may provide clinical benefit to patients with mCRC who were good responders with longer periods of initial cetuximab-based therapy.

Two cases of perforated duodenal diverticulum successfully treated using conservative therapy.

We encountered two cases of perforated duodenal diverticulum successfully treated with conservative therapy. The first case involved a 72-year-old man who presented with abdominal pain and fever. An abdominal computed tomography revealed pneumoretroperitoneum. The second case involved a 90-year-old woman who presented with abdominal pain, vomiting, and fever. An abdominal computed tomography also revealed pneumoretroperitoneum and fluid collection. In both the cases, we initiated conservative therapy with parenteral nutrition and intravenous antibiotic therapy because the patients' general condition was good and the pneumoretroperitoneum was localized. Both patients were cured without serious complications and were discharged from the hospital 14 days after admission. Conservative treatment may be useful in the patients with early stage of perforated duodenal diverticulum and a good general condition without impending sepsis. However, in case of disease aggravation, careful observation and preparation for immediate surgical drainage are desired.

A case of small intestinal ileus caused by migration of gastric bezoars, which was successfully treated by dissolution therapy with cola through an ileus tube.

A 60-year-old woman with a history of distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer presented with a chief complaint of epigastric pain. Duodenal ileus due to the migration of a gastric bezoar was diagnosed, and she was hospitalized. We performed endoscopic lithotripsy and injection of cola, but the bezoar migrated toward the anus. Her abdominal pain worsened the following day, and she was diagnosed with ileus induced by the gastric bezoar. After decompression with an ileus tube, 1000ml/day of cola was injected via the ileus tube, and the ileus resolved on the 5th day of therapy. Based on this experience, we believe that dissolution therapy with cola via an ileus tube is effective in the treatment of bezoar-induced small bowel ileus.